Sorry, looking more detailed at the logs i found this: /var/log/daemon Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: relay_connect: no connection in flight Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[22615]: pfe exiting, pid 22615 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31674]: hce exiting, pid 31674 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[9082]: relay exiting, pid 9082 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[701]: relay exiting, pid 701 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[21358]: parent terminating, pid 21358 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[24886]: relay exiting, pid 24886 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[21395]: relay exiting, pid 21395 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13155]: relay exiting, pid 13155 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[20557]: relay exiting, pid 20557 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[14903]: relay exiting, pid 14903 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10686]: relay exiting, pid 10686 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[17355]: relay exiting, pid 17355 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[26908]: relay exiting, pid 26908 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[6551]: relay exiting, pid 6551 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[16649]: relay exiting, pid 16649 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[2567]: relay exiting, pid 2567 Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[3159]: relay exiting, pid 3159
/var/log/messages Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: relay_connect: no connection in flight Regards Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> 2013/11/18 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com> > Hello everybody, i still having some issues whit relayd. > > Nov 17 21:01:56 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4252]: relay relay4, session 75 > (1 active), 0, 190.51.90.22 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:01:57 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 97 > (4 active), 0, 190.49.60.30 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:01:58 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4781]: relay relay4, session 142 > (3 active), 0, 190.188.18.202 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[25332]: relay relay4, session 28 > (1 active), 0, 181.29.46.36 -> :0, hard timeout > Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 55 > (3 active), 0, 108.36.150.233 -> :0, hard timeout > Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[18695]: relay relay4, session 67 > (3 active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout > Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13096]: relay relay5, session 73 > (3 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> :0, hard timeout > Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31990]: relay relay4, session 25 > (1 active), 0, 186.188.178.215 -> :0, hard timeout > Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4781]: relay relay4, session 144 > (7 active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout > Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay2, session 55 > (5 active), 0, 181.109.7.31 -> :0, hard timeout > Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[22942]: relay relay4, session 93 > (2 active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout > Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13862]: relay relay4, session 80 > (3 active), 0, 190.111.231.50 -> :0, hard timeout > Nov 17 21:02:06 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[19770]: relay relay4, session 92 > (1 active), 0, 75.70.87.158 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:08 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay4, session 131 > (5 active), 0, 190.113.173.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:11 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session 103 > (9 active), 0, 186.137.241.254 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:15 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay4, session 143 > (2 active), 0, 24.232.115.134 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 101 > (7 active), 0, 108.87.58.21 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 102 > (6 active), 0, 108.87.58.21 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session 142 > (13 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.73:80, no method > Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session 114 > (12 active), 0, 190.49.11.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 104 > (5 active), 0, 190.49.11.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session 120 > (10 active), 0, 189.237.152.81 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31990]: relay relay4, session 117 > (5 active), 0, 189.237.152.81 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session 144 > (9 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.71:80, no method > Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session 145 > (9 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.70:80, no method > Nov 17 21:02:19 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[30656]: relay relay4, session 126 > (4 active), 0, 190.220.108.107 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:22 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[19770]: relay relay4, session 103 > (1 active), 0, 189.149.155.136 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:25 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[18695]: relay relay4, session 79 > (3 active), 0, 181.167.177.45 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:28 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 109 > (4 active), 0, 190.18.27.4 -> :0, buffer event timeout > Nov 17 21:02:30 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 112 > (3 active), 0, 181.21.154.28 -> :0, buffer event timeout > > Here is my config > > dmesg: http://pastebin.com/fLU8qaTd > relayd.conf: http://pastebin.com/Nn1VYRxQ > pf.conf: http://pastebin.com/HcQchkgP > /etc/hostname.carp0: http://pastebin.com/wyccT20r > /etc/hostname.em1: http://pastebin.com/MQq9nExL > /etc/sysctl.conf: http://pastebin.com/QrkwLgWN > > Anybody can "enligth me" ? > > Thank you in advance, best regards > > Saludos.- > Leonardo Santagostini > > <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> > > > > > > 2013/11/14 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com> > >> Hello Andy. Actually i proved flushing pf rules, tables and counters with >> no luck. >> >> But after restart relayd things come to work as expected. >> >> Thanks, Leonardo >> El nov 14, 2013 8:15 p.m., "mxb" <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> escribió: >> >> No, >>> it is number of currently active sessions for this particular relay. >>> Eg. 502 âusers". >>> >>> On 14 nov 2013, at 21:59, Andy Lemin <a...@brandwatch.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, as a complete guess (not used relayd yet let alone DSR) a 502 sounds >>> like >>> an error return from nginx/apache etc. could be a direct server return >>> issue >>> causing the TCP three way handshake to not be completing properly >>> between the >>> endpoints, even though a 502 is usually server side issue.. I'd try >>> removing >>> the 'in' or 'out' direction from the rules.
