On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:39:42PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
> Last time I checked though, clients only talk with the web server on
> port 80. So, the only reason you would want to keep state would be if
> you have a ruleset like block out all (which is generally only usefull
> if you don't trust
ers put lowest priority boxes on the bottom of the cart.
Clearly it's impractical to unload starting from the middle or the bottom of
the cart. I'm afraid I don't understand the point though...
Regards,
Brian.
example being "echo" :-)
The assumption here of course is that the only services worth attacking are
on ports <1024 or 2049. This still doesn't prevent your box being used as a
DoS repeater, but that's a pretty fundamental limitation of simple UDP
request-response exchanges.
Regards,
Brian.
On Jan 19, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
We chose Gandi for controversial web sites (like ffii.org) because
they tend not to shut down the delegation whenever they receive a
preliminary injunction.
For any kind of Open Source movement, this might become crucial
in the future...
As a result, I don't
see much commercial reason to roll it out, and certainly no commercial
reason to switch off the existing IPv4 Internet. Arguments here:
http://pobox.com/~b.candler/doc/misc/ipv6.txt
Regards,
Brian.
formace, try setting up your six-disk array as
three separate mirrored pairs, or as a single RAID-01 (strip/mirror) and see
what you get. Of course your available storage size will be reduced to
3/5ths of what it was.
Regards,
Brian.
> 262144 bytes transferred in 29.696 secs (88274982 bytes/sec)
RAID 0 is just striping, so half the data gets written to one disk while
half gets written to the other, so that would be expected to have better
performance than a single disk.
Regards,
Brian.
allocations than /48, making them second-class to customers of
"real" ISPs.
Some of the initial rigid design of IPv6, totally divorced from commercial
reality, has thankfully now gone: remember the 13-bit "top level aggregator"
and 13-bit "second level aggregator"? But from a micro-ISP's point of view,
it lives on in the /32 (provider) to /48 (end site) divide. Not that it
matters a jot if IPv6 never rolls out.
I'll get off my soap box now.
Regards,
Brian.
ient?
The former leaves the clients vulnerable to all sorts of attacks from
malicious servers. The latter allows the firewall to validate data. As a
side effect it can also give an audit log of activity at layer 7, which many
companies require for compliance reasons anyway.
Regards,
Brian.
arounds.
In the case of a greylisting type of solution, it seems that
identification would be especially devastating since the work-around
is so trivial. Unless my understanding is very wrong, the whole
effectiveness of the solution depends on the spammers not realizing
the differe
;t have to pay for them (or very little for a bot herd
compared to "bulletproof hosting"), but it could make them a little
more efficient.
The history of fighting spam has tended to show that if any form of
combating spam becomes too effective (and wide-spread), spammers wi
On Feb 20, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Darren Spruell wrote:
On 2/20/07, Brian Keefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the case of a greylisting type of solution, it seems that
identification would be especially devastating since the work-around
is so trivial. Unless my understanding is very wron
On Feb 20, 2007, at 1:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:57:54 -0800, "Brian Keefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
Now they've evolved to using botnets and the vast majority of spam
comes from such systems, so the bandwidth costs are gone and the
hosting
Hello folks,
I was curious about the maximum amount of RAM an OpenBSD system will
recognize. Is there any way at all to get it to recognize more? Kernel
recompile? Sysctl options?
I've browsed through the archives here a bit and have found a few answers
relating to my question, but there
John, others,
Upon closer look, it only shows roughly 3.5GB of RAM, see below:
+ paste +
OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC.MP) #967: Sat Sep 16 20:38:15 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 3757342720 (3669280K)
avail mem = 3223769088 (3148212K)
us
artup. These are likely called something like
/etc/hostname.em0 (if your network card is called 'em0')
/etc/pf.conf
/etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/rc.conf.local
/etc/named.conf
Regards,
Brian.
n the wait manpage for OpenBSD (4.0) which works this way.
Any other suggestions as to the best way to avoid this problem? I'm sure
this must be old ground :-)
Thanks,
Brian.
icult for me to understand the subtleties
involved in asynchronous signal-driven programming. And that's with a copy
of the Stevens book beside me :-)
Many thanks for giving me more food for thought.
Regards,
Brian.
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:40:06PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:10:39PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> > I'm not saying that anything is actually wrong with the code you've
> > provided; rather, that it's difficult for me to understand
pid and removes that entry.
This eliminates the need for dealing with signals. The extra overhead of a
linear search is small, given that children don't die that often.
Cheers,
Brian.
