On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:22:08PM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> Many mailing lists tuck links and addresses useful for list
> management in the headers, like List-Unsubscribe and List-Help. I
> looked around in the manual and in Google, but I couldn't find much.
> I'm assuming this means mutt command
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:13:50PM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Steve!
> On So, 10 Jan 2010, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> > The mail (and web) servers have been migrated to a new platform,
> > hopefully all should be running smoothly, but let me know if there are
> > pr
The mail (and web) servers have been migrated to a new platform,
hopefully all should be running smoothly, but let me know if there are
problems.
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd UK mob +44 7775 755503
UK +44 20 7993 2612 / US +1 310 857 7715 / Fax +44 20 7483 2455
Skype/GoogleTalk/AIM/Gizmo/.Mac/Twitt
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:17:11AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > I find myself in a tough situation. The mailserver at my work is
> > running Microsoft Exchange. "For security reasons", the sysadmin says,
> > IMAP and POP are disabled. From what I understand, Exchange uses some
> > different
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 04:33:55PM +0100, Fintan Gaughan wrote:
> I can't get off this mailing list for love nor money :-(
Instructions are in the headers of EVERY message the list sends out. If
you kept the original subscription message, it also tells you how to un
sub.
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd U
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> a few seconds ago, I wanted to re-subscribe under a different name on
> http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
> A thing I did not like there was the way how you offer the different
> mailing lists: You offer them as radio-buttons instea
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:42:28AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-03 22:23]:
> > Is there a list charter anywhere for mutt-users? The
> > majordomo info was less than helpful ("see mutt.org for info")
> try http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/mail.ph
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:42:54AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * D. J. Bolderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-29 23:24]:
> > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote:
> > > I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. And there is an error message
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:26:40AM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
> Who is the kind person responsible for the mutt.org
> server?
> Is it possible they lost a disk, or ran out of space,
> or their firewall went kabluey now blocking everything?
> Is is it now ok to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> since th
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:02:26PM +0100, Dave Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
> The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
> the list address, e.g. [EMAIL PR
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:43:59PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> * David T-G [2002-06-06 16:15:42 CEST] wrote:
> > I forget how mutt-users is set up, but could you have
> > turned off metoo (in the list config, not muttrc) when you
> > weren't looking?
> Hmm, I thought this list is run by majordomo
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:50:46PM -0600, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message, gpg gives the
> following output:
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Jun 5 13:45:19 2002) --]
> gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 5 13:24:25 2002 MDT using DSA key ID
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:17:57PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
> % to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
> % occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
> % email where I
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 03:39:46AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> error on FreeBSD 4.5... 1.3.27 built ok on this system.
> no patches or anything... anyone else see an error like this, or should
> i send a message to mutt-dev?
> roland% ./configure --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-exact-address
> [confi
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:40:37PM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
> Maybe this is the problem?? I am using:
> Mutt 1.2.5i - CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) [using ncurses 5.2]
> This is the version of Mutt currently listed at
> http://cygwin.com -- where did you get Mutt 1.3.28i??
You'd have to buil
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 05:55:23PM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
> I just checked cygwin.com and it would appear that the
> Mutt 1.2.5i I already have is up-to-date. In my understanding,
> the native WIN32 ports of Mutt are not as solid as the Cygwin
> port.
Cygwin now has fetchmail as one of the
Compile env.
./configure --with-homespool=Mailbox --with-domain=gbnet.net --enable-pop \
--enab le-imap --with-included-gettext --with-catgets --with-regex \
--enable-mailtool -- with-curses=/usr/local \
--with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local --without-wc-funcs
gcc 2.95.2
ibintl.a -liconv -liconv -ls
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:16:52PM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
> I am amazed that this list gets absolutely no spam.
> How is this accomplished?
> Perhaps some tricks cam be passed on to zsh-users,
> which isn't nearly as air-tight when it comes to
> spam-infestation.
Because it only allows peo
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:55:08AM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> > Well, if we're not reinventing the wheel, why not just ask the guy if
> > we can have a copy of his whole HTML and just include it with the mutt
> > distribution? I'm sure it's not very big on disk. Then just include
> >
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:05:08AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote:
> myself to this project. Also, someone mentioned earlier in the
> thread that they could provide CVS space and mailing list support.
> In other words, count me in.
Hosting another mutt list wouldn't be a problem here either.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:29:48AM -0800, Bob McLaren wrote:
> So now what I am looking for is a simple SMTP client that is as easy to use as
> Mutt, or, some alternative means of getting Mutt to talk to my remote smtp server.
ssmtp, or others
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, B
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
> gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857
Use something like keyserver wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net in your options
file, where uk would be your country ...
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsi
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:56:07PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> This was a duplicate message apparently inserted at trymedia.com.
> It's certainly not the version of the message I sent out.
