On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:39:39 +1000
<bytevolc...@safe-mail.net> wrote:

> Thanks for the start points, Christian and Philip.
> I would have never thought about those use cases.
> I'll definitely look into this further.

I rewrote some code for key generation for particular memory
handling/protection reasons and it certainly provides some extra
confidence to yourself and/or other if you find your implementation and
four others all produce the same 10000 outputs with the same repeatable
but random looking inputs. Usually specific and well chosen test vectors
are available, but not always.

I did have a cry/laugh at the function name of the deterministic
"random" generator in mbedtls though and reminding me of the OpenBSD
commentry on them. Unfortunately I forget the details of what was
particularly alarming/funny though.

Reply via email to