On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:03:05 -0600
David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > < .
> > pop_authenticate: Using any available method.
> > > AUTH CRAM-MD5
> > < + PDMyNzU3LjEwMjAyMjMxMjUzMzRAaXNwd2VzdG
On Mar 14, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 10:24]:
> > I have a script which grabs today's Garfield comic,
> > and /should/ then send it on to my wife.
> > This is what I have:
> > mutt -x -s Daily\ Garfield -a ga$theimg.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 14, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> 14-Mar-02 at 12:20, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote:
> > >
> > > Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs.
> > > Cool.
> >
> > Except it doesn't wor
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:53:50AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Timothy Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 22:01]:
> > I'm on a lot of mailing lists and I would like to strip out
> > all the pgp sigs from messages but I don't know the correct
> > kungfu to do this w/ procmail. Anyone do this be
* Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 23:34 -0500]:
> This really is way cool.
>
> With KDE, I just dragged the script file onto my bottom panel. Now,
> I just highlight the link in mutt, hit the icon on the bottom panel,
> and netscape starts up, etc.
If you're using KDE 2.x, you can us
This really is way cool.
With KDE, I just dragged the script file onto my bottom panel. Now,
I just highlight the link in mutt, hit the icon on the bottom panel,
and netscape starts up, etc.
Linux is an acquired taste.
Joel
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:53:17PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote:
> Yes!! T
* Timothy Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 22:01]:
> I'm on a lot of mailing lists and I would like to strip out
> all the pgp sigs from messages but I don't know the correct
> kungfu to do this w/ procmail. Anyone do this before?
:0
* Content-Type: multipart/signed
DEVNULL
works for m
* Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 17:54]:
> > I haven't tested it yet, and I don't know how clever the regex
> > engine is for hooks, but have you tried "send-hook [^@]* ..." yet?
> No, I haven't. Great idea... and it worked!
> So mutts regex engine is really smart :-)
send-hook !
Dean Richard Benson wrote:
>
> First time poster, so please be gentle! :)
>
> I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt.
that's a big upgrade! also a very different way of doing things. one
minor thing... you don't appear to be wrapping your lines in your
editor... it's generally considered
Hi all
First time poster, so please be gentle! :)
I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt.
Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to default to the folder
list.
It shows me which folders have new mail in with the N character, but this never updates
unless I
a) exi
Has traffic disappeared or do I have list problems?? Please cc: me at
the reply-to address in header.
tks
--
Pat Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
Registered at: http://counter.li.org
7:36pm up 3:05, 6 users, load
Yes!! This is just what I wanted. xclip -o just dumps the current clipboard
into your script. Very nice. Very userful. Whata great utility.
Thanks,
Joel
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:49:14AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Heiko Heil wrote:
> Hello Mutt-users,
> taken from my ~/.muttrc:
> save-hook "~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +tux
> Is it possible to use an logical or operator in order to avoid
> redundancy?
> I didn't succeed with this attempt:
> save-hook "(~t|~c) [EMAIL PR
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, David T-G wrote:
> Rob, et al --
> ...and then Rob Reid said...
> %
[snip]
> % Netscape/LookOut users, and David himself seems to enjoy the attention.
> Actually, I don't, but that doesn't seem to keep it from coming my way,
> does it? If such attention is the price I p
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:14:49AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:51:38PM +0100, Maarten den Braber wrote:
> % >
> % > Do you have some 'buffy' kind of program that checks ~/Mailbox?
> %
> % To the best of my knowledge, no. Though I'm not sure how that would affect
> % mu
I know this is more of a procmail question, but no one on the procmail
list seems to know or respond...
I'm on a lot of mailing lists and I would like to strip out all the pgp
sigs from messages but I don't know the correct kungfu to do this w/
procmail. Anyone do this before?
--timball
--
On 020314, at 13:31:55, Heiko Heil wrote
> taken from my ~/.muttrc:
> save-hook "~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +tux
>
> Is it possible to use an logical or operator in order to avoid
> redundancy?
