Re: How do I browse folders using IMAP?

2002-10-01 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hello. On Tue 2002-10-01 at 14:23:03 -0700, you wrote > --- Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > > I usually work with mail on the local machine, but > > > sometimes have to log onto an IMAP server. I have no > > > problem logging on with "c{user@serv

No locks available (errno 37) while upgrade to Mandrake 9.0

2002-10-01 Thread Charles Jie
Mandrake 9.0 is really trobulesome! I've just upgraded from MD8.2 to 9.0 and suffered a lot, including mutt. Now my mutt will complain "fctrl: No locks available (errno = 37)" when I open any mbox. This makes the mbox readonly. I have no cue how to start trouble-shooting. Help! (Further info:

Re: [OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)

2002-10-01 Thread Mike Leone
* Gerhard Häring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 10 01, 02 at 21:32: > * Mike Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 22:03 -0400]: > > Exchange, by default, makes it's Global Address Books available via LDAP, so > > anything that reads LDAP can read it off of Exchange that way. Not so for > > pe

Re: [OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)

2002-10-01 Thread Gerhard Häring
* Mike Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 22:03 -0400]: > Exchange, by default, makes it's Global Address Books available via LDAP, so > anything that reads LDAP can read it off of Exchange that way. Not so for > personal address books. The Active Directory flavour, right? As far as I understa

Re: Update IMAP Immediately

2002-10-01 Thread Burton Samograd
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:49:28PM -0700, Jack Bates wrote: > How can I force mutt to update my IMAP server - changing, for instance, > the "new" flag - immediately, instead of waiting until I quit? Thanks, Try doing a mailbox sync with the '$' key. burton msg31438/pgp0.pgp Description:

Re: Update IMAP Immediately

2002-10-01 Thread Kurt Lieber
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:49:28PM -0700 or thereabouts, Jack Bates wrote: > How can I force mutt to update my IMAP server - changing, for instance, > the "new" flag - immediately, instead of waiting until I quit? Thanks, $, by default, resyncs your IMAP mailbox. --kurt

Re: [OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)

2002-10-01 Thread David Britton
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:03:26PM -0400, Mike Leone wrote: > > Exchange, by default, makes it's Global Address Books available via > LDAP, so anything that reads LDAP can read it off of Exchange that > way. Not so for personal address books. Thanks for the tip... Good info. /db

Re: The browser

2002-10-01 Thread David Britton
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:13:48PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > Another frustrating thing that happens is that the new-mail indicator > doesn't work on that box even if it actually contains new massages. > :-( When I come out of a folder (to the browser screen), the folder I am *in* is not m

Update IMAP Immediately

2002-10-01 Thread Jack Bates
How can I force mutt to update my IMAP server - changing, for instance, the "new" flag - immediately, instead of waiting until I quit? Thanks, Jack

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-01 Thread Will Yardley
Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > I'm just wondering why some people don't honor Reply-To or > Mail-Followup-To. Maybe they choose to ignore it. > Or maybe their mailer is expecting another header therefore. Most people probably don't *see* it, because most people don't read all the headers of their ema

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

2002-10-01 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 07:38:35AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, kevin lyda wrote: > > i find fmt to be more standard across unicies. > > that's arguable (fmt is likely to be installed, but like most Unix > utilities would have version dependencies - par is a relative latec

Re: How do I browse folders using IMAP?

2002-10-01 Thread Tom
--- Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > I usually work with mail on the local machine, but > > sometimes have to log onto an IMAP server. I have no > > problem logging on with "c{user@server}inbox.folder" > > but I would like to browse the IMAP folders,

Re: How do I browse folders using IMAP?

2002-10-01 Thread Michael Tatge
Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > I usually work with mail on the local machine, but > sometimes have to log onto an IMAP server. I have no > problem logging on with "c{user@server}inbox.folder" > but I would like to browse the IMAP folders, but > every "c?" or "c" only lists the local folders >

How do I browse folders using IMAP?

2002-10-01 Thread Tom
I usually work with mail on the local machine, but sometimes have to log onto an IMAP server. I have no problem logging on with "c{user@server}inbox.folder" but I would like to browse the IMAP folders, but every "c?" or "c" only lists the local folders (I usually want the local folders, but not wh

Re: Bouncing emails from the command line!

2002-10-01 Thread David T-G
Frank -- ...and then Bright, Frank said... % % Hi all, Hello! % % I would like to bounce emails with a command line entry. Is there a way to % do this with mutt? I read through the manual of how it does thru the % interface but not how it can be done from the command line. You mean like o

Re: Colour problem on NetBSD

2002-10-01 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 01 at 06:06, Thomas E. Dickey spoke: > NetBSD has a strong not-invented-here faction, which is busily porting > chunks of ncurses into their native BSD curses. It's not complete, but > the latest version reportedly has use_default_colors(). If the entrypoint > exists, but does not work

Re: reply-to alternatives

2002-10-01 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 01 at 01:13, Sven Guckes spoke: > * Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 20:12]: > > are there alternative headers to Reply-To: > > and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs? > > "we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you." Why? It isn't a fight against Reply-To and M

