issues an http PROPFIND request. At that point relayd returns 500
Internal server error. It seems relayd is not happy with webdav requests.
Is there a way to tell it to transparently forward unknown requests?
Here's my old nginx config:
% cat /etc/nginx/sites/radicale.conf
server {
liste
Em 25-05-2014 21:23, Tyler Morgan escreveu:
> On 5/25/2014 1:48 AM, raul o wrote:
>> Hi buddies, can anyone tell me as I implement WebDAV with nginx? Thanks.
>
> Are you hitting any specific problems that may be OpenBSD-centric? As
> long as nginx is compiled with --with-http_da
On 2014-05-26, Tyler Morgan wrote:
> On 5/25/2014 1:48 AM, raul o wrote:
>> Hi buddies, can anyone tell me as I implement WebDAV with nginx? Thanks.
>
> Are you hitting any specific problems that may be OpenBSD-centric? As long as
> nginx is compiled with --with-http_dav_modu
On 5/25/2014 1:48 AM, raul o wrote:
Hi buddies, can anyone tell me as I implement WebDAV with nginx? Thanks.
Are you hitting any specific problems that may be OpenBSD-centric? As long as
nginx is compiled with --with-http_dav_module (which it isn't by default, so
you may have to recompi
Hi buddies, can anyone tell me as I implement WebDAV with nginx? Thanks.
Stuart Henderson wrote:
while this is a way if you _must_ use SMB/CIFS, I'm not too sure if a
combination of samba, cygwin (which users won't bother to update once
it's installed so no security fixes) and MS loopback adapter (for some
client-breaks-their-own-network-and-shouts-at-you fun) is real
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
> > > Denny White wrote:
> > > >That's all one line above. I dropped part of it down for the 72
> > > >character rule. As the article shows, instead of having to open
> > > >a cygwin prompt, then issue the tunneling command, the whole thing
> > > >can
while this is a way if you _must_ use SMB/CIFS, I'm not too sure if a
combination of samba, cygwin (which users won't bother to update once
it's installed so no security fixes) and MS loopback adapter (for some
client-breaks-their-own-network-and-shouts-at-you fun) is really the
simplest and most s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:10:07AM -0500, Daniel Ouellet sez:
> Denny White wrote:
> >That's all one line above. I dropped part of it down for the 72
> >character rule. As the article shows, instead of having to open
> >a cygwin prompt, then issue the
Denny White wrote:
That's all one line above. I dropped part of it down for the 72
character rule. As the article shows, instead of having to open
a cygwin prompt, then issue the tunneling command, the whole thing
can be automated with a script & a windows service started on boot.
When the user c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 05:58:57PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet sez:
> Hi,
>
> I need some possible suggestions if I may asked to not setup, or have to
> setup WebDav on OpenBSD to allow users to do their web folder stuff. It
> can be set
On January 24, 2008 04:58:57 pm Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some possible suggestions if I may asked to not setup, or have to
> setup WebDav on OpenBSD to allow users to do their web folder stuff. It
> can be setup with ftp for example to allow them to map a folder in t
Urban Hillebrand wrote:
If using sftp with WinSCP is still an option, but you do not want users to
have SSH access, this can be achieved easily with sshd_config-settings
like:
# override default of no subsystems
Subsystem sftp/usr/libexec/sftp-server
Match Group sftp
X11Forwar
Boris Goldberg wrote:
Hello Daniel,
I believe it should be possible to set up samba-over-ssh. I mean samba
listening localhost only on the server andputty
(www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/) with port forwarding on
clients.
Thanks,
I don't thin
Quoting "L. V. Lammert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Frank Bax wrote:
Boris Goldberg wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> I believe it should be possible to set up samba-over-ssh. I
mean samba
> listening localhost only on the server
andputty
> (www.chiark.green
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Frank Bax wrote:
> Boris Goldberg wrote:
> > Hello Daniel,
> >
> > I believe it should be possible to set up samba-over-ssh. I mean samba
> > listening localhost only on the server andputty
> > (www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/) wi
Boris Goldberg wrote:
Hello Daniel,
I believe it should be possible to set up samba-over-ssh. I mean samba
listening localhost only on the server andputty
(www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/) with port forwarding on
clients.
You can also use sam
If your interest is seeing the code, not being able to get it for
free, then talk to the SftpDrive people; they're a down to earth group
of guys, and are really great to work with, and for all I know, they
might be perfectly open to letting you see the code.
On Jan 24, 2008 7:41 PM, Daniel Ouellet
Hello Daniel,
I believe it should be possible to set up samba-over-ssh. I mean samba
listening localhost only on the server andputty
(www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/) with port forwarding on
clients.
