I am recording on a MSI Wind PC running -recent,
using the integrated azalia
azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801GB HD Audio" rev 0x01: apic 1 int
16 (irq 10)
azalia0: codecs: Realtek ALC888
audio0 at azalia0
Everything I record has a small negative DC offset:
http://stare.cz/~hans/.tm
I am not completely sure to understand, is it possible to make a pseudo device
bridged to an interface and marking the packets with a tag according to rules
based on MAC adress and then to take account of the tag in pf while doing NAT
translation to a second interface ?
In my opinion, this migh
Yep, see snippet from man page for brconfig(8)
The following commands will tag packets from and to 9:8:7:6:5:4 on fxp0
so that pf(4) can refer to them using the tagged directive:
# brconfig bridge0 rule pass in on fxp0 src 9:8:7:6:5:4 tag boss
# brconfig bridge0 rule
i hate to bring this up, but if you have cisco gear with dhcp snooping enabled
you can enforce this on the switch.
On 20/02/2010, at 8:49 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Is it possible to do filtering through pf or blocking traffic based of MAC
adress
> recognition ?
>
> We want to i
The input should be capacitively coupled, so even if your mic has a DC
offset it shouldn't matter. Either the capacitor is leaky or the ADC is
broken. It could be a driver weirdness but that sounds unlikely.
If you don't mind losing the few bits of dynamic range, you can just
remove the DC offset
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:26:44PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> i hate to bring this up, but if you have cisco gear with dhcp snooping enabled
> you can enforce this on the switch.
That's probably also the only reasonable place to do it. Thankfully it's
not only cisco that does that nowadays.
St
[IMAGE]
Recadastramento
===
Prezado Cliente,o Bradesco adota uma rigorosa polmtica de seguranga e de
privacidade para proteger as suas informagues,preocupado com vocj,
estamos adotando medidas preventivas de seguranga de tal forma informar
que o uso da Chave de Seguranga tornou-se obr
On 21/02/10 04:42, L. V. Lammert wrote:
Dude? Seriously?
Your mother's a whore.
Wow! Such intelligence! Sorry, but you's was the one I saw in
Amsterdam.
Lee
http://www.google.com/search?q=crontab+gui
http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/cronweb.htm
http://quicksilver.be.washington.edu/soft
Hi again,
Seems I missed this part in ipsec.conf:
mode For ESP and AH the encapsulation mode can be specified. Possible
modes are tunnel and transport. When left out, tunnel is
chosen.
Since I obviously want transport mode for host-host I changed psec.conf:
esp transport from 10.1
On 21/02/10 13:57, Robert wrote:
Hi again,
Seems I missed this part in ipsec.conf:
mode For ESP and AH the encapsulation mode can be specified. Possible
modes are tunnel and transport. When left out, tunnel is
chosen.
Since I obviously want transport mode for host-host I changed psec.conf:
E
On 21-02-10 03:42, L. V. Lammert wrote:
>> Dude? Seriously?
>>
>> Your mother's a whore.
>>
> Wow! Such intelligence! Sorry, but you's was the one I saw in
> Amsterdam.
Hehe, mentioning "Amsterdam", you dare! Seriously seeking trouble?
+++chefren
p.s. Frantisek mentioned "webmin", in this case
Le Dimanche 21 FC)vrier 2010 11:07:28, Tomas Bodzar a C)crit :
> Yep, see snippet from man page for brconfig(8)
>
> The following commands will tag packets from and to 9:8:7:6:5:4 on fxp0
> so that pf(4) can refer to them using the tagged directive:
>
># brconfig bridge0 rule pass
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:29:15AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> I consider buying the Lexicon Alpha souncard:
> http://www.lexiconpro.com/product.php?id=7
>
> Is someone using it sucessfully? I understand there
> are "USB soundcards" out there not even appearing as
> USB Audio class devices.
>
> If
Hi All,
Do you believe it is not a bad idea to use ext2 as a file system for the
regular back-up (dumps) of the filesystem ?
Actually, I would like to be able to read from a simple Linux the disk that
contents the dumps - reaon why.
