problem with folder hooks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, I'm having a little trouble with setting a reply-to on a specific folder. I've commented the code below so I'm sure you can see what I'm attempting to do: #this is my main account send-hook '.' "m

Re: help with folder hook?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then David T-G declared > % folder-hook =Tioka/nick set "my_hdr Reply-To: Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > % > % That doesn't work and it will not work without the 'set' either so I'm a >

help with folder hook?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone... Could someone help me sort this folder-hook out please? folder-hook =Tioka/nick set "my_hdr Reply-To: Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" That doesn't work and it will not work without the 'set' either so

problem recieving .zip attachment

s and +Articles for website owners - -- Nick Wilson -- |and designers. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8i+ChHpvrrTa6L5oRAox+AJ0XQrY3Qs958ptWLcyGta0c8SckWgCdGLv5 Gz0ZmX5Hbe1Z+tHBfP/1V5A= =IgI1 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: 'clicking links'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Justin R. Miller declared > Said Nick Wilson on Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 03:14:14PM +0100: > > > I regularly use urlview and lynx with mutt but am frustrated because > > I've not been able to work out how to avoid

Re: 'clicking links'

; - in my case mozilla. Note I'm not > using gnome, just the terminal :-) Ahh,, running kde :-) - -- - --- www.explodingnet.com |Projects, Forums and +Articles for website owners - -- Nick Wilson --

'clicking links'

es if that is of any use. Many thanks for your suggestions. - -- - --- www.explodingnet.com |Projects, Forums and +Articles for website owners - -- Nick Wilson -- |and designers. -BEGI

arrggh, print hell [little OT]

om) I just did: $ lpr mymboxfile What might I have done? Many thanks... - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8bB69HpvrrTa6L5oRAv3kAKCeBgUxn8bKkxKtlqbTY

Re: People who don't wrap their lines

p, aggrovating isn't it? That's where my par trick comes in handy. It doesn't stick quote chars in on every line but will make sure it breaks at 72 which helps somewhat. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP

Re: People who don't wrap their lines

ely works :-) so why can't it do that? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8ZklzHpvrrTa6L5oRAnHUAKCbWDFivS9WQ8v4ArFezvs1d6y3ZwCfQfMY cxhNkOQa+f6mhp3KqGL4s94= =YOeT -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: People who don't wrap their lines

d/misread the Q. Bad wilson! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8ZPyNHpvrrTa6L5oRApHvAJ0Y/g2kqcMo0kkVtOGtTJ24cPC8UQCfXB8v mLhvL4Q0f5fJ0uXgwAgfOQ4= =1yag -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: People who don't wrap their lines

talled, but it works a treat. Just hit ^l and > | it will reformat the lines for you. > > Wouldn't fmt do ok? It'll mangle quoted text (which I presume is the > advantage of par) but OTOH is already installed. No idea, sorry. I didn't even know what par was untill t

Re: People who don't wrap their lines

forward a specific message that > should cause these conditions. No. hehe, but a nice gentlemen from 'the rolling hils of south carolina' sent me this handy little vim macro: map {!}par 72 }j Of course you need par installed, but it works a treat. Just hit ^l and it will reforma

Re: problems with text wrappin?

27;t forget to turn off > any stationery settings and to have not only new mail but replies and > forwards use plain text. Thanks, it really is a pile of, huh? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- V

Re: problems with text wrappin?

all one line to me but they swear blind they're not. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8W8qeHpvrrTa6L5oRAq32AKCVS6G8wUWawYULivKEd4oI12o3RACbBoh+ i/00hUdoDUN72fiDjXl0tKI= =N7op -END PGP SIGNATURE-

problems with text wrappin?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone. Prompted by a really dumb argument on another list I sent myself a mail from Outhouse with the text/plain settings set to wrap at 72chars Problem is, /I'm/ getting it like it's not wrapped at all? What gives? - -- Nick W

Re: Pity that mutt doesn't read news - what's the best match?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then John P Verel blurted > Slrn, as others have said. My model is Mutt/Slrn/Vim. Fabulous all > around. The threading can not be beat, IMHO :) Well, I'm sold. Is slrn as tricky as mutt in the beggining? - -- Nick

