Re: How to get mutt bark for new created mbox?

2002-03-05 Thread John Buttery
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:25:04PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: >Hi, > >Now I have a mail system with 7 mboxes. Some of them are usually cleared >to empty and removed by mutt. > >I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them, >mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is i

Re: How to get mutt bark for new created mbox?

2002-03-05 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:25:04PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: > Now I have a mail system with 7 mboxes. Some of them are usually cleared > to empty and removed by mutt. > > I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them, > mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is it

Re: Article Re Mutt (re: ..handicapped.. )

2002-03-05 Thread John Buttery
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:11:30PM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote: >Hello All: > Earlier I posted an email to this list soliciting comments >about mutt. Many of those comments were used in an article that I wrote >in our "webzine" about ncurse/s-lang/command-line tools for linux. >The article(s) i

How to get mutt bark for new created mbox?

2002-03-05 Thread Charles Jie
Hi, Now I have a mail system with 7 mboxes. Some of them are usually cleared to empty and removed by mutt. I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them, mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is it a feature? best regards, charlie

Re: external page: vi

2002-03-05 Thread John Buttery
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 05:13:27PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote: >map z z <--- fast shift email to top of screen. First command given >after email comes up in vi. I wish I could get this to happen automatically. > >Joel Well, I'm pretty much a vi newbie myself but someone showed me a command cal

Re: unable to send mails....

2002-03-05 Thread Joel Hammer
I am confused too, but: My linux box uses sendmail with mutt. I don't know how to configure mutt to use another mail server! It looks like your mail relay machine can't figure out who 192.168.1.130 is, which I assume is the machine sending the mail. Do you have a static ip? Is there a DNS which o

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread Thomas Huemmler
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/03/05 20:42]: > I uploaded my key to certserver.pgp.com. I've also successfully > retrieved my key from this server. Is this one not "in the rotation"? > Is there some other server I should be using? I have successfully > retrieved (almost) everyone else

Article Re Mutt (re: ..handicapped.. )

2002-03-05 Thread Tim Johnson
Hello All: Earlier I posted an email to this list soliciting comments about mutt. Many of those comments were used in an article that I wrote in our "webzine" about ncurse/s-lang/command-line tools for linux. The article(s) is/are at http://www.frozen-north-linuxonline.com/ under "Tim's By

Re: Aliases won't source with MacosX

2002-03-05 Thread Josh Kuperman
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 03:45:45PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Josh -- > > ...and then Josh Kuperman said... > % > % On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:00:12AM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote: > % > I installed mutt on my MacOS X (using the fink package version) and it > Not to be persnickity, but did you put

Re: mutt is not for everyone

2002-03-05 Thread Sven Guckes
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020301 09:20]: > i love mutt, and wouldn't switch for the world, but i > don't think that it's the mail client for everyone. > i'd even be hesitant to recommend it to many of my > (fairly computer-literate as a rule) co-workers. that's fine. dont give mutt to

Re: webpages without doctype decloration harmful?

2002-03-05 Thread Sven Guckes
* Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020228 23:51]: > > http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/faq/maillist.html ;-) > Hmm, I should do a nice long rant on why laying out > stuff using tables, tags, all the stupid style attributes > and not including doctype declorations is concidered harmful ;) go

Re: Saving a read E-Mail into an imap-folder -> O-flag

2002-03-05 Thread David DeSimone
Heiko Heil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > whenever I save a *read* message into an imap-folder the message is > marked as "old" (O). What can I do against this behaviour? This is documented as a known bug in IMAP: * Server copy currently doesn't take into account uncommitted changes i

Re: external page: vi -> vim / avoid dangerous mappings!

2002-03-05 Thread Sven Guckes
* Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020305 22:13]: > Well, I switched to vi (vim, actually) as the . "as the ??" > For page a vi junkie, this is really much better. (And, for a > person who doesn't really understand how to use mutt right.) ;-) > I though I would pass along some helpful points

Re: Folder view -> use file mask!

2002-03-05 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! John Buttery spake thus: > >http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/setup.html >=20 > What in the name of all that is holy are you _doing_ in there?!=20

Re: deleting an attachment while composing..

