Hi loic,
Sorry for top posting.
I need exactly the same for OpenBSD. Maybe we could work together... In my
example all I need on top of it is some same network config and a first puppet
run after reboot...
But I hesitated to modify bsd.rd...
Maybe it's more wise to create a "netboot.rd" and let bs
Am 13.08.2013 um 10:07 schrieb Don Jackson
:
> Later, Nick did this:
>
> redux - fully automated OpenBSD installation - hiqu.biz
>
> We failed to get any sort of buy in to this approach into the main
> distribution…
>
This is sad :-/
For any mass deployment I need this... I was okay with doin
for debian. My first
scripted OpenBSD install was based on that.
Am 13.08.13 13:52, schrieb Nick Holland:
On 08/13/13 07:13, Marian Hettwer wrote:
...
This is sad :-/ For any mass deployment I need this... I was okay
with doing it semi automated for the first three boxes at work. But
nowaday
Hi Loic,
Am 13.08.13 15:43, schrieb � Blot:
Hello Marian,
i think you are right, because bsd.rd is required for last chance to
repair system, among others.
right. And I'd like to leave it untouched. This hopefully also increases
the possibility that whatever we come up with might get added
Am 13.08.2013 um 19:08 schrieb Johan Beisser :
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>> Hi Loic,
>>
>>
>> Am 13.08.13 15:43, schrieb � Blot:
>
>>
>> PS.: personal opinion: I like FAI (www.fai.org) much more then debians
>>
For FreeBSD: stay on -RELEASE and use freebsd-update(8)
Nowadays no need to build world.
--
sent via my mobile C64
> Am 30.10.2013 um 03:44 schrieb David Noel :
>
> I started playing around with FreeBSD back in the 2.2.7 days. I'd
> describe myself as a casual desktop/workstation user. Back in
Am 2013-11-05 10:06, schrieb Peter Hessler:
On 2013 Nov 04 (Mon) at 17:14:57 -0500 (-0500), Predrag Punosevac
wrote:
:I was driving last night so I have not had much sleep. I just want to
:make sure that I am not hallucinating. Then minutes ago when I
installed
:the latest snapshot I was presen
Hi All and a happy new year,
got a short question here.
I'm building a home router from a blue box (embedded pc), which has 3 nics
(rl0, 1, 2).
Internet drops in via dhcp client on rl0. Now I got 2 NICs left and I'd
like to use them similar like a hub. Just use a cross over cable and plug
in 2 mor
stname.rl2
> up
>
> bridgename.bridge0:
> add rl1
> add rl2
> up
>
> Then add dhcpd_flags="rl1" to rc.conf.local, dhcpd will respond to
> requests on either interface since it's a bridge.
>
> -Nick
>
> Marian Hettwer wrote:
>> Hi All and
Hi,
Am 11.01.12 20:17, schrieb L. V. Lammert:
At 01:04 PM 1/11/2012, Barry Grumbine wrote:
Bite the bullet, upgrade, life is better at 5.0
Sorry, but *UPGRADING* isn't the question - the question is why locate
is not working properly.
No. You were advised to upgrade, since 4.3 is not suppo
Am 11.01.12 22:34, schrieb Ted Unangst:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 01:30 PM 1/11/2012, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
4.3 was released May 1, 2008. That's almost 4 years old software. What
are you expecting here? Someone to check out the code from that
version and deeply inspect what
Am 12.01.12 00:13, schrieb Philip Guenther:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
...
([foobar@bistromath]<~>)$ time sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
Password:
Ah, but that's *not* how locate.updatedb is invoked by the cronjob!
There's a reason I called
Hi All,
I'm trying to get a teamspeak server (linux binary) running under
OpenBSD 4.0
I already digged the archives and teamspeak forums and it looks like
nobody got it running yet.
Well, my thought was: If it runs under FreeBSD's linux emulation, why
shouldn't it run with OpenBSD's linux emul
Hi All,
I tried to setup a pf(4) based load balancer for some webservers.
I did follow the instructions from openbsd.org's pf FAQ.