It uses a simple
plain-text protocol which you can drive easily using telnet. It's also
trivial to extend to monitor any other parameters of interest.
Regards,
Brian.
tive answer in a reasonably short period of time, and
"nslookup xyz" gives you an NXDOMAIN answer also in a reasonably short
period of time)
Regards,
Brian.
open(0x3c002b8b,0x2,0)
4341 lspciNAMI "/dev/pci"
4341 lspciRET open -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
...
Regards,
Brian.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 03:16:36PM +0200, St?phane Chausson wrote:
> Brian Candler wrote, On 29/06/07 14:43:
> >Also, under Linux, "lspci -v" gives useful info about the PCI cards you
> >have
> >installed. In theory, you should be able to do this with O
which definitely works in another unit (say something
which appears as fxp0 in another box), so much the better.
Given that your on-board LAN isn't working either, maybe the motherboard has
a serious fault. But you might not be able to return it until you can prove
that *Windows* can't find any network cards either :-)
Regards,
Brian.
t solution ultimately is to go with jails, or full VMs.
In that case, when user 1 asks you to upgrade mod_fribble from version 0.99a
to 1.73b, you can do this confidently (or even let them do it themselves)
without any risk of accidentally breaking other users. Disk space is very
cheap these days, although RAM and other virtualisation overhead is less so.
Regards,
Brian.
ad/write access on their own files of course, and grant read/write
access to the webserver's gid, but without being members of the webserver
group themselves (otherwise they'd be able to read/write all the other
users' files). You may be able to achieve this by suitable checks on the
top-level directory, and making files world-writable inside (ergh).
Otherwise, welcome to sticky-bit city :-)
Regards,
Brian.
> > >You don't want user 1's web applications to be able to access data in user
> > >2's web application storage space.
> > I will only be using mod_php. In the past, without the user shell
> > accounts, this has worked rather well for me in combination with the
> > "open_base_dir" directive in
e the Soekris, you could look at
mini-ITX motherboards from the likes of Epia. My home desktop system is an
Epia M-1 in a fanless case. I've not measured its power consumption, but
I think it's pretty low.
Regards,
Brian.
cence(*) is extremely unclear. However, it is
published on the Internet for anyone to download. Do you believe the author
would take you to court for not sending a postcard? Pragmatically, if the
software does want you want, I suggest you could take that (minimal) risk.
Or, just send the guy a post
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 11:02:46PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> My home desktop system is an
> Epia M-1 in a fanless case. I've not measured its power consumption, but
> I think it's pretty low.
I just got an Electrisave. Its resolution is only 10W, but according to
that
task and using what algorithms?
Thanks.
Brian
Brian Hansen wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have no prior experience in encryption but wants to figure out how to -
as
>> safe as possible - encrypt some files on my computer. I have been looking
at
>> both GNUPG and Mcrypt. I am not interested in the KEY part of GNUP
presume it's just to allow for networks
which load-share across multiple paths.
However, this is just my understanding of things from a user point of view,
which may very well be flawed. Someone with a knowledge of pf internals
could give a more authoritative answer.
Regards,
Brian.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:59:23PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
> Grateful if anyone could recommend a mail retrieval program which does
> not require a local SMTP service like fetchmail does.
>From 'man fetchmail':
-m | --mda
(Keyword: mda) You can force mail to be pass
d be great!
Well, you could try remounting the filesystem as read-only. Also, I seem to
remember that geom had a sysctl for allowing dangerous operations such as
writing to the MBR while partitions were in use. Hmm, a quick google
suggests:
sysctl kern.geom.debug = 16
This is known as the "foot-shooting" flag :-) See
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=geom&sektion=4&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.2-RELEASE
HTH,
Brian.
gigabit). The big advantage of this is that it is
silent and fanless, which you'll appreciate if you've ever had a Catalyst on
your desk.
Regards,
Brian.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 09:39:04AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> > Could anyone recommend anything that would be great for leaning
> > purposes
Sorry, my mistake - I thought you said for *learning* purposes. For
*leaning* purposes, an empty 72xx chassis is probably heavy enough :-)
he Broadcom
> chipset...)
Equivalent Broadcom hardware, but even cheaper and smaller: Buffalo
WHR-G54S. Under 30 UKP.
Both these devices have a built in 6-port hardware switch (5 ports brought
out as RJ45, one port connected to the CPU internally) and even has VLAN
capability.
The "no-nonsense replacement Linux" referred to is probably OpenWrt:
http://www.openwrt.org/
Regards,
Brian.
and haven't looked back. Get your MTA to deliver
to ~/Maildir/ and the problem goes away. It solves a lot of problems to do
with locking too.