You can also use samba-over-ipsec. IPSec is
If using sftp with WinSCP is still an option, but you do not want users to
have SSH access, this can be achieved easily with sshd_config-settings
like:
# override default of no subsystems
Subsystem sftp/usr/libexec/sftp-server
Match Group sftp
X11Forwarding no
AllowTcpFo
Andrew Ruscica wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 05:58:57PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
..
I only allow ssh access and in very special case, I had accepted ftp from
If you're considering a commercial product, http://www.sftpdrive.com
If the product performs as it says, you shouldn't need to cha
NetOne - Doichin Dokov wrote:
I really didn't fully understand you - do you want or not to allow FTP
acces, and why clients are not able to "save as" when using it? Do you
mean that they need it mapped as a network drive? If so, they can use
something like this:
http://www.acs.uwosh.edu/novell
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 05:58:57PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
..
> I only allow ssh access and in very special case, I had accepted ftp from
If you're considering a commercial product, http://www.sftpdrive.com
If the product performs as it says, you shouldn't need to change anything
on the web
homas Althoff wrote:
www.webdrive.com
"WebDrive has built-in support for the industry standard SSL protocol.
When used in conjunction with secure WebDAV, FTP, FTPS, or SFTP servers,
WebDrive will open an encrypted tunnel between the client computer and
the remote server; giving you secure trans
e.com
"WebDrive has built-in support for the industry standard SSL protocol.
When used in conjunction with secure WebDAV, FTP, FTPS, or SFTP servers,
WebDrive will open an encrypted tunnel between the client computer and
the remote server; giving you secure transmission of critical data over
th
Hi,
I need some possible suggestions if I may asked to not setup, or have to
setup WebDav on OpenBSD to allow users to do their web folder stuff. It
can be setup with ftp for example to allow them to map a folder in their
"network place" on XP for example, but then they can'
On 3 Dec 2006, at 21:12, Pete Vickers wrote:
> I've used it problem free with osx & windows clients; it should
> probably only be available only over https,
Amusingly, that's almost the exact same setup I ended up with :)
I also had a non-ssl site serving from the same web root and denied
a
Hi,
I've used it problem free with osx & windows clients; it should
probably only be available only over https,
DocumentRoot "/var/www/secure_content"
ServerName whatever.com
ServerAlias www.whatever.com
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ErrorLog logs/error_log
TransferLog
Hi,
Although the mail archives have little on the topic, as does google,
are there any major security concerns I should be aware of when
installing mod_dav under the stock OpenBSD apache1.3, with apache
chrooted?
Gaby
--
Junkets for bunterish lickspittles since 1998!
http://www.playr.co.uk
> What version of Apache?
>
The standard pached variant of 1.3.29 that is included with 3.8-stable.
On 2/28/06, Nick Forrette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:httpd / mod_dav locking troubles (DavLockDB is
> chrooted
> relative)
> Date: February 28, 2006 7:21:59 AM PST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> I'm running Ope
On 3/1/06, Didier Wiroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I don't know if this helps you but I thought I let you know. I used to
> run
> into a lot of strange problems running httpd with mod_dav, httpd crashes
> and also
> (as far as I can remember) some db lock problems.
>
> All my problems we
Hi,
I don't know if this helps you but I thought I let you know. I used to
run
into a lot of strange problems running httpd with mod_dav, httpd crashes
and also
(as far as I can remember) some db lock problems.
All my problems were solved by copying the libdav.so into the chroot
directory:
/var/w
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: httpd / mod_dav locking troubles (DavLockDB is chrooted
relative)
Date: February 28, 2006 7:21:59 AM PST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm running OpenBSD 3.8 stable with mod_dav 1.0.3p0 installed from
ports (sparc64 architectur
Mike Gould wrote:
Hi
Has anyone got any advice for installing apache2 on openbsd 3.6
(stable). There seems to be a port for freebsd but nothing for openbsd.
If I start from the apache source what kinds of things will I need to
change?
Stick with the base install. You will be much better off, p
x27;s integrated(*) fast and
secure. Installing apache2 will be a step backwards. Search the list.
The last time it was asked it was labeled kind of "too much work and too
little to gain"
* configure + start and your on your way.
Also what's the consensus on webdav? Can it be mad
the apache source what kinds of things will I need to
> change?
Add chroot support, patch security holes, add compatibility with all
the modules in ports ...
> Also what's the consensus on webdav? Can it be made secure?
Hi
Has anyone got any advice for installing apache2 on openbsd 3.6
(stable). There seems to be a port for freebsd but nothing for openbsd.
If I start from the apache source what kinds of things will I need to
change?
Also what's the consensus on webdav? Can it be made secure?
Thanks
Mike
38 matches
Mail list logo