However, I seem to make a stupid mistake and I can't see which one.
My Setup:
- OpenBSD 4.0 box, should be the load balancer
- 2 other boxes with official IP address
Hej Bryan,
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:32:43 -0500, Bryan Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
> Do you have a pass rule along with that rdr rule?
Nope. But IIRC it's pass in and pass out anyway by default. And I have no block
rule (yet) :)
Correct me if I'm wrong...
./Marian
Hej Stuart,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:52:15 +, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2007/01/18 09:17, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>> That doesn't make sense to me... why should the destination reply
> directly to the origin?
>
> That's because rdr only rew
Hi OpenBSD'lers,
I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers. So
far, everything is looking just perfect.
Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU and memory usage.
So I'd say: Thats great :)
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache acces
Gregory Edigarov schrieb:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
Okay... anybody with any usable suggestions?
There's the X-Forwarded-to Information in a http header, which can be
set via some software load balancers. However, those are operating on
the application layer, which pf isn't... too ba
Hej Berk,
Berk D. Demir schrieb:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip
of the request.
This is, to my knowledge, due to the fact that
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:51 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could also do an ugly hack which would consist of attaching a
second network on your servers and load balancers (provided they are in
the same (v)?lan) like 172.16.1.0/24 a
Hi,
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:21:13 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
the SYN to one of my webservers, and the webserver would send a
SYN-ACK back to me. But my machine, obviously ca
Hej Bob,
Bob Beck schrieb:
* Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 09:49]:
Hi OpenBSD'lers,
I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers. So
far, everything is looking just perfect.
Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU
Henning Brauer schrieb:
* Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 18:46]:
Ah... there we go.
I can't setup the webservers with their default gateway to my load
balancer. The boxes are dedicated servers and I have no possibility to
change the network settings.
These are ren
Hej Stuart,
Stuart Henderson schrieb:
On 2007/01/29 16:21, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Is there any possible way to get the real ip addresses in my apache
access log?
Readers who didn't see the earlier posts about setting this up, they're
here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=open
Hej there,
Xavier Mertens schrieb:
Hi *,
I've a problem with an Apache web server hit by f*cking spammers...
I would like to filter some URLs (unused but still used by the bots) *BEFORE*
they reach the httpd processes. What could be the best method? pf? something
else?
I had the same problem
Hi,
Karsten McMinn schrieb:
On 2/6/07, Xavier Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi *,
I've a problem with an Apache web server hit by f*cking spammers...
I would like to filter some URLs (unused but still used by the bots)
*BEFORE* they reach the httpd processes. What could be the
best method
Hi there,
atstake atstake schrieb:
I been given this Cisco VPN Client software version 4.8 where a
"vpnclient.ini" file needs to be imported and authentication is done
via username and password to a Cisco VPN gateway which (after
authentication) drops me off to the internal network.
ugh. That'
Toni Mueller schrieb:
Hi,
On Wed, 07.02.2007 at 19:08:46 +0100, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had the same problem with botnets, attacking a specific URL. Even
sending out 404 errors didn't help at all.
I wouldn't recommend the pf overload feature, as this depend
If you've never heard of it, chances are you've spent too much time in
a stupid corporate messaging environment or using a retarded email
client from a vendor that thinks they have to reinvent the conventions
that electronic mail has followed for decades.
I must be using a retarded mail client t
Hej Timo,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:34:41 +0200, Timo Schoeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus Juan Miscaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake on Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:21:27
> -0400 (EDT):
>
>> My findings:
>>
>> $ which mailq
>> /usr/bin/mailq
>>
>> $ ls -l /usr/bin/mailq
>> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel21B M
Hi Pieter,
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:37:07 +0200, Pieter Verberne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> How do I rename multiple files at once? I want to rename a list of
> files like:
>
> file.jpg
> file1.jpg
> file_2.jpg
>
> to:
>
> file_thumb.jpg
> file1_thumb.jpg
> file_2_thumb.jpg
>
As
Hi All,
I'm using a Soekris box with OpenBSD 4.0 (sorry *g*) on my home soekris box.
