I just installed an old compaq desktop that I intend to use as a
webserver. I haven't installed anything on it yet, it's using vanilla
4.2-RELEASE.
Twice now, I've booted it and left it running, intending to ssh in and
work on it, except I've found that I couldn't because it's crashed on
me. It has
it
is, so it must be better!). Otherwise, treat it as just part of
your daily mails.
(Interestingly, your subject line auto-filed your message into my
"Insecurity Reports" folder, and it rather concerned me that a new
message suddenly arrived there. :)
Nick.
; backed by files, svnd devices backed by whole disks and disk partitions
> are extremely slow.
This is really really really weird. You'd think that files, having the
filesystem to go through before getting to the disk, would necessarily
be slower. There must be some kind of weirdness with the thing.
-Nick
ask one novice question and you become an expert on mail list
etiquette? You have the nerve to dictate how people help you for free?
You can't imagine how offensive that is.
I've got a really interesting idea for a filter...
Nick.
On 11/16/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am playing with softraid. So far it seems very good.
>
Hijacking the thread a bit: Do all your disks need to be the same size
to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
about that.
-Nick
.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=softraid&sektion=4
It would help to read this too:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=bioctl&sektion=8
-Nick
On 11/16/07, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:01:13AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
> >
> > Hijacking the thread a bit: Do all your disks need to be the same size
> > to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
On 11/16/07, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
> just use svnd with a file.
Yeah but doesn't this hint at some horrible inefficiency in the stack somewhere?
-Nick
On Nov 17, 2007 12:14 PM, David Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What is a convenient way for me to get the source for the man pages in
> current?
Something like find /usr/src -path "*/man/*" ?
hould put your preferred repository at the
> > front,
> > and less wanted stuff later: if pkg_add finds something in the
> > preferred
> > repository, it won't even look at the rest.
>
>
> So something is apparently wrong then.
I saw this bug two years ago when I first started with OpenBSD. I
assumed I was doing something wrong and forgot about it.
things to try: are you sure the second repository has the package you need?
-Nick
t should also be documented in faq8.html, I'll
try to fix that this evening. :)
Nick.
passwd file.
You have a regular "user" at line 24...that's been a while since a
regular user popped up that early in the file. You probably have got
lots of problems there. Fortunately, it is pretty easy to rebuild.
Just save a copy of your current version, and after the dust settles,
copy over the individual users you need (and watch for wraps!).
And ONLY those users...
Nick.
problem is IN that file, and not a systemic problem,
which is not out of the question, considering the other apparent damage
to it. Then do what we will do and chew through the file and figure
out why it isn't working.
Nick.
On 11/22/07, Pieter Verberne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to install gnome-doc-utils :
>
> $ sudo pkg_add gnome-doc-utils
> perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> LC_ALL = (unset),
> LC_CTYPE = "en_US.U
See
http://www.openbsd.org/armish.html
That port is primarily meant for the zaurus devices, but it's possible
you could adapt it (and write drivers for it) to elsewhere.
-Nick
pt that gets run at the end of /etc/rc
Put your calls in rc.local
or make /etc/rc.mydaemons and call it from /etc/rc
or something.
It's a pretty simple system.
-Nick
es
a lot of output, which you may be misinterpreting as "changes", even
though it was just a progress report. ("-q" is your friend. usually).
If you really are getting large numbers of actual changes, you probably
aren't working with a -stable tree. If you didn't intend to, that's life,
lots of changes are made to the tree every day. If you did intend to,
your process is wrong, because you aren't. :)
Nick.
..
> MATH WORKS BITCHES!
'poor dude' probably never even tried... did you actually read the comic?
meh. I find it more interesting that "BSD" appearently defaults to
OpenBSD and not FreeBSD here.
-Nick
that user logs off the vmware
> host the guest computer will shutoff.
>
> In order for it to be available at all times, it should be running in the
> local system context OR a specially created user. Then it runs regardless of
> the login status of the person who clicks the start button on the vmware
> console.
And if the admin is being uncooperative, take your business elsewhere.
-Nick
ke
install". -stable has the advantage that old binaries and new binaries are
"compatible".
Now, if the power had gone out mid-way through, you might have some nasty
messed up files, but if you just lost console, things should be more-or-less
intact.
Nick.
two times and both times it
>> worked. Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
>>
>
> Either you knew everything then or you got incredibly lucky.
If we define "Guru" as one who knows the wisdom of the creator, Art is
no guru.
He's a creator. :)
Nick.
