On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:16:48PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > Gary Johnson wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Ren? Clerc wrote: > > > > > Looks nice! You could consider adding the text-based browser "links". > > > IMO, this is the best alternative for lynx. It supports frames! > > > > For the record, w3m also supports frames, manually via the F command or > > automatically via the -F command-line option. (I don't know why it > > doesn't render them by default.) > > does anyone WANT to be able to view frames in their email client? it's > bad enough that tables work.....
it's very important to provide unuseful functionality... (I can only recall two people this year sending me html'd email that wasn't spam). -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net