On 2009-04-22, Whyzzi wrote:
> I was happy /w the re driver too until 4.4 (I think my previous
> firewall/samba share server was 4.2)
>
> I did mention in my original post I was watching systat vmstat, during
> the post I mentioned I was watching hard drive kbyte writes. When I
> decided to run ou
I was happy /w the re driver too until 4.4 (I think my previous
firewall/samba share server was 4.2)
I did mention in my original post I was watching systat vmstat, during
the post I mentioned I was watching hard drive kbyte writes. When I
decided to run out and buy the em I noticed my re was doin
On 2009-04-20, Kristian Rooke wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I was more than happy to dump the whole dmesg, but I just didn't want to put
> too much into my first message.
quite the reverse actually. put all the information you can think of right
there in the first message.
On 2009-04-21, why...@gma
My 2cents worth:
On Apr 20, 2009 12:58am, Kristian Rooke wrote:
> OpenBSD 4.4 (GENERIC) #1021: Tue Aug 12 17:16:55 MDT 2008
ok you're running 4.4
> rl0 at pci1 dev 5 function 0 "Realtek 8139" rev 0x10: irq 10, address
> 00:40:f4:1d:22:8c
> rlphy0 at rl0 phy 0: RTL internal PHY
> em0 at pci1
Thank you!
On 20/04/2009, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:19:05PM -0500, Tony Abernethy said that
>> frantisek holop wrote:
>> > all hw is unrealible to some degree,
>> ... and all degrees of unreliability are equivalent?
>> Methinks some people like stuff that is LESS un
l Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
> Syntic
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:50 PM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Slow SATA write speeds with SMB
>
> So from what I can tell... my chipset is crap and nobody wants to
> deve
Or write the support yourself...
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Syntic
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:50 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Slow SATA write speeds with SMB
So from what I can tell... my chipset is crap and
ut loosen up a bit
>
> You need to go write some acpi code and tell me again to loosen up.
> Once you have taken a few bites of that shittaco tell me again how funny
> this is.
>
>>
>> -f
>> --
>> windows error: 004 erroneous error. nothing wrong.
>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:29:20AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:19:05PM -0500, Tony Abernethy said that
> > frantisek holop wrote:
> > > all hw is unrealible to some degree,
> > ... and all degrees of unreliability are equivalent?
> > Methinks some people like st
frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:19:05PM -0500, Tony Abernethy
> said that
> > frantisek holop wrote:
> > > all hw is unrealible to some degree,
> > ... and all degrees of unreliability are equivalent?
> > Methinks some people like stuff that is LESS unreliable.
> > Even g
hmm, on Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:19:05PM -0500, Tony Abernethy said that
> frantisek holop wrote:
> > all hw is unrealible to some degree,
> ... and all degrees of unreliability are equivalent?
> Methinks some people like stuff that is LESS unreliable.
> Even going so far as to make an OS that is L
frantisek holop wrote:
> all hw is unrealible to some degree,
... and all degrees of unreliability are equivalent?
Methinks some people like stuff that is LESS unreliable.
Even going so far as to make an OS that is LESS unreliable.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:06:18AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:48:15PM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
> > > some of the devs really need to give up their thinkpads and start
> > > buying cheap msi or other stuff with amd and nvidia monstrosities :]
> >
> > Rig
hmm, on Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:48:15PM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
> > some of the devs really need to give up their thinkpads and start
> > buying cheap msi or other stuff with amd and nvidia monstrosities :]
>
> Right, dealing with hardware that is unreliable on a daily basis is
> exactly
hmm, on Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:33:25PM -0600, Bob Beck said that
> > some of the devs really need to give up their thinkpads and start
> > buying cheap msi or other stuff with amd and nvidia monstrosities :]
> >
>
> Yeah... you're like... the guy who is sits outside the estwing
> factory hittin
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:33:25PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> > some of the devs really need to give up their thinkpads and start
> > buying cheap msi or other stuff with amd and nvidia monstrosities :]
> >
>
> Yeah... you're like... the guy who is sits outside the estwing
> factory hitting his ba
> some of the devs really need to give up their thinkpads and start
> buying cheap msi or other stuff with amd and nvidia monstrosities :]
Right, dealing with hardware that is unreliable on a daily basis is
exactly what I need. I mean I am totally not busy at all so what is a
random reboot here a
> some of the devs really need to give up their thinkpads and start
> buying cheap msi or other stuff with amd and nvidia monstrosities :]
>
Yeah... you're like... the guy who is sits outside the estwing
factory hitting his balls with an estwing hammer - telling everyone
who comes in and out tha
hmm, on Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:30:58PM +1000, Kristian Rooke said that
> ahci0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "NVIDIA MCP73 AHCI" rev 0xa2: irq 11, AHCI
MCP77 is also unsupported. but there was a patch floating about
on tech@ regarding ahci. my notebook is quite unusable at the
moment so i can't tes
The 2 SATA drives are currently connected to SATA port 1 & 2 (so the BIOS
tells me).
I just connected another SATA drive to port number 4 and the same occured
for that drive too.
There are no further details following the scsibus0 line.
ahci0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "NVIDIA MCP73 AHCI" rev 0xa2
I'm not an expert by any means when it comes to OpenBSD,
AHCI, or SATA, but here are some shots in the dark.
Does your machine have four SATA ports on it? Can you
identify which of the four ports your two SATA drives are
plugged into? Can you add additional SATA drives and see
if these errors ar
Thanks for the suggestions.
I checked the BIOS configuration and it appears that the SATA controller was
set to IDE (not sure how that happened). I have now set it to AHCI, but I am
seeing another error in dmesg
ahci0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "NVIDIA MCP73 AHCI" rev 0xa2: irq 11, AHCI
1.1
ah
Just noticed this, thought I'd quickly give you the following tip :
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:40:35AM -0600, Anathae Townsend wrote:
| [Quote]
| pciide1 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "NVIDIA MCP73 AHCI" rev 0xa2: DMA
| (unsupported), channel 0 wired to native-PCI, channel 1 wired to native-PCI
| [end
[Quote]
pciide1 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "NVIDIA MCP73 AHCI" rev 0xa2: DMA
(unsupported), channel 0 wired to native-PCI, channel 1 wired to native-PCI
[end quote]
The AHCI implementation on your mb is not supported by the version of
OpenBSD
you are using.
That, or it is configured to something o
Kristian Rooke wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I was more than happy to dump the whole dmesg, but I just didn't want to put
> too much into my first message.
I have yet to see anyone complaining about too much information. ;-)
Nevertheless, AFAICS (which is rather limited), it seems your wd2 disk
(wh
sector PIO, LBA48, 305245MB, 625142448 sectors
>> wd1 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 1:
>> wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 715404MB, 1465149168 sectors
>> wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
>> wd1(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
>> wd2 at pciide1 ch
Hi Alexander,
I was more than happy to dump the whole dmesg, but I just didn't want to put
too much into my first message.
Please find the full dmesg below:
OpenBSD 4.4 (GENERIC) #1021: Tue Aug 12 17:16:55 MDT 2008
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R
0:
> wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 305245MB, 625142448 sectors
> wd1 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 1:
> wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 715404MB, 1465149168 sectors
> wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
> wd1(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
> wd2 at pciide1 chan
Syntic wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I recently installed OpenBSD on one of my servers and I have noticed that I
> am experiencing slow SATA write speeds when using SMB to copy files across
> my network.
>
> I currently have 1xSATA disk & 2xPATA disks in my server.
> When I copy files across my network
Thanks,
Kristian
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Slow-SATA-write-speeds-with-SMB-tp23130953p23130953.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
30 matches
Mail list logo
