On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 03:24:38 +
Lloyd wrote:
> obs...@loopw.com wrote:
>
> > not 100% conjecture, but not 100% science either:
> > You have <90MB on /, which is where relinking happens, on a ~30MB
> > kernel. Thats a bit tight. My guess is more than one
> > thing was moving things around in t
One other perculiar thing that happened on there after the failed
syspatch was this, but I'm going to assume I did a ctrl-C before
something had finished running, while I was repeating syspatch attempts.
Running security(8):
Checking special files and directories.
Output form
obs...@loopw.com wrote:
> not 100% conjecture, but not 100% science either:
> You have <90MB on /, which is where relinking happens, on a ~30MB
> kernel. Thats a bit tight. My guess is more than one
> thing was moving things around in the first relink attempt, and in your
> second attempt less of
Thanks.
Yeah probably not critical, I'm mainly using it for its serial ports,
for console access to other devices. Backing up state tables was just a
secondary role since it has the NICs available, I added it in to an
existing CARP pair.
No other services on it.
I'll swap out that CF someti
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:42:06 +1000
David Diggles wrote:
> This is the disk space available on mine.
>
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a 1021M144M826M15%/
> /dev/wd0e 1.9G 22.7M1.8G 2%/home
> /dev/wd0d 2.9G2.4G
:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 04:32:35 +
Lloyd wrote:
I encountered a relink failure after the last syspatch as well.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=175023041416172&w=2
David Diggles wrote:
> Any ideas? I'm thinking maybe the root disk is on a bad CF card.
both David'
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 18:05:18 +
Lloyd wrote:
> Janne Johansson wrote:
>
> > that doesn't sound 100% like out-of-space.
> >
>
> Disk space was my first guess, but unlikely:
>
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/sd0a 384M276M 89.6M76%/
> /d
Janne Johansson wrote:
> that doesn't sound 100% like out-of-space.
>
Disk space was my first guess, but unlikely:
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/sd0a 384M276M 89.6M76%/
/dev/sd0k 2.9G328K2.7G 1%/home
/dev/sd0d 500M
> Lloyd wrote:
> > I encountered a relink failure after the last syspatch as well.
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=175023041416172&w=2
> > > Any ideas? I'm thinking maybe the root disk is on a bad CF card.
>
> both David's and Lloyd'
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 04:32:35 +
Lloyd wrote:
> I encountered a relink failure after the last syspatch as well.
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=175023041416172&w=2
> David Diggles wrote:
>
> > Any ideas? I'm thinking maybe the root disk is on a bad CF
Hi David,
I encountered a relink failure after the last syspatch as well.
For me, ld segfaulted during the relink. I posted some info here:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=175023041416172&w=2
I originally thought it was related to a change I had made, but now
reading this I'
newbsd
'${SYSTE...)
OpenBSD 7.7 (GENERIC.MP) #0: Sun May 4 11:23:50 MDT 2025
r...@syspatch-77-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 4267245568 (4069MB)
avail mem = 4111486976 (3921MB)
random: good seed from bootblocks
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath
gt; { USB_VENDOR_APC, USB_PRODUCT_APC_UPS5G, ANY, { UQ_BAD_HID }},
>
> If I compile my own kernel with the above settings, and it resolves the
> problem, will that break "syspatch". Can I keep syspatch compatibility by
> following any specific steps?
>
> Thanks,
&g
ys/dev/usb/usb_quirks.c and build a new kernel:
>>
>> { USB_VENDOR_APC, USB_PRODUCT_APC_UPS, ANY, { UQ_BAD_HID }},
>> { USB_VENDOR_APC, USB_PRODUCT_APC_UPS5G, ANY, { UQ_BAD_HID }},
>>
>> If I compile my own kernel with the above settings, and it resolves the
>&
own kernel with the above settings, and it resolves the
problem, will that break "syspatch". Can I keep syspatch compatibility by
following any specific steps?
Thanks,
Steve Williams
OpenBSD 7.6 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Mon Feb 10 00:14:14 MST 2025
r...@syspatch-76-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/s
ODUCT_APC_UPS5G, ANY, { UQ_BAD_HID }},
If I compile my own kernel with the above settings, and it resolves the
problem, will that break "syspatch". Can I keep syspatch compatibility
by following any specific steps?