2002-03-05 Thread Shawn D. McPeek
Previously, Ryan Singer wrote: % % i was sending a message today and ran into a problem. i was attaching a % series of files, and attached one that i later wanted to remove before % sending. i checked the help, but couldn't seem to find a key-binding to % do this. i ended up just sending the mess

Re: procmail log tailing (was "Re: mutt and noatime partitions")

2002-03-05 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 15:37 05 Mar 2002, David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | % On 17:15 02 Mar 2002, christophe barb? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | % | It seems there is no option to avoid the use of the access time. | ... | % Instead, I have my procmail recipe write a line to a log file when | % interesting email

deleting an attachment while composing..

2002-03-05 Thread Ryan Singer
hey all, i was sending a message today and ran into a problem. i was attaching a series of files, and attached one that i later wanted to remove before sending. i checked the help, but couldn't seem to find a key-binding to do this. i ended up just sending the message w/ the unnecessary file a

Re: Is mutt really "handicapped"?

2002-03-05 Thread Dave Smith
Our IT group have just fixed the mail setup so that I can send mail to the outside world... On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:05:16AM -0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We also have a local linux user's group and a mailing list. > A comment was made to the mailing list that mutt was "handicapped"

Re: save_name -> one folder for each address

2002-03-05 Thread Sven Guckes
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020305 17:52]: > "John Buttery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What in the name of all that is holy are you _doing_ in there?! > He's set save_name, probably. I only have 2000 mboxes in mine, > but Sven probably sends mail more broadly than I do. yup - i hav

Re: external page: vi

2002-03-05 Thread Joel Hammer
Well, I switched to vi (vim, actually) as the . For page a vi junkie, this is really much better. (And, for a person who doesn't really understand how to use mutt right.) I though I would pass along some helpful points in case anyone else wants to do this. To start vi, I use the following set page

Re: Garbled charsets

2002-03-05 Thread Sven Guckes
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-03-02 10:27 AM EST]: > Until yesterday, I used mutt installed from RedHat's RPM (1.2.5). > I have now switched to mutt-1.3.27i-1.1.rhl6 > (linked from www.mutt.org) and ... * David Collantes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020305 16:27]: > Please check the whole thre

Re: procmail log tailing (was "Re: mutt and noatime partitions")

2002-03-05 Thread Mike Schiraldi
> I like this, and I've been looking for something this simple. Can you > post or send your config for me to blatantly copy? :-) I use a modified version of a program called root-tail (www.var.cx/root-tail) to tail -f my procmail log, /var/log/secure, and a few other files. Each one is displayed

Re: mutt and noatime partitions

2002-03-05 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 15:39 05 Mar 2002, David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | ...and then Cameron Simpson said... | % have the folder open in one mutt at a time (which I suppose is desirable | % anyway - I enforce that in my wrapper script). | | I've heard this before and I still haven't seen a reason to worry ab

Re: Setting the hostname used in HELO

2002-03-05 Thread Bob McLaren
That solved it! I didn't understand the 'SmartHost' concept in sendmail before you mentioned it. I looked it up, configured it, now it works like a charm. Thanks man! Now I can use Mutt to my heart's content. ;) Charles Cazabon wrote: > Bob McLaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But this isn'

Re: Setting the hostname used in HELO

2002-03-05 Thread Charles Cazabon
Bob McLaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But this isn't a problem with the SMTP headers having bad info. This is a > problem with the HELO SMTP "handshake" having bad info. > Mutt sends the message to my local sendmail, my local sendmail attempts to > send the mail, it connects to the destination

Re: Setting the hostname used in HELO

2002-03-05 Thread Bob McLaren
But this isn't a problem with the SMTP headers having bad info. This is a problem with the HELO SMTP "handshake" having bad info. Mutt sends the message to my local sendmail, my local sendmail attempts to send the mail, it connects to the destination mail server and begins the conversation with '

Re: procmail log tailing (was "Re: mutt and noatime partitions")

2002-03-05 Thread Christopher S. Swingley
David, > % Instead, I have my procmail recipe write a line to a log file when > % interesting email arrives (i.e. only when one of a few recipes fires). > % And I have a small window which tails that logfile. If I were in text mode I > % could just tail that log in the background. > > I like thi

