f a prefix, aggregation at the edge makes this
difficult or impossible.
In those networks we don't use any aggregation of prefixes.
In general I try to avoid it anyway if I build something new.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
On 29/03/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:33:15PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > > > The second problem is, that I want to announce an external
> full-feed,
> > > > received with openbgpd, to my core-router. This
ng able to decide what how to handle each prefix at every hop in the
network
offers some featurettes which you can't get without MPLS TE, and maybe not
even then
in reality.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
On 01/04/06, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Set the MTU and MRU to 1453, not 1500.
1453 ? Explain please.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
On 01/04/06, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 09:16:33AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > On 01/04/06, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Set the MTU and MRU to 1453, not 1500.
> >
On 01/04/06, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 10:39:26AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> >
> > In my case (aslo on crappy UK broadband)
>
> You should try it in NZ, 128k upstream!
>
> > 1454 is actually optimal.
> > O
as from another ibgp peer,
nexthop, clusterlist should be different though, metric might be the same as
previous prefix.
If I get the little guy to sleep before me I'll try to have a closer look.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
On 04/04/06, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:05:50PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> >
> > I'm afraid it is.
> > Look at the third option in 4.4.2.10. (PPPoE LLC/SNAP)
> >
>
> That is optional at the discretion
On 04/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:37:38PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > I'm playing a bit with bgpd while trying to get the kids to sleep, 50%
> to
> > go.
> > With Hennings next-hop self patch I made a mini
rom the core router ?
Above you could see 192.168.0.0/24 from the core router and the local box,
the local /24 was chosen as best path.
Some pure guess work here:
Do you have a /24 network statement in your bgpd.conf but no real route for
it ?
Maybe this in bgpd means that you will announce that /24, basically beating
the
/24 you are receiving from the core, and thus not installing that /24 into
the
routing table.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
On 04/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:46:24AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > On 04/04/06, Falk Brockerhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 29.03.2006 um 14:32 schrieb Falk Brockerhoff:
> >
1500
>lladdr 00:13:d4:de:cf:88
>media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT half-duplex)
>status: no carrier
Do you have full duplex hardcoded on the switch and sk0 set to auto
negotiate ?
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion repl
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
/Tony
quagga-bgpd# sh ip bgp 192.168.10.0
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.10.0/24
Paths: (11 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
Local
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
> things.
> Originator is backwards.
>
>
Correction, I installed a route-collector in my openbgp network
which peers with all boxes. Ac
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
> > things.
> > Originator is backwards.
r 5 13:13:39 cr212-FRA bgpd[2618]: fatal in SE: session_dispatch_imsg:
pipe closed: Connection refused
Apr 5 13:13:39 cr212-FRA bgpd[3196]: kernel routing table decoupled
Apr 5 13:13:39 cr212-FRA bgpd[3196]: Terminating
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion repli
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> After a jug of coffee I tried being a bit more methodical.
>
> I took the entire network down and brought up one router at a time.
> I monitored the prefix 192.168.30.0/24 from a route-collector sitting on
>
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > On a side note, at this stage I did:
> > >
>
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:45:22AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
> > things.
> > Originator is backwards.
> >
> > /Tony
&
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:19:44PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:19:44PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > > On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
valid vlan26 UP, Ethernet, unknown <<<< Looking
good
10.1.1.14valid vlan16 UP, Ethernet, unknown
172.16.1.5 valid vlan12 UP, Ethernet, unknown
10.1.1.1 valid vlan13 UP, Ethernet, unknown
cr203-STO#
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTE
On 08/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/04/06, Jonathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 02:07:54AM +0100, pedro la peu wrote:
> > > > The 0x705c has a ZyDAS ZD1211 chipset in it, the 0x70
On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 00:51]:
> > It looks like bgpd has a problem with validating nexthop on new
> interfaces
> > when they are created.
> > A flap of the interface or
On 10/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > * tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 00:51]:
> > > It looks like bgpd has a problem with validating nextho
On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-10 19:04]:
> > On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > * tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 00:51]:
&g
H#
I have so far been unable to find a fixed pattern of where/why this happens.
