er hand I see why it's maybe not seen as a priority ;-)
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart, da...@sungate.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
record of it has actually fallen off the end of the
Changelog ;-)
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart, da...@sungate.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lso helpfully puts the message "Nothing to do" in the status
message, which is very handy.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart, da...@sungate.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ctly this. The answer to
your first two questions is definitely Yes. The answer to 'move folder'
is I don't think so, but what I did was create empty folders on the
target folder and then tag-and-select-all-messages for each folder in
turn to copy across.
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart, da...@sungate.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Friday, 06.05.2022 at 22:38 +0800, lilydjwg wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:32:38PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > What are the implications of the access code expiring? I don't see any
> > symptoms which might be associated with that and t
On Friday, 06.05.2022 at 22:23 +0800, lilydjwg wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Hmm, so "testing mode" is where I did the initial setup to hardcode the
> > tokens into my (encrypted) config?
> >
>
recent change in
the Google setup. I thought 'app passwords' were considered somewhat
deprecated by GMail, to be honest... ?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart da...@sungate.co.uk, http://twitter.com/DaveEwart
All email from me is digitally signed, http://www.sungate.co.uk/
GPG key updated J
de the
tokens into my (encrypted) config?
So it sounds like maybe I don't need to do anything, but is there a
better way that doesn't use 'testing'? [Maybe it's not needed, I've been
using the single 'testing' setup unmodified since late 2020!]
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart da...@sungate.co.uk, http://twitter.com/DaveEwart
est, I don't really understand what it's describing here
as I don't understand OAuth - I just followed a HOWTO! Nor can I see
what to do to fix it. I don't understand what OOB means in this context.
Does the config just need a minor tweak, or is this whole approach a
complete non-
d' for every message, so you need to make sure
that something will match for every message in the way you'd like.
The first line I've given above sets a default, which can then be
followed by one or more modifications - just one in this case.
Does that make sense?
Dave.
--
Dave
> it still complains that it could not verify signature in messages which
> were _encrypted_ony_.
Well, obviously it _couldn't_ verify the signature - there is no
signature to verify?!?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
Cancer Researc
lear to both the main recipient and the CC recipient that
the message is not just going to one or other of them. Nothing
automated, but I usually write messages to a single individual or to a
well-defined group (thus no need for CC).
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epid
ch.
Shouldn't it be +COMPRESSED, rather than -COMPRESSED? In my 'mutt -v',
options that are disabled appear as '-OPTION' and those that are enabled
appear as '+OPTION'.
Sounds like it's in the source, but it needs to be enabled (via
./configure befor
On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 09:01 -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> * Dave Ewart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 16:13 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> >
> > > Hope it's useful - it works for me, YMMV.
> >
> > Ought to have ment
On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2001-08-16 16:13:16 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> >Printing plain text email messages has always been a bit of a
> >annoyance, since it looks so, well, "plain".
>
>
> I'm using this
On Thursday, 16.08.2001 at 16:13 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> Hope it's useful - it works for me, YMMV.
Ought to have mentioned - you'll need LaTex installed, plus dvips to
actually print the DVI file that is created from the TeX that the script
creates. I have it working on a R
ch is then rendered and sent to the default printer.
Modify to your taste!
I use this:
set print_command="/FULL/PATH/TO/PROGRAM/emailprint.pl"
in ~/.muttrc for it to work.
Hope it's useful - it works for me, YMMV.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF
ow
> this really isn't the proper list to be asking, but I figured enough
> people here use vim that somebody might know :-)
I use a ViM macro to do this:
map fd ggV/^-- gq
This goes to the top (gg), highlights up to the sig-line (two dashes and
a space), goes BACK one line and then for
relsford" rather than "To W M Brelsford".
You could always just make a minor edit to the source code so that it
doesn't print the "To " ?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
Latest build (1.9) of urlview has a call to "url_handler.sh" as its
default "program". This shell script can differentiate between FTP,
HTTP and call the appropriate program, e.g. wget, netscape or whatever
...
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Can
development release 1.3.12 - haven't checked).
Failing that, you can always edit the source - look for "sleep (1) /*
Allow user time to read message */" in curs_main.c and mx.c ... I don't
have a patch to do this, but it takes no time to comment out the above
lines ...
Dave.
--
Dave
t; is there a cleaner solution?
