On 03/09/06, micke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But if you want to use specified audio device only for amarok xine
> engine you can do that by changing the line:
>
> audio.device.sun_audio_device:/dev/audio1
>
> in the config file:
> $HOME/.kde/share/apps/amarok/xine-config
Great!
Thanks for y
Hello all,
I have a bit of a problem here, which I figured you might be able to shed
some light on.
Setup:
2 x obsd 3.8 (+patches) machines running pf/pfsync/carp/ftp-proxy. Using 4
carp interfaces per machine,
plus an if for pfsync. Hardware used is a couple of ibm x306, each with an
intel quad-
On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
> On 9/3/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all
> >> the time. However, after I've read about them at this lis
thus Marcus Popp spake:
On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 9/3/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all
the time. However, after I've read about th
thus Marcus Popp spake:
On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 9/3/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all
the time. However, after I've read about th
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, viq wrote:
> > As for reporting, you already did. ;-)
>
> Well, no, I didn't submit an 'official' PR ;)
I did, as a reminder to myself (or any other volunteer who wants to
attack this). It's PR 5129, containing a file and a diff to reproduce
the problem. Thanks for paying at
On 2006/09/04 10:32, anders winckler wrote:
> 2 x obsd 3.8 (+patches) machines running pf/pfsync/carp/ftp-proxy.
See http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c
- note where OPENBSD_3_8 is in the page. Try a snapshot, plenty has
changed.
> My coworker did a bit of research on th
On 9/4/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, viq wrote:
> > As for reporting, you already did. ;-)
>
> Well, no, I didn't submit an 'official' PR ;)
I did, as a reminder to myself (or any other volunteer who wants to
attack this). It's PR 5129, containing a file and
On 9/4/06, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's PR 5129, containing a file and a diff to reproduce
the problem. Thanks for paying attention and reporting this.
It's 5219 - I keep hitting the keys in wrong order too ;)
-Otto
--
viq
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, viq wrote:
>
> > > As for reporting, you already did. ;-)
> >
> > Well, no, I didn't submit an 'official' PR ;)
>
> I did, as a reminder to myself (or any other volunteer who wants to
> attack this). It's PR 5129, containing a file and
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Dries Schellekens wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, viq wrote:
> >
> > > > As for reporting, you already did. ;-)
> > >
> > > Well, no, I didn't submit an 'official' PR ;)
> >
> > I did, as a reminder to myself (or any other volunteer
Hi
I might be missing something obvious (in which case I apologize!), but I
think that the current behaviour of hostapd(8)'s configuration file
parser in -current is not quite correct when dealing with multiple
matches of the 'not' grammar rule.
Take, for example, the config file excerpt
ho
since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially proactive about
debugging, it would not surprise me to learn that there is automated code
auditing going on. is this already the case? i didn't see openbsd listed on
coverity's page, http://scan.coverity.com/ .
further info about software
Original message
>Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:52:46 -0300
>From: "Diego Casati" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Speack Freely broken
>To: ports@openbsd.org
>
>speak freely seems to break when its Makefile gets updated, is anyone
>getting the same?
>
diego,
speak freely 7.1 is getting pre
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially proactive about
> debugging, it would not surprise me to learn that there is automated code
> auditing going on. is this already the case? i didn't see openbsd listed on
> coverity's page, http://scan.coverity.co
On 9/4/06, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially proactive about
debugging, it would not surprise me to learn that there is automated code
auditing going on. is this already the case? i didn't see openbsd listed on
coverity's page
Nick Holland wrote:
> Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> > since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially
> > proactive about debugging, it would not surprise me to learn
> > that there is automated code auditing going on. is this
> > already the case? i didn't see openbsd listed on coverity's
Original message
>Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:26:26 -0400
>From: "Nick Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: automated source code scanning
>To: OpenBSD-Misc
>
>On 9/4/06, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially p
How large is the "real" offset? What happens if you set the time
yourself to a value reasonable close to the actual value?
About 3.5 hrs... The reason I found the bouncing numbers suspect
was that I have a dual-boot XP/OpenBSD laptop for field work. The
time reported from the system clock
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
>
> since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially
> proactive about
> debugging, it would not surprise me to learn that there is automated code
> auditing going on. is this already the case? i didn't see openbsd
Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:30:13AM +, Marcus Popp wrote:
> On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
> > Other than Intel, is anyone else making quad port gig cards?
>
> Silicom makes em-based quad/six port cards.
I thought the point of this subthread was Bill trying to avoid
em(4)-based card
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 02:06:11AM -0600, Jason George wrote:
> >How large is the "real" offset? What happens if you set the time
> >yourself to a value reasonable close to the actual value?
