Output for

'pfctl -si', 'pfctl -sm' and 'sysctl -a|grep net.inet.ip.ifq’ would be hie to
see.

//mxb


On 18 nov 2013, at 04:20, Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Sorry, looking more detailed at the logs i found this:
>
> /var/log/daemon
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: relay_connect: no
connection in flight
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[22615]: pfe exiting, pid 22615
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31674]: hce exiting, pid 31674
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[9082]: relay exiting, pid 9082
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[701]: relay exiting, pid 701
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[21358]: parent terminating, pid
21358
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[24886]: relay exiting, pid 24886
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[21395]: relay exiting, pid 21395
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13155]: relay exiting, pid 13155
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[20557]: relay exiting, pid 20557
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[14903]: relay exiting, pid 14903
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10686]: relay exiting, pid 10686
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[17355]: relay exiting, pid 17355
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[26908]: relay exiting, pid 26908
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[6551]: relay exiting, pid 6551
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[16649]: relay exiting, pid 16649
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[2567]: relay exiting, pid 2567
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[3159]: relay exiting, pid 3159
>
>
> /var/log/messages
> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: relay_connect: no
connection in flight
>
>
> Regards
>
> Saludos.-
> Leonardo Santagostini
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2013/11/18 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com>
> Hello everybody, i still having some issues whit relayd.
>
> Nov 17 21:01:56 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4252]: relay relay4, session 75 (1
active), 0, 190.51.90.22 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:01:57 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 97 (4
active), 0, 190.49.60.30 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:01:58 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4781]: relay relay4, session 142 (3
active), 0, 190.188.18.202 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[25332]: relay relay4, session 28 (1
active), 0, 181.29.46.36 -> :0, hard timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 55 (3
active), 0, 108.36.150.233 -> :0, hard timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[18695]: relay relay4, session 67 (3
active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13096]: relay relay5, session 73 (3
active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> :0, hard timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31990]: relay relay4, session 25 (1
active), 0, 186.188.178.215 -> :0, hard timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4781]: relay relay4, session 144 (7
active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay2, session 55 (5
active), 0, 181.109.7.31 -> :0, hard timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[22942]: relay relay4, session 93 (2
active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13862]: relay relay4, session 80 (3
active), 0, 190.111.231.50 -> :0, hard timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:06 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[19770]: relay relay4, session 92 (1
active), 0, 75.70.87.158 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:08 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay4, session 131
(5 active), 0, 190.113.173.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:11 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session 103
(9 active), 0, 186.137.241.254 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:15 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay4, session 143
(2 active), 0, 24.232.115.134 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 101
(7 active), 0, 108.87.58.21 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 102
(6 active), 0, 108.87.58.21 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session 142
(13 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.73:80, no method
> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session 114
(12 active), 0, 190.49.11.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 104
(5 active), 0, 190.49.11.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session 120
(10 active), 0, 189.237.152.81 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31990]: relay relay4, session 117
(5 active), 0, 189.237.152.81 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session 144
(9 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.71:80, no method
> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session 145
(9 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.70:80, no method
> Nov 17 21:02:19 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[30656]: relay relay4, session 126
(4 active), 0, 190.220.108.107 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:22 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[19770]: relay relay4, session 103
(1 active), 0, 189.149.155.136 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:25 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[18695]: relay relay4, session 79 (3
active), 0, 181.167.177.45 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:28 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 109
(4 active), 0, 190.18.27.4 -> :0, buffer event timeout
> Nov 17 21:02:30 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session 112
(3 active), 0, 181.21.154.28 -> :0, buffer event timeout
>
> Here is my config
>
> dmesg: http://pastebin.com/fLU8qaTd
> relayd.conf: http://pastebin.com/Nn1VYRxQ
> pf.conf: http://pastebin.com/HcQchkgP
> /etc/hostname.carp0: http://pastebin.com/wyccT20r
> /etc/hostname.em1: http://pastebin.com/MQq9nExL
> /etc/sysctl.conf: http://pastebin.com/QrkwLgWN
>
> Anybody can "enligth me" ?
>
> Thank you in advance, best regards
>
> Saludos.-
> Leonardo Santagostini
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2013/11/14 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com>
> Hello Andy. Actually i proved flushing pf rules, tables and counters with no
luck.
>
> But after restart relayd things come to work as expected.
>
> Thanks, Leonardo
>
> El nov 14, 2013 8:15 p.m., "mxb" <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> escribió:
>
> No,
> it is number of currently active sessions for this particular relay.
> Eg. 502 “users".
>
> On 14 nov 2013, at 21:59, Andy Lemin <a...@brandwatch.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, as a complete guess (not used relayd yet let alone DSR) a 502 sounds
like
>> an error return from nginx/apache etc. could be a direct server return
issue
>> causing the TCP three way handshake to not be completing properly between
the
>> endpoints, even though a 502 is usually server side issue.. I'd try
removing
>> the 'in' or 'out' direction from the rules.

Reply via email to