Haleema Hamza wrote:
> Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem,
> Assalamo Alaikum,
Hey, maybe this guy can help the project get some donations. >;->
"DEAR MY DEAREST FRIEND:
I am MARY DE RAADT, wife of deceased Canadian software developer
Theo de Raadt, in need of your Christian assistance. I have a lar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security is everything you've ever said, plus a process.
If it is secure, it doesn't need a process. So why would security be a
process again? Because of the vendors making "mistakes" and fix it later?
Jimmy Scott
It is a "process" in the same way that "making toast
Question: Is there any really outstanding reason why a suitably-
licensed database or fork thereof, e.g. PostgreSQL, couldn't be fully
integrated into the OpenBSD distribution? Alternately, is there any
reason why a small-scale SQLish database couldn't be implemented for
OpenBSD? (Ex: "Theo th
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Don't the OpenBSD developers already work hard enough, that now we
are supposed to do even more boring business oriented things for you
all?
Every release, more people download OpenBSD and fewer people buy OpenBSD.
But the solution is not to make OpenBSD developers "web bus
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Wow, free advice as to how I can spend my time. Aren't you kind? Want
some advice from me?
Yes, I _am_ full of grandmotherly kindness, as well as invariably
excellent advice. It is well that you realize this. In this instance,
that advice was "Do not spurn good ideas",
David Hill wrote:
If you want PostgreSQL, install it from the ports tree.
What is wrong with dump/restore and using tar for a backup solution?
Thank you, I am well aware of the fact that it can be installed from
the ports tree. Going back and _reading_ the original post, we find
that _that
Chris Kuethe wrote:
I was just about to say "SQLite". From their web page: "Sources are in
the public domain. Use for any purpose." see
http://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html
SQLite might be easier, indeed.
I don't think the actual requirement is for any particular server,
although I note that
Jason Dixon wrote:
Why do these wackos come out of the woodwork every 6 months to "help"
the project?
I never said I was here to "help". I wasn't even the one who had this
idea, recall.
However, I do not think that the idea advanced - by one Will H. Backman,
remember? - of having something i
According to the manpages, MegaRAID controllers are "supported" using
the ami(4) driver. However, I have heard some things to the contrary.
Therefore, I am uncertain and will ask the question:
ATTENTION ALL OPENBSD USERS!
If you POSSESS or HAVE PERSONALLY WITNESSED any of the following cards
FU
The MetaStore is at this point essentially complete, save for content.
There are links on the page to assist in populating it. There are
about 20 pieces of hardware featured on this: IT NEEDS MORE.
I have received several bits and pieces of information, but to make
this more useful, I need even
jared r r spiegel wrote:
i'd VERY much like to see someone put up a short little www-type
( or whatever ) illustration of how they were really experiencing
a service-affecting performance degredation which was solved by
the use of 'quick' in their ruleset.
For what it's worth, I've ne
OpenBSD users:
In light of the recent post about ath(4) D-Link cards of particular
revision numbers not functioning properly, anyone who has the following
cards and can verify their functionality under some version of OpenBSD,
please inform me of that fact:
D-Link DWL-G520
D-Link DWL-G650
Senao
The MetaStore has been updated - comments are now enabled, you can post
comments under each item listed. Drivers for hardware are also listed.
Some other categories have been added, and some other stuff has changed
in the background.
Also, some new items have been added. The more hardware that
New stuff has been added. Thanks to those who provided me information
on the Plextor PX-716A, the RouterBoard rb44, the Zonet ZEW2500p, and
the SysKonnect SK-98xx series.
A problem with Internet Explorer (naw, really?) that was reported to me
as preventing comments from being added has been fixe
matt valdes wrote:
$ telnet www.sdeath.net 80
Trying 64.4.231.19...
Connected to www.sdeath.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
Try a traceroute or tcptraceroute
Nah, he's probably bouncing off my router. While I don't think he's
running afoul of my OpenBSD pf-friendly auto-retrieval and aggregat
Lars Hansson wrote:
Our ip addresses are assigned from TWNIC, even though we're not actually in
Taiwan, so that's probably why. The CIDR blocks in question is 203.65.244.0/22
and 203.65.248.0/22.
