Note: I am am employee of Coverity.
Coverity is not currently scanning OpenBSD. Right now the major reason
is that our software has not been ported to OpenBSD. I cannot
speculate on any future plans, nor say if anything is in the works.
PS: my automated signature generator is right on topic :)
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:48:55PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:01:20AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:27:32AM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Automating
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:01:20AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:27:32AM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands little chance of making
> > > anything be
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:27:32AM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands little chance of making
> > anything better. Me, I just lurk here and do not speak for anyone, but
> > I can ass
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands little chance of making
> anything better. Me, I just lurk here and do not speak for anyone, but
> I can assure you that the OpenBSD folks are not so naive as to put any
> trust in aut
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
>
> since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially
> proactive about
> debugging, it would not surprise me to learn that there is automated code
> auditing going on. is this already the case? i didn't see openbsd
Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands
Original message
>Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:26:26 -0400
>From: "Nick Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: automated source code scanning
>To: OpenBSD-Misc
>
>On 9/4/06, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> since the ope
Nick Holland wrote:
> Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> > since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially
> > proactive about debugging, it would not surprise me to learn
> > that there is automated code auditing going on. is this
> > already the case? i didn't see openbsd listed on coverity's
On 9/4/06, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially proactive about
debugging, it would not surprise me to learn that there is automated code
auditing going on. is this already the case? i didn't see openbsd listed on
coverity's page
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially proactive about
> debugging, it would not surprise me to learn that there is automated code
> auditing going on. is this already the case? i didn't see openbsd listed on
> coverity's page, http://scan.coverity.co
since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially proactive about
debugging, it would not surprise me to learn that there is automated code
auditing going on. is this already the case? i didn't see openbsd listed on
coverity's page, http://scan.coverity.com/ .
further info about software
11 matches
Mail list logo
