Hi,
Federico Grau typed:
> For now, I am looking for a pine like "expunge" feature, where I can
> really delete emails from my mailbox without having to first leave
> it. I tried searching the FAQ and teh Manual but could not
> find anything with "expunge|purge|compress".
Delete the mails you
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 03:06:12PM -0400, Federico Grau wrote:
> I believe I have finally made my conversion to mutt (from pine)
> for good. I am still working out some details but I am sure
> with time they will be squashed.
>
> For now, I am looking for a pine like "expunge" feature, where I
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 03:06:12PM -0400, Federico Grau wrote:
> I believe I have finally made my conversion to mutt (from pine)
> for good. I am still working out some details but I am sure
> with time they will be squashed.
> For now, I am looking for a pine like "expunge" feature, where I ca
Hi folks,
I believe I have finally made my conversion to mutt (from pine)
for good. I am still working out some details but I am sure
with time they will be squashed.
For now, I am looking for a pine like "expunge" feature, where I can
really delete emails from my mailbox without having to f
Hi,
This will affect the mutt-* lists.
Mikko
- Forwarded message from James R Grinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 17:47:55 +0100
From: James R Grinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Another Power Outage: Downtime Sat 19 Aug 0100 +0100 to 0900 +0100
(Sorry for the late n
Suresh, et al --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% Using a large mallet, David T-G whacked out:
%
% > You could always
% > send-hook abuse@ 'my_hdr fcc: /dev/null'
% > like I do with spamcop submissions. Interestingly enough, I have to
%
% You know, that _could_ be a hassle if you
Using a large mallet, David T-G whacked out:
> You could always
> send-hook abuse@ 'my_hdr fcc: /dev/null'
> like I do with spamcop submissions. Interestingly enough, I have to
You know, that _could_ be a hassle if you have a persistent spambag you want to
lart further - say by filing an RBL
Chris --
...and then Chris Green said...
% Is there a simple way to prevent some messages from getting sent to the
% $record file?
%
% For example I'd prefer not to save messages sent to 'abuse@'
% addresses as I don't want to keep them and they're often large.
You could always
send-hook abu
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, [iso-8859-1] André Dahlqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 10:21:04AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
>
> > perhaps your xterm doesn't have eightBitInput resource set
>
> But like I pointed out later in my message, 8-bit input works in the
> xterm. The only time it fails
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 10:21:04AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> perhaps your xterm doesn't have eightBitInput resource set
But like I pointed out later in my message, 8-bit input works in the
xterm. The only time it fails is when I run emacs from within it.
--
// André
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, [iso-8859-1] André Dahlqvist wrote:
> I apologize if this message is a bit off topic, the connection to Mutt
> is that I discovered this problem when I was switching to using Emacs as
> an editor in Mutt.
>
> Like I mentioned above I have switched to using Emacs as an editor
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 01:03:18PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> Is there a simple way to prevent some messages from getting sent to the
> $record file?
>
> For example I'd prefer not to save messages sent to 'abuse@' addresses as
> I don't want to keep them and they're often large.
Use `fcc-hook
I apologize if this message is a bit off topic, the connection to Mutt
is that I discovered this problem when I was switching to using Emacs as
an editor in Mutt.
Like I mentioned above I have switched to using Emacs as an editor in
Mutt (Yes, I like Emacs. Sue me:-) The problem is that Emacs wil
Is there a simple way to prevent some messages from getting sent to the
$record file?
For example I'd prefer not to save messages sent to 'abuse@'
addresses as I don't want to keep them and they're often large.
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hello !
Sven Guckes wrote on 18.08.2000 10:13:58 +0200:
> * Frank Altpeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000817 22:04]:
> > I just bounced you [mutt-bugs] an email with subject: IRCD hosting ...
> > This is very important. Because i got this mail and as i tried to
> > forward it to another person, my mut
Sitting at the campfire, Bernhard Valenti told:
> i connect to my IMAP server that has ~8 folders, the thing is that right now i have
>to go through all the folders every few minutes to check if there is
> any new mail in one of them. is there a solution for that so mutt like displays a
>message
I just want the headers to come across nice and rfc standards of course,
i want to customize it a bit more, maybe appending signature to the
bottom
i want to develop it more but what could i do just to get it in rfc
standards for emailing so the clients read it fine...
--
/Jason G Helfman
"
Sitting at the campfire, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told:
> I take your point about Solaris but it also required libiconv on a
> RedHat 6.1 system.
Debian slink (2.1) also needs it.
Kai
--
x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
Kai Blin(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sitting at the campfire, Michael Soulier told:
> Hey guys. At home on Debian 2.2, when I try to quit mutt, I get the
> following:
>
> "(null): Bad address (errno = 14)"
>
> And it won't let me quit. This is if I hit the "q" at the top level. If I
> Ctrl-C, then I can exit.
>
>
* Frank Altpeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000817 22:04]:
> I just bounced you [mutt-bugs] an email with subject: IRCD hosting ...
> This is very important. Because i got this mail and as i tried to
> forward it to another person, my mutt segfaulting with core dump.
Is this important because of the co
20 matches
Mail list logo