Re: Pity that mutt doesn't read news - what's the best match?

n the links section of mutt.org I'm sure someone else will provide more details. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8WYFhHpvrrTa6L5oRAhZUAJ4xUwVDP6KnytJtJYgp

Why is this an attachment?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Can anyone tell me why this was received as an attachment? **Headers** - From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 31 14:54:42 2002 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:54:42 +0100 From: 'Nick Wilson' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Studenterne <[EMAIL

Re: Organization revisited...

e for my personal address book, but as the file has > grown, it's become less convenient to give everyone an alias, so I'll Yes, that's exactly where I'm at. I'd only really got as far as thinking about seperate alias files but the word 'database' had been lurki

Organization revisited...

le. Do you guys split them up into separate files for work | personal | etc? How can I better organize my contacts? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8WE2GHpvrrTa6L5

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

ch thanks everyone. I'll try the var stuff this evening but where do I get muttprint and is it a GUI thing? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.

2 Q's about printing...

lpr? It doesn't work if I just print. Much thanks as always. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8WALUHpvrrTa6L5oRAm+MAJ4trZD7x0fXbfk6EV7

Re: Mails received as attachment?

tlook patch! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8Vts3HpvrrTa6L5oRAoelAKCae1zkwji/jkvpQvxZEBI19ZJwEACgj+0O KxrNDb7oZ/YAOQy/P4SCfbE= =ViAv -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Mails received as attachment?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Jeremy Blosser blurted > On Jan 29, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Hmmm... Thanks Jeremy, that's getting results, unfortunately it's > > failing on each hunk? > > What output? Here ya g

Re: Mails received as attachment?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Jeremy Blosser blurted > On Jan 29, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > from inside the untarred mutt dir: > > $ patch --dry-run -i ../dales_patch-xxx > > [snip] > > and that's where I

Re: Mails received as attachment?

- File to patch: and that's where I'm stuck, I've tried -p0 and -p1 instead of -i but no joy. Can you see what mistake I'm making? Many thanks - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN

Re: Mails received as attachment?

hat's discussed on mutt-dev? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8VlopHpvrrTa6L5oRAlzuAKCvgrS0yAWM37y3klvh6u05du22hwCfQ+UF g/Y1DgjEdWU+/9X3hdQh+aE= =M9lU -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Mails received as attachment?

> patch, I don't think it'll apply if you have the outlook_compat patch > applied. Aha! Therein lies the problem I think, I have the originaly patch in place. Cheers. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIG

Re: Mails received as attachment?

u try it yourself perhaps I can follow your steps as I'd really like to get it done. In fact, saying that I think I'll send Mr Woolridge a mail and see if he'll lend a hand. If I get it sorted I'll let you know. Take care - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+

Re: Mails received as attachment?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Nick Wilson blurted > No, I mean $p_c_t (pgp_create_traditional) along with the outlook compat > patch, Which is why I can't understand why she's getting both the > message /and/ an attachment containing the mes

Re: Mails received as attachment?

h from Dale No, I mean $p_c_t (pgp_create_traditional) along with the outlook compat patch, Which is why I can't understand why she's getting both the message /and/ an attachment containing the message? Most worrying :( - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:

Mails received as attachment?

e can understand me so why is this happening? Thanks very much - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8VHKNHpvrrTa6L5oRAtIaAJ9gE5bMI3IMwTqQl/Dfk2KKEPvpMQCfeAWs yxY

Re: html email

the word > document. It was sent to every email address in the institution - From the /IT/ department? Sheesh, even my mum sends text only, /and/ understands why. How can you work in an IT department and be so monumentally ignorant? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3

Re: \223 and \224

gle quote). In the original > file they're 0x92, 0x93 and 0x94 (not ASCII, obviously). That looks exactly like what I've been getting. Do you also get '?' chars coming up unexpectedly? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.co

Re: Don't mention MUAS to fight html email

ands of even millions of times it's a bigger deal. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UdwRHpvrrTa6L5oRAtTGAKCvWP8ohHbeA3A88Io6p3R6XvEzZgCeIHcB cBCrY82w

Problem with locale?