On Nov 26, 2007 9:56 PM, badeguruji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just discovered by chance that, someone is
> constantly trying to break into my openbsd box from:
,...
>
> whois details on each IP go to South America, Bangkok,
> Taiwan... all over the world! Although i have sent
> email to the em
ENBSD_4_2 -Pd
you really want a -d in there. Pretty much mandatory if you are using
the source tar files.
OpenBSD docs are rather good, but IMO, "http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html";
could be simplified somewhat.
try http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html instead. (yeah, there's some
redundancy that should be eliminated).
Nick.
dering if your USB port isn't putting out the juice needed to
spin it up fast enough, and you get the timeouts. If you have to wait
for a POST and a OS boot, it probably has plenty of time to get to speed.
Nick.
http://www.wiroth.net/images/netbeans.png
>
> How can I solve this problem in netbeans?
Looks like a font problem. I'm guessing Netbeans is trying to use
fonts you don't have installed?
Can you change the font preferences anywhere in Netbeans?
-Nick
On Nov 29, 2007 10:07 AM, Yuri Spirin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, misc.
>
> I wonder, is there some software that could show me in top(1) manner
> which files are accessed most intensively right now and by which
> process/user? The main question I wish to answer is why my OpenBSD/4.2
> rout
his is what I will do right now on a 16MB machine just for the experience.
> It seems partition magic only creates linux partitions AFAICT.
>
>> 8mb won't work for openbsd without trickery that you want to get near.
>> I believe these days 24 is about the lower limit. Nick corr
ceived a bit of bad advice from someone else), or if they have tried
to raise a stink about getting two copies of a response (do that, I'll
make sure you get two copies from me! :). Sometimes, the direct
response is faster, sometimes the mailing list is faster (if the
recipient is using greylisting, for example).
A further arguement:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Nick.
You
have to change the server's settings (or hack dhclient I guess) to
give you this ability.
-Nick
. But now I've seen it on other systems too, so I'm
wondering what's up.
Has anyone else seen this behaviour?
I've search the archives with "netstat hang" and "netstat freeze" and
found nothing.
-Nick
On 12/4/07, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:05:31PM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
> > Hi misc,
> >
> > I noticed way back with 3.8 that netstat would sometimes hang on me
> > for a very long time (over two minutes) before spi
may
be able to use a binary blob linux client under linux emulation to
make it work (but that it'll be kind of lame).
You might be able to run another database as a wrapper around the
oracle one? e.g. see
http://www.sqlmag.com/Article/ArticleID/22264/sql_server_22264.html ?
-Nick
it. Just
> > curious about this... is the process described someplace?
>
> No. OpenBSD doesn't sign code.
Well, there's the MD5 files (e.g.
http://openbsd.arcticnetwork.ca/pub/OpenBSD/4.2/i386/MD5).
but yeah, for the most part OpenBSD doesn't need it.
-Nick
y flakey.
Still, it's a good point. OpenBSD manages to boot so quickly even
though it has all drivers enabled and running at boot--though I'm not
sure if it's always "under a minute".
-Nick
On 12/5/07, badeguruji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On solaris, i can do:
>
> grep /var/sadm/install/contents
>
> and see whether it is installed or not, also location
> etc.
>
> But, How can i do it on OB? where is the system map?
> to see whether/where is installed.
>
> Thanks in adv
iles for the main distribution, and for
packages.. well the official OpenBSD mirrors are all trustworthy--if
they aren't, it will be discovered and they will no longer be official
mirrors.
This isn't a great answer, I know.
-Nick
On Dec 5, 2007 2:23 PM, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/5/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Come on... twice a year and get the benefit of not being excluded from
> > company policies which require digital signature of software downloaded
> > through the inte
nbsd :-))
Oh? What story is that? I can't google it.
> Maybe the faq needs a prequel in front of it - if you are not willing
> to do the work, don't use openbsd.
Doesn't it already have that, pretty much?
-Nick
f my machines,
I found nothing I wouldn't be more than happy to post to the Internet,
other than the rather anemic specs might be a bit embarrassing, but I
found that I was glad I didn't have to have root privs to look at
them.
Nick.
sides not really giving a chance to
listen to the other. He finds BSDers abrasive; Funny, I've more found
linux to be the bastion of irritating screechy fanbois. This is a sign
that we (myself included) don't all have the overall picture. "we"
call him 'sheer stupid' for being overzealous with "No security bugs"?
Well how far removed, really, is that claim from "Only two remote
holes in the default install, in more than 10 years!"?
But I don't want to get into personality debates again.