Re: Colour problem on NetBSD

2002-10-01 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:52:34PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > On Oct 01 at 06:06, Thomas E. Dickey spoke: > > > NetBSD has a strong not-invented-here faction, which is busily porting > > chunks of ncurses into their native BSD curses. It's not complete, but > > the latest version reportedl

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-10-01 Thread David Rock
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-01 20:54]: > On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 the mental interface of > David Rock told: > > > * Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 13:17]: > > > Gregory Seidman said: > [...] > > > > > Good question. Dunno how mutt integrates with LDAP, but I kn

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-10-01 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 the mental interface of David Rock told: > * Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 13:17]: > > Gregory Seidman said: [...] > > > Good question. Dunno how mutt integrates with LDAP, but I know I > > have used Outlook Express to query a GAL via LDAP. If you need > > t

Re: Creating Aliases from sent messages?

2002-10-01 Thread darren chamberlain
* Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-01 14:17]: > Why don't you run a little shell or perl script against that folder? Hmm... #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use File::Slurp; use Email::Find; my (%addrs, $data, $mbox, $finder); $data = read_file("mutt-users"); # read_fil

Re: Creating Aliases from sent messages?

2002-10-01 Thread Michael Tatge
John P Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > I've searched the manual high and low on this and come up blank. I want > to create a file of aliases based upon messages I've sent, rather than > receive. They are all in one folder for ease of access. While creating > an alias from a received messa

Re: Bad Encoding?

2002-10-01 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 17:54 -0400 30 Sep 2002, PeterKorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My mutt viewer shows: > > N^X¬µìm\212Ç^Z­¹^u¼¦ºÛÿ²ø\236ÁêÿZ^\ÿÿÿ_^Aô^M;^D@u^LPúì^N¶^WÝE The text/plain version of the message is specified as being sent base64 encoded, even though it actually isn't. So mutt and evolut

Re: From: header wrong w/ multiple IMAP accounts

2002-10-01 Thread Michael Tatge
Kurt Lieber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > I have two accounts on the same IMAP server. I can successfully navigate > between accounts using account-hooks. However, in both accounts, the > From: header defaults to my username followed by the @ sign. (i.e. > kurtl@) > I've set both the $envelope

Re: Howto mark all messages as read?

2002-10-01 Thread Lukas Ruf
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002, Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote: > Please, would someone tell me how can I mark all messages > in the mailbox as read, with a single key command? macro index .r \ ".\nN.\n" \ "mark all messages as read and press ".r" in the index mode --lpr -- Lukas Ruf htt

Re: Howto mark all messages as read?

2002-10-01 Thread Gregory Seidman
Jose Romildo Malaquias sez: } Hello. } } Please, would someone tell me how can I mark all messages } in the mailbox as read, with a single key command? In your .muttrc: macro index \cr 'T~O\n;NT~N\n;N;t' Now ctrl-R will mark all messages as read unless, of course, you've rebound T, N, ;, or t

Re: Howto mark all messages as read?

2002-10-01 Thread Sascha Huedepohl
Hi, * Jose Romildo Malaquias ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello. > > Please, would someone tell me how can I mark all messages > in the mailbox as read, with a single key command? i use two keys, but... ## == ## Bindings for index ## == macro index ,r

Howto mark all messages as read?

2002-10-01 Thread Jose Romildo Malaquias
Hello. Please, would someone tell me how can I mark all messages in the mailbox as read, with a single key command? Romildo -- Prof. José Romildo Malaquias Departamento de Computação - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto http://www.decom.ufop.br/prof/romildo/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://uber.com.b

Re: feature request - save_domain

2002-10-01 Thread darren chamberlain
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-01 10:18]: > Some suggested hacks for this but IMHO, this is sufficicently > useful (especially for those who deal with many companies / > organisations) to be native functionality. This seems like a good learning excersize, so I was looking into this, tr

Re: Mutt Question

2002-10-01 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 the mental interface of Schoppitsch Dieter told: [...] > * What can I try else? - Who causes this error (mutt, MTA, myISP)? > > I'm using mutt 0.91.2, ssmtp 2.27 resp. smail 3.2.0. (I couldn't / > don't want to upgrade my system - Debian 2.0). Switch to woody, set up mutt an

feature request - save_domain

2002-10-01 Thread Eric Smith
.. like save_name but mutt resolves `bar' from foo.bar.com Some suggested hacks for this but IMHO, this is sufficicently useful (especially for those who deal with many companies / organisations) to be native functionality. -- Eric Smith [hoping]

Re: Mutt Question

2002-10-01 Thread René Clerc
* Schoppitsch Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-10-2002 15:36]: > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: a folder-hook question

2002-10-01 Thread Gregor Zattler
Hi Isaac, * Isaac Claymore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27. Sep. 2002]: > It seems that folder-hook is executed whenever a folder is entered, > but is there a 'leave-folder-hook'? Notwendig, but there is hope: > I need to reset something back to normal upon leaving a folder, > after setting it to fold

Re: a folder-hook question

2002-10-01 Thread Patrick
* Isaac Claymore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-30-02 23:31]: > > It seems that folder-hook is executed whenever a folder is entered, > but is there a 'leave-folder-hook'? I need to reset something back to > normal upon leaving a folder, after setting it to folder-specific > value in a folder-hook. > >