Regards,
Brian.
oxy would be better, in that it could add an
X-Forwarded-For: header which contained the original source IPv6 address.
However, I think you'd find life far, far easier just by recompiling Apache
to work with IPv6 natively.
Regards,
Brian.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 04:36:06PM +0200, alwin wrote:
> the faithd daemon als looks quit cool, although it maps the other way
> around, it will be usefull when you have an ipv6 only network.
"When faithd receives TCPv6 traffic, faithd will relay the TCPv6 traffic
to TCPv4."
Hmm, sounds
es on
OpenBSD?
Thanks in advance,
Brian
# ldd /usr/bin/more
/usr/bin/more:
StartEnd Type Open Ref GrpRef Name
exe 10 0 /usr/bin/more
00745000 20758000 rlib 01 0 /usr/lib/libcurses.so.10.0
00951000 20985000 rlib
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 08:38:17PM +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> The problem of Linux as a whole is that it tries to resolve security
> problems not by auditing code but by implementing SELinux. But what
> the problem would be if OpenBSD has "SeBSD" extension?
I think the nearest equivalent is "
of this to do, then consider an 'open server' which
returns the open file descriptor.
Regards,
Brian.
n only help your customers, and help OpenBSD gain mindshare which would
otherwise go to Linux. Good luck in your venture.
Regards,
Brian.
P.S. If you still feel uncomfortable by what others have said in this
thread: then I suggest you make, sell and evangelise FreeBSD DVDs instead.
Unlike OpenBSD, the FreeBSD project releases ISO images which you are free
to copy.
n end, as you threaten, IMO it won't be because
people don't buy the CDs - it will be because it continues to cut itself off
from the mainstream and simply becomes irrelevant.
Regards,
Brian.
built-in lpd/lpr without the need of filters or extra stuff.
I think that BR-Script3 is Brother's own PostScript Level 3 emulation
(renamed to avoid paying licenses to Adobe).
-Brian
to OpenBSD? Is this
something a developer should look into fixing (i.e. I'm a developer, I might
want to fix it for the experience)?
Brian
on these issues over the last several weeks. The
normal caveat applies of course: OpenBSD named is not stock BIND,
but it'll point you in the right direction.
Brian Keefer
Sr. Systems Engineer
www.Proofpoint.com
"Defend email. Protect data."
-P flag. I
receive the error "mount_nfs: /mnt: Permission denied".
I've also played around with maproot and mapall, thinking the
permission denied error could be related to users, but any
combination of these options and user options always yielded the same
result: the -P flag made the difference.
Any help would be much appreciated.
-Brian
see: http://bsdforums.unixro.net/forum/16
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Traian Ciobanu
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:01 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Any users in Romania?
Hello Marc.
Why are you asking? I'm not from Romania
under an
Intel proc, will support W^X? If not it looks like I should stick with
32-bit... and if not, any plans in the future on implementing Intel's
specific XD bit?
Thanks,
Brian Drain
days closed hardware vendors like Intel, Creative,
etc., will open up a bit and provide the necessary support to people
trying to write software that will flawlessly work with various
hardware, much better than the original vendor could ever dream of
doing.
Best regards,
Brian Drain
-Original
een in, NX
never stopped anything, just slightly mitigated the damage done (and
even that was debatable). I would have to assume that with the
stability and maturity I've come to find in OpenBSD W^X may never come
in to play or ever be needed.
Cheers,
Brian Drain
___
al Message-
From: Ted Unangst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 1:04 PM
To: Brian Drain
Cc: Theo de Raadt; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Intel x86-64 using the amd64 platform
On 9/4/08, Brian Drain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe one of these days closed ha
7;t ^C or
^Z or anything out of it. Does it have a purpose? This is being run
from an i386 desktop and I have no real need for it, just curious about
it's function.
Thank you.
Brian
On Jul 20, 2008, at 1:48 AM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:47:40 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
I've an OpenBSD box that's been running postfix for a few
years, strictly as a "send-only" mta, and every night the
box gets rebooted. Every couple of months postfix does
not come up on reb
On Sep 20, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Sunnz wrote:
OK I am trying to completely erase the data of a hard disk so I though
I can just do `dd if=/dev/arandom of=/dev/rwd0c` as to my
understanding that is the entire hard disk (slice c) of wd0 in 'raw'
mode?
But that dd refuse to do it.