# cb findip 203.65.244.1 203.65.248.1
Netblock 203.64.0.0/14 is in country TW (TAIWAN)
Netblock 20
Martin Schrvder wrote:
On 2005-10-13 07:15:26 -0800, Szechuan Death wrote:
there's nothing I care about in Taiwan enough to do so. Alternately,
Then stop buying anything manufactured in Taiwan (or China).
HTH. HAND.
Martin
I'm sorry - by what theory do you claim that I have
frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:15:26AM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
Yup, looks like. Sorry, Charlie. Take a flight to Taipei and snuff
a spammer or scriptkiddie, if everybody does that TW can be put back on
the "Civilized Net Nation" list. Argumen
Rico wrote:
If you need anything - write the stuff yourself, if you can't then just
ask nicely, otherwise buy hardware that is supported or run something
that works on your hardware - it's your choise!
[...]
Many of us experience the same as you! I too have experienced hardware
that isn't sup
Daniel A. Ramaley wrote:
I submitted the Adaptec 1205 SA to your list. I put it in my OpenBSD 3.7
machine and it just worked.
The drive plugged into the 1205 is wd1. I believe these are the relevant
dmesg lines:
pciide1 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "CMD Technology SiI3112 SATA" rev
0x02: DMA
frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:01:18PM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
This has been a public service announcement, paid for by the "Friends
of Civilized Vendors" economic-action committee. The FCV reminds you;
FCV also stands for "Fuck Closed Vendors!&qu
Okay, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having heard the whining about my apparently unpopular
policy WRT netblocks in certain filthy, spammer-ridden Third World
shitholes that should be nuked from orbit to protect the Internet
from their miserable spams, SSH scans, and generally bogus traffic,
and after searchi
Gordon Grieder wrote:
Why block access to your website in an attempt to block spam? Spam
harvesters? If so it's pointless, these lists are archived all over the
net, your address is already out there.
No, I just block netblocks because I don't care about any traffic
from those countries, whose
Jason Dixon wrote:
I have no intention of starting a flamewar with you, so please take this
as constructive criticism, not a throwing down of the gauntlet, as it
were.
Tragically, it is not constructive, and yes, it is very much a request
for a flamewar. It contains nothing of value; it can
Jason Dixon wrote:
Good luck with that MetaStore thing. I'm sure it's going to be a huge
success.
Thank you, although the goal is not that it be a "success" for me,
but rather that it will provide useful information to OpenBSD users
and assistance to the OpenBSD development team in negotia
Okay, misc: As near as I can tell (been talking with Alexey offlist),
one of the things he wants is to get an OpenBSD router to not decrement
the TTL for packets that it is forwarding. That behavior seems to me
to be against RFCs, but I'll ask on the off chance that it's there:
is there an option
Szechuan Death wrote:
> Okay, misc: As near as I can tell (been talking with Alexey offlist),
Okay, misc, I'm a dumbass. My Russian is really remarkably rusty.
Alexey wants to prevent some benighted ISP from counting hosts behind
a NAT device; the problem is that they're wise to
Darrin Chandler wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
In light of all the recent activity on misc about "will OpenBSD run on
X?" perhaps someone would like to host a wiki for strange/new hardware?
Travers
Are you volunteering?
It wasn't long ago that the "OpenBSD Metastore" got going, amid some
con
Chris Zakelj wrote:
I am currently using a Belkin F5D7000, version 3001, as a wifi host in
my firewall. dmesg snippet:
ral0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "Ralink RT2560" rev 0x01: irq 12, address
00:11:50:14:f6:a0
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2560 (rev 0x04), RF RT2525
and from ifconfig:
ral0: flags=8943 mtu 1
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Ray Lai wrote:
>> I thought you meant you could do something like:
>>
>> block in log-table to port 25
>>
>> where is updated automatically.
>
> If you read on the PF and look at what I send you, you will see that
> IS updated automatically.
>
> That's what the line
Chris Smith wrote:
> But with max-src-conn-rate aren't you actually allowing connections? The
> first I want to do is block connections, not allow them. Will use of
> max-src-conn-rate work with a block? With attempted connections that
> never get allowed?
A "block" rule will just block all co
31 matches
Mail list logo
