Re: mutt and lynx

2000-01-14 Thread Kim DeVaughn
eeds to be done: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: Kim DeVaughn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Lynx Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Setting mailer in Lynx Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:21:52 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Kim's Home for Waywa

Re: bounce multiple messages to the same user

1999-12-24 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Fri, Dec 24, 1999, Shao Zhang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | Thanks for all the replies about bounce multiple messages. | I now have a special situation, where I need to bounce messages | from 1 to 1. Is there an easy to tag them all?? T~m1-1 /kim

Re: Multiple POP accounts and personalities...

1999-12-08 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999, Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | On 1999-12-08 01:54:57 -0700, Kim DeVaughn wrote: | | > Or, if that isn't feasible for some reason, then developing a | > stand- alone "fetchimap" program would be the way to go. | | You are free to write su

Re: Multiple POP accounts and personalities...

1999-12-08 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, Brendan Cully ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | > Fetchmail I believe handles IMAP4 mailboxes quite well, why not | > advocate that fetching IMAP4 mail isn't mutt's job either? | | fetchmail doesn't handle IMAP4 mailboxes well. It can download mail | from your INBOX to your spool

Re: automatically running the '$` command

1999-11-01 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999, Eric Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | Is it possible to set up so that the `$' command or refresh runs | every n minutes? Not without hacking the source code. | This way your deleted messages are automatically expunged. You *do* know what *will* happen eventually, shou

Re: Getting people's names not list names into index

1999-10-27 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999, Telsa Gwynne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 11:50:46AM -0400 or thereabouts, | Carrie Jamrogowicz wrote: | > | > Is there a way to get the message index to show the author's name instead | > of the list name? | Change: set index_format="%4C %Z %{

Re: mbox or MAILDIR

1999-08-27 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999, Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | > Personally, I've never found any good reason to use anything other | > than mbox style boxes. They are also easier to do "external" | > things with (like grep'ing the contents, etc), and seem to have | > fewer problems with "ne

Re: mbox or MAILDIR

1999-08-26 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999, Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 04:51:04PM +1000, Craig McVean wrote: | > | > Could someone explain the diffs between Mailder | > and mbox, and which is best | | This is detailed fairly well in the manual in the section on mailbox types.

Re: [OT] U.S. Crypto-Export Laws (was: [ANNOUNCE] mutt-1.0pre1i RPMs)

1999-08-25 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999, Fairlight ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | But yeah...this is getting political. Sorry for raising the question...I | should have just let Telsa's post alone (although I'm slightly less | ignorant now, for having questioned it). Sorry to have troubled the rest | of you with th

Re: updates to www.mutt.org

1999-08-25 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999, Peter van Dijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 07:42:41AM -0600, Kim DeVaughn stupidly said: | > | > Also, NO chars >= 0x3F, please ...! | | I think you mean 0x7F. Duh. Of course that's what I meant ...! Thanks for catching tha

Re: updates to www.mutt.org

1999-08-25 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999, Erik Jacobsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | One other thought: am I the only one out there who likes "text" and/or | ".txt" files to mean "plain text" (i.e., with ASCII codes >= 0x20, except | for whitespace encodings)? Yes indeed (or, to avoid confusion, "me too"). Also, N

Re: Deja vu (all over again...:^)

1999-08-14 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Sat, Aug 14, 1999, David Thorburn-Gundlach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | No, I think you're right. And their Message-Id: contents must be | different (or *really* delayed, I suppose, like the repost from 08/02 | that I saw go by), since my procmail dupe filter isn't catching | them... Perhaps

Re: additional flags

1999-07-08 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999, David Thorburn-Gundlach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | % If you (or anyone else) is interested in integrating it into the current | % rev, I'll be more than happy to email you a copy of the patch, as is. | | I'd be happy to take the copy, but won't pretend that I'm any sort of

Re: additional flags

1999-07-02 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999, David Thorburn-Gundlach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | I have taken to storing letters in my mailbox when I have read them but | still want a reminder that there's something to do. I'm interested in | adding additional flags; I know about NOrD and KPSM as well as FCT+*! | but

Re: Using mutt with news?

1999-05-27 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, May 26, 1999, Brandon Long ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | some people like slrn, though I could never get past the single | pager/index thing. Others like tin. Personally, if I'm not using | mutt+nntp, I use nn. And some of us like trn4 ... /kim

Re: half-up/down

1999-05-21 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, May 19, 1999, Joshua N Pritikin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | The strange thing is that half-up does not scroll back to the prior | message, yet half-down *does*. I think it would be better if | it consistently did not switch to the next/prev message. I'm not exactly sure what you mean.

Re: Features

1999-03-31 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999, Roland Rosenfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | The compressed folders patch is a bigger problem. The patch works but | it isn't checked against all possible problems. Additionally it is not | programmed very clean. So Thomas seems to be waiting for someone | cleaning up the s

Re: later send-hook?

1999-03-13 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999, john manoogian III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | how can i have a send-hook -like function that will be called *after* | i compose a message? i want to post-process a message after i compose | it, but i couldn't find a function to do it, since send-hook happens | before you c

Re: Editing mails in place

1999-03-09 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999, Martin Julian DeMello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | A friend and I have been trying to write a macro to edit mails in place | (i.e. pipe a mail to your editor of choice, edit and save it back to the | same folder, marking the original D). | | The macro to date is | | macro in

Re: [FAQ] Re: Binding the equivalent of "mutt -y"

1999-03-08 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999, Dan Resler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | Sorry, this does not work "as advertised" nor as you state it | above. If I type "mutt -y" I get a listing of the incoming mailboxes | that I have defined. If I enter one of these, then hit c for | change-folder, then press , I get the

Re: Automoving messages?

1999-01-27 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999, Daniel González Gasull ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | It's better to use procmail. news:comp.mail.procmail Far as I know, there's no such newsgroup in the so-called "big-8" hierarchy (though there *should* be, IMHO). Most of the procmail discussions take place in comp.mail.m

Re: colours in mutt?

1999-01-26 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | I'd like to be able to see different colours for my headers, | signatures,...whenever I open a message to read it. The pager I use is | less, and my /home/user/.muttrc file looks as follows (it seems to be right, | but it doesn

Re: "text/enriched" message support?

1999-01-22 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999, David DeSimone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | Wouldn't it be neat if you could send a multipart/alternative message | with a text/enriched part, and a text/plain representation of the same | message? Then anyone should be able to read it, in theory. No, it wouldn't (be "neat

Re: comments on 0.95.1i

1999-01-18 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999, Adam M. Costello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | In the index, half-up and half-down behave strangly near the top and | bottom. Usually, they scroll the viewable region without affecting | the selection, unless the selection is scrolled out of the window, | in

Re: comments on 0.95.1i

1999-01-18 Thread Kim DeVaughn
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999, David DeSimone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | Mutt tends to model Elm in this respect. It treats each group of | messages as a "screen's" worth. Say, if your screen can hold 20 lines | of index, then the group of messages will be broken into groups of 20, | and each group is