Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 22 Feb 2000:
> Well, maybe you´re right and it´s better not to change ithowever, what´s
> so bad in remembering one more key to do things after all those combinations
> one uses with mutt, emacs, jed and all those M$-soft at work...
Whatever
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 22 Feb 2000:
> > I've used cat > /dev/null followed by pressing the key, and seeing
> > which characters get printed. This may or may not work for you...
> well, if I tell mutt to use those keys, it won´t recognize them, too. Is
> there a way
> I've used cat > /dev/null followed by pressing the key, and seeing
> which characters get printed. This may or may not work for you...
well, if I tell mutt to use those keys, it won´t recognize them, too. Is
there a way to make mutt display the code it sees, like in jed?
> It's possible to
Hi Mikko,
Well, maybe you´re right and it´s better not to change ithowever, what´s
so bad in remembering one more key to do things after all those combinations
one uses with mutt, emacs, jed and all those M$-soft at work...
--
Jens Wilhelm Wulf *** [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:39:40AM +0200 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 21 Feb 2000:
> > although I can´t find a word about it, ^c seems to be bound to "exit"
> > and I can´t unbind it. Or does mutt catch a signal on ^c ...
>
> The pro
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 21 Feb 2000:
> I just updated my whole system, now mutt tells me that the keys I mentioned are
> not bound. Well, of course they are, but mutt doesn´t seem to get their
> standard-codes. Is there a possibility to find out which codes mutt receive
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 21 Feb 2000:
> although I can´t find a word about it, ^c seems to be bound to "exit" and I
> can´t unbind it. Or does mutt catch a signal on ^c and runs "exit" by itself?
> However, I want to bind ^x^c to "quit". Because of the fact just mentione
Another question regarding IMAP in Mutt.
Every time I send mail through the IMAP connection, I get a Returned mail:
User unknown email in the INBOX of my machine, even though I am replying
to messages from gwyn.tux.org.
How can I straighten out this sending problem?
Thanks,
--Brad
I just updated my whole system, now mutt tells me that the keys I mentioned are
not bound. Well, of course they are, but mutt doesn´t seem to get their
standard-codes. Is there a possibility to find out which codes mutt receives so
I can bind them?
I linked mutt against the current slang-version,
Hi there,
although I can´t find a word about it, ^c seems to be bound to "exit" and I
can´t unbind it. Or does mutt catch a signal on ^c and runs "exit" by itself?
However, I want to bind ^x^c to "quit". Because of the fact just mentioned
mutt never executes what I bind it to...binding for exampl
Jeremy,
thanks to you and Hall, Johan and Tom for your answers;
that´s true, with my Eterm (0.8.9) i cannot get the menus;
$ Eterm -t mutt invokes only Eterm from where i can call up mutt;
F1 gives the help file of mutt
thanks anyway
finn
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, you wrote:
>
> finnegan [[EMAIL PR
According to Thomas Roessler on Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 12:04:58PM +0100:
| (As an alternative, you may set the arrow_cursor variable. This
| will paint a little arrow on the left side of the line you have
| selected, and won't change the color scheme at all.)
yeah - tht is what I was going to do if
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 21 Feb 2000:
> Is there a way to make mutt getting into the
> headers by default and editing the message only when I press "e"
Currently, no way. This would seem like a reasonable addition though,
it's simple enough to continue editing the text for t
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 09:49:24AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> At 10:04 -0500 21 Feb 2000, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 12:06:22PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > > On 2000-02-20 10:41:45 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> > > > I wonder if there is a way to approxi
Hi,
I'm using mutt 1.1.4 under Debian, and once I connect to the server, if
the session sits for some length of time, when I try to update the list, I
get something like imap_check_mailbox() [..@.."]. (the characters in the
[]s vary.) The only thing I can do is c out of mutt, go into the
server a
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is here way to bind macro to or \c. I try it with
> mutt 1.1.4 but with no success.
A standard xterm does not generate different key sequences for shift-tab
or ctrl-tab. You would have to tell your xterm to generate a special
sequ
David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm using set mark_old now, but I do miss the old mbox behavior. I
> just don't feel good about trusting mboxes anymore.
It actually is possible for a maildir folder to have messages with
status "N", yet still not appear as "new" in the folder browser.
At 10:04 -0500 21 Feb 2000, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 12:06:22PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > On 2000-02-20 10:41:45 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> > > I wonder if there is a way to approximate the mbox behavior with
> > > maildir?
> >
> > Set mark_old.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 12:06:22PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-02-20 10:41:45 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
>
> > Got it. I guess I was expecting the old mbox behavior. I switched to
> > maildir after the second corrupted mbox file in the past year (I bug
> > reported the last one, but I
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 10:56:53AM -0800, Alan wrote:
> Sadly the stable debian distro only has mutt 0.95, so I'm going from scratch.
> I am Compiling it on a debian stable box with slang 1.2.2 (runtime and dev files)
> and ncurses 4.2 (tuntime and dev) and it all compiles fine, but no color! The
On 2000-02-20 10:41:45 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> Got it. I guess I was expecting the old mbox behavior. I switched to
> maildir after the second corrupted mbox file in the past year (I bug
> reported the last one, but I don't know if the fix made it in to
> mutt).
Which one?
> I wonder if th
hi,
Is here way to bind macro to or \c. I try it with mutt 1.1.4
but with no success.
for example would be nice bind /~F\n to (jump on next flaged)
--
Keso
don't worry about glory
On 2000-02-20 14:08:15 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I have a red bar that shows the currently selected mail in
> reverse video. But this shows the same sceme (yellow on red)
> regardless of the status of the mail message. Only when I move
> off that message can I see what its status is by the inde
On 2000-02-20 10:10:11 -0800, Evan Vetere wrote:
> When I email a friend of mine at [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mutt complains that
That message isn't created by mutt, but by pgp.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Glyn Millington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 20 Feb 2000:
> Is it possible to receive all my mail into one folder, and then have Mutt move
> it to seperate folders when it has been read or when I shut down?
It can be done halfway, Mutt supports automatic moving of read messages
from the spoo
After postponing a message, when I want to change it's headers I press
"m" (bound to compose, by default) and the answer "y" on the edit
postponed message prompt. This takes me to editing the message, which
is not what I want. I, then, get out of the message's body to finally
edit it's headers. Is
: The soul is greater than the hum of its parts
Hi - this may seem like a silly question but.
Is it possible to receive all my mail into one folder, and then have Mutt move
it to seperate folders when it has been read or when I shut down?
A straight "yes" or "no" and a pointer to re
27 matches
Mail list logo