Looks like someone re-injected. Next time I'll check more carefully.
Sorry (also can't find any tryme
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:32:24AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
> Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
> Jan 01 message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (which
> was PGP-MIME signed, I noted, while this one isn't)? It's
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:40:27PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Of course :-)
> What about the workaround of sending a probe and waiting to see if that
> bounces, perhaps having sent it after a delay?
that would involve intelligence, and something more than majordomo
does at the moment.
Steve
--
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:46:03PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> I too seem to be suffering from random unsubscribtions. I hate the fact
> that i don't get a message telling me I've been booted off, because I
> have to wait for a day or two without getting any messages before I
> realize some
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:43:02PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> I would say to look at it like a mailing list signature that you have no
> say in. Perhaps you could make procmail remove it, or otherwise modify
> the mail, but other than that I think that you will have to live with
> people s
Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
necessary ?
It slows reading down, and digests dont look so nice ...
I can understand that certain things should be signed, but it
seems more than not are now signed.
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Park, Londo
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> The company wide mailsystem is based on that product called
> "M$-Exchange-Server", and I am not able to change the mind of some
> admins to use a linux box instead!
> My question:
> How can I communicate with that Exchange box
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:43:17PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Evolution is a new-style Personal Information Manager - that is,
Funnily it looks just like Outlook, which of course all the
MS hating geeks have been moaning about ;) So MS must have
got something right.
Steve
p.s. geek is no
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 07:45:45PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % I would not design a production quality mail setup that relied on it
> % if that is what you are asking.
> Well, that's one way to answer it :-) I don't know enough to know
> whether there are "right" and "wrong" ways to implement NF
If I get a pgp/gpg message I now get
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: 11/30/01 13:08:07) --]
> gpg: Signature made 11/30/01 12:08:21 GMT using DSA key ID 2125BB86
> gpg: requesting key 2125BB86 from wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net ...
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Can't check signature: pu
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:24:36PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=100288683121313&w=2
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=100288714522738&w=2
No that's fine, but shouldn't it be fixed somewhere ... it's been
around for a while ...
Steve
--
N
SunOS 4.1.4 gcc 2.95.2
make[2]: Entering directory `/home2/ns/steve/mutt/mutt-1.3.24/imap'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I/usr/local/include -I../intl
-Wall -pedantic -O2 -c auth.c
In file included from ../protos.h:20,
from ../mutt.h:809,
fro
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:58:07PM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> I have a theory as to what happened with that message I sent that was
> delivered to the list with another message, containing sircam,
> dangling off the end.
> I just sent a reply to Lars's post about that message, in that thread,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:10:21PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Ah, oops. I must have misunderstood :)
> Well, the gist I got from the subscription email that I got sent when I
> joined, it only takes one bounced message for the list to unsubscribe
> me. I guess if my mail server went down t
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:10:01PM +, Glyn Millington wrote:
> I recevie the mutt-users list in digest form- and it has been a
> terrific help. But now I wish to unsubscribe. Steve Kennedy
> helped me out with the suggestion that I mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 07:02:04PM +, Glyn Millington wrote:
> Hello! How do I get off this list? Can't find instructions anwhere!
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
unsubscribe
in the body of the message
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd tel +44-(0)20 7483 1169 fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
Flat 2,
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:32:07AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Not me, a list-user ... I just get the crap bounces ...
> Oops, sorry, I misread your message. You are refering to
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
> Still, what I posted applies. The problem can be remedied by setting
> hostname explici
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:21:41AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Steve Kennedy writes:
> > I dont know whether it's mutt or the mta, however someone
> > on the lists here was using mutt and generating a header
> > of the form
> > > Message-ID:
> > Which
I dont know whether it's mutt or the mta, however someone
on the lists here was using mutt and generating a header
of the form
> Message-ID:
Which was being rejected by lots of MTA's (and thus causing
bounces).
Is this mutt ?
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd tel +44-(0)20 7483 1169 fax +44-(0)20 7483
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:11:02AM -0600, Kelly Scroggins wrote:
> I'm having a problem sending mail *>OUT<* of my Linux box. Recieving
> mail works very well.
> This problem just 'suddenly' appeared a month or two ago. Everything
> worked very well for several months.
> The Linux box is Red Ha
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 03:06:12PM -0400, Federico Grau wrote:
> I believe I have finally made my conversion to mutt (from pine)
> for good. I am still working out some details but I am sure
> with time they will be squashed.
> For now, I am looking for a pine like "expunge" feature, where I ca
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 09:28:29AM -0400, Ray Crane wrote:
> I'm running Mutt 1.2.5i with IMAP support, in the unfortunate
> condition of needing to use MS Exchange as the IMAP server.