Re: Aliases won't source with MacosX

2002-03-05 Thread David T-G
Josh -- ...and then Josh Kuperman said... % % On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:00:12AM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote: % > I installed mutt on my MacOS X (using the fink package version) and it % > works fine except for the aliases. I tried different shells (tcsh is % > the default shell, bash is availabl

Re: mutt and noatime partitions

2002-03-05 Thread David T-G
Cameron, et al -- ...and then Cameron Simpson said... % ... % have the folder open in one mutt at a time (which I suppose is desirable % anyway - I enforce that in my wrapper script). I've heard this before and I still haven't seen a reason to worry about having multiple mutts open. Can anyone

Re: procmail log tailing (was "Re: mutt and noatime partitions")

2002-03-05 Thread David T-G
Cameron, et al -- ...and then Cameron Simpson said... % % On 17:15 02 Mar 2002, christophe barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: % | It seems there is no option to avoid the use of the access time. ... % % Instead, I have my procmail recipe write a line to a log file when % interesting email arrives

Re: Setting the hostname used in HELO

2002-03-05 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:29:48AM -0800, Bob McLaren wrote: > So now what I am looking for is a simple SMTP client that is as easy to use as > Mutt, or, some alternative means of getting Mutt to talk to my remote smtp server. ssmtp, or others Steve -- NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, B

Re: Setting the hostname used in HELO

2002-03-05 Thread Bob McLaren
In response to both David and Ralf, The original problem is that, when I use Mutt from the command line, it uses the LOCAL smtp server to send emails. I need the client to connect to a REMOTE smtp server, and as far as I understand from Simon, Mutt cannot be configured to connect to a remote

Saving a read E-Mail into an imap-folder -> O-flag

2002-03-05 Thread Heiko Heil
Hello mutt-users, whenever I save a *read* message into an imap-folder the message is marked as "old" (O). What can I do against this behaviour? -- Cheers, Heiko Heil (using Mutt 1.3.27i) __ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.

Re: Setting the hostname used in HELO

2002-03-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:17:46AM -0800, Bob McLaren wrote: > Would any of you know of a simple, command-line based Linux SMTP client that is > as easy to use as Mutt for sending mime attachments? > I really like the fact that Mutt handles all the mime encoding so I don't have > to mess with it.

Re: Setting the hostname used in HELO

2002-03-05 Thread David Champion
On 2002.03.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bob McLaren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would any of you know of a simple, command-line based Linux SMTP client that is > as easy to use as Mutt for sending mime attachments? > I really like the fact that Mutt handles all the mime encoding so I don

Re: Setting the hostname used in HELO

2002-03-05 Thread Bob McLaren
Would any of you know of a simple, command-line based Linux SMTP client that is as easy to use as Mutt for sending mime attachments? I really like the fact that Mutt handles all the mime encoding so I don't have to mess with it. -- Bob McLaren Internet Services Project Manager Financial Statement

Re: Downloading messages

2002-03-05 Thread Michel
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:37:17PM -0600, Knute wrote: > press return to continue. It's a small price to pay to get my email > filtered for me. :D Ok! However, I suggest mutt developers to implement this feature! Maybe including fetchmail support directly distribuited with the Mutt... Well, I a

Re: Folder view -> use file mask!

2002-03-05 Thread David Champion
On 2002.03.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "John Buttery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What in the name of all that is holy are you _doing_ in there?! He's set save_name, probably. I only have 2000 mboxes in mine, but Sven probably sends mail more broadly than I do. -- -D.[EMAIL

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread MuttER
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-05-02 11:57] crowed: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:02:55AM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote: > >Said John Buttery on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600: > > > >> gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857 > > .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

Feature request: auto_view accepts its own handler

2002-03-05 Thread John Buttery
I'm not sure I used the correct terminology in the Subject: line, but what I'm looking for is pretty easy to explain (hopefully easy to implement also :p). Basically, this is what we have now: auto_view image/tiff This line tells mutt to consult $mailcap_path and find a mailcap entry that c

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread John Buttery
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:02:55AM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote: >Said John Buttery on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600: > >> gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857 > >That worked for me. I use pgp.dtype.org, though, and it wasn't there. > >-- >[!] Just