Are there any constraints in doing so ? May you strongly reco
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> I am recording on a MSI Wind PC running -recent,
> using the integrated azalia
>
> azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801GB HD Audio" rev 0x01: apic 1
> int 16 (irq 10)
> azalia0: codecs: Realtek ALC888
> audio0 at azalia0
>
>
For storage/backup you may find much more better Hammer FS or ZFS
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Do you believe it is not a bad idea to use ext2 as a file system for the
> regular back-up (dumps) of the filesystem ?
>
> Actually, I would like to be able to rea
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Michael Dexter wrote:
> OpenBSD has a booth at the SCaLE conference in Los Angeles and no one
> appears to be available to staff it.
>
> It's a great conference and I highly recommend someone drop by to staff
> it Saturday and Sunday.
Although I am un
Hello,
Le Dimanche 21 FC)vrier 2010 16:11:20, vous avez C)crit :
> For storage/backup you may find much more better Hammer FS or ZFS
I can't find out how to make a newfs with HFS or ZFS. Are there any additional
packages to install ?
Hi All,
Sorry for the so many questions but still manual may not always answer to
them.
I actually mounted 2 usb pens in RAID 1 in order to understand how it works.
When one is removed the RAID device properly works.
When remounted I keep having the device offline.
$ sudo bioctl -i sd2
Volume
They aren't available on other platforms. As I know Hammer FS is only
on DragonflyBSD, but there is some project to use it under fuse on
Linux. ZFS is on Solaris/OpenSolaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X. There is
project to port it to Linux, but don't know about progress. On Linux
is only available competent
Hi Rich!
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:59:05PM -0500, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
>> As I often have greater respect for a much larger portion of this list
>> than the rest of the internet, I am curious what is thought about
>> current IDS/IPS hardw
Anyway it's quite OT :-)
Here two stories
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2009-02/msg00090.html
http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/10/10/success-with-opensolaris-zfs-mysql-in-production/
We are still talking just about backup/storage. ZFS has a lot of
features and it's used for ab
It seems the format of
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/index.txt
has changed again from 'ls -l' to plain 'ls'.
Should scripts expect this format from now on?
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 17:51, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Sorry for the so many questions but still manual may not always
> answer to them.
Did you read bioctl(8) and did you try the -R option that man page
mentions? It would seem appropriate for your question.
> How do we make the device become onl
Le Dimanche 21 Fivrier 2010 18:56:32, Rogier Krieger a icrit :
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 17:51, Jean-Francois wrote:
> > Sorry for the so many questions but still manual may not always
> > answer to them.
>
> Did you read bioctl(8) and did you try the -R option that man page
> mentions? It would s
Hello,
Thanks I will read.
My problem is that the disks will be available in RAID1 for system to dump
upon, and in case the system itself is not responsive anymore or fails to boot
for a hardware reason, I need the external hard drives to be readable by a
Linux system. But they will be mounted an
On Feb 21 19:52:54, Jean-Francois wrote:
> My problem is that the disks will be available in RAID1 for system to dump
> upon, and in case the system itself is not responsive anymore or fails to boot
> for a hardware reason, I need the external hard drives to be readable by a
> Linux system.
Why?
There is no way to mount Hammer FS or ZFS in OpenBSD as I know. What's
the target you want to achieve? To have some data on RAID accessible
from both systems? Then you can use FFS or ext2 as both are of course
on OpenBSD and Linux can read FFS. Or you can share it over NFS.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at
What the heck is your "business requirement"? Nobody runs an OS in
prod and expects to use another OS on the same drives.
Figure out what you *NEED* rather than what you *WANT* needless
complexity is going to kill you. So's going for buzz words. I love
zfs but it isn't the right thing for eve
Hi,
I think you misunderstand me, I was not trying to argue that Cisco's firewall
offerings are any better or worse than OpenBSD based solutions. I was merely
pointing out that:
- A _correctly_configured_ Cisco 6500/7600 SUP is not vulnerable to "a few
Mbps of multicast traffic" as alleged by c
> It seems the format of
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/index.txt
> has changed again from 'ls -l' to plain 'ls'.