Thanks,
Steve Williams
OpenBSD 7.6 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Mon Feb 10 00:14:
On 2024-09-17, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:09:05PM -0400, Allan Streib wrote:
>> I have installed the latest syspatches on 4 different 7.5stable amd64
>> machines and had no issues with relinking.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, at 22:59, Chris Bennett wrote:
>>
>> > *** Parse
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:09:05PM -0400, Allan Streib wrote:
> I have installed the latest syspatches on 4 different 7.5stable amd64
> machines and had no issues with relinking.
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, at 22:59, Chris Bennett wrote:
>
> > *** Parse error in /usr/share/relink/kernel/GENERIC.MP:
I have installed the latest syspatches on 4 different 7.5stable amd64
machines and had no issues with relinking.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, at 22:59, Chris Bennett wrote:
> *** Parse error in /usr/share/relink/kernel/GENERIC.MP: Could not find
> /usr/ports/infrastructure/templates/mk.conf.template (/
After running syspatch, I received the following message below. Things
seemed odd. I looked at logs and I am not sure what to do or not do.
Manually is not the same as rebooting.
/var/log/messages shows a reboot and the first two are from installing
the syspatch and trying reorder_kernel. Second
Dear misc@,
I do not know which mailing list is the best one for such report, so I
start here.
Syspatch worked properly for 75-001 on an earlier date but syspatch
fails on 75-003 now.
I tried with various different installurls with the same issue
located at any of the mirror links, for
>> example,
>>
>> https://mirror.hs-esslingen.de/pub/OpenBSD/syspatch/7.5/amd64/
>>
>> manually verified the signature with signify, then changed the online path
>> under /etc/installurl to point to the usb/location that c
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 3:29 AM jonathon575
wrote:
> For the current release 7.5, specifically for security patches, if we
> downloaded the security patches located at any of the mirror links, for
> example,
>
> https://mirror.hs-esslingen.de/pub/OpenBSD/syspatch/7.5/amd64/
>
&
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:42:15PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> > Any suggestions to mitigate the zero-click exploit with fileless malware
> > attacks. Please advise. In the firewall rules, one of the main purposes of
> > block all rule is to make the attacker completely blind of the system b
the current release 7.5, specifically for security patches, if we
> downloaded the security patches located at any of the mirror links, for
> example,
>
> https://mirror.hs-esslingen.de/pub/OpenBSD/syspatch/7.5/amd64/
>
> manually verified the signature with signify, then changed the onl
located at any of the mirror links, for example,
https://mirror.hs-esslingen.de/pub/OpenBSD/syspatch/7.5/amd64/
manually verified the signature with signify, then changed the online path
under /etc/installurl to point to the usb/location that contains the downloaded
security patch files, and
Suppose I want to add a custom patch to a release system (backport patch from
current and compile on release),
but keep the system able to load more official syspatches:
is it enough to put the relevant new object file (say pf.o) in
/usr/share/relink/kernel/GENERIC.MP/
and just do reorder_kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yup. My screwup. Leftovers.
Dhu
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 19:12:20 +0200
Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:10:20PM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> > I'm just looking at
> > http://www.openbsd.org/errata71.html
> > (see attac
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:10:20PM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> I'm just looking at
> http://www.openbsd.org/errata71.html
> (see attached PNG)
>
> and it's missing the last 8 entries
> (029_expat.patch thru 036_rpki.patch)
That sounds like 6.9:
https://www.openbsd.org/errata69.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
That's fine. But patches 29 thru 36 which I've already downloaded have
disappeared from that site.
Dhu
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 07:16:10 -0600
"Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> We only manufacture errata for the last two releases.
>
> 7.1 is 3 releases
We only manufacture errata for the last two releases.
7.1 is 3 releases ago.
You are on your own, or you upgrade to the last two releases.
Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
>
> I'm just looking at
> http://www.openbsd.org/errata71.html
> (see attached PNG)
>
> and it's missing the last 8 entr
accessible via my T-Mobile phone
On July 12, 2023 5:04:21 PM MDT, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:19:17PM -0700, latin...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
>> Is it working?
>> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD
>
>Works for me.
>
>Best regards,
>Chris Narkiewicz
>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:19:17PM -0700, latin...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
> Is it working?
> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD
Works for me.
Best regards,
Chris Narkiewicz
Hello misc
Is it working?
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD
# syspatch
syspatch: cdn.openbsd.org: no address associated with name
Thanks
On 16.05.23 08:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023-05-16, Benjamin Stürz wrote:
PS 2: I compile with
COPTIMIZE=-O3 -march=native -mtune=native
and no crashes so far.
btw: don't even think of reporting bugs unless you've verified it with a
standard build (i.e. clean the build dir and rebuild u
On 2023-05-16, Benjamin Stürz wrote:
> PS 2: I compile with
> COPTIMIZE=-O3 -march=native -mtune=native
> and no crashes so far.
btw: don't even think of reporting bugs unless you've verified it with a
standard build (i.e. clean the build dir and rebuild using standard
optimiser flags).
The rules are clear.
syspatch only works on against official releases.
We are not going to change this code to handle piece-meal adjustments
and the potential shitshow that could occur.
So you get to run release (and use syspatch), or you are on your own and
probably following -current
Hi misc@,
out of curiosity I recently compiled a custom kernel
and now syspatch(8) fails with:
syspatch: Unsupported release: 7.3-stable
Taking a short look at /usr/sbin/syspatch reveals the following lines:
set -A _KERNV -- $(sysctl -n kern.version |
sed 's/^OpenBSD \([1-9][0-9]
On 2022-09-13, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> I'm posting this here since I'm not sure if it's a bug or something I
> did wrong. Today I upgraded to the latest snapshot and while booting to
> the new system init ran syspatch(8). I can't figure out why.
This is
I'm posting this here since I'm not sure if it's a bug or something I
did wrong. Today I upgraded to the latest snapshot and while booting to
the new system init ran syspatch(8). I can't figure out why.
dmesg:
OpenBSD 7.2 (GENERIC.MP) #720: Sun Sep 11 15:41:58 MDT 20
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 08:51:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> And of course, the syspatch testing procedures will get another step or
> two to make sure this doesn't happen again
>
> So just wait.
Thank you for explanation and clarification. Two of my systems were alr
Richard Narron wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) wrote:
>
> > After the 7.1 update syspatch -c started throwing errors due to a
> > missing signatures file:
> >
> > Patch check:
> > syspatch: Error retrieving
> > http:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) wrote:
> After the 7.1 update syspatch -c started throwing errors due to a
> missing signatures file:
>
> Patch check:
> syspatch: Error retrieving
> http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/syspatch/7.1/amd64/SHA256.sig
After the 7.1 update syspatch -c started throwing errors due to a
missing signatures file:
Patch check:
syspatch: Error retrieving
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/syspatch/7.1/amd64/SHA256.sig: 404 Not Found
The error is valid. To suppress this message it would make sense to drop
an
On Nov 26 16:37:02, em...@suelze.de wrote:
> I found the issue and have rectified it.
I hope meassures were taken as well.
I Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML e-mail
/ \
8<
On 25/11/2021 21:06, Goetz Schultz wrote:
Hello list,
I am a bit stuck with syspatch. When running syspatch it is "doing
nothing" - coming back with exit code "1". So far I assume someth
L e-mail
/ \
8<
On 25/11/2021 21:06, Goetz Schultz wrote:
Hello list,
I am a bit stuck with syspatch. When running syspatch it is "doing
nothing" - coming back with exit code "1". So far I assume something
fails. I checked dmesg and systemlogs, but
25/11/2021 21:06, Goetz Schultz wrote:
Hello list,
I am a bit stuck with syspatch. When running syspatch it is "doing
nothing" - coming back with exit code "1". So far I assume something
fails. I checked dmesg and systemlogs, but nothing in there. Any hints?
I tried var
Hello list,
I am a bit stuck with syspatch. When running syspatch it is "doing
nothing" - coming back with exit code "1". So far I assume something
fails. I checked dmesg and systemlogs, but nothing in there. Any hints?