Mutt Question

2002-10-01 Thread Schoppitsch Dieter
Hi all - I'm desperated - sorry for bothering you. I can't get mutt (or my MTA ?) to run. Since 2 weeks I try to find help in documents (ie Sven Guckes Setup Hints) and asked in two mailing lists. I tried to run mutt with ssmtp or smail. Mutt tells me "Mail sent." but then I get (with both MTAs)

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

2002-10-01 Thread Ken Weingold
On Tue, Oct 1, 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > I use gqap in vim. Thats for leaving the qotes at start of line. Oh, yeah. Q} will preserve quotes too, but I forgot that I have Q remapped to gq, since I had gotten used to the Q in vim 4 I think. Or something like that. :) -Ken

Re: download pgpwrap from where?: thanks

2002-10-01 Thread savanna
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > savanna told: > > > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > On debian you can find it at /usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap. Try > /usr/local/lib/mutt as well. /usr/lib/mutt isn't a part of $PATH so Hi everyone, thanks a lot for

Re: .procmailrc: thanks

2002-10-01 Thread savanna
* Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-30-02 18:56]: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote: > > > > > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering, > .. > You might find this easier/simpler: > > :0: > * ^Sender:.*owner\-mutt\- >

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

2002-10-01 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 the mental interface of > > "Or you can have vim do this reformatting automatically by applying > patches 6.1.142 and 6.1.143 and adding this to your autocmd: > > set formatoptions+=a" > (posted at vim.vim.org!) I don't use

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

2002-10-01 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told: > On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, kevin lyda wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:09:47AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: > > > > Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of > >

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

2002-10-01 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, kevin lyda wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:09:47AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: > > > Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of wrapping text. A > > > simple Q} will wrap the whole paragraph. Or Q will do for > >

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

2002-10-01 Thread kevin lyda
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:09:47AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: > > Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of wrapping text. A > > simple Q} will wrap the whole paragraph. Or Q will do for > > Outhouse since it seems to make each paragraph

Re: The browser

2002-10-01 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 09:51:11PM +0100, Dean Richard Benson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 06:26:25PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the > > browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press > > enter? >

cc to myself in some cases only?

2002-10-01 Thread Erik Simon
Dear and happy mutt users, I would like to CC a message to my email address, but not for all patterns. I tried a send-hook: send-hook . my_hdr Cc: send-hook foo.bar my_hdr Cc: It works, except than the changes take effect only for the subsequent message. Any hint how I co

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

2002-10-01 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002, Mike Jackson wrote: > > If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, and the > > message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix" that part which I quote? > > I would like to be able to do this automatically. > > Not su

Re: Colour problem on Solaris

2002-10-01 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > On Sep 27 at 11:28, Chris Green spoke: > > > Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 28: default: no such color > > Mutt (ncurses?) on NetBsd doesn't like this either. > > If you have a light background you might choose `brightwhite' > instead. T

Re: The browser

2002-10-01 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:16:41AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 16:44]: > > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox > > when you're in the browsers mailbox view and place > > the indicator on some mailbox and press enter? > > no. tell us

Re: The browser

2002-10-01 Thread Johan Svedberg
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:58:13AM -0700, John Iverson wrote: > * On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're > > in the browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some > > mailbox and press enter? > > This happens when you

Re: Mail-Followup-To/Reply-To alternatives

2002-10-01 Thread Will Yardley
Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > Are there headers used by other MUAs that have similar function like > Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To? Well Reply-To: is an internet standard, and is followed by most mailers. Mail-Followup-To: was an internet draft that never got adopted as a standard; mutt is still cli

Re: What Country is Mutt developed

2002-10-01 Thread Will Yardley
Tim Johnson wrote: > > And where is the author of Mutt from? Trivia, I know, > but wanted to include it in the article. > Thanks Michael Elkins is the author of Mutt, and he lives in LA (USA). Mutt is currently maintained mostly by other developers, who live in various places. --

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-10-01 Thread Cristiano Reis Monteiro
... então, em 26 de setembro de 2002, Gregory Seidman disse ... > it's LDAP? Perhaps it has something to do with the query functions? Do I > need an external program to help? Is there a HOWTO somewhere (Google did Hello, You can use the mutt external query function together with the "Little Bro

Bad Encoding?

2002-10-01 Thread PeterKorman
My mutt viewer shows: N^X¬µìm\212Ç^Z­¹^u¼¦ºÛÿ²ø\236ÁêÿZ^\ÿÿÿ_^Aô^M;^D@u^LPúì^N¶^WÝE for the attached distribution. I think there was a thread for a problem like this not so long ago. The distribution was encoded by a Mozilla 4.76 mailer. There are 2 attachments. The second 1 was an ht

mutt -Z question

2002-10-01 Thread Robin Johnson
Greetings, I have a question for the list, that I haven't been able to locate an answer for on Google. I have a lot of Maildir folders that procmail sorts my incoming email into. However, not all of them get mail on a daily basis. Presently to check all of my email, I run "mutt -Z" repeatedly to