Any ideas ?
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
On 10/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:56:33PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > * tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-10 19:
--
> BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/
> OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ...
> Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
> (Dennis Ritchie)
>
>
I'll apply it tonight and see what it does in my environment.
Oh how productive one can be when the family is out of the country =)
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
On 12/04/06, Sylvain Coutant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> - Shouldn't OpenBGP drop the session if the nexthop is not valid ?
Next hop and peer address does not have to be the same thing.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
etting that, if set to yes, would drop the session
> if it receives an unreachable nexthop ... just an idea. It could default to
> yes for eBGP session and no for iBGP sessions. Would that fit most of
> "usual" cases ?
That sounds like fixing a bug with an option.
In your case the
On 12/04/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/04/06, Sylvain Coutant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > What was the state of the parent interface and what kind of interface
> > is
> > > it?
> >
> > Bg
l, best
Originator: 10.0.0.2, Cluster list: 10.0.0.7 10.0.0.8 10.0.0.6
10.0.0.5 10.0.0.3 10.0.0.1
Last update: Wed Apr 12 14:11:25 2006
quagga-bgpd#
The loop does not occur at the same place everytime.
Do you have a setup with route-reflectors ?
Claudio, could my problem have to d
On 12/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:58:24PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> > On 12/04/06, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
e?
> >
>
>10 year old RFC's confirm it!
>
>*BGP is dying!
>
>(you dumbasses)
>
>-Bob
>
>
Me and my old Betamax vcr are just waiting for OpenIDRP to be included
in obsd. Stop whining and start implementig Claudio.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
there are man companies out there selling
this stuff. If you can find something which can run as a repeater go for
that.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
On 21/04/06, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 19.04.2006 at 12:57:16 +0100, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On 19/04/06, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Anyway, if someone of you comes a
gt; within a block allocated to Google.
>
> Duh. The obvious solution is to have pf make a DNS lookup on each and
> every packet that arrives.
Good stuff, disarm the subject with humour.
/Tony
gt;
> Thanks again for your support it really help.
I used to work on networks with thousands of routers to manage,
in the end nothing was better than writing my own tools.
I may be drunk now, but I do miss it.
/Tony
;VIX-True"
> allow from any community 31064:1000 set pftable "VIX-User"
> allow from any community 31064:500 set pftable "VIX-Orig"
>
> allow from any community 65333:888 set pftable "bogons"
> allow from any community 65333:888 set nexthop blackhole
>
> #allow from any community 31064:4000 set rtlabel "VIX-True"
> #allow from any community 31064:1000 set rtlabel "VIX-User"
> #allow from any community 31064:500 set rtlabel "VIX-Orig"
> #allow from any community 65333:888 set rtlabel "bogons"
>
> deny from any prefix 0.0.0.0/0
> deny from any prefix 10.0.0.0/8 prefixlen >= 8 deny from any prefix
> 172.16.0.0/12 prefixlen >= 12 deny from any prefix 192.168.0.0/16
> prefixlen >= 16 deny from any prefix 169.254.0.0/16 prefixlen >= 16 deny
> from any prefix 192.0.2.0/24 prefixlen >= 24 deny from any prefix
> 224.0.0.0/4 prefixlen >= 4 deny from any prefix 240.0.0.0/4 prefixlen >=
> 4
>
> #
Time for one last drink, cheers.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
ll and the config is as
easy
as it gets, man 4 pppoe.
The only issues I've seen is that it seems to ignore PADT and that MTU
doesn't seem
to correlate with the remote end MRU received during LCP neg. But since it
works
so well I haven't bothered with looking closer at it.
No idea about
c to my network go to or via the secondary site
if the primary site is down?"
If so, yes. Basic internet routing.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
client
there isn't any config for it.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
; > > to install MRTG and SNMP so that I can get the network utilization.
> > >
> > > Any documentation in the web that anyone can suggest?
