Hello,
I am using OpenBSD 3.7 GENERIC on an i386 and installed the
redhat_base-8.0p4.tgz for linux compatibilty and was fooling around
with getting linux binaries to work within a chroot when I noticed
that my system clock had been reset to 1969. The only reference to
that happening that I found w
Hello misc@,
I finally decided to send a mail here because I'm despairing with my
wireless network since I upgraded to the latest snapshot.
I simply try to connect to a 802.11b network using a Lucent Orinoco.
For testing purposes I even got over my paranoia for a couple of minutes
and tested wit
Folks,
I'm trying to set up a wireless system and looking to use a wireless usb
adapter. If anyone has successfully configured a wirelesss usb on obsd,
please email me the make and model.
TIA,
Qv6
Same problem.
> I too have this same problem.
>
> Fresh install...no custom anything...just trying to add modules to
> perl, and anything tried fails 100% no matter which source I use
> (even perl.org).
>
> Whats going on? - anyone have any further insight on this?
--
Chet Langin
Hi Dave:
Have you created a new user and a new group "_ppp" as described in
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade-old.html#3.5.8 ?
Ciaoi
Steffen
I've a question related to PF.
SpamD provides a trap. If somebody sends e-Mail to a e.g. special
mailadress this host will be added to a list.
Is there any spamtrap-like Mechanism for the pf?
E.g. more skilled "badguys" don't use `nmap -sS &target`.
Such guys will limit their scans to just a few
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:46:30AM -0500, Qv6 wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm trying to set up a wireless system and looking to use a wireless usb
> adapter. If anyone has successfully configured a wirelesss usb on obsd,
> please email me the make and model.
There are plenty of Wireless USB ethernet ad
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so spake WR (gen2):
> "Checksum mismatch for distribution file. Please investigate.
>
> I'd recommend removing
> /root/.cpan/sources/authors/id/R/RE/REATMON/Net-Jabber-2.0.tar.gz. Its MD5
> checksum is incorrect. Maybe you have configured your 'urllist' with
--On 26 June 2005 15:27 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any spamtrap-like Mechanism for the pf?
E.g. more skilled "badguys" don't use `nmap -sS &target`.
Such guys will limit their scans to just a few ports (3-6).
Since this type of scan typically won't complete a 3-way handshake,
th
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:46:30AM -0500, Qv6 wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm trying to set up a wireless system and looking to use a wireless usb
> adapter. If anyone has successfully configured a wirelesss usb on obsd,
> please email me the make and model.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 03:27:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've a question related to PF.
>
> SpamD provides a trap. If somebody sends e-Mail to a e.g. special
> mailadress this host will be added to a list.
>
> Is there any spamtrap-like Mechanism for the pf?
> E.g. more skilled "badgu
> --On 26 June 2005 15:27 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Is there any spamtrap-like Mechanism for the pf?
>> E.g. more skilled "badguys" don't use `nmap -sS &target`.
>> Such guys will limit their scans to just a few ports (3-6).
>
> Since this type of scan typically won't complete a 3-way ha
By Googling off and on for the last 6mo it seems there is no
port/package for NoMachine/Freenx remote desktop on OpenBSD???
I only found one a post by Philipp over on the dev forum at NoMachine
and a FreeBSD port by Dewey on www.freshports.com.
Is anyone aware of efforts to in this direction?
Th
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Kareem Dana wrote:
> I am using OpenBSD 3.7 GENERIC on an i386 and installed the
> redhat_base-8.0p4.tgz for linux compatibilty and was fooling around
> with getting linux binaries to work within a chroot when I noticed
> that my system clock had been reset to 1969. The only r
hey!
i'm curious about all these new operating systems,
that all claim to be the next generation.
there are many out there. plan9, hurd, eros, movitz. and many
vaporware projects as well, such as lainos. but they all want to
reinvent the wheel. i think this approach is wrong. instead, we
shoul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hey!
>
> i'm curious about all these new operating systems,
> that all claim to be the next generation.
>
> there are many out there. plan9, hurd, eros, movitz. and many
> vaporware projects as well, such as lainos. but they all want to
> reinvent the wheel. i think t
Hello,
I've just upgraded my WRAP board to OpenBSD 3.7. The board has a
Wistron CM9 mini-PCI card, which has an AR5213 chipset, and is supported
by the ath(4) driver as an AR5212. Everything seems to work fine until
a few minutes after booting, at which point the WRAP board crashes. All
I can s
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, bofh wrote:
>
> > I tried a newfs -m 1 /dev/wd3a. After newfs is over, wd3a is not mountable.
> > fsck can't find any usable superblock. However, when I did a "newfs
> > /dev/wd3a", the resulting partition checks out fine (fsck is ok
Are you gonna add anytime soon a resource limit for human-time, so it would be
easier to keep dead locks and any other same kind of type processes in control?
httpd would really benefit from it when providing service for many newbie users
out there.
Regards,
David
-
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 11:34:51PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
> Please forgive me if I missed something about the kernel pppoe but my initial
> tests with the program were positive. However I noticed that when my ISP
> disconnects the connection, it reauthenticates with a new IP and the default
>
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 02:19:19 -0400, Ted Unangst proclaimed...
> you changed a default and found a bug. less than 1% of users ever use -m.
> there's really no good reason to use -m 1, and several reasons not to (not
> least of which is it apparently doesn't work). leave it alone and use the
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, eric wrote:
> > you changed a default and found a bug. less than 1% of users ever use -m.
