Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
triggering something screwy. I am still convinced the router change is one of the pieces of the puzzle. And I never have a problem with other terminals that are opened to the same server. Thanks for the help! -- Hal Burgiss

Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
0 Excellent! Its going now. Thanks. -- Hal Burgiss DBS>Interactive Technical Services

Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
re the problem might have been. I'll know better next time. -- Hal Burgiss

Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
ntrol-z. Both times it worked, though there was a delay. On the second attempt, I had tried Control-c a couple of times first, and its possible there was a delayed thing going on. What should a functional control-z tell me? -- Hal Burgiss DBS>Interactive Technical Services

Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > Try running mutt in debug mode; with luck, we can see what mutt's > doing when it dies. All I get is ... Caught signal 15... Exiting. That is from killing the mutt process after its hung. -- Hal Burgiss DBS&

Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:01:10PM +, Jussi Peltola wrote: > Try enabling SSH keepalives. Thanks. I have keepalives enabled on the server end already. -- Hal Burgiss DBS>Interactive Technical Services

Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > > Try running mutt in debug mode; with luck, we can see what mutt's > doing when it dies. Thanks! I wasn't aware of debug mode, but I'm game. Rebuilt now and running -d 5 now. -- Hal Burgiss DBS>Interactive Technical Services

Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
wlessly until the new router. The router thing might be co-incidence and a red-herring, but that is when the problem started. Thanks. -- Hal Burgiss

Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:13:34PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:45:47PM +0200, Rado S wrote: > > a) try 1.5.18 > > OK, good idea. I am running that now, and should know within an hour > or two. No go. Still hanging. :( -- Hal Burgiss

Re: Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
't > hang, it's NFS. I don't think thats it. There are no nfs mounts involved here. Thanks! -- Hal Burgiss

Mutt hangs, Network Issue?

2008-05-20 Thread Hal Burgiss
hangs. But that is a wild guess. It may turn out to be a network issue, but if so, mutt is the only thing triggering it. I am at a loss of how to troubleshoot this. Any ideas would be hugely appreciated! -- Hal Burgiss

Re: Dependency problem: OpenSSL and Mutt 1.3.18i-2

2001-06-08 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:58:36PM -0400, John P. Verel wrote: > I'm attempting to upgrade to Mutt mutt-1.3.18i-2, using an rpm. I get > these failed dependencies messages: > > libcrypto.so.0.9.6.1 is needed by mutt-1.3.18i-2 > libssl.so.0.9.6.1 is needed by mutt-1.3.18i-2 >

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-10 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 03:52:49PM +0200, Ulf Erikson wrote: > >mostly I think the autoedit is a bit easier > > (ie I am lazy :), especially when replying. The 'To' and 'Subject' > > normally have already been decided in this case. I rarely change To or > > Subject on a

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-10 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:51:31AM -0400, David T-G wrote: > Hal -- > > ...and then Hal Burgiss said... > % > % Yea, it works fine with autoedit off, but I like autoedit too :( > > What does autoedit get you that you can't have otherwise? Do you have > edit_hdrs

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-06 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 07:27:38PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > Hal Burgiss muttered: > I don't have a clue how combine autoedit and send-hooks. Harold says > it is possible so maybe you should start a new muttrc from scratch > and you'll see which line confuses mutt. Sou

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:08:48PM +0200, Hal Burgiss wrote: > Peter Jaques muttered: > > > > > Please post your whole muttrc. > > > http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc > > do you have 'autoedit' set? > > He does. And that's why the sen

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss
Peter Jaques muttered: > > > Please post your whole muttrc. > > http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc > do you have 'autoedit' set? He does. And that's why the send-hooks do not work. So, Hal the solution is obvious - give up that autoedit stuff. HTH, Michael -- Our informal mission is to impr

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > Hal Burgiss muttered: > > > > unset use_from > > Don't know why you do that, but according to the docs it shouldn't > hurt. It might be worth testing without this line, though. Still no go. --

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > Hal Burgiss muttered: > > Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even. > > Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the > > exceptions. > > > > &

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 01:30:40AM -0600, Harold Oga wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:29:30PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:25:47PM -0600, Harold Oga wrote: > >> > >> send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>&#x

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-04 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:25:47PM -0600, Harold Oga wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 07:58:13PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote: > >Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently > >even. Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to > >handle the exc

Send hook question

2000-10-04 Thread Hal Burgiss
Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even. Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the exceptions. unset use_from send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burg

Error: Warning changing readonly file

1999-11-02 Thread Hal Burgiss
I just rebuilt linux kernel (2.2.12), and all of a sudden I get this error anytime I try to look at any mail -- new or stored. Ctrl-C seems to be the only to get past this message. After that all seems well. I am using vim as pager (vim -R). I used the identical config on the kernel build as previ

Re: wmaker and mutt

1999-09-12 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 08:08:40PM +0200, finnegan wrote: > Hi, > this mutt is pretty enigmatic, at least for such a beginner like me; > I run windowmaker and would like to put an appicon on my desktop; > perhaps there is here somebody who prefers this combination of a mailer > and window manager

Re: message width in vim?

