On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:58:56PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-06-02 04:51, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> 
>> There shouldn't be.  While new functions are periodically added to
>> GPGME as features are added to GPG and its related projects,
>> efforts are made not to change existing functions.
> 
> I think I found it:
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600600
> 
> More mutt's fault than the library's, for using such a generic name.

Ah ... and that corresponding fix in mutt:

https://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/84ad86e8b8ab

That's ten days after GPGME 1.8.0's release.  So you should be pretty
safe overriding Gentoo's restriction there.


Regards,
Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to