Hello list, i found something strange. By one side, cpu idle is at 0%
[root@v-arcbabalancer01 ~]# vmstat 2 20 procs memory page disks traps cpu r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr wd0 cd0 int sys cs us sy id 5 0 0 86576 1450072 845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 2922 308 60 5 35 4 0 0 86668 1449976 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 435 4554 869 94 6 0 4 0 0 86732 1449896 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 4269 827 94 6 0 5 0 0 86732 1449896 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 297 4098 762 92 8 0 7 0 0 86740 1449872 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 287 3264 625 94 6 0 4 0 0 86748 1449864 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 370 4400 804 92 8 0 4 0 0 86756 1449836 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 311 3708 730 92 8 0 4 0 0 86840 1449744 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 331 3585 701 93 7 0 4 0 0 86840 1449728 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 453 4744 885 93 7 0 4 0 0 86840 1449728 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 355 3832 745 92 8 0 5 0 0 86876 1449668 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 375 5003 934 92 8 0 4 0 0 86880 1449664 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 3600 707 93 7 0 9 1 0 87136 1449148 13421 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 242 24373 778 87 13 0 5 1 0 91964 1445628 23388 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 273 44441 1256 80 20 0 5 0 0 86892 1449624 479 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 313 4012 736 90 10 0 7 0 0 86892 1449608 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 308 3831 712 93 7 0 4 0 0 86892 1449608 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 3694 732 95 5 0 4 0 0 86900 1449576 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 345 4439 857 92 8 0 4 0 0 86900 1449576 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 337 4798 879 92 8 0 5 0 0 86964 1449492 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 389 4723 923 94 6 0 By the other assigned cpus are two not one as the machine sees. [root@v-arcbabalancer01 ~]# dmesg | grep cpu acpicpu0 at acpi0 cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Opteron or Athlon 64, 2660.64 MHz cpu0: FPU,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,PGE,CMOV,PAT,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,POPCN T cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0 cpu0: apic clock running at 1000MHz cpu at mainbus0: not configured So i will try to do some search about gettint the proper config for openbsd hosts in kvm If anyone can give to me some clues.... it will realy welcome. Regards Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> 2013/11/18 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com> > Ok, thanks for all the replies. Im waiting to this situation appears to > send to you the output of those commands. > > Thanks and regards > > Saludos.- > Leonardo Santagostini > > <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> > > > > > > 2013/11/18 mxb <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> > >> >> Output for >> >> 'pfctl -si', 'pfctl -sm' and 'sysctl -a|grep net.inet.ip.ifqâ would be >> hie to see. >> >> //mxb >> >> >> On 18 nov 2013, at 04:20, Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Sorry, looking more detailed at the logs i found this: >> >> /var/log/daemon >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: relay_connect: no >> connection in flight >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[22615]: pfe exiting, pid 22615 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31674]: hce exiting, pid 31674 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[9082]: relay exiting, pid 9082 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[701]: relay exiting, pid 701 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[21358]: parent terminating, pid >> 21358 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[24886]: relay exiting, pid 24886 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[21395]: relay exiting, pid 21395 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13155]: relay exiting, pid 13155 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[20557]: relay exiting, pid 20557 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[14903]: relay exiting, pid 14903 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10686]: relay exiting, pid 10686 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[17355]: relay exiting, pid 17355 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[26908]: relay exiting, pid 26908 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[6551]: relay exiting, pid 6551 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[16649]: relay exiting, pid 16649 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[2567]: relay exiting, pid 2567 >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[3159]: relay exiting, pid 3159 >> >> >> /var/log/messages >> Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13984]: fatal: relay_connect: no >> connection in flight >> >> >> Regards >> >> Saludos.