Assuming you had a number of save hooks using the same set of
operators, you might fin
* On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 03:08:41PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> which part is dependent upon rxvt? (other terminal windows, including
> the console-window that cygwin runs in would suffice).
rxvt is not required (just convenient).
Bob Heckel
On 2002-03-14 13:52 +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> I am using the format yymmdd on my *webpages* - and for dates only.
> apart from that I was using it in the attribution - with hh:mm.
>
> but if applied to messages - which century can this be?
> 1900? 2100? Think, man, THINK! no - try HARDER!
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 02:40:27PM -, The spice must flow wrote:
> * On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:09:09PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote:
> > I used to highlight and copy the address into the browser (netscape). But,
> > this seems a bit clumsy. It was clumsy, in fact.
> For the Cygwin mutt users amon
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:21:49AM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]:
>
> > * MuttER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020313 14:17]:
> >
> > > Many editors would have difficulty recognizing and parsing your date
> > > format.
> >
> > Which editors pa
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20.44 +0100]:
[...SNIP...]
> > Now it works, I have to use %Z instead of %z.
> > attribution="* %f [%{%Y-%m-%e %k:%M:%S %Z}]:"
>
> Stupid me, of course I want
> attribution="* %f [%{%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z}]:"
>
> Nicolas (who should go to bed no
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20:38:15 +0100]:
> * Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20:26:29 +0100]:
> > * Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20.02 +0100]:
> > > * Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]:
> > > I tried:
> > >
* On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:09:09PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote:
> I used to highlight and copy the address into the browser (netscape). But,
> this seems a bit clumsy. It was clumsy, in fact.
For the Cygwin mutt users among us, I do the following to view URLs
in IE by highlighting the link then pre
* Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20:26:29 +0100]:
> * Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20.02 +0100]:
> > * Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]:
> > I tried:
> > attribution="* %f [%{%Y-%m-%e %k:%M:%S %z}]:"
>
> Why not set the date-part i
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 20.02 +0100]:
> * Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]:
> I tried:
> attribution="* %f [%{%Y-%m-%e %k:%M:%S %z}]:"
Why not set the date-part in $date_format, like so:
set attribution="* %n <%a> [%d]:"
and
* Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]:
> * John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 06:01 -0600]:
> > Oh, I definitely agree that the ISO format is the way to go. Although
> > I would change it a bit since technically the hyphens (-) are
> > unnecessary due to the f
* Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-14 13:14 -0500:
> * Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > * Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I use the nntp patch from vvv.
> > > I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avo
Hi David,
> I haven't tested it yet, and I don't know how clever the regex engine is
> for hooks, but have you tried
> send-hook [^@]* ...
> yet?
No, I haven't. Great idea... and it worked!
So mutts regex engine is really smart :-)
Thanks,
Andy.
--
Dr. Andy Spiegl, Radio Marañón, Jaén, P
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 06:01 -0600]:
> Oh, I definitely agree that the ISO format is the way to go. Although
> I would change it a bit since technically the hyphens (-) are
> unnecessary due to the fields being fixed-length, but that's a bigger
> nitpick than even I am w
Rory --
...and then Rory Campbell-Lange said...
%
% I often receive attachments with Mac encoding which I need to bounce or
% forward to another email address. How do I get the 'forward' and
% 'bounce' commands to automatically include all the attached files in the
% original mail?
Since 'b'oun
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 09:29]:
> > This is all at least in 1.3.27. If I tag messages,
> > and then hit ';d', it doens't apply 'd' to the
> > tagged messages, only the one the indicator is on.
>
> check the bindings of these keys
Shawn, et al --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > Nope; I sign everything except for a few special cases, so I just use
% > send-hooks, and I just gave him my example and let him convert to folders
% > on his own. Excercises for the stu
14-Mar-02 at 12:20, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote:
> >
> > Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs.
> > Cool.
>
> Except it doesn't work with any mailing list I've tried.
