2010/12/1 Adam Kennedy <a...@ali.as>: > Since my releases seem to have "regressed" issues that were "fixed" in > the no-longer-existing 0.23 (and created problems for some people) my > plan to not have to touch the actual code seem to have been derailed a > bit. > > I'm going to see if I can apply some of the fixes suggested in RT, or > reapply some of the fixes from 0.23. If I can't knock out a decent > test-passing dev release I'm then going to rip out the leaking XS > versions of the functions as damage control. > > Alternatively, if Jens plans to work on it straight away then I'll yield.
Current plan of order of tasks: - finish current task (SQL::Statement / DBI-bundled Pure-Perl-DBD's) - Proc::ProcessTable code merge from current $work on libstatgrab (make it thread-safe, all fields available on all OS, ...) - List::MoreUtils (first (re)write tests to cover leak-test, then fix and go on business as usual) > I'll see how far I can get now, but won't push a stable release > without Jens' approval. The meanwhile deleted releases had other issues - all XS related. I studied a bit since I got maintainership - should be easy to fix >:-) >From my point of view, nothing beyond 0.22 didn't work for real. I hope I get P::PT managed this year, but could require some weeks at start of 2011. So you have a rough time line. I suggest you don't try to fix the leaks without tests :) Jens > Adam K > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:27 PM, David Golden <xda...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Adam Kennedy <a...@ali.as> wrote: >>> I'll try to replicate on a 5.8.8 system later today, but this should >>> not change your priority (although the existence of a Critical >>> Twiki-breaking bug might). >> >> Isn't it just so tempting to stall on 5.8.X bugs until April 20, 2011 ... >> :-) >> >> -- David >> >