This is running of
On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Brian Keefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I booted a Sunfire V120 off a 4.4 snapshot CD and dd if=/dev/zero
of=/rsd0
was humming along quite nicely when I left this evening.
You may want to go back a
On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Brian Keefer wrote:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Brian Keefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I booted a Sunfire V120 off a 4.4 snapshot CD and dd if=/dev/zero
of=/rsd0
was humming along quite nicely when
On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
Fernando Gont wrote:
If the discoverers of this bug don't make their sockstress
available to OpenBSD then I have a userland TCP/IP stack for
OpenBSD developers (mail me), but it's only written to be a server,
but I suspect it would be ea
x27;s not ready yet. Would assume
it's tied to 4.4 coming out... but just in case.
Brian
2008/10/10 Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Wow. Good luck. Can't you see we've been down that road before with
>> those bastards? But really. Good luck. You really are too
>> optimistic, but sure, learn the reality for yourself.
>I'm sure calling vendors 'bastards' on a public mailing
The t-shirt looks great.
Thanks to everyone involved for another great release!
--
bk
I'm finally getting around to starting my project to build a home-
monitoring system. I'm going to need multiple capture devices inside
the home, and at least one outside as well. I'm looking for
recommendations on a video capture card, and wireless video cameras.
I don't mind spending >
On Nov 1, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:28:34 -0700
Brian Keefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm finally getting around to starting my project to build a home-
monitoring system. I'm going to need multiple capture devices inside
On Nov 2, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-02, Brian Keefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 1, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
Unless you have a good reason not to, use "WebCams" that implement
an http(s) server on camera.
The u
On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Administrator wrote:
Brian Keefer wrote:
On Nov 11, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Administrator wrote:
Nope, didn't help. There must be some other mistery. Now it stops
at DHCPOFFER part.
DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:18:48:cb:3d via vlan51
DHCPOFFER on 192.168.51.3 to
ng it
once a day and posting any relevant updates as they appear on errata.
Cheers,
Brian
>From http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
"security-announce
Security announcements. This low volume list receives OpenBSD
security advisories and pointers to security patches as they
become available."
On Nov 24, 2008, at 9:32 AM, K H A I wrote:
Hello,
I receive sunfire V100 hardware wifh 512K RAM , IDE cdrom without
hard disk.
Does any one know it support regular ide hard drive?
what bsd architecture support it? is it sparc 64 or sun ?
if any one has experience helps to make it work is
Make sure you're setting a state.
I had the same problem with gmail, and then I realized that I had
accidentally preempted the rule which was setting state on my DMZ
interface. Once I fixed that I didn't have any more problems.
--
chort
On Jun 24, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Monah Baki wrote:
On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:28 PM, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:00 PM, Ryan McBride wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:48:22PM -0700, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
what gives?
Oh, I missed this before:
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to 75.36.44.22 port 80
pass in on $ext_if
hide everything behind a pretty GUI and do
the same things through a custom written app.
Please feel free to tear my every simple plan to shredsI can take
it.
Thanks,
Brian Shackelford
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Lars Hansson
om this morning's snapshot and the issue
hasn't resurfaced yet...
Brian Keefer
www.Tumbleweed.com
"The Experts in Secure Internet Communication"
On Nov 15, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
>
>
> On 11/14/06, Brian Keefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FWIW I was having very similar problems with em(4) in OpenBSD 4.0-
> release under VMware (amd64 SMP). It would cease to recognize ARP
> replies and just
tcpdump -nxr /var/log/isakmpd.pcap' shows that only one quick mode exchange
took place; crypto debug output on the Cisco shows the same.
Looking at this, it seems that the last entry in /etc/ipsec.conf has taken
precedence over the others.
Is there a way to achieve what I'm trying to
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:45:45AM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> Looking at this, it seems that the last entry in /etc/ipsec.conf has taken
> precedence over the others.
>
> Is there a way to achieve what I'm trying to do, either using ipsecctl, or
> manually configuring is
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:22:26AM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> To answer my own question: inspired by the output of ipsecctl, I wrote a
> perl program (attached) to generate a suitable isakmpd.conf (also attached),
> and this appears to work just fine.
And now I seem to have hit som
[IPsec-10.1.1.6-10.1.1.1-17] or
[IPsec-10.1.1.6:0-10.1.1.1:0-17]
# protocol specified but ports not specified
[IPsec-10.1.1.6-10.1.1.1] or
[IPsec-10.1.1.6:0-10.1.1.1:0-0]
# no protocol specified
Regards,
Brian.
I'm getting the following when posting to 'misc'. Is this known and/or
intentional?
