On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:48:55PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:01:20AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:27:32AM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands little chance of making > > > > anything better. Me, I just lurk here and do not speak for anyone, but > > > > I can assure you that the OpenBSD folks are not so naive as to put any > > > > trust in automated gizmos. > > > > > > Coverity found at least 30 bugs in OpenBSD (counting the number of > > > commits to the cvs mailing list containing ``coverity'', according to > > > marc), so it seems the OpenBSD developers *do* acknowledge the value > > > of some automated testing. > > > > > > Also, tedu@ is a Coverity employee. > > > > Yes. *Relying* on such tools is foolish, as is not availing yourself of > > the information they *do* provide. > > Agreed, but Tony said ``the OpenBSD folks are not so naive as to put > _any_ trust in automated gizmos,'' not ``[...] to _only_ put trust in > [...].''
I'm agreeing with you. -- Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ |
