Re: relayd question - from the man page

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:25 PM, System Administrator wrote: > The answer to your question is right there in the very manpage > paragraph you quoted below. Yes, I should have clarified that I did see that. (That is why I quoted it) It just does not seem to make a lot of sense that one would have

Re: relayd question - from the man page

The answer to your question is right there in the very manpage paragraph you quoted below. On 21 Oct 2014 at 10:24, Alan McKay wrote: > Anyone? > Anyone? > Buehler? > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Alan McKay > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > The manpage for relayd.conf has this basic constru

Re: relayd question - from the man page

Anyone? Anyone? Buehler? On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Alan McKay wrote: > Hi folks, > > The manpage for relayd.conf has this basic construct in it a couple of times : > >table { 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.2, 192.168.2.3 } >table disable { 10.1.5.1 retry 2 } > >

relayd question - from the man page

Hi folks, The manpage for relayd.conf has this basic construct in it a couple of times : table { 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.2, 192.168.2.3 } table disable { 10.1.5.1 retry 2 } redirect "www" { listen on www.example.com port 80

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Hello list, painfully i had to migrate the relayd service to a linux boxes with piranha until find the issue that caused relayd exit unexpectedly. So if someone want to make some smoke test to find the issue, please tellme. Best regads, Leonardo Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Hello all, unfortunally i have to setup a cron entry that bounce relayd. Here the log that show how relayd stopped working Nov 18 18:34:55 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[20347]: relay relay5, session 1961 (54 active), 0, 200.16.99.232 -> 172.19.224.71:80, done Nov 18 18:34:55 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[2

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Hello Jan, thanks for answering. The point was with booting without bsd.mp, now box rebooted and showing 4 procs =) By now, all is working fine. Thank for all your support. I will keep you all informed how things are going. Best regards Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini

carp+pfsync+relayd question

qemu-kvm ...-smp sockets=2 ... solved it for me. What qemu version an build are you using ? Am 14.11.2013 18:47 schrieb "Leonardo Santagostini" : > > Thanks a lot to all, i will give it a try and gives tou you feedback as > soon as it get implemented. > > Saludos.- > Leonardo Santagostini > >

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Hello list, i found something strange. By one side, cpu idle is at 0% [root@v-arcbabalancer01 ~]# vmstat 2 20 procsmemory pagediskstraps cpu r b wavm fre flt re pi po fr sr wd0 cd0 int sys cs us sy id 5 0 0 86576 1450072 845 0

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Ok, thanks for all the replies. Im waiting to this situation appears to send to you the output of those commands. Thanks and regards Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini 2013/11/18 mxb > > Output for > > 'pfctl -si', 'pfctl -sm' and 'sysctl -a|grep net.

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Output for 'pfctl -si', 'pfctl -sm' and 'sysctl -a|grep net.inet.ip.ifq’ would be hie to see. //mxb On 18 nov 2013, at 04:20, Leonardo Santagostini wrote: > Sorry, looking more detailed at the logs i found this: > > /var/log/daemon > Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: rel

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Sorry, looking more detailed at the logs i found this: /var/log/daemon Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: relay_connect: no connection in flight Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[22615]: pfe exiting, pid 22615 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31674]: hce exiting

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Hello everybody, i still having some issues whit relayd. Nov 17 21:01:56 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4252]: relay relay4, session 75 (1 active), 0, 190.51.90.22 -> :0, buffer event timeout Nov 17 21:01:57 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 97 (4 active), 0, 190.49.60.30 -> :0, buf

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Hello Andy. Actually i proved flushing pf rules, tables and counters with no luck. But after restart relayd things come to work as expected. Thanks, Leonardo El nov 14, 2013 8:15 p.m., "mxb" escribió: > No, > it is number of currently active sessions for this particular relay. > Eg. 502 “use

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

No, it is number of currently active sessions for this particular relay. Eg. 502 “users". On 14 nov 2013, at 21:59, Andy Lemin wrote: > Hi, as a complete guess (not used relayd yet let alone DSR) a 502 sounds like > an error return from nginx/apache etc. could be a direct server return issue > c

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Ok im not at the office now. But tomorrow we could do more test. Regards and thank you !!! El nov 14, 2013 8:01 p.m., "Andy Lemin" escribió: > In fact thinking about it if think that is a relayd issue somewhere and > not pf at all.. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 14 Nov 2013, at 19:37, Leonardo

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

In fact thinking about it if think that is a relayd issue somewhere and not pf at all.. Sent from my iPhone > On 14 Nov 2013, at 19:37, Leonardo Santagostini wrote: > > Well well well there is one thing its ocurring that i cant figure out. > > im getting some relay site3 session 3370 (502 active

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Hi, as a complete guess (not used relayd yet let alone DSR) a 502 sounds like an error return from nginx/apache etc. could be a direct server return issue causing the TCP three way handshake to not be completing properly between the endpoints, even though a 502 is usually server side issue.. I'd tr

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Well well well there is one thing its ocurring that i cant figure out. im getting some relay site3 session 3370 (502 active), 0, 190.179.249.128 -> :0, buffer event timeout And after a couple a minutes (i couldnt take note exactly how many) relayd get restarted Is there any clue where to look in

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Ok, just added my second website to both servers like your recommendation. I will post my config before the end of the day just to share it with you. Thank you so much !!! Regards Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini 2013/11/14 Leonardo Santagostini >

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Thanks a lot to all, i will give it a try and gives tou you feedback as soon as it get implemented. Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini 2013/11/14 Andy > On 14/11/13 15:21, Leonardo Santagostini wrote: > > Hello misc, > > Im doing my final approach to

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

On 14/11/13 15:21, Leonardo Santagostini wrote: > Hello misc, > > Im doing my final approach to put a production system with > carp+pfsync+relayd on production. > > The point is that im facing some trouble setting more than one ip alias > address with different vhid and different passwd. > > So, th

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Ok, i will modify the config. But i really want to know about the carp configuration. I forget to mention that im doing DSR. Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini 2013/11/14 mxb > 15 sites and only 9? > I’d put around 50 (and have). You might n

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

Put all of those into the same "relay { }” as they are going to the same forward table. relay { listen on addr1 port 80 listen on addr2 port 80 etc…. } or you’ll end up doing “check http” several times. and I’d do just simple "check tcp” - faster. On 14 nov 2013, at 16

Re: carp+pfsync+relayd question

15 sites and only 9? I’d put around 50 (and have). You might need even more. On 14 nov 2013, at 16:21, Leonardo Santagostini wrote: > set limit states 9

carp+pfsync+relayd question

Hello misc, Im doing my final approach to put a production system with carp+pfsync+relayd on production. The point is that im facing some trouble setting more than one ip alias address with different vhid and different passwd. So, this is the scenario. Im trying to relayd more or less 15 sites

relayd question

Hi List ! Another Quick question... Is there a way to define a table name in relayd.conf and use this same table name in pf.conf ?? ( instead of dealing with __automatic_.. in pf.conf ) Marcus