> (Corporate email, really tired of Outlook)
> Something somewhere is clearly buggy, to the point of just
Due to some unforeseen work on the site where the servers hosting
the website and mailing lists for mutt.org, power is being turned
off from Sat 2am (GMT) through probably 6am.
This means there will be no access to the website or lists during
this time.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Steve
--
N
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 10:49:10AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> save-hook ~l +%B # if message was sent to a known list, default save box is
> #
OK I have one too. I have about 1300 messages sent from Nobody and
I want to bounce them all to another address (or better pipe them
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:16:03PM -0800, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
> Well, quite honestly, I've "disappeared" from the list because of an
> overloaded mail server or mis-behaving/looping upstream relay (there's
> been a couple of weird ones that, all told, lasted an hour or two)...
> so I think
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 07:40:15PM -0800, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Hi. I am trying to get to the mutt website, http://www.mutt.org/.
> The primary nameserver for mutt.org, ns.calyx.net, resolves www.mutt.org
> to 194.70.126.33; however when I try to go to http://www.mutt.org/,
> I get the we
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:16:55PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > Due to previous mail loops problems, some of the received
> > lines cause the loop detection to kick in, thus the messages
> > get sent for approval.
> Hmm.. it's quite easy to see where the headers end... Should be easy to not
>
Can people who follow-up to messages on this list and
include the previous messages (generally tagged on at the
end), remove the headers (or the irrelevant ones at least).
Due to previous mail loops problems, some of the received
lines cause the loop detection to kick in, thus the messages
get se
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:49:27AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > Will mutt talk ssl-imap to my ssl-imap-capable server? Is there
> > anything specific to set up, or will it just happen automagically?
> I don't think so. But I don't know anything about the SSL-IMAP protocol. If
> anyone has any
There is a problem with the mutt-users list, well no the list
but a user re-injecting messages into the list.
They have now been removed, but there is a 1500 or so backlog
to clear. Most sensible MTA are detecting a mail loop and
bouncing them back to me
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd tel +44-(0)20
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 03:34:37PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Ken W wrote:
> > I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
> > Anyone know what the problem is?
> Solaris has it's own 'patch' which is not
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Ken W wrote:
> Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I
> have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I
> run 'patch < ' I get the following:
> The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> The
On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 03:00:31PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 10:44:17AM +0000, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 02:21:03AM +0100, Juergen Leising wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 05:33:32PM -0500, Randall J. Million wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 02:21:03AM +0100, Juergen Leising wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 05:33:32PM -0500, Randall J. Million wrote:
> > lists. The automatic removal system has a hair trigger.
> just for interest - can somebody please explain to me, what a
> "hair trigger" is?
Was a scri
On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 05:33:32PM -0500, Randall J. Million wrote:
> > I keep subscribing and then suddenly after a few emails everything
> > dries up... Do I get get dropped automatically after a couple of days
> > if I don't pick up mail?
> No. Your mail address bounced some mail and you were
Sorry, the lists may have broken last night.
I added an account to allow the web pages to be modified
by a new maintainer, and unfortunately changed ownership
on the .qm
Sorry, the lists may have broken last night.
I added an account to allow the web pages to be modified
by a new maintainer, and unfortunately changed ownership
on the .qmail files maintaining the lists. Qmail rightly
so ignored them as they weren't owned by the account
anymore :(
Everything shoul
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 03:33:11PM -0700, Franklin R. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 09:56:48PM +0000, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 02:54:51PM -0700, Franklin R. Jones wrote:
> > > while on the subject of mailing addresses and such. It would
>
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 02:54:51PM -0700, Franklin R. Jones wrote:
> while on the subject of mailing addresses and such. It would
> also be useful to change the subscription information in the
> FAQ/manual. Every copy I found including those touted as "current"
> state:
> "To subscribe to o
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 10:25:19PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> David Thorburn-Gundlach schrieb am Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 02:20:47PM -0500:
> > [...] and noticed that the mutt home page is still listed at
> > hmc.edu.
> ... and when doing a "mutt -v", the last line says: "To contact the
> developer
On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 11:55:35AM -0500, Michael Sanders wrote:
> Since the on-line manual at http://www.mutt.org/manual.html is still an old
> one, I have put the html version of the 0.95.3 manual up at
> http://tms.physics.lsa.umich.edu/mutt/
If the manual is up to date, if someone sends me a
uld prefer to have the lists open. But
> he's not running the lists, Steve Kennedy is. I will be glad to be one
Send me the email address you want, and I'll put it on the owner alias.
I should have the majordomo resend command modified rsn, it will will
send the message to the moder
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 07:26:42PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:14:26PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I realize that most of you have filters which keep you from seeing doubles,
> > but this doesn't mean that the problem shouldn't be resolved. Is th
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:01:26AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 1999, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
> > mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
> > mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
> The pro
66 matches
Mail list logo