-Nick
ve decentralized systems/methods for this. There's no way
to combine data together, the best you can do is share techniques
which you can verify with your own logic -- except for blacklists like
SPEWS, and even then there are all sorts of politics and troubles.
-Nick
On Dec 7, 2007 1:03 PM, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> badeguruji wrote:
> > I am getting constant hacking attempt into my computer
> > from following IPs. Although, I have configured my ssh
> > config and tcp-wrappers to deny such attempts. But I
> > wish some expert soul in this comm
Since you are using QEMU,
it most likely counts as a "new disk". Make sure you either answer "y"
to the "Use entire disk" or "Reinit" the drive in fdisk to put down a
valid MBR before.
I'm not sure if #2 will give you that message, I do believe error #1
will.
Nick.
untryName_min = 2
> countryName_max = 2
^ your country name is not set to 'US' like you think it is?
-Nick
kernel built for (which was needed
for a driver not in GENERIC), but once running, it is pretty solid.
I won't even try to build a system with it until I get around to
slowing it down/putting better RAM in it.
Nick.
me know.
Appearently you have to make sure to plug into the frontmost port for
some unknown reason.
Also I've seen USB keyboards not get along with bsd.rd before, so
you'll have to make sure the one you're using works.
-Nick
actually look, you will see that the old files are stored
in the "Attic", where they can be referred to in the future, should
the need arise.
Nick.
y because the disks are different
sizes, so you'll have to re-disklabel manually. Plug the scsi into an
extra box OpenBSD box you have lying around (you have extras, right?).
fdisk and disklabel the scsi. Mount its partitions somewhere (I
suggested /mnt/$part but you can pick).
Does this help?
-Nick
tware won't teach
> users that non-free is ok by giving an example: not distributing it.
Since when was propaganda honourable?
> > always going to be someone respected taking shots at you. Talking
> > about it gets noting accomplished.
>
> Neither does bullshitting about it.
Exactly.
-Nick
says "Option to
preserve file timestamps on downloads (all protocols)" (and it makes
sftp look like ftp, so you can push for using a secure set up). It's
not a function of the server at all.
-Nick
t your site on you ("modify software they use") then you are
violating the Four Freedoms and the GPL.
Is any of that anywhere near reality?
Argh, the GPL is so ridiculously complex; nobody understands it. The
main attraction open source has for me is that I *don't have to think
about licensing shit*, and GNU (especially now with GPLv3) miss that
goal completely.
-Nick
nto an untrusted network, boot up,
get your macbook booted with a malicious kernel.
-Nick
ith the free GNU/Linux distros.
Sir, it was brought up that the linux distributions you do suggest do
often include in their ports systems non-free software. See e.g.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119726055819074&w=2
What do you say to that? Was that a lie or a mistake?
Respectfully,
-Nick
, shouldn't the default configuration change to address their
> requirements and to make it more user friendly?
Well what are you going to change it to? OpenBSD is used globally.
Perhaps an extra step in the installer, or something implied from
setting the timezone, but you can't presume where it will be used like
that.
-Nick
ng the service you're relying on, isn't it?
What's the worry? That who uses OpenBSD will be trackable through ntp
by what pool they use?
-Nick
On Dec 10, 2007 4:02 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-10 19:39]:
> > That is sure 100% true. I was just trying to be sensitive to the request
of
> > the ntp.org itself asking not to do so. There is multiple zone and as
such
> > it would b
RC, can I tell OpenBSD the
> > > bios time zone?
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=111956694726618&w=2
> >
> Thanks, but I can NOT open the page, could you excerpt for me ?
Really? What's wrong? Are you in China?
-Nick
On Dec 11, 2007 11:26 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 12:58 AM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 2007/12/11, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On Dec 10, 2007 9:58 PM, Dongsheng Song <[E
tu.com/community/ubuntustory/components
Um, that first link says "Restricted removed". So presumably they mean
gNewSense = Ubuntu.Universe - Ubuntu.Restricted
-Nick
e ports
> > tree would be useful.
>
> PERMIT_*=(not Yes)
The infrastructure is all there, it's just not emphasized.
-Nick
On 12/11/07, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Guenther wrote:
> > On Dec 11, 2007 12:30 AM, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Curious problem here, though I'm probably missing something obvious. I
> >> have apm enabl
M in production, what happens if you
do an FTP install? I suspect that will work fine.
2) If you need a CDROM, try a dull, ordinary PATA drive
3) if you need THAT CDROM drive, try a snapshot.