correct value but what's that, and how do I do it? I'm a tad confused. Thanks very much - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UcE3HpvrrTa6L5oR

Re: macros help

a control character in the > _key_ portion of a macro or keybinding. That makes sense, it's not very clear though as both of us were reading it the same way. On the whole I find the manul /relatively/ simple in most places but that bit is just plain trickey :) - -- Nick Wilson Tel:

Re: macros help

rol key. Is this a > documentation bug? Must be, I don't know how I managed to get it working wiht ^D but it didn't last long. Your version works great. Thanks guys! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: resending a msg

t have made a typo and not noticed because I just tried it again and of course it worked. I couldn't find it when I looked through '?' either though: Odd. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNAT

Re: resending a msg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Ben Logan blurted > The default keybinding is e. At least that's what it is on my > system, and I don't think I re-bound it. Yep, thanks Ben. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+

resending a msg

like to know how this is normally done. Much thanks - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UTh/HpvrrTa6L5oRAs0aAJ0aeO0gekSIRi8xEdc7CQsqHhh7bQCeNdGV 4aSIz+uGqVl3Xn2Fuw

Re: Why sign posts on mailinglists?

to get into it again :-) So much for that :) > close to unsubbing at this point. by all means say something if you have > something constructive to add... but if you don't, then try to think for > a few minutes before posting. How about 'stick around Will, it's not that ba

Re: [OT] html email

velant Procmail recipe for dumping mail if it's text/html ot not addressed to you? I use this to get the latter: :0: * !(^[EMAIL PROTECTED]) ~/Mail/Other/suspect Which works fine, adding the ability to weed out html would make it much better. Cheers - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325

Re: [OT] html email

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Brian Clark blurted > :0: > * ^From.*pc-html-user@domain\.com > /dev/null > > Save yourself from having to explain further. :-) Hehe, yeah, that'd do it! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

f killing such a beutiful monster. > I've been using mutt for a couple of years though I've only been on this > list a couple of weeks. The signal-to-noise ratio here really sucks. Rubbish! ;-) - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.ex

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

; Is this thread still going? You two are like a couple of late night drinkers. The chairs are up on the tables, the barman keeps looking at his watch and there's bugger all chance of another beer. FWIW that was the way I read that part of this thread. Have fun! - -- Nick W

Re: macros or hook?

t; $editor is just the editor variable. Thanks Maarten, got it now. One last thing: I wrote 4 macros (r,g,L,m) for the index and then wrote then *again* for the pager. Could I have done that more efficiently? Thanks again - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:w

Re: macros or hook?

there are unequall " pairs which I guess has something to do wiht \\\n but that too confused me :) Worked though huh? I've settled on: macro index r "set editor=\"vim +'/^$/+1' -c ':set textwidth=72'\"" macro index m "set editor=\"vi

Re: macros or hook?

nce I'd seen Wills post, and saw the again. Cheers, I'll start messin' with it! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UG70HpvrrTa6L5oRAj7EAJ0ay1KjsPixDUyw

Re: macros or hook?

acro index R ":set editor=blah\n" > macro index L ":set editor=blah\n" Ah now I see a pattern, you can put the thingy in the set editor bit. So how might it look with this line: set editor="vim +'/^$/' -c ':set textwidth=72'" like this? set

Re: macros or hook?

;:0;/Subject'\\\n" > macro index r ":set editor=\"vim -c ':0;/^$'\\\n" Hmmm Yeah, I getcha. How does mutt know how to reply/compose as well though? Is that them noop buggers? Much thanks Maarten. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 067

Re: macros or hook?

uld have done it :) - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UGQ0HpvrrTa6L5oRAictAJkBI4uWK8Ps/N0wrVqJDI8zgyv3/QCgmceJ PgNkX/loH7Na/qY0dJP2ltE= =SQ1O -END PGP SIGNATURE-

macros or hook?

ow to do it, I looked at hooks but didn't see one that seemed to fit? Thanks.... - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UE9XHpvrrTa6L5oRAt

