On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:13:51PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
BTW, the use of the bright prefix was documented only for foreground
colors.
I've pushed my patch, with documentation. I tried to be rather
concise, without giving too many details.
Moreover, the "+ 8" is done only when the col
On 2018-12-18 16:03:38 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:40:33PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > With the suggestion I've just done in my reply to Derek, I can
> > propose for foreground colors:
> >
> > #colors < 16 >= 16
> > light A_BOLD + 8
> > bri
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:40:33PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
With the suggestion I've just done in my reply to Derek, I can
propose for foreground colors:
#colors < 16 >= 16
light A_BOLD + 8
bright A_BOLDA_BOLD(as currently)
and for background colors, both "l
On 2018-12-17 12:45:22 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:41:36AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > If one chooses to support "bold" for terminals with >= 16 colors,
> > I think that instead of "boldbright", the "bold" prefix would be
> > sufficient, because when the bold
On 2018-12-17 18:35:21 -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> In xterm, there are resources that affect how bold and italics are
> rendered on your terminal window. The problem, AFAIK, is that the
> gnome developers in their infinite wisdom decided to make
> gnome-terminal use xterm-256color by default, giv
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 05:15:07AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> In the Mutt manual:
>
>foreground can optionally be prefixed with the keyword bright to make
>the foreground color boldfaced (e.g., brightred).
>
> That's the way to do with xterm, where boldfaced mode is a way to get
> br
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:41:36AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
If one chooses to support "bold" for terminals with >= 16 colors,
I think that instead of "boldbright", the "bold" prefix would be
sufficient, because when the bold attribute is set, adding 8 or
not to the color number does not seem
On 2018-12-15 15:50:26 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 05:15:07AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> ...
> > For instance, in xterm, one uses
> >
> > tput bold; tput setaf 3; echo abcdef
> >
> > but in GNOME Terminal, one uses
> >
> > tput setaf 11; echo abcdef
> >
> > I
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 05:15:07AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
...
> For instance, in xterm, one uses
>
> tput bold; tput setaf 3; echo abcdef
>
> but in GNOME Terminal, one uses
>
> tput setaf 11; echo abcdef
>
> I assume that the reason is that xterm just has 8 colors:
You appear to be
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 05:15:07AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
In the Mutt manual:
foreground can optionally be prefixed with the keyword bright to make
the foreground color boldfaced (e.g., brightred).
That's the way to do with xterm, where boldfaced mode is a way to get
bright colors, b
In the Mutt manual:
foreground can optionally be prefixed with the keyword bright to make
the foreground color boldfaced (e.g., brightred).
That's the way to do with xterm, where boldfaced mode is a way to get
bright colors, but in GNOME Terminal, this does bold + bright colors.
IMHO, one s
11 matches
Mail list logo
