On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:27:32AM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands little chance of making > > anything better. Me, I just lurk here and do not speak for anyone, but > > I can assure you that the OpenBSD folks are not so naive as to put any > > trust in automated gizmos. > > Coverity found at least 30 bugs in OpenBSD (counting the number of > commits to the cvs mailing list containing ``coverity'', according to > marc), so it seems the OpenBSD developers *do* acknowledge the value > of some automated testing. > > Also, tedu@ is a Coverity employee.
Yes. *Relying* on such tools is foolish, as is not availing yourself of the information they *do* provide. -- Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ |
