On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 09:18 +0200, Rudi van Houten wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
> > verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
> >
> > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 20 16:14:34 2000) --]
> > [-- End of PGP output --]
> >
> > [-- The following data is PGP/MIME encrypted --]
> >
> > <blah>
> >
> > [-- End of PGP/MIME encrypted data --]
> >
> > But the above mentioned error shows up in the status area at the
> > bottom of the mutt screen.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> It means that there is nothing in that PGP signature (more correct PGP
> certificate) that makes sure that the certificate belongs to the
> person who is named in that certificate. ...
> [Stuff about certificates snipped.]
I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
it says) to "PGP signature could NOT be verified" when verifying THE
EXACT SAME MESSAGE after upgrading from Mutt 1.2.x to Mutt 1.3.7 ...
nothing in the PGP config had been changed.
Guess some bug got introduced in the 1.3.x series?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
PGP signature
