Gary Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Ren? Clerc wrote: > > > Looks nice! You could consider adding the text-based browser "links". > > IMO, this is the best alternative for lynx. It supports frames! > > For the record, w3m also supports frames, manually via the F command or > automatically via the -F command-line option. (I don't know why it > doesn't render them by default.)
does anyone WANT to be able to view frames in their email client? it's bad enough that tables work..... w -- GPG Public Key: http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/
