On 2017-04-19, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> On 04/18/17 17:05, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>> Mine is in the pkg-readme.
>>
>>
>
> A pkg-readme? Is this included in the binary package?
Yes - pkg_add should have drawn your attention to it:
# pkg_add dhcpcd
dhcpcd-6.11.5: ok
The following new rcscri
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:31:47PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2017-04-19, Heiko wrote:
>
> > I'm using current on amd64 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz,
> > 3411.91 MHz)
> >
> > I noticed that with clang it needs 109 minutes for "make build" and
> > before with gcc 32 minute
On 2017-04-21 02:13, Jeff wrote:
I have a Sunfire V120 (Sparc) with mirrored disks running OpenBSD 6.0.
...
First I tried to copy bsd.rd to / and boot from it. When I boot
using 6.1 bsd.rd (boot /bsd.rd), the boot messages still show
OpenBSD 6.0.
Hi Jeff,
If you use softraid on sparc64, you s
0
C Iran
P Tehran
T Tehran
F irregular
O Iranian meetBSD Group
I abdorrahman homaei
M d.orien...@gmail.com
U http://meetbsd.ir
N *BSD
On 2017-04-20, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
> Could it be any buffers that is causing this in 6.1 but not in 6.0 ?
There were changes that would allow larger TCP buffers in 6.1. This
would not have made a difference to normal or natted connections from
non-OpenBSD going through PF to non-OpenBSD but c
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 06:13:47PM -0600, Jeff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Sunfire V120 (Sparc) with mirrored disks running OpenBSD 6.0.
> I attempted to update to OpenBSD 6.1 using the files first from:
>
> http://mirrors.sonic.net/pub/OpenBSD/6.1/sparc64
>
> Then from:
>
> https://ftp3.usa.open
Hello misc
I'm setting the small mail system and I don't investigate with the working
of spamd.
spamd is working in the greylisting mode with "-v -G 2:4:864" options.
For every trying of the delivery mail a remote host become TRAPPED for 24
hours, and I don't understand why.
Please help me chang
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:04:07AM +0200, Mickael Torres wrote:
> On 2017-04-21 02:13, Jeff wrote:
> > I have a Sunfire V120 (Sparc) with mirrored disks running OpenBSD 6.0.
> > ...
> > First I tried to copy bsd.rd to / and boot from it. When I boot
> > using 6.1 bsd.rd (boot /bsd.rd), the boot me
Hi there,
so if you have spamd in place in greylisting mode and you have customers
that work with people who use Office365 as a service you will get calls
that emails are delayed for a freaking long time and if you check the ip
range that outlook.com could send from you get scared.
So what
On 2017-04-21 10:50, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:04:07AM +0200, Mickael Torres wrote:
On 2017-04-21 02:13, Jeff wrote:
> I have a Sunfire V120 (Sparc) with mirrored disks running OpenBSD 6.0.
> ...
> First I tried to copy bsd.rd to / and boot from it. When I boot
> using 6
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:25:14AM +0200, Markus Rosjat wrote:
>
> so if you have spamd in place in greylisting mode and you have customers
> that work with people who use Office365 as a service you will get calls that
> emails are delayed for a freaking long time and if you check the ip range
> t
hey peter,
like your pf book very much helped me a lot to grasp some stuff :)
fot the host solution I already did this but skiped the part with
following the includes.
MS is providing a list of there possible ip ranges here
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn163583(v=exchg.150).a
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:59:20AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:25:14AM +0200, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> >
> > so if you have spamd in place in greylisting mode and you have customers
> > that work with people who use Office365 as a service you will get calls that
>
On 03/04/17(Mon) 10:41, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'm reading some networking stuff and I saw Van Jacobson presentation
> about net channels concept.
> For me, as user that doesn't know net internals, this presentation seems
> quite reasonable.
>
> Beside that it's about linux network
Hi Markus,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:25:14 +0200 Markus Rosjat wrote:
> so if you have spamd in place in greylisting mode and you have
> customers that work with people who use Office365 as a service you
> will get calls that emails are delayed for a freaking long time
Email is not instant messaging
Hello Peter/all,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:59:20 +0200 "Peter N. M. Hansteen" wrote:
>
> start with
>
> $ host -ttxt outlook.com
>
> and follow the includes to the very end. Then weep.
>
In February 2015 Paul de Weerd calculated Google published 217,088 IPv4
addresses, and 29,710,560,942,849,12
> On 21 Apr 2017, at 10:34, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2017-04-20, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
>> Could it be any buffers that is causing this in 6.1 but not in 6.0 ?
>
> There were changes that would allow larger TCP buffers in 6.1. This
> would not have made a difference to normal or natted
> On 21 Apr 2017, at 10:34, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2017-04-20, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
>> Could it be any buffers that is causing this in 6.1 but not in 6.0 ?
>
> There were changes that would allow larger TCP buffers in 6.1. This
> would not have made a difference to normal or natted
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
> Op Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:16:31 +0200 schreef Reyk Floeter :
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:59:20AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:25:14AM +0200, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > I use the a
Hi,
I'm trying to use the new acme-client on a server behind a corporate
proxy (i.e. I have to set a http_proxy to get out). It seems (from
reading the code) that acme-client(1) does not honor http_proxy.
Is this on purpose? If so, can someone point me to another acme client
that does this?
--
M
And apropos of the subject, quite on-topic:
https://home.nuug.no/~peter/dmarc-reject_openbsd-misc_spadm_and_spf.txt
- P (pats robot on virtual head)
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Rem
Thanks for the start points, Christian and Philip.
