On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:53:32AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
> A couple more ideas:
>
> 'maildrop' comes with some nice tools for working with mail in
> scripts. (It's also a rather good filtering / routing / piping /
> you-name-it MDA.)
Maildrop is awesome and so much better than procmail.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:18:14AM -0500, David Engel wrote:
>
> We are a small company ahd IT is only one of his many jobss along
> with facilities, planning, project management and others. He got IT
> because nobody else was willing to do it. The explanation I got for
> not embracing an integr
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:54:54PM +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
> On Monday 13 August 2018 20:22,
> Matthias Apitz put forth the proposition:
>> On Monday, 13 August 2018 18:59:38 CEST, David Woodfall >>>
Dave, do you verify gnuPG keys/signs on the fly? Is this secure?
Thx
>>>
>>> Mutt d
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:15:17PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> When I send a GPG-encrypted mail to, say "Foo Bar ",
> and there is a public key for that address in the GPG keyring,
> mutt still asks for a key to use for encryption. Can I tell mutt
> to use the key matching the receiver address au
Hello,
As we all know, the question of if and how the group entries
in gpg.conf can be used in Mutt or Neomutt crops up periodically and
generally the answer is no, not directly. I finally got around to
making a permanent solution which, as its current location indicates,
will be reference
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 08:14:31AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 07:33:18AM +1000, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>>
>> Fortunately configuring Postfix is simple; either as easy or easier
>> than configuring Mutt.
>
> Friendly and helpful support from
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 04:43:46PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 11:50:01PM +1000, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>>
>> I do the same thing, except the Postfix instance on the laptop is
>> configured to relay through the Postfix instance on the MX server.
>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:56:52PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
>
> I use postfix which, while it is a full-blown SMTP server, isn't
> difficult to configure (well I managed it!). Postfix will queue
> outgoing mail so its sendmail responds instantly and I never see any
> delays from mutt.
I do the
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:10:01AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
> I'm another Gentoo user. I unmasked Mutt 1.8.2-r2 to see if it
> would help a problem I was having with some S/MIME signed messages,
> and that pulled in gpgme 1.8.0-r3. I have fewer problems now with
> S/MIME and no new issues.
E
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:58:56PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-06-02 04:51, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>
>> There shouldn't be. While new functions are periodically added to
>> GPGME as features are added to GPG and its related projects,
>> efforts are made not
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 12:28:07PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:09:40AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>> Is there a good reason for this restriction, i.e. a known
>> incompatibility with gpgme-1.8 and later?
>
> I'm compiling against gpgme 1.8.0, and am not aware of a
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:09:40AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> Somewhat related:
>
> The latest (in fact, the only) mutt version in gentoo stable is
> 1.5.24. When I roll my weekly gentoo upgrade I am warned that a new
> version of gpgme, namely 1.8.0, is available, but is not being
> instal
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:42:10PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote:
>> I don't know if this is relevant: the list is not a real list with
>> appropriate headers, and most of the people use poorly-designed MUA
>> (no Mail-Followup-To, etc
fference between a mailing list post or a
single message from someone. If it could, well, it'd almost certainly
pass a Turing test and that might not be what you'd want in your MUA.
Regards,
Ben
--
| Ben McGinnes | Adversarial Press | Author and Publisher |
| Writer, Tra
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:43:01AM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to reply to a subscribed list without anybody in copy?
> I often receive messages from someone not subscribed, then want to
> answer to the list only (and sometimes forget to remove the people in
> Cc).
15 matches
Mail list logo