>
>
If you use altq and need something to help tweak the queues
have a look at http://www.prefixmaster.com/eyeonpf.php
/Tony
--
T
NAT
> is being used on both of these gateways, and all boxes inside each
> respective gateway are able to reach the internet without problems.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Nathan Johnson
>
>
Did you enable ip forwarding, Nate ?
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
The most popular way of managing passwords:
http://iatservices.missouri.edu/images/techknowledge/archive/secconn-0403.jpg
Guaranteed to not require any BLOB.
Peter Fraser wrote:
>
> I was very surprised, that when I was installing
> a 3.9 system, that you can use an empty root password
>
> I accidentally entered a 'return' when it asked for the
> root password, so I entered a 'return" again when
> I was asked to repeat the password, thinking that
> a
Joseph C. Bender wrote:
>
> Nick Guenther wrote:
> > On 5/6/06, Henrik Borgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> $ sudo fdisk wd0
> >> Password:
> >> Disk: wd0 geometry: 4864/255/63 [78140160 Sectors]
> >> Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55
> >> Starting Ending LBA Info:
> >>
Jacques wrote:
>
> Florin Iamandi wrote:
> > Jacques dixit (2006-05-05, 12:58:02):
> >
> >> May we know, what kind of 'incident'?
> >> Sounds like a security issue.
At this point nobody with a clue will take this or any of its
descendents seriously. Think.
Imagine I've just managed to crack the O
Nick Guenther wrote:
>
> On 5/6/06, Tony Abernethy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Me, I'd take a closer look at that j OpenBSD partition.
> > It does NOT look like it corresponds to anything in the DOS partitions.
> > Whether or not you redo the disklabel from
dave feustel wrote:
>
> On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
> > The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
> >then why is kio accessing them?
> >
> > Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
> > answered?
>
> OK I didn't get it the first tim
Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for some hints on evaluating load average.
>
> You can't. It's a statement about "job queue lengths", not about "how
> busy" a machine is. And since different operating systems (and even
> different versions) have made various tweaks to it over the years,
Darrin Chandler wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:14:06PM -0400, Adam wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 May 2006 19:52:10 -0400 Dave Crawford
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > or another viable solution.
> >
> > There's no solution because there's no problem. OpenBSD
> doesn't randomly
> > reord
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
>
> i have a single CSV file that is 2.5GB (!) unzipped which i need to either
> partition into chunks or read from directly. trying to open it
> with vi doesn't
> work since 2.5GB >> 500MB, the size of the /var partition on this machine.
> opening with vi gives a "/var: wr
You log stuff in your time zone.
I log stuff in my time zone.
When your stuff and my stuff interact, that's a very confused log.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Bruno Carnazzi
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 11:56 AM
> To: misc
> Subject:
SkyBlueshoes wrote:
>
> I've just installed OpenBSD 3.8...my first ever *nix. I've got most up
> and running, but I'm having problems recieving email. I followed the
> guidelines on this page http://www.nomoa.com/bsd/mailServer.htm to the
> letter. All the localhost tests work, but when I try t
Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:18PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
> > On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have a simpler question: is there any plan to make installing
> > > >
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
>
> I have used lynx for years as a file browser as well as web browser
> (when I can) and it is routine for me to "fix" /etc/lynx.conf to show
> me dotfiles.
>
> Recently I need to inspect lots of text files and sometimes edit a few
> so I set vi to be the system editor fo
ee was completed by the provider black-holing
the target
to protect the other customers in the network. A few of the attacks were
more clever
than just aiming at a customers site and also took out ISP infrastructure
like dns where
the domains were handled.
Aaahhh... the good old days...
/Tony
Nick Guenther wrote:
>
> On 5/23/06, prad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 22 May 2006 17:54, you wrot
> > > You can consider short-circuiting of Boolean evaluation
> greedy, but it a
> > > feature which may also save clock cycles if the right-most
> sub-expressions
> > > are costly to eval
Marcin Wilk wrote:
>
> Hi
> I'm using OpenBSD 3.7 with default Apache with SSL over two
> VirtualHosts witht he same IP.
>
> Here is how it works in there:
>
> NameVirtualHost *:80
> NameVirtualHost *:443
Regardless of what you can put in any configuration,
Port 80, http 1.1+ (I think) allows
misiu wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
> what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
> thought give it a nother try.
> Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
> Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and lat
Adam wrote:
> The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Methinks there is a problem with scalability if you cannot even
add two numbers together. (Well maybe with Lisp and infinite tapes)
Dijkstra had an analogy with comparing, as a means of
Adam wrote:
>
> On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:58:39 -0500 "Tony Abernethy"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Adam wrote:
> > > The question was about scalability.
> >
> > I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
>
>
Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> OpenBSD scales very well an most tasks you'll find.
> There are some exceptions tho. That unfortunately includes threads.
Out of curiosity, what happens when you run apache on SMP hardware
where the libraries are not "thread safe"? (or whatever it's called)
Adam uttered following nonsense.
> "Linux programs" have nothing to do with anything,
That is a good characterization of SMP and scaling?
> and your desire to make a big stupid thread of bullshit is quite annoying.
You are annoyed.
My desire is a small thread.
akonsu wrote:
>
> in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service
> packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a
> service pack, this is not a proper implementation.
Exactly.
(And I don't seem to hear a lot about keeping OpenBSD patched up-to-
Is there a way to compile something on i386 OpenBSD box to run on amd64?
or is there a sysctl option I am missing?
Thanks.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
"so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
not help
architecture of input file `some.o' is
incompatible with i386:x86-64 output
Is compiling this way possible at all?
Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 29 August 2005 16:34 -0500, Tony Lambiris wrote:
Is there a way to compile something on i386 OpenBS
I actually hacked an existing util for NetBSD to run flawlessly on
OpenBSD (I have a Dell inspiron 700m).
You can get it here:
http://lysergik.com/~tony/openbsd.phtml
Baldur Sigurpsson wrote:
hi
use this thing:
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/i855vidctl/
just remember to put the command
I know this will run fine, but will the dual-core and such be detected
and setup correctly, or is this an amd64 specific thing?
TIA.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
"so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that doe
he CB54G2 is a RT2500, but the CB54G is
> Broadcom.
>
Is there any vendor that doesn't do that ?
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
pipe to connect them.
>
I belive recent studies in internet/universe behaviour shows that
there is an infinite amount of porn, you just have to tweak
net.inet.somaxporn correctly.
/Tony
I use OpenBSD boxes with a few 4xFE on two sites as switches/routers =)
I'm am happier with them than the cheapo switches I replaced.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
es it is really nice to use, it is
starting to give me the same feeling as pf. I got a 10 router bgp-only
test network up and running in just a few hours, most of the time was
spent installing the boxes.
/Tony S
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
On 06/09/05, Karl Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tony sarendal wrote:
>
> >I've started to test bgpd to see if I can use if for a future project.
> >Are there any plans to make bgpctl show communities, originator-id and
> >cluster-list ?
> >
>
rboard
boxes), were brand new.
Any suggestions?
TIA.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
"so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
not help then perhaps should not use computers..."
I (think I) found the problem... I will be posting a patch shortly if I
confirm my suspicions.
Thanks.
Tony Lambiris wrote:
We have some motherboards with (what we think) are the same chips and
revisions with the same hard drives, but some drives are being detected
as DMA and others as
ny light that can be shed would
be greatly appriciated.
Thanks.
Tony Lambiris wrote:
I (think I) found the problem... I will be posting a patch shortly if I
confirm my suspicions.
Thanks.
Tony Lambiris wrote:
We have some motherboards with (what we think) are the same chips and
revisio
I forgot to ask, would it be bad practice to just add
PCI_PRODUCT_VIATECH_VT82C571 to one of the cases in the switch
statement? It seems like this might go a little deeper
Tony Lambiris wrote:
Well I thought I knew what the problem was (nope).. I found something
interesting though
else
+ reg |= (VP3_CFG_TRIGGER_EDGE << shift);
pci_conf_write(ph->ph_pc, ph->ph_tag,
VP3_CFG_PIRQ_REG, reg);
break;
Tony Lambiris wrote:
I forgot to ask, would it be bad practice to just add
PCI
ut
it's a temporary fix for me.
Over and out, sorry again for the noise.
Tony Lambiris wrote:
Sorry for all the noise, this seems to have fixed it (from NetBSD):
--- via82c586.c.origMon Sep 12 19:38:35 2005
+++ via82c586.c Mon Sep 12 20:27:28 2005
@@ -256,9 +256,10 @@
isn't that important.
Weekend.
/Tony
Sorry about the dupicate, Joel.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
On 29/09/05, Schvberle Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I hope this proves to be useful to someone,
> Daniel
>
I personally find all network performance/routing info on openbsd interesting.
Thanks Daniel.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= Th
support looks in -current,
but when experimenting a few months back I had some problems with
setting multiple communities and I was also forced to use an external
route-server to see what was happening in my test network. I intend to
give this a new try when I have finished the project I'm curre
book Internet Routing Architectures from cisco press.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
t; vlan and the second .120 on another vlan, and then just translate packets.
>
>
Set ip IPIP (gif) tunnels between the firewalls, encrypt them if you want to,
add the statics you wish on the main site pointing at the other end of the
tunnel where you want it to go.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
put in a single directory. And of course, where
> you work with multiple directories, each can be on a separate
> partition...
>
I thought fsck on 300GB was painful. 2TB...
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
-p0 < file.diff
This isnt correct at all, but it works.
Sebastian Dehne wrote
Hi Tony,
It turns I'm having the same problem and saw you've done some research.
# dmesg| grep DMA
pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 "VIA VT82C571 IDE" rev 0x06: DMA,
channel 0 configur
Try:
boot -c
disable fdc
Lionel Vidal wrote:
I tried to boot the new 3.8 version on a (rather old) PC,
a HP pavilion 422.fr. I tried both to boot from cdrom38.fs
and floppy38.fs and the result is the same :
OpenBSD i386 BOOT 2.10
boot>
booting fd0a:/bsd: 3263620
Entry point at 0x100120
L
probably not -- but we use ldap here at work, and the auth_ldap in the
ports tree works great.
Aiko Barz wrote:
I googled, but I couldn't figure out the current status.
My problem:
I tried to move my mailservers from Linux to OpenBSD. It's a qmail-ldap
system with its users stored in OpenLDAP.
ge
had incorrect info in the mac-address table and did no re-learn until
I cleared the table.
I wasn't able to troubleshoot more due to the thing being live.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
Fully possible. Just use a tunneling protocol (man gif) for the
point-to-points and encrypt them, then use the tunnels for dynamic
routing.
You even get the bonus of working path-mtu-discovery wiithin your network.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion
On 23/11/05, Kor Boerema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> In what ways do the GIF tunnels differ from a normal ipsec tunnel?
>
By using a tunneling protocol your traffic will from an ipsec point of
view always have the same source/des
let me know how it goes.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
command on each end, I doubt you'll need help
with that.man page, tcpdump, trial/error.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
enterprises
that are in the process of migrating their OpenSSH environments to SSH
Tectia...
"The large installed base of the OpenSSH code on Linux and Unix
servers today is a major opportunity for SSH,"
---
Wow, I think I'll keep my money and let them hump that dead dog in peace ?
> It is very important that we educate people about what the choice
> of open source software means.
>
>From a business perspective I don't see this being very important =)
If the competition is willing to give me an edge on them, be my guests.
/Tony
x to protocol y.
One thing I noticed when testing with openbsd was that I wasn't able to add
xxx/yy on an interface if the same prefix already was known via bgp.
/Tony
ing traffic from
> carp source addresses on multiple ports without duplicate suppression?
"duplicate suppression", makes the lack of per-vlan mac-address tables
sound like a feature.
Get switches with per-vlan mac-address tables, even old cisco 3500 has this.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarenda
501 - 600 of 718 matches
Mail list logo