1999-08-29 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 03:59:15PM -0230, Chris Gushue wrote: > I *know* I saw how to do this recently on a mailing list but I couldn't > find it. I need to know how to set the message width when using vim as > my editor. I didn't see anything helpful in the vim docs for this, but > I might have m

Re: Sending mail ?? HA

1999-07-26 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 11:02:41PM +0200, Niels Rasmussen wrote: > > Hi all > > As a newbie I must say that I am getting exstremely frustrated at the moment !! > > Mutt is a wonderfull mailclient with all the features that I always wanted! > > But why in the H... cant I send mail with it ?? >

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-16 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 12:37:13PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Mark Mielke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Also many of them wouldn't know how to use a non "impressing" view of > > their mailbox. It's so much cooler to have messages fade and titles > > Standard-Mutt is b/w for me with

Re: Email client poll

1999-07-14 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 12:26:02AM +0200, J Horacio MG wrote: > Jeremy Blosser dixit: > > > Uh, we do, and even crashed netscape when I tried a second time (just to > check if I had done it right the first time, of course). > > Notice though, that netscape was by far the widiest voted mailreader

Re: HTML Mail -> no temp file

1999-07-06 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 10:12:01AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 08:10:36PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote: > > Trying to view html mail and I get a NS message to the effect of: > > > > No Such File: /tmp/mutt > > > > Correct there is

HTML Mail -> no temp file

1999-07-06 Thread Hal Burgiss
Trying to view html mail and I get a NS message to the effect of: No Such File: /tmp/mutt Correct there is no such file -- anywhere. I have tmpdir set to /tmp in .muttrc. I don't see that mutt is creating any temp files in this situation? I've changed mailcap to '-remote openFile(%s)', si

Re: Return Address problem

1999-04-23 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Claus Assmann wrote: > > Maybe this discussion should be done in a sendmail related list/group? My original query was whether this situation is addressable with Mutt ... > > Well I am starting sendmail as : sendmail -bd -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] I > > th

Re: Return Address problem

1999-04-23 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 10:23:06AM -0400, David Shaw wrote: > > Hhere is no such domain as "hals.box" and some (but, as you found out, not > all) systems won't talk to you because of it. This is generally done as a > spam protection technique (all those mails coming from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and >

Re: Return Address problem

1999-04-23 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 11:23:06AM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: > This is not a mutt problem but a sendmail problem. > You can fix this using the genericstable. I wrote a sort of mini howto on offline >mailing that fixes this problem, and posted the address a while ago. > You may have missed

Re: Return Address problem

1999-04-23 Thread Hal Burgiss
Djlou-ts3-23.iglou.com Thanks Liviu for the detailed, informative response!!! Sounds like what I needed to know. I had tried '[EMAIL PROTECTED]`, but it bombed. > > my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > to your .muttrc . It doesn't have to b

Re: Return Address problem

1999-04-22 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 09:52:08PM -0500, Ray or Donna Menke wrote: > I've been chasing this problem for weeks, and will be watching the list > for a solution. I have been sending the message (to queue) using Mutt, > then chasing it to /var/spool/mqueue, and using an editor to remove > the name

Re: Return Address problem

1999-04-22 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 07:08:51PM -0500, Ronny Haryanto wrote: > On 22-Apr-1999 07:40PM, Hal Burgiss wrote: > > Using mutt .95 with sendmail on a standalone home box. My mail headers are > > apparently showing 'sender' as $user@$HOSTNAME. Some mail servers ignore this

Return Address problem

1999-04-22 Thread Hal Burgiss
New user, stupid question probably ... Using mutt .95 with sendmail on a standalone home box. My mail headers are apparently showing 'sender' as $user@$HOSTNAME. Some mail servers ignore this, but others complain -- 'BadReturnPath' or '(mail may be forged)' -- and some are bouncing mail back to