I would have never thought about those use cases.
I'll definitely look into this further.
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:31:08 + (UTC)
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2017-04-19, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> > For a broader answer to the "why?", ta
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 06:13:47PM -0600, Jeff wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Sunfire V120 (Sparc) with mirrored disks running OpenBSD 6.0.
> > I attempted to update to OpenBSD 6.1 using the files first from:
> >
> > http://mirrors.sonic.net/pub/OpenB
On 04/21/17 07:12, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
Op Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:16:31 +0200 schreef Reyk Floeter :
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:59:20AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:25:14AM +0200, Markus Rosjat w
My main OpenBSD system is a Shuttle SH81R4 with a 4th Gen i5. I run the latest
snapshot on it and once or twice a week I will boot into bsd.rd and run update.
A week or two ago I put a mini-pcie wifi card in it (athn0) and after getting
some help from this mailing list, I got this system runni
Op Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:16:31 +0200 schreef Reyk Floeter :
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:59:20AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:25:14AM +0200, Markus Rosjat wrote:
>
I use the attached script to fetch the SPF entries recursively, in a
plain text format that can be fe
Op Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:12:56 +0200 schreef Reyk Floeter :
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
Op Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:16:31 +0200 schreef Reyk Floeter
:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:59:20AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:25:14AM
On 2017-04-21, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> so if you have spamd in place in greylisting mode and you have customers
> that work with people who use Office365 as a service you will get calls
> that emails are delayed for a freaking long time and if you check the ip
> range that outlook.com could send
On 2017-04-21, Craig Skinner wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:25:14 +0200 Markus Rosjat wrote:
>> so if you have spamd in place in greylisting mode and you have
>> customers that work with people who use Office365 as a service you
>> will get calls that emails are delayed for a freak
Like I said I had one case where I had the same message send from 20 different
outlook.com servers that's just stupid
Regards
Markus
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Edgar Pettijohn
Datum: 21.04.17 15:20 (GMT+01:00)
An: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: spamd and outlook.com
O
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:39:39 +1000
wrote:
> Thanks for the start points, Christian and Philip.
> I would have never thought about those use cases.
> I'll definitely look into this further.
I rewrote some code for key generation for particular memory
handling/protection reasons and it certainly p
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:02:20 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > Email is not instant messaging.
> >
> > Customers need educated to that fact.
>
> How do you educate them to that when they send to their gmail account
> and it shows up on their phone within seconds?
>
> Sometimes there
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 04:02:20PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-04-21, Craig Skinner wrote:
> > Hi Markus,
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:25:14 +0200 Markus Rosjat wrote:
> >> so if you have spamd in place in greylisting mode and you have
> >> customers that work with people who use Of
Hi misc,
ldapd on one of my two ldap servers stop working overnight
# uname -a
OpenBSD atlas.int.autonlab.org 6.1 GENERIC.MP#20 amd64
I manually restarted it and it appears to work OK. I started digging
little bit through the log fil
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-04-21, Craig Skinner wrote:
> > Email is not instant messaging.
> >
> > Customers need educated to that fact.
>
> How do you educate them to that when they send to their gmail account
> and it shows up on their phone within seconds?
We, at school, used the pen
On 2017-04-21 19:09, bian wrote:
I did not try slappasswd but the message is triggered from other
places as well. From my ~/.xsession-errors (using 6.1 , xfce4):
firefox-esr:/usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.12.0:
/usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.12.0 : WARNING: symbol(icudt58_dat) size
mismatch, relink you
On 04/21/17 10:44, Alex Shupikov wrote:
> spamd is working in the greylisting mode with "-v -G 2:4:864" options.
> For every trying of the delivery mail a remote host become TRAPPED for 24
> hours, and I don't understand why.
is there a very restrictive spamd.alloweddomains you're not showing us?
Thanks again. The connections are all working.
On 4/20/17 8:54 PM, Igor V. Gubenko wrote:
> Thank you, the patch appears to work. I haven't fully tested
> connecting/establishing connections, so I'll send another update.
>
> Prior to the patch, iked also complained about lack of public keys for
>
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:21:48 -0700
Kurt H Maier wrote:
> Greylisting is a hack, an abuse of a side-effect. Most such
> approaches have deleterious side effects. This particular side
> effect is why I don't like greylisting in general, even though it's
> fairly effective.
Do you answer your pho
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:40:42PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:21:48 -0700
> Kurt H Maier wrote:
>
> > Greylisting is a hack, an abuse of a side-effect. Most such
> > approaches have deleterious side effects. This particular side
> > effect is why I don't like greylist
On 2017-04-21, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> What I don't do it set an outgoing voicemail greeting informing
> correspondents that my time is more valuable than theirs, and if they
> want to contact me I have a list of hoops through which they must jump.
>
> That would make me an asshole.
Heh. I do actua
=== BACKGROUND ===
I'm trying to set up an OpenBSD 6.1 server having two externally visible
IP numbers through one physical network port, each IP mapping to a
unique MAC address[1]. I have it mostly working, but my interfaces can't
talk to each other.
All traffic should use the primary IP, and mo
On 04/21/17 20:49, Anders Andersson wrote:
=== BACKGROUND ===
I'm trying to set up an OpenBSD 6.1 server having two externally visible
IP numbers through one physical network port, each IP mapping to a
unique MAC address[1]. I have it mostly working, but my interfaces can't
talk to each other.
43 matches
Mail list logo