> Should scripts expect this format from now on?
Yes, it is required by the installer.
On Feb 21 16:09:18, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > I am recording on a MSI Wind PC running -recent,
> > using the integrated azalia
> >
> > azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801GB HD Audio" rev 0x01: apic 1
> > int 16 (irq 10)
>
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 19:47, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Seems appropriate in the latest man, but did not appear in my man page. The -R
> is'nt available in version 4.4 ? any way to proceed ?
As far as I know, softraid didn't support rebuilds in 4.4; it was
added later. Judging from the man page dif
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 02:04:01PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:29:15AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > I consider buying the Lexicon Alpha souncard:
> > http://www.lexiconpro.com/product.php?id=7
> >
> > Is someone using it sucessfully? I understand there
> > are "USB
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:05:39PM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think you misunderstand me, I was not trying to argue that Cisco's firewall
> offerings are any better or worse than OpenBSD based solutions. I was merely
> pointing out that:
>
> - A _correctly_configured_ Cisco 6500/760
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> I am recording on a MSI Wind PC running -recent,
> using the integrated azalia
>
> azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801GB HD Audio" rev 0x01: apic 1
> int 16 (irq 10)
> azalia0: codecs: Realtek ALC888
> audio0 at azalia0
>
>
> > record.adc-0:1_mute=off
> > record.adc-0:1=224,224
>
> that is amplifying the input to the ADC considerably. the 0..255 mixer
> values represet -16.5..+30dB *for this codec*. it would be nice if
> mixer values corresponded to decibles somehow, but that is not the case
> currently.
>
> > inp
Opedk`r`el nqsyeqrbhr| p`ss{kjh hmtnpl`vhnmmn pejk`lm{u l`reph`knb on
`dpeqm{l a`z`l ema3l `dpeqnb onk\...@rekei Sjp`hm{ h Onk|xh!
<<_...@jrs@k\m[...@dpeqm[e..a@z[..on...@rekei_>>
Kheb (1,45 lhk.`dp.)* -1350 cphbem
Deknbni Kheb (600 r{q.`dp.)* -1000 cphbem
Sjp`hm` (2,2 lhk
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:35:25PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > record.adc-0:1_mute=off
> > > record.adc-0:1=224,224
> >
> > that is amplifying the input to the ADC considerably. the 0..255 mixer
> > values represet -16.5..+30dB *for this codec*. it would be nice if
> > mixer values corresponde
Making again the test on 4.6 Now I have "bioctl: BIOCCREATERAID: Invalid
argument" however on a another machine. Am I wrong in any point ?
Is there any need to compile raid into the kernel as I saw here ?
http://www.argon18.com/raid_openbsd.html
Following example (same method as I first used)
E
Thank you Seth and Brooke for materializing and putting on a great
OpenBSD booth at SCaLE in Los Angeles.
Overheard question of the day: Could you please get EAL level 4
certification so I can use you in the US Air Force? (Milaero country...)
Michael
On 21/02/10 23:21, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:05:39PM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote:
- 6500/7600 can do HW stateful FWing, e.g. FWSM (which is not a line card) ,
but which is obviously a different budget the a PC running OpenBSD.
This is a special module that costs about $1
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:35 -0800, "Michael Dexter"
wrote:
> Thank you Seth and Brooke for materializing and putting on a great
> OpenBSD booth at SCaLE in Los Angeles.
>
> Overheard question of the day: Could you please get EAL level 4
> certification so I can use you in the US Air Force? (Milaero
> Although I am unable to attend this conference, I was speaking the
> other day with devs about having booths at european conferences. Are
> you involved in this kind of thing?
That's odd. You had the best conference and community network I've ever
seen hands down. Anywhere. Period. I wouldn't be
Hi,
Henning Brauer wrote:
[...]
> in general, tag/tagged influences ruleset evaluation. once state is
> created there is no ruleset eval any more for packets matching that
> state.
Is there any way to, e.g., tag or queue packets that allready match a state?
Bye,
Andreas M|ller.
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Michael Dexter wrote:
Thank you Seth and Brooke for materializing and putting on a great
OpenBSD booth at SCaLE in Los Angeles.