Re: multipart/alternative

s base-64 encoded. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UEIkHpvrrTa6L5oRAk1DAJ9y8G4PfEbs1srBek1d808AN0BXBgCghzEL m0Qkdq8X3pcYLj/bTHbAbAA= =lkYI -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: macros help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Michael Tatge blurted > I bet that works, except you press the wrong keys. :) > Ctrl-d is \cd in mutt. See manual section 3.3. Not sure I get you there but I eventually solved it by using '^D' as opposed to '^d

Re: [OT] html email

he > presentation is just nicer. A lot of people take pride in how their Yes, it's a good point. I don't think you need your flame suit, it's a point worth making. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BE

Re: char % as quote

Oh boy, are you in for it! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8UDjxHpvrrTa6L5oRAuYrAJsGl+UYnFJKeX0Cg3XvMb9h4PdUsgCfaYLE d/ufxQlCmI4wbmqYEK+XOok= =FdFs -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Filtering of incoming email directly to folders.

rs and similar with other lists. Also it's nice to have a special mutt trash file. Not sure on your second point though I'm sure someone will be :) - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP

macros help

o pager ^d to no avail. Anyone spot what I'm doing wrong? Much thanks - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8T+rwHpvrrTa6L5oRAozkAKCpTMweQmy0klXd

Re: [OT] html email

ng similar, I've bookmarked the page but have not had time for more than a quick glance as of yet. Thanks - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (

Re: Guide.

he set editor bit) - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8T9u1HpvrrTa6L5oRAjIbAKCM10OKRygjM14wi/Xm8h1pE8RadgCeKl2V tNCXdosCvYGvqVP4lZA5iz4= =zscA -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Guide.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] blurted > Or better how do I start a mutt e-mail ??. > > How do I set Midnight Commander to be the editor for mutt ??. Have you been to www.mutt.org ? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45

Re: Deleting Mass emails..

rn for messages 1-2000 Would that make it D~m * if I wanted to completely empty a mailbox? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8T8XzHpvrrTa6L5oRAj/NAJwPXt3iIpfCa+7W6

Re: multipart/alternative

odd mails from one of the w3c lists i'm on. multipart/alternative and when I open if it's just full of stuff that looks very much like a pgp sig, only *much* longer? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP S

multipart/alternative

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 'ello What kind of monster is would a message containing multipart/alternative be? Is there somewhere that gives idiots guides to mime types? Cheers... - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingne

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

few days but it all boils down to just a little tolerance of what others perceive as necessary quoting and I may not. As long as no one get's really quote happy all is well :) - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNA

Re: how to change xterm title depending on current mailbox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Dan Boger blurted > > I guess something like this? (I'm not a vim guru though) > > set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 et;:0;/^$'" My Vim didn't like that but I think I've got it licked

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

is great but only really good for techy sites and manuals and stuff. No idea about compatible office software, I use Star Office in X but even that isn't /really/ compatible. Take care - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.

Re: how to change xterm title depending on current mailbox

> trim the quoted text. Fantastic! How might I incorporate a tw command in that? This is what I have for mine (nicked it from somewhere else so I don't understand all of it but it works :) set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 et'" Mucho grassy arse - -- Nick Wilson Tel:

Re: back to quoting (was "Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers")

That was almost as ugly as this thread has been in places. Geeks can be real bitchy huh? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8TbJqHpvrrTa6L5oRAorcAKCASWiA1sQy

Re: how to change xterm title depending on current mailbox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 22-01-02 at 18:51 * Christoph Kampe said > Is there any folder-hook, to change the xterm-title displaying the name > of the mailbox i'm changing in? Why? Sorry I can't answer, just curious :) - -- Nick Wilson Tel:

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

coded font sizes in websites to that list, I know you can overide stylesheets but it's annoying to have to go to such lengths to read sites like cnn.com. > Just my 0.2$ to this monsterthread ;-). Yep, and it's still growing! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45

Re: text-input-problem

tand that bit!) David TG covered this. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8TY6gHpvrrTa6L5oRAqt4AKC0H0aOg1PtjTVcOvRodm4Pc3p+rwCaAr4A zO5uaACq+vfmYir6voExOg0= =4xpY -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

;t the first time someone on the > > % list has picked on him about that prefix. ;-)) Anyone remember the subject or something of that thread, I'd like to have a look at it. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SI