I just hit SHIFT-L and this
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:20:06PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote:
> >
> > Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs.
> > Cool.
>
> Except it doesn't work with any mailing list I've tried.
>
> Including, for example
This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote:
>
> Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs.
> Cool.
Except it doesn't work with any mailing list I've tried.
Including, for example, this one...
msg25508/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
>
> Nope; I sign everything except for a few special cases, so I just use
> send-hooks, and I just gave him my example and let him convert to folders
> on his own. Excercises for the student and all :-)
No need; I sign everything except for two addr
* Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use the nntp patch from vvv.
> > I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam.
> > When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed acc
I often receive attachments with Mac encoding which I need to bounce or
forward to another email address. How do I get the 'forward' and
'bounce' commands to automatically include all the attached files in the
original mail?
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andy --
...and then Andy Spiegl said...
%
% Hi Mutters,
Hello!
%
% a short question:
...
% But I would also like to define a send-hook that "hooks" when I send to
% local addresses, i.e. "mutt user1" instead of "mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
%
% How can I write the send-hook line for local addre
Hi Mutters,
a short question:
I have send-hooks defined to change my .signature depending on the To:
address. This works great, for example:
send-hook '~C "radiomaranon\\.org\\.pe$"' set signature="$HOME/.mutt/.signature.rm"
But I would also like to define a send-hook that "hooks" when I send
Dr . Sharukh K . R . Pavri . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> may have typed [02/03/14 05:47]:
>
> the error log shows the following, which makes me suspect it is a Latex
> error, but I may be wrong. I have *not* ever used or configured Latex on
> my machine.
>
> Output written on mail.dvi (1 page, 2124
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 15:26:01 +0100]:
> oh - you mean, this Mail-Followup-To is for "extra notification"?
Please actually read what I write. I mean it could be one use for someone.
You asked a question, I provided one possible answer. Once again it seems
that such a ques
Andre, et al --
...and then Andre Berger said...
%
% folder-hook nntp "send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: news'"
% folder-hook !nntp "send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: mail'"
Since one doesn't change folders without leaving the folder, you might
say, couldn't the send-hooks be left out and you j
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:09:09PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote:
> > Is there a way to run a shell script which would automatically read in
> > the current contents of the clipboard, thus avoiding the need for the
> > mouse click?
>
> I
* Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500:
> Hi,
>
> I use the nntp patch from vvv.
> I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam.
> When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly.
> Now my question is: is there a way to have
Hi, there!
I have problems in compiling mutt (1.3.28) with together with the vvv.nntp
patch on the latest (self compiled) autoconf release (2.53).
On autoconf-2.52 I get the following warnings(?):
$ ./configure
[...]
$ make
cd . && aclocal -I m4
cd . && automake --foreign --include-de
* Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500:
> Hi,
>
> I use the nntp patch from vvv.
> I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam.
> When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly.
> Now my question is: is there a way to have
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 14:14]:
> > So this Mail-Followup-To seems redundant [on a closed list]
> Could it not be the case that the personal entry in
> Mail-Followup-To might be pointing to an address with which
> the author isn't subscribed to the list? This might be an
> a
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 13:55:59 +0100]:
> * Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:51]:
>
> > Don't follow... what am I doing wrong?
>
> well, you have to be subscribed to the list to be able to send to it. so I
> know that when I reply to the list you'll get a cop
Hi,
I use the nntp patch from vvv.
I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam.
When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly.
Now my question is: is there a way to have my 'normal address' used when
I hit 'r' to personnaly reply to a newsgroup
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 13:52:07 +0100]:
> * Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:17]:
>
> > How should it infer the year format, get the seconds and work out the
> > timezone from the above data? Even if the seconds is considered "lossy"
> > the other two items o
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:50:10PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> it is possible whenever a followup has a reference
> to this message - or to a followup which in turn
> has a reference pointing back at the message.
>
> so much for theory.