I do believe I have heard there may still be some issues on SATA
CD/DVD drives. Don't quote me on that.
Nick.
Alexander Hall wrote:
...
Apache is chrooted by default, making `apachectl restart' unusable for
quite some time.
It should be in the archives and possibly in the FAQ.
it is (and has been for quite some time)...
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#httpdchroot
Nick.
se on people!
You might have meant "I don't think it is wrong in general to get
permission from the original authors to relicense code from BSD to
GPL" but it doesn't sound like that.
And in *all* cases it is useful not to do so, because you should
always be trying to integrate fixes upstream.
-Nick
On 12/10/07, Mayuresh Kathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey Nick, sorry to go against you, but do take a look at;
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/gnu/usr.bin/sudo/
> >
> > It's been eliminated since there's a replacement by Todd under
gt; for everything.
>
> I love this one. May be will need a bob.c along side the theo.c soon
> too! (;>
Only if Theo decides to make OpenBSD an "Adult" operating system, and I
don't mean you need the wisdom of age to understand it. :)
Nick.
On Dec 14, 2007 10:45 AM, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's not that clear if it is, at least on the version of OpenBSD 4.2 I
> have. It's very much a plain vanilla setup however, /etc/sysctl.conf says:
> #vm.swapencrypt.enable=0 # 0=Do not encrypt pages that go to swap
>
> To me
On Dec 14, 2007 5:09 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But I would also like you to answer my emails, especially this one:
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119741909911558&w=2
>
> However, because of your offer, I will send mail to try to find the
> message that URL refers
new_guy wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just received an old Sun Netra T1 (105) that has an older version of
> Solaris (SunOS 5.9). It has two 18GB SCSI drives, no cd or floppy drives.
> There is a serial/LOM port that I can access and dual Ethernet ports. I can
> get the ok prompt (Stop-A), the LOM promp
; speaking of a single person, but the language has evolved.
>
Actually, it just came back to it's roots:
http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/linghebr/austheir.html
But now we're offtopic.
-Nick
(WHY oh WHY do some websites where all I'm
interested in is downloading an application and reading documentation
a: insist that I log in at all, b: have a password of 37 or more
characters, mixed case, odd punctuation, three digits and want to
know when my mother gave up her virginity?)
If you follow the above advice, you will not be guaranteed quality code,
but I can assure you your project will take much longer and cost more
than management was hoping. And this is why shit happens.
Nick.
e-or-port-tp14375855p14375855.html
> Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It's easy to search ports:
# cd /usr/ports
# make search key=gnupg
This is in the ports(7) manpage.
-Nick
On 12/18/07, Przemys3aw Pawe3czyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I bring up the subject once more. I tried to compile Open Object Rexx
> for the n-th time but to no avail. It seems it needs Xalan program. I
> tried to go for it but it needs Xerces C++ files for compilation, and so
> on.
>
> [
e is that those lines say "rejected", but the
configuration file there is configured to reject 192.168.0.1
I haven't touched dhclient.conf, and this has been happening since 3.8 to 4.2.
I don't know if this is a bug or just something confusing. Has anyone
else ever seen this?
-Nick
On Dec 19, 2007 7:53 PM, Kian Mohageri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 10:26 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've seen this problem intermittently before. Every once in a while,
> > this happens (the adapter it happens on doesn&#
lly ready:
http://www.ropersonline.com/openbsd/xen/
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119801138304744&w=2
-Nick
On Dec 21, 2007 6:26 PM, Kian Mohageri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 8:25 PM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 2007 7:53 PM, Kian Mohageri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Dec 19, 2007 10:26 AM, Nick Guenther <[
r an example. But ultimately, people who write bad software
will do it on any platform, with any set of tools. Make it easier, you
just get more bad software.
Nick.
johan beisser wrote:
On Dec 24, 2007, at 12:34 AM, Lord Sporkton wrote:
i could be wrong but here is my 2 cents:
ive seen something like this related to upnp, i would venture to guess
your 2 friends have routers which support upnp and so far as i know
openbsd does not support upnp.
I would su
een the -current version of
/etc/master.passwd and the early versions (say, OpenBSD 3.0). Easy
to see where conflicts would start to occur.
Nick.
t
sourcecode to make it run on OpenBSD. Download ports.tar.gz, extract
it (into /usr/ports, canonically) and read the Makefile for the
program you want. It'll have the URL you want.
-Nick
to reinstall a -release
> every year... although I'll still buy CDs as they are released to support
> the project.
What you probably want is to go the upgrade-every-6-months route.
