Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-12-01 Thread Adam Kennedy
Agreed on the leaking. I've had a quick look through what is there at the moment and have concluded that I'm best to start by refactoring the test suite. The current test suite has two separate copy and pasted test scripts for the XS and pure perl cases. If I diff between the various releases, it

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-12-01 Thread Adam Kennedy
Since my releases seem to have "regressed" issues that were "fixed" in the no-longer-existing 0.23 (and created problems for some people) my plan to not have to touch the actual code seem to have been derailed a bit. I'm going to see if I can apply some of the fixes suggested in RT, or reapply som

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-30 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/12/1 Adam Kennedy : > Agreed on the leaking. > > I've had a quick look through what is there at the moment and have > concluded that I'm best to start by refactoring the test suite. > > The current test suite has two separate copy and pasted test scripts > for the XS and pure perl cases. If I

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-30 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/12/1 Adam Kennedy : > Since my releases seem to have "regressed" issues that were "fixed" in > the no-longer-existing 0.23 (and created problems for some people) my > plan to not have to touch the actual code seem to have been derailed a > bit. > > I'm going to see if I can apply some of the f

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-30 Thread David Golden
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Adam Kennedy wrote: > I'll try to replicate on a 5.8.8 system later today, but this should > not change your priority (although the existence of a Critical > Twiki-breaking bug might). Isn't it just so tempting to stall on 5.8.X bugs until April 20, 2011 ... :-)

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-30 Thread Adam Kennedy
Oh, the other 0.24, right. Will look into it. Adam K On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Jens Rehsack wrote: > 2010/11/29 Adam Kennedy : >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Jens Rehsack >> wrote: >>> Can you please prove whether >>> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=63342 >>> is becau

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-30 Thread Adam Kennedy
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Can you please prove whether https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=63342 > is because of your changes and answer the ticket accordingly? > >> Nothing I've changed has any effect on the module itself, and Jens >> should be able to continu

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-29 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/11/29 Adam Kennedy : > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> Can you please prove whether https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=63342 >> is because of your changes and answer the ticket accordingly? >> >>> Nothing I've changed has any effect on the module itself, and J

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-29 Thread David Golden
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Anyway - I vote for changing the workflow: CPAN admins should not be > allowed to add themself as a secondary. > > I'm fine with everything else of this chaos so far :) As a new admin, I don't know what past precedent is, but I do agree that,

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-29 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/11/29 Adam Kennedy : > Hi gang > > This is mainly a mistake on my part. > > I'd spoken before Tassilo about doing some updated releases to fix the > packaging issues, and he was fine with it. > > When I looked at the permissions last week to do so, I saw Jens as the > primary. But when I looke

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-28 Thread Adam Kennedy
Hi gang This is mainly a mistake on my part. I'd spoken before Tassilo about doing some updated releases to fix the packaging issues, and he was fine with it. When I looked at the permissions last week to do so, I saw Jens as the primary. But when I looked at his page it appeared that he had nev

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-28 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/11/28 brian d foy : > [[ This message was both posted and mailed: see >   the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] This is not a private talk. I have no objections if this is public readable. > In article > , Jens > Rehsack wrote: > > >> It took me a while to get the maintai

Re: List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-28 Thread brian d foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article , Jens Rehsack wrote: > It took me a while to get the maintainership from Tassilo, but in late Summer > I > received the permissions. Now I've seen that Adam hast co-maintainer

List::MoreUtils maintainership

2010-11-25 Thread Jens Rehsack
Hi CPAN Modules managers, it looks like we have some trouble regarding List::MoreUtils. It took me a while to get the maintainership from Tassilo, but in late Summer I received the permissions. Now I've seen that Adam hast co-maintainership (new) without anyone asked me, wrote me a mail or anythi