Re: Garbled charsets

2002-03-05 Thread David Collantes
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-03-02 10:27 AM EST]: > Until yesterday, I used mutt installed from RedHat's RPM (1.2.5). I have > now switched to mutt-1.3.27i-1.1.rhl6 (linked from www.mutt.org) and Please check the whole thread starting with <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The fix is there. Che

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread Phil Gregory
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-05 09:24 -0600]: > This is really odd; you're not the first person to say this, but I > _did_ upload it to a keyserver, not only that but I have successfully > retrieved it as well. > I uploaded my key to certserver.pgp.com. It looks like that serve

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread Justin R. Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said John Buttery on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600: > gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857 That worked for me. I use pgp.dtype.org, though, and it wasn't there. - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Garbled charsets

2002-03-05 Thread Maarten den Braber
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020305 16:49]: > Until yesterday, I used mutt installed from RedHat's RPM (1.2.5). I have > now switched to mutt-1.3.27i-1.1.rhl6 (linked from www.mutt.org) and > have discovered that my outgoing messages have garbled charsets (and > umlaut letters are display

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread Maarten den Braber
* MuttER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020305 16:28]: > I also cannot retrieve your key: > > pat@wahoo:~> gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys \ > 587F0CD702368857 > gpg: requesting key 02368857 from certserver.pgp.com ... > gpg: can't get key from keyserver: eof Odd: mdb@cyclone:~/$

Re: A bit OT, mail notification tool to go with mutt

2002-03-05 Thread Adam Byrtek
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:10:54AM +, Thomas Hurst wrote: > gkrellmmailwatch is one solution to this. > > http://gkrellm.luon.net/mailwatch.phtml, Thanks a lot. It's great I could have such feature integrated in gkrellm... I'm going to check it in a moment... -- _.|._ |_ _.: Adam B

Garbled charsets

2002-03-05 Thread Johan Almqvist
Hi! Until yesterday, I used mutt installed from RedHat's RPM (1.2.5). I have now switched to mutt-1.3.27i-1.1.rhl6 (linked from www.mutt.org) and have discovered that my outgoing messages have garbled charsets (and umlaut letters are displayed as question marks in incoming messages). I don't e

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread MuttER
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-05-02 10:25] crowed: > report back if it works? > I uploaded my key to certserver.pgp.com. I've also successfully > retrieved my key from this server. Is this one not "in the rotation"? > Is there some other server I should be using? I have successfully

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600, John Buttery wrote: > gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857 Use something like keyserver wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net in your options file, where uk would be your country ... Steve -- NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsi

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread John Buttery
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:07:50PM +0100, Thomas Huemmler wrote: >* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/03/05 15:41]: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org >> >> iD8DBQE8hNitWH8M1wI2iFcRApO/AJwOFPUVJn3wxcP8r26eeANYGT7f

Re: gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread David Collantes
* Thomas Huemmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-03-02 09:46 AM EST]: > ...and now for something completely different: > > Sorry, if I do not add something more genuine to this thread. But could > you please send your gpg signature to a public keyserver or stop signing > your messages. Just because ev

gpg signature (was: Folder view -> use file mask!)

2002-03-05 Thread Thomas Huemmler
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/03/05 15:41]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE8hNitWH8M1wI2iFcRApO/AJwOFPUVJn3wxcP8r26eeANYGT7fdgCgklRs > 3c1l651J0OaZ86L/ae2phjE= > =+SPC > -END PGP SIGNATURE---

Re: Pager problems in 1.3.27 - mailcap? TERM?

2002-03-05 Thread Raymond A. Meijer
On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, 11:25, Sven Guckes wrote: > $ mv $HOME/.mailcap $HOME/.mailcap.removed > $ mutt > what now? The same.. > try with TERM=vt100, too: > > $ TERM=vt100 > $ export TERM > $ mutt No...still a blank screen, in B&W now... Strange huh? :) Ray --

Re: Folder view -> use file mask!

2002-03-05 Thread John Buttery
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:19:36AM -0500, MuttER wrote: >* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-05-02 06:45] crowed: > >> > >> >multicolumn output has not been implemented yet. >> >one column is all you get for now. sorry. >> > >> >anyway, mutt builds up the list of all >> >my folders in less tha

Re: Folder view -> use file mask!

