On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 12:28:07PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:09:40AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >> Is there a good reason for this restriction, i.e. a known >> incompatibility with gpgme-1.8 and later? > > I'm compiling against gpgme 1.8.0, and am not aware of any issues. > I haven't tested against 1.9.0 yet, but haven't received any reports > of problems. If anyone is aware of an issue, please file a ticket > or email mutt-dev.
I'd be extraordinarily surprised if there were any since the majority of the changes between 1.8 and 1.9 were language bindings additions. There were one or two bugs fixed and a bit of documentation, but very little core work. There's a little bit, but not very much. Still, as much as I'm willing to bet that Gentoo did something silly here, I've also seen some ridiculous things under the hood of GPGME, so if you find anything that shouldn't be there or is doing anything odd, bring it over to gnupg-devel. Other than the GTK2 stuff, we know it's gotta go. Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