Actual setup is one interface with a cable modem connected for internet use.
The cable modem provider talks dhcp, so no pppoe magic involved.
Now I do have an old second DSL provider lying around, which I basical
Gregory Edigarov schrieb:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
Hi All,
Question is:
How do I fiddle around with my routing table, that basically the wget
running on my router is using sis2 (with the pppoe uplink), while the
rest (my existing working lan) is still using sis0 with my good-guys
cable modem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Joco Salvatti wrote:
>
> 1. Why doesn't passwd ask superuser's current password when it's run
> by the superuser to change its own password? May not it be considered
> a serious security flaw?
No. If you are already root, you could add eas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Boling wrote:
> Wouldn't this be the main reason to use sudo?
>
Not at all.
If your box is not physically secure, even sudo wouldn't prevent an
attacker of joking around with your server...
Use sudo anyways, but keep your servers physically secu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Julian,
Julian Bolivar wrote:
>
> I use MySQL 5.0.18 and OpenBSD 3.9 for AMD64 and work fine, and I used
> a lot of insert / hour in it, using Innodb tables.
>
What means "a lot" ? Can you provide a mysqladmin status, or a show
status from mysql
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> mysql> status;
> --
> 44 Open tables: 455 Queries per second avg: 5.117
> --
>
>
>
> # dmesg
> OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>
> In the end, run what you fell comfortable with, but to the original
> question, is MySQL run good on OpenBSD.
>
> The answer to that is YES!
>
ACK :)
sorry, I was just out for some statistics. Did some not seri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej Daniel,
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
>> I'd love to have the time to give OpenBSD a chance on our production
>> system. Seems unlikely, since we're running Linux only :(
>
> Really, a c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej Rod,
on a side note...
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list.
I can't CC you. You're in the "To:" Header when I hit reply.
> Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.
oh. great!
> Your IP a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> garbage is third party garbage. One doesn't overlap the others. So if a
> third party package runs into a bug (security, stability, or otherwise),
> OpenBSD doesn't *have* to scramble to brin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
just a short question: Does anyone has OpenBSD 3.9 successfully up and
running on a Sun Cobalt RAQ4i ?
I searched the archives but couldn't find anything useful.
Background. A co-worker of mine wants to setup a DSL router for 8 to 12
people a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nico,
Nico Meijer wrote:
> Hi Marian,
>
>
>>just a short question: Does anyone has OpenBSD 3.9 successfully up and
>>running on a Sun Cobalt RAQ4i ?
>>I searched the archives but couldn't find anything useful.
>
>
> I don't think it can be done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:19:31PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
>
> ip is from the iproute2 package. From the lartc.org manual, ``Why
> iproute2?''[1]:
>
> Most Linux distributions, and most UNIX's, currently use t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I'm trying to pxeboot a Dell 1650 with OpenBSD 3.9. Console redirection
of the BIOS is running without problems and pxeboot gets transmitted via
tftp too.
When I type in "set tty com0", I get the following message:
com0 console not present
And
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej David,
David Golden wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 August 2006 13:00, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
> Don't have a Dell 1650 specifically, but most pre-boot "console redirection"
> I've seen on PCs is basically screen-scr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej David,
second reply, after checking the BIOS settings.
David Golden wrote:
>
> On our PC systems with redirection, there is a BIOS setting for when the
> redirection cuts out, something like:
> always
> pre-boot
> shared
> disabled
>
The Del
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/08/30 15:39, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
>>Redirection After Boot
>>
>>When I set the last paramter to disabled, I don't even see the pxeboot
>>(pxe bootloader) of OpenBSD. Logic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Replying to myself for the archives:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
> The Dell only knows 3 Parameters for console redirection to serial port:
>
> enabled / disabled (is set do "on" obviously)
> Remote Terminal Type: ANSI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Golden wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 August 2006 15:09, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
>
>>Linux can cope with this situation and OpenBSD can't.