I tried various entries in installurl, but nothin
Relinking to create unique kernel failed; after applying /var/db/kernel.SHA256 /bsd> and , this
is what my relink.log looks like:
(SHA256) /bsd: OK
LD="ld" sh makegap.sh 0x gapdummy.o
ld -T ld.script -X --warn-common -nopie -o newbsd ${SYSTEM_HEAD} vers.o
${OBJS}
LLVM ERROR: out of mem
I just ran syspatch on my Raspberry Pi 3 running OpenBSD 7.0 and the
patches initially appeared to have been applied successfully, including
creating a new kernel and printing the message to reboot to use the new
kernel.
Upon reboot, motd, dmesg, and "sysctl kern.version" still rep
Heylas again,
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 21:40:05 -0700, Greg Thomas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:42 PM Amelia A Lewis wrote:
[snip]
>
> If you were just running syspatch I'd be worried that a hardware failure
> showed up on reboot. I'm way out of practice for trouble
ct.
> Is there a straightforward way to install kernel and bootloader without
> requiring a system reinstall? Can I 'upgrade' with an install cd or usb
> stick from (broken) 6.8+sp3 to 6.8, and then syspatch it up to date?
An 'upgrade' install to the same version would
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:42 PM Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> Heylas,
>
> So, I ran 6.8 syspatch (patches 002 and 003 together) for three systems
> today (yesterday by the time anyone sees this, most likely). Two came
> right back up as expected. The third didn't, but as
Heylas,
So, I ran 6.8 syspatch (patches 002 and 003 together) for three systems
today (yesterday by the time anyone sees this, most likely). Two came
right back up as expected. The third didn't, but as it's local, I could
go retry at the console (all three were actually patched an
and am also
happy to help out with octeon stuff in any way I can. Obviously you guys
aren't going to trust me to do anything syspatch related as I'm not a
dev, but I'd at least like it to be known that there are people who care
about the octeon port and who are willing make an effort fo
rd to donate 2 octeon
> machines to any devs that are interested (including shipping world wide;
> any devs reading: please contact me if you're interested), and am also
> happy to help out with octeon stuff in any way I can. Obviously you guys
> aren't going to trust me to do anything syspatch related as I'm not a
> dev, but I'd at least like it to be known that there are people who care
> about the octeon port and who are willing make an effort for it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordan
>
--
Den ons 12 aug. 2020 kl 00:50 skrev Predrag Punosevac :
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
> > didn't you
>
> octeon is the only one I can think of.
>
I would volunteer doing the work and dedicating two octeons of mine for
building sysp
d, I can afford to donate 2 octeon
machines to any devs that are interested (including shipping world wide;
any devs reading: please contact me if you're interested), and am also
happy to help out with octeon stuff in any way I can. Obviously you guys
aren't going to trust me to do anything sy
The only proxy we have for "what is really used" is dmesg submissions.
Since 6.7 release:
amd64 62
i3865
arm64 3
macppc 2
octeon 1
Based on this there isn't a great case for adding any more.
do
let me know if some octeon machines would be useful to you guys. I'd
happily do the legwork myself but there doesn't appear to be a way to
manually syspatch (please correct me if I'm wrong).
Regards,
Jordan
Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> On 2020-08-11 15:50, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> >
> >> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>
> >>> No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
> >>> didn't you
> >>>
> >> octeon is the only one I can think of.
> > read below:
> >
>
On 2020-08-11 15:50, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
didn't you
octeon is the only one I can think of.
read below:
if you name one that less than 100 people use, then well come on
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> >
> > No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
> > didn't you
> >
>
> octeon is the only one I can think of.
read below:
> > if you name one that less than 100 people use, then well come on
platform.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=157716525114361&w=2
Predrag
>
> if you name one that less than 100 people use, then well come on
>
>
>
>
>
> Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>
> > Just a general question as I got to really love syspatch and
No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
didn't you
if you name one that less than 100 people use, then well come on
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Just a general question as I got to really love syspatch and sysupgrade
> to the point that oppose to bef
Just a general question as I got to really love syspatch and sysupgrade
to the point that oppose to before, now my platforms are pretty much
always up to date and patch in just a few days after patches are release
or even in some cases the same day.