Printer [pos. little OT]

here I'm going wrong here that would be great. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8TXKfHpvrrTa6L5oRAmzyAJ0UbcWVhN1iHlXH2TpFIme0rlNuUgCffQYy a4hqjOpCjXnhNYqK4L/tgpk= =84eZ -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

shit. Here, here, behave Preben your being somewhat over zealos at best and downright silly at worst. -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg23537/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

was going mad :) -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg23536/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: text-input-problem

x27;t seem to delete up to the last char entered if I ignore what I see on the screen and believe what it *should* be doing it always turns out right. Phew... anyone get that? This does not happen running Mutt wihhout X though. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 067

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 22-01-02 at 09:17 * Rob 'Feztaa' Park said > Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus: > > How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user? > > Are you blind?? I'm /registered/ blind. But I see okay in reasonable li

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

Of course, that's like saying "I have the best tasting poo out of > everybody here!" ;) Hey! I havn't even had breakfast yet! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

ost over-12-year-olds to > program a VCR. Hehe, I like the 'flashing 12:00 reference although I'm sure the age limit is a little higher. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

ith your attribution, like me or > > others here. > > Like mine? It's only 6 lines, and it's *so* useful. Honest.. I think yours might be just a little much, I'm getting my arse kicked here about trimming, a six line attribution? That's as g

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 22-01-02 at 09:17 * Rob 'Feztaa' Park said > Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus: > > > * On 21-01-02 at 23:17 Brian Foley said > > > > > Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have &

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 21-01-02 at 23:17 * Brian Foley said > I got this email, did you bounce it to mutt-users as well? Yes, sorry about that I thought it would just end up in the thread where it belonged. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

in a reasonable tolerance zone. (something like that anyway) and this thread has been a real eye opener in many ways! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8TJUJ

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

ason there David. Hehe. > > I've finally come to my senses; changed from '| ' to '> '. Now it's up > to that other pagan, David, to change ;) You think that'll happen? I like the @ idea but I think && or could be pretty bad too. -- Nic

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 21-01-02 at 22:29 * Nick Wilson said Seeing as the sender of these next few lines didn't seem to want to send them to the list. Here they are in all thier glory. - --- Funny that your reply on 'not trimming' wa

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

imming of list mail. I'm for it. Deal me in. I agree. Help I'm losing my mind! Cold beans 'aint hot. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8TIe0HpvrrTa

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

in me... Join the dark side and piss off everyone on > the mutt-users list... I am your father! Haha, at last the voice of sanity! This thread was begging to ruin my day, silly me, all it needed was a bit of slap with the stupidity stick. Nice one! - -- Nick Wilson Tel:

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

ad to see what it's about, rather > than expecting everyone else to waste bandwidth. I'm not expecting anyone to do anything. I have read the thread. I don't like your rudeness and I'm taking my ball back. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 21-01-02 at 17:41 * Preben Randhol said > Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (17:20) : > > > And there's where we differ, my point was just that the line above where > > preben decided to

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 21-01-02 at 16:58 * Derek D. Martin said > > > Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) : > > > > people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if > > > >

Re: setting Reply-To header

;my_hdr Reply-To: Mutt-Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" Yep, those little single quotes were the problem. Thanks guys. Cheers - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

take, and doesn't solve the > problem for people who still have to pay for their bandwidth, as is > not so uncommon in non-US locations. I think the quote is taken a little out of context. Bandwidth's a bugger on mailing lists huh? - -- Nick Wilson Tel:

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 21-01-02 at 15:38 * Thomas Hurst said > * Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user? > > You don't; quoting properly has nothing to do with who you'r

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 21-01-02 at 15:08 * Preben Randhol said > Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) : > > people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if > > we spend all our time wor

Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers

; > Perhaps mutt should demand confirmation for sending messages with more > than 80% quoting.. Nah, people gotta choose how they do thier stuff. - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: setting Reply-To header

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 21-01-02 at 14:12 * Im Eunjea said > * Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-21 13:51]: > > [...] > > > > > Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it > >

Re: setting Reply-To header

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 21-01-02 at 13:15 * Ken Wahl said > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:43:26PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: > > > Hi everyone. > > I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the > > Reply-To

  1   2   3   >