And in practice, mutt does a great job of threading alread
Oliver --
...and then Oliver Fuchs said...
%
% On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:16:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > My, but you really should work on your quote trimming. At least I get
% > rid of *some* of the original message!
% >
...
% > http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzha
* Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 13:08]:
> Can I set up a keymapping to Reply to the
> mailing list, rather than hitting "g" and
> manually pruning the headers where necessary?
> *checks manual*
> Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply).
> Or whatever you map it to
> in your muttrcs. Cool
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:16:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Oliver --
>
> My, but you really should work on your quote trimming. At least I get
> rid of *some* of the original message!
>
> ...and then Oliver Fuchs said...
> %
> % On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:32:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> ..
14-Mar-02 at 13:55, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > > > Mail-Followup-To: Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > > Mutt User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > this is a closed list, isn't it?
> > Don't follow... what am I doing wrong?
>
> well, you have to be subscribed to the li
David, Ralph...
> % We have this in German as well. But we use a comma:
> % You telepathic fiend, you.
>
> Same here in the US.
*Blush* so I should have used a comma too. My mistake. My English is
usually so good, too *sarcastic grin*.
--
John Lennon:--v [Simon White. vim/mutt/Linux. [EMAIL P
Simon & Ralf --
...and then Ralf Hildebrandt said...
%
% Am 14.03.2002 um 12:51:27 + schrieb Simon White folgendes:
% >
% > You telepathic fiend you. (idiomatic word order, for your English notes Sven)
%
% We have this in German as well. But we use a comma:
% You telepathic fiend, you.
Sa
* Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:51]:
> 14-Mar-02 at 12:39, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote / schreibt :
> > now, if crontab does all this then you probably have to use "/dir/mutt".
> You telepathic fiend you. (idiomatic word order, for your English notes Sven)
*grin*
> > >
Am 14.03.2002 um 12:51:27 + schrieb Simon White folgendes:
> 14-Mar-02 at 12:39, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote / schreibt :
> > now, if crontab does all this then you probably have to use "/dir/mutt".
>
> You telepathic fiend you. (idiomatic word order, for your English notes Sven)
W
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:17]:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:09]:
> > * Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 09:27]:
> > > ,
> > > | ELISP> (parse-time-string "020313 14:17")
> > > | (0 17 14 nil nil nil nil nil nil)
> > > `
> > looks li
14-Mar-02 at 12:39, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote / schreibt :
> now, if crontab does all this then you probably have to use "/dir/mutt".
You telepathic fiend you. (idiomatic word order, for your English notes Sven)
> hmm... make mutt use some non-standard setup file then
> by applying t
* Heiko Heil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:32]:
> taken from my ~/.muttrc:
> save-hook "~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +tux
> Is it possible to use an logical or operator
> in order to avoid redundancy?
> I didn't succeed with this attempt:
> save-hook "(~t|~c) [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello Mutt-users,
taken from my ~/.muttrc:
save-hook "~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +tux
Is it possible to use an logical or operator in order to avoid
redundancy?
I didn't succeed with this attempt:
save-hook "(~t|~c) [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +tux
--
Cheers,
Heiko Heil
msg25479/pgp0
* Philip Mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-22 01:41]:
> How does pine do it, anyway? pine wraps paragraphs in
> replies fine. They seem to have some heuristic or
> something that does the right thing almost all the time...
Pine people use pico and its "justify" command (bound to CTRL-J).
You can
Joel --
...and then Joel Hammer said...
%
% Well I found urlview.
Good!
% I do not want to install yet another helpler application (yet). Also, can't
Fair enough.
% even download the thang. This urlview looks hardcore to me!
Why can't you download it?
[zero] [7:21am] ~> ftp -n
ftp>
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, David Champion wrote:
> On 2002.03.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Ken Weingold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, cool. So the following means that mutt doesn't need any of the
> > ncurses libraries at all after the binary is built?