>
>
> Hmph. Could well just be because linux (or at least syslinux)
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej Stuart,
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/08/30 16:10, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
>>
>>Did that. And also "set image bsd.rd" and "boot bsd.rd", as I can't see
>>anything at this point of my ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charles,
Charles M. Hannum wrote:
> popularity in 1993 and 1994) have suffered similar problems. FreeBSD
> and XFree86, for example, have both forked successor projects (Dragonfly
> and X.org) for very similar reasons.
I don't agree that Dragonf
Hi All,
first of all, thanks for the Feature to chroot sftp users. I've been
waiting for that one pretty long :)
Today I came back to that feature since I probably need it at work and
it'll be one more opportunity to not use a Linux system (Debian etch's
openssh is too old).
Anyway, back to the t
Hi there,
I succesfully installed OpenBSD 4.3 on above mentioned blade, using pxeboot
and bsd.rd
Everything went fine.
But after rebooting, the kernel crashes with some weird ACPI stuff.
Unluckily this bloody IBM blade has no serial console access, so all I can
provide is a screenshot:
http://criv
Hi Ioan,
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:29:00 +1000, "Ioan Nemes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> marian,
>
> try this:
>
> boot> boot -c
> disable apm
> disable acpi
> quit
>
yeah, that got the kernel booting.
More interesting, though, the MP kernel boots fine, without disabling apm,
acpi.
What way to go
Hi OpenBSD devs,
I wonder what would be needed to get SerDes support into bnx(4).
According to webcvs, rev 1.52 of bnx:
Add the BCM5709 PCI device Id. It is disabled for now since we do not
support SerDes-based (1000base-SX fibre) bnx(4) devices yet. The
reason is simple - we do not have any fibre
Hi All,
I just tried a -current snapshot from today on one of our HP blades.
The bnx0 SerDes network card works fine (at a first glance), but there
seems to be another problem.
This time it ciss.
The boot hangs quite some time at:
ciss0 at pci7 dev 8 function 0 "Hewlett-Packard Smart Array" rev 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej All,
since I do prefer OpenBSD and FreeBSD on any server, and our company
policy is to run Debian Sarge, I thought "What the hack" and gave
OpenBSD a try for MySQL (inspired too by all those long threads on misc@
recently).
Well, I guess I'm doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
>> As soon as replication starts, mysql gets very unresponsive:
>> - -bash-3.1$ time mysqladmin -uroot -p proc stat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej Stuart,
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/09/18 11:46, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
>>Okay... but by looking in iostat, it looks like pretty low traffic. 1 to
>>2 MB/sec. A higher number of transfers per second, though.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>25222 _mysql-50 185M 50M sleep/0 biowai 0:14 1.42% mysqld
>>
>>Well... to me it looks like the box is idle... why is MySQL still pretty
>>unresponsive (I tend t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>> Okay... but by looking in iostat, it looks like pretty low traffic. 1 to
>> 2 MB/sec. A higher number of transfers per second, though.
>
>
> You are right! Yes But the question is also, is there something else
> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Marian Hettwer wrote:
>>
>> 060915 17:33:29 [Warning] /usr/local/libexec/mysqld: ignoring option
>> '--low-priority-updates' due to invalid value 'ON'
>>
>> - --> Seem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gustavo,
Gustavo Rios wrote:
> It sound very strange, i see no soekris output. I am using a
> female-male cable connector with a gender changer adapter on one cable
> end.
>
hm... that doesn't sound like a NULL-Modem cable to me...
Are you 100% s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ingo,
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> I doubt the project is worth the effort at all.
> Whatever numbers might result will be heavily biased.
Of course it's biased. It's statistics of running *BSD systems. How
could that possibly not biased?!
> BSDstats i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
does anybody use munin on OpenBSD?
If not, I'll try do create a port...
If somebody else already tried this and has an old port flying around,
I'd be glad to use this one :)
Background: We're using munin in our Datacenter to monitor all ser
x27;m not subscribed, so please keep me in CC:
Thanks in advance,
Marian Hettwer
iD8DBQFEOixJgAq87Uq5FMsRAqBcAKCHbZnZwzFgbqoPQKvxqrEE3YxnbQCg8Swo
njyl9OtTKxbHza7RxPf9gcc=
=e2Ix
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
iting for his 3.9 CD Set... hej Wim! ;) )
Chris Kuethe wrote:
> i usually run in 16bit, with "-x m" ... i don't need the eyecandy, i
> just need to get to a 'doze box every now and then.