> > there's really no good reason to use -m 1, and several reasons not to (not
> > least of which is it apparently doesn't work). leave it alone and use the
> > default; you will be
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 15:48:58 -0400, Ted Unangst proclaimed...
> perhaps not, but not every knob is meant to cranked to the extremes.
> there are more important things to be worked on than find out why newfs -m
> 1 doesn't work.
Definitely, and if I ever bumped into the bug and could figure o
eric wrote:
# newfs -m 1 /dev/wd1h
# mount /dev/wd1h /home/users
# df -k
/dev/wd1h257268116 92122160 15228255238%/home
Five percent of /home would be a LOT of space that could be used for users.
Naturally, good system adminstration would want to use that space and have
the proper qu
I am using obsd 3.7 with a update to 3.7-stable.
I am using the stock ntpd..
I have several Cisco boxes that need to sync off of this obsd box for NTP
and they are seeing connection refused.
I enabled time (udp/tcp) in inetd.conf and gave it a HUP.
Still cisco sees 'connection refused'.
So the
By default, OpenNTPd doesn't listen on any port, it just acts as a
client for the local machine only. In order for it to serve time to
other machines on your network, you must uncomment the listen * line
in /etc/ntpd.conf, then send a SIGHUP to ntpd, or restart it, in order
for it to listen on port
At 04:29 PM 6/26/2005, Jason Crawford wrote:
By default, OpenNTPd doesn't listen on any port, it just acts as a
client for the local machine only. In order for it to serve time to
other machines on your network, you must uncomment the listen * line
in /etc/ntpd.conf, then send a SIGHUP to ntpd, o
What about trying listen on *? And are you mabye running pf with
block-policy return? There are a bunch of reasons why connections
might be reset. If listen on * still doesn't work, maybe think about
filing some sort of bug report, or posting more to the list to get the
problem solved, because Open
At 04:40 PM 6/26/2005, Jason Crawford wrote:
What about trying listen on *? And are you mabye running pf with
block-policy return? There are a bunch of reasons why connections
might be reset. If listen on * still doesn't work, maybe think about
filing some sort of bug report, or posting more to t
On 6/26/05, J.D. Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:40 PM 6/26/2005, Jason Crawford wrote:
> >What about trying listen on *? And are you mabye running pf with
> >block-policy return? There are a bunch of reasons why connections
> >might be reset. If listen on * still doesn't work, maybe thi
On Sunday 26 June 2005 09:48 am, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:46:30AM -0500, Qv6 wrote:
>
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ural&apropos=0&sektion=4
>&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
I am familiar with that link and I bought one, a Belkin F5D7050
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 05:26:21PM -0500, Qv6 wrote:
> On Sunday 26 June 2005 09:48 am, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:46:30AM -0500, Qv6 wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ural&apropos=0&sektion=4
> >&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
Ok, so this is not really an OpenBSD question but I am doing this on an
OpenBSD system and I am about to lose my mind...
I have done some basic shell scripting before but I've not had to deal with
actual integer math before and now it is killing me. The script takes a
parameter in (year number) a
On 6/26/05, Peter Bako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dayscount=$(expr ($year - 1900) * 365)
Try:
dayscount=$((($year - 1900) * 365))
--
http://erdelynet.com/
Support OpenBSD! http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Peter Bako wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> month=$1
> day=$2
> year=$3
>
> dayscount=$(expr ($year - 1900) * 365)
> echo $dayscount
> exit
>
> This will generate a "syntax error: `$year' unexpected" error. I have tried
> all sorts of variations and I am not getting it!!! HELP!!!
ma
> Hello,
> I've installed OpenBSD recently and wanted to install few extra
> applications. Due to that I have some questions. First of all i will
> introduce what i would like to accomplish so maybe it would be easier to
> answer. My goal is to install www, ftp and ssh server based on stable
> soft
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:16:43 -0500
"J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have several Cisco boxes that need to sync off of this obsd box for NTP
> and they are seeing connection refused.
Cisco works with ntpd.
> I enabled time (udp/tcp) in inetd.conf and gave it a HUP.
This is not how y
Hum, I get a "syntax error: '*' unexpected"
-Original Message-
From: Michael Erdely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 6:20 PM
To: Peter Bako
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: SH programming
On 6/26/05, Peter Bako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dayscount=$(expr ($year -
On 6/26/05, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> > you changed a default and found a bug. less than 1% of users ever use
> -m.
> > there's really no good reason to use -m 1, and several reasons not to
> (not
> > least of which is it apparently d
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:32:36PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Peter Bako wrote:
>
> > #!/bin/sh
> > month=$1
> > day=$2
> > year=$3
> >
> > dayscount=$(expr ($year - 1900) * 365)
> > echo $dayscount
> > exit
> >
> > This will generate a "syntax error: `$year' unexpected" e
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:51:07 -0700, Peter Bako wrote:
>Hum, I get a "syntax error: '*' unexpected"
>
IJWFM using sh or ksh on 3.7 i386 entering year and the calc line at
the prompt and echoing $daycount at the prompt.
>-Original Message-
>From: Michael Erdely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hello, everyone.
I am wondering that openbsd supports LVM(Logical Volume Manager).
Does openbsd support LVM?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 05:26:21PM -0500, Qv6 wrote:
> On Sunday 26 June 2005 09:48 am, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:46:30AM -0500, Qv6 wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ural&apropos=0&sektion=4
> >&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
43 matches
Mail list logo
