On 01/04/06, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 10:39:26AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> >
> > In my case (aslo on crappy UK broadband)
>
> You should try it in NZ, 128k upstream!
>
> > 1454 is actually optimal.
> > On the dsl part of the link my connection runs the Ethernet frames over
> ATM,
> > so I get this nice pancake when crossing the pvc:
> >
> > ATM/AAL5/Ethernet/PPPoE/PPP/IP
>
> I doubt that there would be PPPoE in there, if your ISP resells std BT
> ADSL. You may want to see: http://www.sinet.bt.com/386v2p0.pdf
I'm afraid it is.
Look at the third option in 4.4.2.10. (PPPoE LLC/SNAP)
/T
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
