Re: PGP sign mail without MIME

David T-G wrote: > That sounds like a nice middle ground. Do you have one of those hooks > for every outlook user in your list, or do you build a regexp of all > users for that single hook? No, I keep a list of all the Outlook users I know, but right now, there's only two people in that list.

mail2procmailrc

[sent once before when i wasn't subscribed to mutt-users if it double posts I appologize] I've written a little program to make using mutt and procmail together slightly happier... it's a filter like mail2muttalias.py but it generates procmail recipies. Please try it and tell me what you think. I

Re: MUA statistics

On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 06:20:32PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with: > ...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said... > % On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:56:28PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan (dis)graced my >inbox with: > % > > the 161 Web clients is one person (my best friend, he uses a webmail thing)

Re: mutt sends signed messages as multipart attachments?

On 11/10/01 06:08 PM, David T-G sat at the `puter and typed: > Will -- > > ...and then Will Yardley said... > % David T-G wrote: > % > > % > % attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline > % > % mail, for instance). > ... > % > % Anyway, I have been reprimanded, and

Re: mutt sends signed messages as multipart attachments?

David T-G wrote: > % > % that seems a little harsh i'm sure there are many who would tell > % those of us who use mutt to use a 'real mail program'. there's nothing > % wrong with using mailx or other command line clients. > > While I overlooked that and figured that it was a mandated-by-ma

Re: MUA statistics

Rob, et al -- ...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said... % On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:56:28PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan (dis)graced my inbox with: % > > the 161 Web clients is one person (my best friend, he uses a webmail thing). And he's still a friend? I thought you had better taste ;-) % >

Re: mutt sends signed messages as multipart attachments?

Will -- ...and then Will Yardley said... % David T-G wrote: % > % > % attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline % > % mail, for instance). ... % > % Anyway, I have been reprimanded, and so I promised not to autosign % > % until I figured out what the deal was. %

Re: MUA statistics

On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:56:28PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan (dis)graced my inbox with: > > I'm pretty sure I don't know that many people. You need to implement > > some way of not counting the same guy twice. I'd be willing to bet that > > the 161 Web clients is one person (my best friend, he

transliteration

d anyone please point how I can solve the problem? If the issue is libiconv-related, what is the current address of the maintainer or the mailing list? Thanks in advance, Baurjan. libiconv-1.7.0.1-ibr.2000-1713.gz Description: application/gunzip

Re: mutt sends signed messages as multipart attachments?

David T-G wrote: > > % mail. Unfortunately, it seems that mutt started sending everything as > % attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline > % mail, for instance). > > If you're just sending ordinary text, then you can get around this, > though that is the Wrong Way

Re: mutt sends signed messages as multipart attachments?

Louis -- ...and then Louis LeBlanc said... % Hey all. I recently got my gpg setup and autosigning all outgoing Yay! % mail. Unfortunately, it seems that mutt started sending everything as % attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline % mail, for instance). If

problematic behavior

Hi there, I don't know whether this is really a bug, or something configurable, but I have this problem with mutt (1.3.23i) I'd like to have solved. This is when it shows up: enter an embox do nothing in it AFTER it's got new mail go to the mailboxes view enter a different mbox I end up in the

mutt sends signed messages as multipart attachments?

Hey all. I recently got my gpg setup and autosigning all outgoing mail. Unfortunately, it seems that mutt started sending everything as attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline mail, for instance). Anyway, I have been reprimanded, and so I promised not to a

mail preferences menu?

Hi all :) I have one, maybe trivial, problem...I want to choose some configuration options (like 'from' string, signature etc) when I start composing mail. Now I can do this with folder-hook, but this is very uncomfortable. IMHO the best solution would be adding a menu with defined templates...Is

Re: PGP sign mail without MIME

Viktor -- ...and then Viktor Rosenfeld said... % David T-G wrote: % % > % Still not parseable by (say) Outlook and Eudora. The best way to go is % > % % > % macro compose S "Fgpg -a --clearsign -u 0xEDEDEFB9" % > % > Much better is Shane Wegener's pgp_outlook_compat patch so that you don't %

Re: MUA statistics

Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:50:27 +0530 Hi, On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spoke thusly: [-- snip --] > I'm pretty sure I don't know that many people. You need to implement > some way of not counting the same guy twice. I'd be willing to bet that > the 161 Web clients is one person (my bes

Re: PGP sign mail without MIME

David T-G wrote: > % Still not parseable by (say) Outlook and Eudora. The best way to go is > % > % macro compose S "Fgpg -a --clearsign -u 0xEDEDEFB9" > > Much better is Shane Wegener's pgp_outlook_compat patch so that you don't > have to muck with macros. Unfortunately, pgp_outlook_compat r

Re: anonymous CVS access

Have a look at the main README file. On 2001-11-09 13:03:36 -0600, Peter Horst wrote: >From: "Peter Horst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 13:03:36 -0600 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: anonymous CVS access >Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i > >Is anonymous