-Nick
e anything else I can do to avoid
slapping my forehead and saying, "D'oh! Forgot to ..." before I
ship it out fully detached? The good news is I'm pretty sure
there is at least one OpenBSD developer near-by, but that's just
all the more reason to make sure I don't screw it up, I'll never
live it down. :)
Nick.
cessing. This is good.
> 3) I hate spamassassin and I love dspam and its statistical filtering
> math. But alas, the project is largely unmaintained and dying. What
> alternative do I have in combating spam by textual analysis, context
> sensitive Bayesian techniques and so on?
Assuming this is a personal mail server, first of all, see how much
gets through spamd. If not much, use your delete key for the rest.
IF you really have a problem, then get fancy. Don't make your life
difficult if you don't have a problem.
Nick.
er memory than me (entirely possible) or you are missing
out on some good stuff, and not just things that changed.
(I have had people say to me, "Hey, you are just looking at the
docs, I thought you knew this?" "I WROTE the docs. Doesn't mean
I remember anything more than 'where to look'".)
Nick.
nd you thought those distributed computing projects were "free"...)
(my Wattmeter reads only to the nearest 1W, so all those figures are
+/-1W on top of whatever the accuracy of the thing is.)
(the hard disk is installed on this thing so I can start imaging
and making additional flash cards o
But as a stopgap, look into rm -P (on OpenBSD). Linux has "shred" too.
On Dec 31, 2007 1:25 PM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grind them up. There is nothing else you can do to "permanently" wipe
> disks. Residual magnetism is always there provided good enough
> equipment. If you
ingress on tun0. By the time it hits rl1, it is OpenVPN traffic.
Any recommendations on how to handle this?
--
Nick Golder
the system as you can.
The fewer packages you have installed, the fewer special cases you will have
to deal with. The fewer cutesie-crap apps you put in your servers, the less
often you will have to take down your servers because of cutesie-crap bugs.
Nick.
Erik Wikstrvm wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am setting up a OpenBSD box to act as a router/file-server for my
> parents, the box consists mostly of old parts and I try to not spend any
> extra money on it. One of my biggest worries is, since it will act as a
> file-server which will contain stuff with some em
but not always).
What you have here clobbers your MBR, which holds your (now hosed)
fdisk partitions.
see faq4.html.
Nick.
lity of data loss.
How would you verify the whole disk is readable? And if it's all
readable, how do you ensure the data is still the same pattern you put
on before?
-Nick
uld choke your app and cause Bad Things
to happen.
The sad thing is you are being more careful with your system design than
your bank probably is. :-/ By the time you are running OpenBSD on your
banking computer, I suspect you have shifted the primary risk to the
other end of the wire...your bank is a bigger risk to your data than you
are.
Nick.
dered a crime trying to do or giving
> you tips how to do this (incitement).
>
>
> So don't expect any answer on this list.
>
That's a lame law. Information should be free, trust the people to do
what's right, &c.
Though I wouldn't help in this case, since it's obvious the OP does
want to just steal wifi, and helping him do that without teaching him
is a waste of everyone's time.
-Nick
On Jan 7, 2008 7:22 AM, knitti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/4/08, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How would you verify the whole disk is readable? And if it's all
> > readable, how do you ensure the data is still the same pattern you put
> >
ing and why you are
concerned about it, then maybe we can help you.
Lies, damned lies, statistics, benchmarks, RMS.
The only benchmark that matters is YOUR application, usually in
production.
Nick.
Make sure that the windows 2003 firewall isn't set up to block web
access. It's caught me out before in the past, although that was on
SBS2003.
See if you can telnet to port 80 from the OpenBSD firewall to the
external interface on the windows box.
On 8 Jan 2008, at 17:04, Sewan wrote:
change to this web
> server (2003-apache-php one) it don't work
>
>
Can you get at the windows web server from inside the router itself?
-Nick
On Jan 8, 2008 8:53 PM, Kevin Stam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at a response [2] on a message posted on Libtorrent-devel, I
> believe it is not an OpenBSD-only situation:
>
> "/me marks another notch on the list of kernels and compilers
> r/libtorrent has killed..."
>
> Either all of the v
e in the direction of what to look at or give
> me any ideas of what could be going wrong.
>
When you build your new kernel you also need to change config(8) to
"set root on raid0". fstab isn't read until *after* the root is
mounted, remember; how is it going to know to read from
raid0a:/etc/fstab if the file to tell it that is raid0a:/etc/fstab?
-Nick
1101 - 1200 of 2677 matches
Mail list logo