>
> with regard to the port, i think
> CC="gcc -g" make SUDO=sudo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anton Karpov wrote:
> Maybe, because in some cases, it just takes a bit more time to 0wn your box
> if it has no compiler installed.
No, not at all. You can't attack a compiler, it's not accessable from
the outside.
The only reason I can think of in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej Bob,
Bob Beck wrote:
>
> In my experience it's simple. Generally speaking, not installing a
> compiler makes the system less secure. Why? real easy. Most systems I
> have ever seen without a compiler has software running on it that is
> beh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert C Wittig wrote:
>
> I have my MUA set so that this (and other) email-list sub-directories
> reply automatically to the list for which they receive email, and only
> noticed that you had emailed me off-list on the last email, so all my
> repl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Paul de Weerd wrote:
>
>
>>Don't change root's shell.
>>
>>
>>It's set to a static shell (/bin/ksh these days) for a reason.
>>
>>
>
> Changing the root shell doesn't hurt. But you have to install your shell
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:17:11PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>>Even if you use the bash-static package, bash gets installed into
>>/usr/local/bin (IIRC) and you may not have /usr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
>>I am seeking advise prior to buying a "serial to ssh" device,
>>sometimes
>> refered to as "serial server" or "serial port server". I am
>>thinking of
>>a black box 19" rack mount thing where I can plug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Veitch wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2006, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
>
>> Any recommendations in addition to the colorful lies on the web from
>> all the vendors? Experiences? Any pitfalls?
>
>
> I've not had any problems with a Cyclad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Diana,
Diana Eichert wrote:
> company doing the same thing called Logical Solutions (think logical). It
> would be nice if companies making money off of selling "secure console
> servers" would give some back to the OpenSSH project.
>
Which remi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Theo,
Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> They won't, if this is the only place this problem is mentioned.
>
> That's why all the large contributions that I have gotten, have been
> hard work of finding the right person to mention it to, and actually
> ask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
>
> IDE. puke. 'ExelStore'. wtf? i wouldn't give such hardware to my
> enemies. ;D
You're right with ExelStore ;)
Anyway, my server at strato is running fine for 2,5 years now. FreeBSD
5.2.1, 5.3, 6.0, 6.1 ;)
But I do have t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:13:47AM +0200, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
>
>>>How do you debug/{copy,paste} a panic on pc or laptop that has no serial
>>>ports?
>>
>>I think IBM thinkpads docking stations have a serial port. Not s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karsten McMinn wrote:
> Back to the OP: there isn't any situation in the
> net facing server world that is not best served
> with OpenBSD.
best served in the net server world is pretty hard stuff.
What is best served? In a business environment "bes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andris Delfino wrote:
> On 5/26/06, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 5/26/06, Alexander Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Christopher Nelson wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > I was wondering what window manager was recommended for use wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marc,
Marc Peters wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> i bought a soekris 4801 from wim and wanted to install it via net. when
> i boot the box it gets it ip-address and when it comes to load bsd.rd it
> loads the kernel but hangs during load:
>
>>> OpenBSD
Am 05.07.11 05:13, schrieb Henning Brauer:
* Tito Mari Francis Escaqo [2011-06-29 03:31]:
Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
Apache 1.3 web server?
yes
indeed.
I was hoping to save a few more megabytes off the base installation
of the system.
I see
Hi David,
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:45:52 +0930, David Walker
wrote:
> Nick Holland
>> define "security" :)
>
> I'm guessing that TLS is out and that IPsec might be in on that criteria.
> Is SSH out there too?
>
I'd say SSH tunnels are still in.
>> Your risks with wireless:
>> * Unauthorized use
Hi Folks,
I'm having some trouble at work with a pair of OpenBSD 4.8's doing
load balancing with relayd.