> >
> > ./mutt:
> > -lintl
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002, David Champion wrote:
> > Run "ldd mutt". This will tell you what shared dependencies the binary
> > has (including whether it used the shared or static libs from your
> > ncurses build).
>
> Oh, cool. So the following means that m
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:09:19 +0100]:
> * Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 09:27]:
>
> > ,
> > | ELISP> (parse-time-string "020313 14:17")
> > | (0 17 14 nil nil nil nil nil nil)
> > `
>
> looks like the parsing can still be enhanced. *ehem*
How sh
Myrddin --
...and then J. Scott Dorr said...
%
% On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:51:38PM +0100, Maarten den Braber wrote:
% > * J. Scott Dorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020313 22:36]:
% > > Everything works just fine, -except- when it comes to the main/default mailbox
...
% > > into one of the other mailbo
Knute --
...and then Knute said...
%
% On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, David T-G wrote:
%
% > Do you mean something like
%
% > send-hook . set pgp_autosign
...
%
% > or so? Modify to folder-hook as you see fit.
% ^^^
% What folder-hook?
The one that he will write t
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > Do you mean something like
% >
% > send-hook . set pgp_autosign
...
%
% You rule, David. Works like a friggin' charm.
Why, thank you .
:-D
--
David T-G * It's
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% Now if you guys would just submit your keys to the public keyservers...
Can you not find mine? I should be fairly widely spread, I think...
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTE
* John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 01:36]:
> Is this easily do-able ? A keypress would mean all
> following emails in this thread get marked somehow
> (colour, whatever ...)
it is possible whenever a followup has a reference
to this message - or to a followup which in turn
has a referen
* Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 10:24]:
> I have a script which grabs today's Garfield comic,
> and /should/ then send it on to my wife.
> This is what I have:
> mutt -x -s Daily\ Garfield -a ga$theimg.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
echo smooches | mutt -s "Daily Garfield" -a ga$theimg.jpg
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 09:29]:
> This is all at least in 1.3.27. If I tag messages,
> and then hit ';d', it doens't apply 'd' to the
> tagged messages, only the one the indicator is on.
check the bindings of these keys then!
(you know, use "help" with '?' ;-)
Sven
On Thursday, 14 March 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> This is all at least in 1.3.27. If I tag messages, and then hit ';d',
> it doens't apply 'd' to the tagged messages, only the one the
> indicator is on.
>
> Also, if I am on the last message and hit 'd', it gets applied to the
> message above the
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 09:27]:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]:
> > Which editors parse for dates? examples? (anyone?)
> Some people consider emacs to be an editor.
oh - that one.
> ,
> | *** Welcome to IELM *** Type (describe-mode)
I am using mutt 1.3.27 w/ muttprint. Previously I used
set print_command="lpr"
which worked quite fine. I downloaded muttprint, installed it, copied over
the default .muttprintrc and made minimal changes to it to get it to work.
But, on trying to print, though it gives a message: Messages pr
I have seen a few posts about this, but no matter how I try, I am missing
something to make mutt send without prompting me for a password for my IMAP
account, which is set up in my .muttrc file.
I have a script which grabs today's Garfield comic, and /should/ then send it
on to my wife.
This is
This is all at least in 1.3.27. If I tag messages, and then hit ';d',
it doens't apply 'd' to the tagged messages, only the one the
indicator is on.
Also, if I am on the last message and hit 'd', it gets applied to the
message above the last, and every time I hit 'd' again, it applies to
the nex
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]:
> * MuttER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020313 14:17]:
>
> > Many editors would have difficulty recognizing and parsing your date
> > format.
>
> Which editors parse for dates? examples? (anyone?)
Some people consider emacs to be an edit
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, 15:05, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > 2002-01-02
> >
> > If we know this is ISO, then obviously it's "January 2, 2002". But if
> > we're not _sure_ it's ISO, then it could be "February 1, 2002".
> Nah. Not even someone who had never even _heard_ of ISO would ever
> write
84 matches
Mail list logo