>
> About 3.5 hrs... The reason I found the bouncing numbers suspect
> was that I have a dual-boot XP/O
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands little chance of making
> anything better. Me, I just lurk here and do not speak for anyone, but
> I can assure you that the OpenBSD folks are not so naive as to put any
> trust in aut
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:27:32AM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands little chance of making
> > anything better. Me, I just lurk here and do not speak for anyone, but
> > I can ass
On 9/4/06, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:30:13AM +, Marcus Popp wrote:
> On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
> > Other than Intel, is anyone else making quad port gig cards?
>
> Silicom makes em-based quad/six port cards.
I thought the point
I recently got a acer aspire 3000 laptop which i got for a good price.
Unfortunately it's got a broadcom wireless card which won't work under
openbsd. I was wondering if there's some way to get it working or if i
have to replace it what would be a good cheap alternative. I don't know if
project evi
Darren Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would appear that while the underlying problem is in the kerberos
> library, Simon has provided a better workaround (below) which has been
> applied to ssh and will be in the next snapshot. Thanks for the report.
Sorry for the late response.
I just i
Darrin Chandler wrote:
> XP and all other versions of Windows set the clock to local time,
> whereas OpenBSD sets it to GMT/UTC.
It's probably better to say "all non-braindead OSes set the clock to
UTC". ;)
That said, if Jason just runs config -ef /bsd and sets the timezone
properly, his problem
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:01:20AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:27:32AM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands little chance of making
> > > anything be
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:30:47PM -0500, Roger Midmore wrote:
> I recently got a acer aspire 3000 laptop which i got for a good price.
> Unfortunately it's got a broadcom wireless card which won't work under
> openbsd. I was wondering if there's some way to get it working or if i
> have to replace
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:30:47PM -0500, Roger Midmore wrote:
> I recently got a acer aspire 3000 laptop which i got for a good price.
> Unfortunately it's got a broadcom wireless card which won't work under
> openbsd. I was wondering if there's some way to get it working or if i
> have to replace
Hello,
I think it's worth to remind this day in year that:
07/22 Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term of BSD license, 1999
ps. I'm not on misc, please cc.
--
best regards
q#
Index: calendar.computer
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr
On 2006/09/04 13:25, Bill Marquette wrote:
> More or less :) I can certainly continue to live with em(4), but I'm
> definitely seeing some bottlenecks (interrupt load) with it on my
> hardware (HP DL380 G4's - I have some new DL385's in that I haven't
> benchmarked) w/ i386 non-MP kernel
sk(4) ca
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:48:55PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:01:20AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:27:32AM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Automating
$ uname -a
OpenBSD morpheus.mokaz.com 3.9 GENERIC.MP#598 i386
I get various locale errors from programs such perl and postgresql:
$ pkg_info mozilla
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LC_ALL = "en_US.ISO8859-1",
LANG = "en
Note: I am am employee of Coverity.
Coverity is not currently scanning OpenBSD. Right now the major reason
is that our software has not been ported to OpenBSD. I cannot
speculate on any future plans, nor say if anything is in the works.
PS: my automated signature generator is right on topic :)
I've configured a Soekris running OpenBSD 3.9 & pf as a firewall, with a
read only CF. I am using the default sshd_config file except to run
sshd on port 222.
My problem is that I cannot connect remotely to this box via ssh except
as root. When a legit user who has an account on that box att
Do you have the AllowUsers or AllowGroups in your config file ? That would do
it.
You shoulda also disable direct root logins. Try changing the following in
/etc/ssh/sshd_config
PermitRootLogin no
Leonard Jacobs([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:22:30PM -0400:
> I've configured a Soekr
** Reply to message from Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:40:27 -0400
>Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
>
>> There is a numbering problem or a missing section in FAQ - 6
>> Networking : http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#6.8
>
>Not quite sure how that's a problem.
>
>Things get added
Is support planned for Woodcrest?
MacPro Quad Xeon tower?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hello,
I've got a freshly installed amd64 (dual core opteron) system running the
latest snapshot (bsd.mp kernel). I have 1GB of ram and a 1GB swap
partition. The machine has next to nothing on it at this point, not even X.
The only packages I have installed are postfix, fetchmail and procmai
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Anon Y. Mous wrote:
> Is support planned for Woodcrest?
>
> MacPro Quad Xeon tower?
Sure, if you send us a machine; these beasts generally do not just
appear in my (or any other developers') house.
-Otto
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:59:57AM +0200, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
> I have a dream.
>
> A dream of unification.
>
> Having one BSD. Merging the three projects and, why not, keeping
> incompatible stuff as options that would be either one or another.
>
> But when you tell yourself that it cannot
43 matches
Mail list logo