2002-03-05 Thread MuttER
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-05-02 06:45] crowed: > > > >multicolumn output has not been implemented yet. > >one column is all you get for now. sorry. > > > >anyway, mutt builds up the list of all > >my folders in less than two seconds - > >and i have quite a few folders there: > > > >

Re: Adding a header is there is an attachment

2002-03-05 Thread David Collantes
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-03-02 06:30 AM EST]: > >That recommendation does not works neither. I think that when you are at > >that point -email already composed- it is not possible to add any extra > >headers. They need to be added 'before' you enter message compossing. IN > > Oh

Re: Adding a header is there is an attachment

2002-03-05 Thread John Buttery
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:05:05AM -0500, David Collantes wrote: >* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-03-02 02:07 AM EST]: > >> >I am looking to add an extra header to my outgoing mails if there is an >> >attachment. I tried the following macro: >> > >> >macro compose a ":my_hdr: X-Attachment:

Re: Folder view -> use file mask!

2002-03-05 Thread John Buttery
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:23:03AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: >* David Collantes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020304 17:09]: >> Does anyone knows how to view folders on more than one >> column? Right now it shows one column only, but when >> you have a lot of mailboxes that gets quite long... > >multicolu

Re: Adding a header is there is an attachment

2002-03-05 Thread David Collantes
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-03-02 02:07 AM EST]: > >I am looking to add an extra header to my outgoing mails if there is an > >attachment. I tried the following macro: > > > >macro compose a ":my_hdr: X-Attachment: Safe\n" > > > >But it seems that at that point headers can not be adde

Re: Deleting text in subject "flea"

2002-03-05 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:08:39PM -0500, MuttER wrote: > * David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-04-02 15:55] crowed: > > Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > This seems to happen specifically when I have input more than 8 > > > characters, which is usual for filenames with full pa

Re: Pager problems in 1.3.27 - mailcap? TERM?

2002-03-05 Thread Sven Guckes
* Raymond A. Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020305 09:14]: > On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, 09:25, Raymond A. Meijer wrote: > > > have you tried linking mutt with slang yet? > > I think so, but I'll try again and let you know what happens... > Hmmm..all I get then is coloured bars.. > it looks nice, but I stil

Re: Folder view -> use file mask!

2002-03-05 Thread Sven Guckes
* David Collantes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020304 17:09]: > Does anyone knows how to view folders on more than one > column? Right now it shows one column only, but when > you have a lot of mailboxes that gets quite long... multicolumn output has not been implemented yet. one column is all you get f

Re: Ask before sending non-rfc gpg-mails

2002-03-05 Thread Christoph Maurer
On 2002-03-05 Heiko Heil wrote: > Hello mutt-users, > > I'm using "set pgp_create_traditional=yes" in my .muttrc to send > encrypted/signed E-Mails to Outlook-users (this client obviously isn't > RFC 2015-compatible). In addition I use the pgp-traditional patch from > Dale Woolridge for forcing t

Ask before sending non-rfc gpg-mails

2002-03-05 Thread Heiko Heil
Hello mutt-users, I'm using "set pgp_create_traditional=yes" in my .muttrc to send encrypted/signed E-Mails to Outlook-users (this client obviously isn't RFC 2015-compatible). In addition I use the pgp-traditional patch from Dale Woolridge for forcing text/plain content. Is it possible to use pg

Re: Pager problems in 1.3.27 - ncurses 5.2 vs slang 1.4.4

2002-03-05 Thread Raymond A. Meijer
On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, 09:25, Raymond A. Meijer wrote: > > have you tried linking mutt with slang yet? > I think so, but I'll try again and let you know what happens... Hmmm..all I get then is coloured bars..it looks nice, but I still can't see the messages :) Ray --

Re: Pager problems in 1.3.27 - ncurses 5.2 vs slang 1.4.4

2002-03-05 Thread Raymond A. Meijer
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002, 20:54, Sven Guckes wrote: > is this for *all* mails in your mailbox? or just for *some*? > > please dont tell us that you only tried it on one message > which contains a text/html part only and that your mailcap > file tells mutt to use lynx but cannot be found. ;-) No, al