On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:16:48PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Ren? Clerc wrote:
> > 
> > > Looks nice! You could consider adding the text-based browser "links".
> > > IMO, this is the best alternative for lynx. It supports frames!
> > 
> > For the record, w3m also supports frames, manually via the F command or
> > automatically via the -F command-line option.  (I don't know why it
> > doesn't render them by default.)
> 
> does anyone WANT to be able to view frames in their email client?  it's
> bad enough that tables work.....

it's very important to provide unuseful functionality...

(I can only recall two people this year sending me html'd email that wasn't
spam).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

Reply via email to