I've posted about this in the past, and I don't think I've ever seen any
suggestions, macros, or workarounds for this problem ... Even if you
specify the key-ID to use in a "pgp-hook", it _still_ gives you this
prompt, which seems bizarre ...
msg.pgp
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 16:11 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-09-26 14:48:35 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> > I think my problem is with the Mutt internal pager not displaying stuff
> > right, since all other aspects involve using the editor Vim, and
> > char
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 11:34 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Dave Ewart writes:
> > On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 11:01 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> >
> > > > e.g. the UK pound sign, £ (don't know how that'll appear for
> > > > most o
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 13:08 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:38:49 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > I'd appreciate any insights as to why my posting got no response!
>
> Well, one of the reasons could be that you post about problems with
> Mutt
t; --enable-locales-fix.
Thanks for the suggestion, Lars. How do I set my locale?
[My original posting already stated that I tried recompiling with
--enable-locales-fix, which made no difference.]
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
PGP signature
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 02:31 -0700, Anton Graham wrote:
> Submitted 26-Sep-00 by Dave Ewart:
> > I find it hard to believe that either of those explanations is true.
>
> It hits me intermittently, yes on some builds, not on others. So I
> don't have a guaranteed fix.
On Tuesday, 26.09.2000 at 20:13 +1100, raf wrote:
> Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> > I posted this question yesterday and have had no replies or
> > follow-ups. Does that mean that no-one else has this problem? Or
> > that loads of people have the problem and they can't
ning Mutt in an Eterm under KDE, if
that's useful info, and I get the same behaviour in a Konsole. In all
circumstances, Mutt 1.2.5 works fine.
Dave.
-
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
PGP signature
gn appears correctly in the editor,
presumably because Vim is displaying it, not Mutt.
I tried recompiling with the --enable-locales-fix option, but that
resulted in the same behaviour.
What am I doing wrong? I am running Mutt in an Eterm under KDE, if
that's useful info, and I get the sam
everal POP3 hosts
in the config file. Also works quite well with Procmail to filter the
incoming messages ...
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
PGP signature
On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 13:47 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
> > noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK"
EXACT SAME MESSAGE after upgrading from Mutt 1.2.x to Mutt 1.3.7 ...
nothing in the PGP config had been changed.
Guess some bug got introduced in the 1.3.x series?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
PGP signature
havior for mutt would be to detect when this is the case
> and simply select the single appropriate key from my keyring and only
> require user input when there is ambiguity.
Well, you've explained the problem better than anyone else, so let's
hope someone can come up with an
I want to make Mutt
auto-select the right key, but it doesn't seem to do it and prompts me
with a "select the key" screen as above ...
Anyone got any ideas, then?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
On upgrading from Mutt 1.0i to Mutt 1.2.4i, I noticed that one of the
changes involved replacing the "X-Mailer: ..." header with "User-Agent:
..."
More out of curiosity than anything else, I'd like to know what the
reason was for changing Mutt's behaviour in t
On Tuesday, 25.07.2000 at 10:48 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> Looks like I've screwed up somewhere ... :-)
>
> I was previously using version 1.0i and compiled and installed 1.2.4i.
> All was well, except that on a couple of occasions (mainly on changing
> folders) bits of
other Mutt in the Konsole, e.g. colourized "ls",
SLRN newsreader (uses Slang, not Ncurses?) ...
Any help most welcome!
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
; domain -- after that all mails have the changed values, not the
> default ones.
I think you want something like this:
send-hook . 'DO DEFAULT THING HERE'
send-hook specialdomain 'DO SPECIAL THING HERE'
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
colours etc.) IRC client. Any suggestions?
>
> xchat
Meant to say - this is probably for low-spec non-X mobile unit, so it
would need to be a CONSOLE app ... any further suggestions??
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
Apologies for the off-topic post, but I figure Mutt users might be a good
group of people to make a recommendation.
I use Mutt and SLRN and am looking for a similarly-configurable
(colours etc.) IRC client. Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF
ssistance. I'm suprised no-one (myself included) picked it up
the last time you posted it.
Are we all asleep? (Rhetorical!)
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
7;s not the problem, are you setting a default folder sort order
anywhere?
e.g.
folder-hook . set sort=date-sent
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
of my message from the normal list address ...
Is no-one else using PGP 6.5.1i with Mutt?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
I should add that encryption works fine from the command line if the
recipient is specified ...
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
ing.skr"
# set pgp_gpg=""
set pgp_default_version="pgp6" # (Not really the default, but...)
# Here, "default" means the value of $pgp_default_version:
set pgp_receive_version="default"
set pgp_key_version="default"
set pgp_send_vers
might get clever and "push" the necessary keystrokes).
Yep, having now implemented Procmail filtering, I totally agree that is the
better way to go ... :-)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
les ... Do I have to use something
like procmail to do the filtering?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
49 matches
Mail list logo