- >> Leonardo Santagostini >> >> <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2013/11/18 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com> >> >>> Hello everybody, i still having some issues whit relayd. >>> >>> Nov 17 21:01:56 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4252]: relay relay4, session 75 >>> (1 active), 0, 190.51.90.22 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:01:57 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >>> 97 (4 active), 0, 190.49.60.30 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:01:58 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4781]: relay relay4, session >>> 142 (3 active), 0, 190.188.18.202 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[25332]: relay relay4, session >>> 28 (1 active), 0, 181.29.46.36 -> :0, hard timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >>> 55 (3 active), 0, 108.36.150.233 -> :0, hard timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[18695]: relay relay4, session >>> 67 (3 active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13096]: relay relay5, session >>> 73 (3 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> :0, hard timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31990]: relay relay4, session >>> 25 (1 active), 0, 186.188.178.215 -> :0, hard timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[4781]: relay relay4, session >>> 144 (7 active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay2, session >>> 55 (5 active), 0, 181.109.7.31 -> :0, hard timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[22942]: relay relay4, session >>> 93 (2 active), 0, 31.221.13.210 -> :0, hard timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:03 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[13862]: relay relay4, session >>> 80 (3 active), 0, 190.111.231.50 -> :0, hard timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:06 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[19770]: relay relay4, session >>> 92 (1 active), 0, 75.70.87.158 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:08 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay4, session >>> 131 (5 active), 0, 190.113.173.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:11 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session >>> 103 (9 active), 0, 186.137.241.254 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:15 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[23317]: relay relay4, session >>> 143 (2 active), 0, 24.232.115.134 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >>> 101 (7 active), 0, 108.87.58.21 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >>> 102 (6 active), 0, 108.87.58.21 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session >>> 142 (13 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.73:80<http://172.19.224.73/>, >>> no method >>> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session >>> 114 (12 active), 0, 190.49.11.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:16 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >>> 104 (5 active), 0, 190.49.11.36 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay4, session >>> 120 (10 active), 0, 189.237.152.81 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[31990]: relay relay4, session >>> 117 (5 active), 0, 189.237.152.81 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session >>> 144 (9 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.71:80<http://172.19.224.71/>, >>> no method >>> Nov 17 21:02:17 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[10590]: relay relay5, session >>> 145 (9 active), 0, 190.195.118.49 -> 172.19.224.70:80<http://172.19.224.70/>, >>> no method >>> Nov 17 21:02:19 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[30656]: relay relay4, session >>> 126 (4 active), 0, 190.220.108.107 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:22 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[19770]: relay relay4, session >>> 103 (1 active), 0, 189.149.155.136 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:25 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[18695]: relay relay4, session >>> 79 (3 active), 0, 181.167.177.45 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:28 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >>> 109 (4 active), 0, 190.18.27.4 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> Nov 17 21:02:30 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[12715]: relay relay4, session >>> 112 (3 active), 0, 181.21.154.28 -> :0, buffer event timeout >>> >>> Here is my config >>> >>> dmesg: http://pastebin.com/fLU8qaTd >>> relayd.conf: http://pastebin.com/Nn1VYRxQ >>> pf.conf: http://pastebin.com/HcQchkgP >>> /etc/hostname.carp0: http://pastebin.com/wyccT20r >>> /etc/hostname.em1: http://pastebin.com/MQq9nExL >>> /etc/sysctl.conf: http://pastebin.com/QrkwLgWN >>> >>> Anybody can "enligth me" ? >>> >>> Thank you in advance, best regards >>> >>> Saludos.- >>> Leonardo Santagostini >>> >>> <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/11/14 Leonardo Santagostini <lsantagost...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> Hello Andy. Actually i proved flushing pf rules, tables and counters >>>> with no luck. >>>> >>>> But after restart relayd things come to work as expected. >>>> >>>> Thanks, Leonardo >>>> El nov 14, 2013 8:15 p.m., "mxb" <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> escribió: >>>> >>>> No, >>>>> it is number of currently active sessions for this particular relay. >>>>> Eg. 502 âusers". >>>>> >>>>> On 14 nov 2013, at 21:59, Andy Lemin <a...@brandwatch.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, as a complete guess (not used relayd yet let alone DSR) a 502 >>>>> sounds like >>>>> an error return from nginx/apache etc. could be a direct server return >>>>> issue >>>>> causing the TCP three way handshake to not be completing properly >>>>> between the >>>>> endpoints, even though a 502 is usually server side issue.. I'd try >>>>> removing >>>>> the 'in' or 'out' direction from the rules.