To add more platform, I guess that mean man
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:12:12PM -0500, Allan Streib wrote:
> Antoine Jacoutot writes:
>
> > "patches waiting, but didn't do anything" might be interesting (i.e
> > patches are available); dunno...
>
> syspatch -c
?
--
Antoine
On 2020-02-08 06:03, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 09:03:59AM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote:
There's no mention of what syspatch(8) returns, in the manpage.
I can prove quickly enough that it exits(0) when there's nothing to
do, but
I'm more interested
Antoine Jacoutot writes:
> "patches waiting, but didn't do anything" might be interesting (i.e
> patches are available); dunno...
syspatch -c
Allan
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 09:03:59AM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote:
> There's no mention of what syspatch(8) returns, in the manpage.
>
> I can prove quickly enough that it exits(0) when there's nothing to do, but
> I'm more interested in knowing (for automation purposes) w
There's no mention of what syspatch(8) returns, in the manpage.
I can prove quickly enough that it exits(0) when there's nothing to do,
but I'm more interested in knowing (for automation purposes) what the
return values are in other circumstances, and all my systems are alre
Thank you. Yes, as I had already replied, it has been out-of-sync clock.
Interestingly enough ntpd was running. Anyway, clock has been corrected
and everything is working OK now.
Jan
On 16 Jan 2020, at 15:13, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On Jan 16, 2020 8:09 AM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
On Jan 16, 2020 8:09 AM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:45 PM Jan Betlach wrote:
>
> >
> > Any ideas what is wrong? Might as well be a pebkac I am unaware of…
> >
> >
> Clock out of sync?
I have seen this a few times and it was always my system clock out of whack.
Mi
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:45 PM Jan Betlach wrote:
>
> Any ideas what is wrong? Might as well be a pebkac I am unaware of…
>
>
Clock out of sync?
Forwarded message:
From: Jan Betlach
To: stan
Subject: Re: Syspatch
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:50:59 +0100
Wow / pebkac as I’ve said. Of course date/time was off for some
reason. Thank you very much.
Jan
On 16 Jan 2020, at 13:48, stan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:43:44PM
Hi,
I am getting following error when running syspatch as root on my APU2C4:
ftp: SSL write error: certificate verification failed: certificate is
not yet valid
I am using Fastly in my installurl: https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD
Other machines run syspatch without any problem, using
Hello Strahil,
I get this very often when pf does not allow traffic out.
First check that pf allows traffic out.
Hope it helps, Dimitrios
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:51:45PM +, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> it seems that syspatch and pkg_add are having an issue
Nikolov wrote:
>> Hello Community,
>>
>> it seems that syspatch and pkg_add are having an issue with 'ftp:
>connect: Permission denied'.
>> System is 6.5 and access via ftp (based on my automatic syspatch
>script) has seized on 03 Nov 2019.
>> /etc/ins
Hello Community,
it seems that syspatch and pkg_add are having an issue with 'ftp: connect:
Permission denied'.
System is 6.5 and access via ftp (based on my automatic syspatch script) has
seized on 03 Nov 2019.
/etc/installurl is pointing to https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/
I
For completeness, I discovered I was having issues with downloading the sources
for the sysupgrade command on my edge firewall also! So it was not limited to
internet servers as first thought.
Since upgrading the 6.6 (had to run sysupgrade 4 times to get it to complete
the downloads), the issue
Hahaha
Thanks Theo, that made me smile.
But you have answered my question perfectly, albeit in a round about way.
Indeed it doesn’t matter what it is called, and would be clearer with a generic
name, as we got caught out by a program calling another program with colliding
name.
For example, Ha
On 2019-10-30, Andrew Lemin wrote:
> - But throws errors when I try and use flavours which is critical for
> installing python for example (NB; This is a different error to before,
> where I was getting 'timeout' instead of 'Invalid argument');
> [HOME]root@testbsd1:/local#pkg_add python%2 py-pip
Andrew Lemin wrote:
> To me this seems unusual (was expecting 'curl' or 'wget' etc to avoid code
> duplication) and confusing? What do you think?
curl is not in openbsd
wget is not in openbsd
Maybe we should rename our downloading software to lemin, which is
obviously a randomly chosen name wi
>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone know if it is possible to completely disable ftp in the
> package management utilities; pkg_add, syspatch, sysupgrade etc?