Overheard question of the day: Could you please get EAL level 4
certification so I can use you in the US Air Force? (Milaero country...)
Michael
Hi,
sorry for the noise, just found that reference in the pf-faq:
"PF will record the queue in the state table entry [...]".
Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> [...]
> > in general, tag/tagged influences ruleset evaluation. once state is
> > created there is no ruleset eva
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, chefren wrote:
> Hehe, mentioning "Amsterdam", you dare! Seriously seeking trouble?
>
Moi? I didn't bring up the subject, ..
> p.s. Frantisek mentioned "webmin",
>
Suggested earlier, .. and replied.
> Your "OT," stands for "I'm lazy and not so competent nor creative but wil
> In my own opinion EAL level 4 cert has some serious issues. A lot of
> what you get is Process and Procedure done by some large corporate
> entity. What you find is code revs rarely go through certification.
> For example Cisco ASA / Pix have to run pretty old code to get EAL 4
> cert.
>
> my
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 03:35:32PM -0800, Michael Dexter wrote:
> Thank you Seth and Brooke for materializing and putting on a great
> OpenBSD booth at SCaLE in Los Angeles.
Seth and Brooke? I know those two! Good people.
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
dwchan
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Darrin Chandler
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 03:35:32PM -0800, Michael Dexter wrote:
> > Thank you Seth and Brooke for materializing and putting on a great
> > OpenBSD booth at SCaLE in Los Angeles.
>
> Seth and Brooke? I know those two! Good people.
>
i volun
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 00:03, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Making again the test on 4.6 Now I have "bioctl: BIOCCREATERAID: Invalid
> argument" however on a another machine. Am I wrong in any point ?
The kernel complains about invalid metadata, so that may well stop you
from rebuilding your 4.4-softra
Hi,
I get a few of this kind of error during a forced manual fsck at boot.
Feb 15 15:43:51 fw2 /bsd: wd0g: uncorrectable data error reading fsbn
5392325 (wd0 bn 24734585; cn 1539 tn 167 sn 29)
Feb 15 15:43:51 fw2 /bsd: wd0g: uncorrectable data error reading fsbn
5392326 (wd0 bn 24734586; cn 1539
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get a few of this kind of error during a forced manual fsck at boot.
>
> Feb 15 15:43:51 fw2 /bsd: wd0g: uncorrectable data error reading fsbn
> 5392325 (wd0 bn 24734585; cn 1539 tn 167 sn 29)
> Feb 15 15:43:51 fw2 /bsd: wd0g: uncorr
Szia!
Elindmtottuk legzjabb oldalunkat. Tvbb ezer filmmel, jatikkal!
http://merwz.servehttp.com
Gyere kukkants be hozzank mindenkipp! Felszeretnid tvrni haverod msnjit,
myvipjit? Js helyen jarsz. A jelszs feltvrÅ men|pontban ezen oldalakhoz
talalsz programot.
Vsszesen 815129 db hacker program tal
On Feb 13, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Matt Bettinger wrote:
Had same issues with net 5501-70. I use a psu from a linksys wifi
ap and it is rock solid now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 13, 2010, at 11:05 AM, daniel wrote:
I've been using a Net 4501 for several years now (since at least
OpenBSD 3.8)
> i have a hard time extracting anything that would make sense from the
> above.
> in general, tag/tagged influences ruleset evaluation. once state is
> created there is no ruleset eval any more for packets matching that
> state.
yes, i just wanna make sure what i'm thinking is right,
problem ear
* Andreas Mueller [2010-02-22 03:00]:
> Hi,
>
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> [...]
> > in general, tag/tagged influences ruleset evaluation. once state is
> > created there is no ruleset eval any more for packets matching that
> > state.
>
> Is there any way to, e.g., tag or queue packets that allre
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Agung T. Apriyanto wrote:
>> i have a hard time extracting anything that would make sense from the
>> above.
>> in general, tag/tagged influences ruleset evaluation. once state is
>> created there is no ruleset eval any more for packets matching that
>> state.
>
>
59 matches
Mail list logo