I'm not bcc'ing to 'ports' - honest!
Regards,
Brian.
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:50:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:20:02AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 02:52:23PM +0000, Brian Candler wrote:
> > I'm getting the following when posting to 'misc'. Is this known and/or
> > intentional?
> >
> > I'm not bcc'in
Has anyone seen
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/OpenBSDhttp://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD ?
Quite informative.
_
The new Windows Live Toolbar helps you guard against viruses
http://toolbar.live.com/?mkt=en-gb
ne.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A15964BF
> > for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:42:33 -0500 (EST)
> >Received: from mappit.linnet.org (212-74-113-67.static.dsl.as9105.com
> >[212.74.113.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No
> >client certificate requ
t sure how to probe deeper to get a handle on what's actually
happening though. Perhaps isakmpd -L logging might shed some light, although
I don't fancy decoding QM exchanges by hand :-(
Regards,
Brian.
rame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 0 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
1015 packets output, 221409 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Regards,
Brian.
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 02:29:46PM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> So now I need to establish whether those original 1,000 sent packets were
> actually arriving at the Cisco or not, which perhaps careful use of
> interface counters might reveal, or else I need to dig out a switch wi
could use the FreeBSD boot loader (first and/or second stage)
to boot OpenBSD? And if so, has anyone got a recipe for this that they would
care to share?
Thanks,
Brian.
within the BIOS
supported part of the hard disk -- this would typically be 504MB, 2GB,
8GB or 128GB, depending upon the age of the machine and its BIOS."
which implies it should work above 8GB with a modern BIOS.
Regards,
Brian.
(*) Such as:
http://geodsoft.com/howto/dualboot/openbsd.htm
http://www.packetwatch.net/documents/guides/misc/multi-boot.php
ecause
without this it also fails. However I don't know what the OpenBSD equivalent
is.
Could someone provide me with the necessary clue please?
Thanks,
Brian.
/callbacks
Thank you - although that would involve rather more radical surgery on
rp-l2tp than I was hoping to make.
Dale Rahn's option of -Wl,-E does the trick though - thank you Dale.
Now I just need to work out if and how OpenBSD's PPPDISC differs from
Linux's N_HDLC :-)
Regards,
Brian.
8. Of
course you can only upgrade if you install a minimal OS X... :-/
I don't have a mini (or any reasonably current Apple hardware) but the
issue you mentioned reminded me of this post by Brian Keefer:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-sparc&m=116483175532387&w=2
It may
DOS
> > partitions MUST EXIST ENTIRELY BELOW cylinder 1024, or you will either not
> > be able to boot OpenBSD, not be able to boot DOS, or you may experience
> > data loss or filesystem corruption."
>
> That's an oops.
> That's a big oops.
> That gives me something to do this evening...
>
> Nick.
Thanks for picking this up.
Regards,
Brian.
#x27;s
happening.
I've also tried to replicate this problem in a small program using forkpty,
but not been able to. Maybe it's related specifically to the ppp(4) driver
sending data over a pty.
Anyway, if there's anyone on this list who know is intimate with the
internals of pty(4) and ppp(4), knows enough about rp-l2tp to set up a test
rig, and would like to see the OpenBSD port working, I'd be very grateful
for your assistance.
Many thanks,
Brian Candler.
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:35:00AM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> Anyway, if there's anyone on this list who know is intimate with the
> internals of pty(4) and ppp(4), knows enough about rp-l2tp to set up a test
> rig, and would like to see the OpenBSD port working, I'd be very
4:43PM0:00.02 ppp -direct
ppp-in
root 23090 0.0 0.3 736 1592 p2 S+ 4:43PM0:00.01 ppp
So, something's not right here. Have I just made a simple error, or is there
something other than inetd required to accept incoming PPP-over-UDP
connections?
Regards,
Brian.
rs to the front would also be a problem. These conenctors
are normally kept free for adhoc connection of devices by students, so a
manual procedure would be needed.
Are there ways for me to influence the behaviour of uchi (sysctl
and if so do you reckon it would be able to boot from a
compact flash ?
Cheers in advance.
Brian.
ord) altq ?
Cheers,
Brian.
ry and copy
the ofwboot file over, I get this message:
Copying 'ofwboot' to the boot partition (wd0i)...mount_msdos: /dev/wd0i
on /mnt2: Device not configured FAILED.
I am then, unable to boot from wd0. I've Googled, read the
INSTALL.macppc doc, and still have been unable to get this to work. All
help is much appreciated,
- brian
401 - 500 of 831 matches
Mail list logo