Pretty often, relayd dies. /var/log/syslog shows:
Feb 17 17:13:14 openlb38-2 relayd[24485]: check_child: lost child:
socket relay engine terminated; signal 11
I'm helping myself right now
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 08:45:58 -0800, Eric Kom
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please I have been try to find a php module for apache!
> if someone can help me?
>
> Thank you in advance
Oh come on...
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=OpenBSD+php
Cheers,
./Marian
Hi there,
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:37:08 -0300, Kleber Rocha
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two openbsd box with pf as firewall, with heavy load I get this error
> on message:
>
> Mar 24 19:13:29 fw01 /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase
> kern.maxclusters
>
> But, both firewalls crash, How
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:24:16 -0300, Kleber Rocha
wrote:
> Thanks all of you, I really don't know how some options of sysctl.conf
> works, I turn back the option to default values and follow the
> considerations of https://calomel.org/network_performance.html [1].
> I'm using OpenBSD 4.8.
>
As so
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:22:44 +0200, Alexander Schrijver
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:06:14AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
>> IMHO it is absolutelly useless, objections are:
>> 1. You can limit connections using firewall.
>> 2. You already have the feature by name "limiting the number of
>
Hej Henning,
Am 25.03.11 17:03, schrieb Henning Brauer:
* Marian Hettwer [2011-03-25 13:59]:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:24:16 -0300, Kleber Rocha
wrote:
Thanks all of you, I really don't know how some options of sysctl.conf
works, I turn back the option to default values and follo
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:53:58 +0200, LEVAI Daniel
wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:42:24 +0300, Michael Sioutis wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I can't find it in the man page, and it seems it is not supported (?)
>> I am trying to backup some folders and want to exclude some and nth
>> will work. I've t
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:39:41 +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
wrote:
> Le 31/05/2011 11:23, Marian Hettwer a C)crit :
>>> That is a GNU extension. You can work this around with find(1) and the
>>> tar(1)'s '-I' option.
>
> Also
> tar cf /foo.tar
On Tue, 31 May 2011 12:39:15 + (UTC), Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2011-05-31, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>>
>> bsdtar from the FreeBSD project supports --exclude too.
>> The OP could as well install gnu tar from packages. bsdtar doens't seem
>> to exist...
>>
On Tue, 31 May 2011 17:05:55 -0400, "Eric Furman"
wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011 13:43 +0200, "Marian Hettwer"
>> Obviously not.
>> I'm talking about shell scripts which should work in a multi unix
>> environment. Namely, in my env, Debian, Solaris and
On Tue, 31 May 2011 17:02:16 +0200, Otto Moerbeek
wrote:
>
> $ pax -vw -f t.tar -x ustar -s /skip.this// .
>
> Should be portable...
>
Good to know! I put this into my list of one-liners.
Thanks! :)
./Marian
Hi all,
I'm experiencing a rather strang behaviour with tcpdump on OpenBSD 4.7
i386 running on a vmware esx vsphere 4.
My tcpdump gives no output at all on stdout, but if I use the very same
command with "-w foobar" it actually does dump packages.
I know that esx server are probably not supp
Hi Damien,
Am 09.07.10 08:16, schrieb Damien Miller:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm experiencing a rather strang behaviour with tcpdump on OpenBSD 4.7 i386
running on a vmware esx vsphere 4.
My tcpdump gives no output at all on stdout, but if I use the very
Hi *,
I'm setting up a http load balancer group with OpenBSD. First of all, great
work regarding pf + carp + relayd. That's a straight forward setup. Me
like! :-)
But now on topic. I'm getting a bit of a headache with my final setup.
It'll be:
2 nic's (bge0, bge1)
trunk those two nic's for failov
Hi Russel,
Russell Howe schrieb:
Marian Hettwer wrote, sometime around 23/07/09 16:07:
Hi *,
# cat
/etc/hostname.bge0 up
# cat /etc/hostname.bge1 up
# cat /etc/hostname.trunk0
trunkproto failover trunkport bge0 trunkport bge1 up
# cat /etc
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