> >>>>
> >>>> My PKG_PATH references http:// urls, as does /etc/install
ftp in the
>>>> package management utilities; pkg_add, syspatch, sysupgrade etc?
>>>>
>>>> My PKG_PATH references http:// urls, as does /etc/install. But I cannot
>>>> stop these tools trying to use ftp which does not work! :(
>>> Can you show
On 2019-10-29 20:19, PJ wrote:
> Am 28.10.19 um 23:52 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
>> On 2019-10-28, Andy Lemin wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know if it is possible to completely disable ftp in the package
>>> management utilities; pkg_add,
On 2019-10-29, PJ wrote:
> Am 28.10.19 um 23:52 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
>> On 2019-10-28, Andy Lemin wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know if it is possible to completely disable ftp in the package
>>> management utilities; pkg_add,
Am 28.10.19 um 23:52 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> On 2019-10-28, Andy Lemin wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Does anyone know if it is possible to completely disable ftp in the package
>> management utilities; pkg_add, syspatch, sysupgrade etc?
>>
>> My PKG_PAT
On 2019-10-28, Andy Lemin wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Does anyone know if it is possible to completely disable ftp in the package
> management utilities; pkg_add, syspatch, sysupgrade etc?
>
> My PKG_PATH references http:// urls, as does /etc/install. But I cannot stop
> these to
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 06:43:03PM GMT, Andy Lemin wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Does anyone know if it is possible to completely disable ftp in the package
> management utilities; pkg_add, syspatch, sysupgrade etc?
>
> My PKG_PATH references http:// urls, as does /etc/install.
Hi guys,
Does anyone know if it is possible to completely disable ftp in the package
management utilities; pkg_add, syspatch, sysupgrade etc?
My PKG_PATH references http:// urls, as does /etc/install. But I cannot stop
these tools trying to use ftp which does not work! :(
Every time I try and
For the archives: this was my silly mistake in putting a symlink to
gnu tar in a directory that was in front of /bin in $PATH. Reverting
to a new login shell with the standard root $PATH solved the problem.
Thanks to Bryan Steele for unwedging my brain on this! -- Jonathan
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:20:40AM -0400, Bryan Steele wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 12:42:25PM -0700, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> > I'm trying to use syspatch to update a firewall (a PC Engines Alix)
> > running 6.5-stable/i386, but syspatch dies with an error message sayin
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 12:42:25PM -0700, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> I'm trying to use syspatch to update a firewall (a PC Engines Alix)
> running 6.5-stable/i386, but syspatch dies with an error message saying
> that the patch file contains inappropriate filenames:
>
>
I'm trying to use syspatch to update a firewall (a PC Engines Alix)
running 6.5-stable/i386, but syspatch dies with an error message saying
that the patch file contains inappropriate filenames:
# uname -a
OpenBSD sodium.bkis-orchard.net 6.5 GENERIC#3 i386
# cat /etc/installurl
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 02:32:22PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Hi Misc,
>
> Are there any plans to build syspathes for Octeon platform in the
> future? Octeon platform has matured nicely since the introduction in
> 2013 and is becoming my goto platform for SOHO environments. Apart of
> the l
Hi Misc,
Are there any plans to build syspathes for Octeon platform in the
future? Octeon platform has matured nicely since the introduction in
2013 and is becoming my goto platform for SOHO environments. Apart of
the lack of hardware clocks the main nuisance is the lack of binary
patches.
I kn
In the latest mds errata patch, I noticed that one of the steps is to
run fw_update. From briefly looking over the syspatch script, I don't
see it calling fw_update once a patch is applied.
Would you welcome a diff to add support for this? If so I can look at
writing one. It would
A few corrections to the previous diff, sorry
Index: Makefile.octeon
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/octeon/conf/Makefile.octeon,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -p -r1.49 Makefile.octeon
--- Makefile.octeon 9 Feb 2018 03:59:15 -
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
