On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 10:03:58PM -0500, James Boyle wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I attempted to get the debug messages to print by doing:
> cd /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/conf, copying GENERIC.MP to
> GENERIC.MP.BIODEBUG, and making this change:
> --- GENERIC.MP Wed Feb 5 23:54:35 2025
> +++ GENERIC.MP
stead of bioctl
-c 1C)?
Thank you,
--James
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 23:12:01 +0100
> From: Stefan Sperling
> To: James Boyle
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: softraid, bioctl -c 1C failed array question
>
> On Fri, Jan 24
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 02:53:06PM -0500, James Boyle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was hoping to get a little help with bioctl and the 1C raid mode after a
> drive failure. The most recent error message I'm getting when trying to
> start the array in a degraded mode is:
> # bioctl -c 1C -l /dev/sd0a s
Hi,
On Friday, November 17th, 2023 at 08:26, D.A. wrote:
> What encryption algorithm does softraid?
According to the presentation titled "softraid(4) boot" by Stefan Sperling
at EuroBSDCon 2015, AES with 256-bit key(s) in XTS mode.
(You can check sys/dev/softraid_crypto.c in sys.tar.gz if desir
>On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 02:33:31PM +, Nathan Carruth wrote:
>>The way I see it, this depends on one's use case.
>>There certainly are cases where it is important to be able
>>to irrevocably destroy all data in an instant. But there are
>>also use cases where one is only interested in making su
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 02:33:31PM +, Nathan Carruth wrote:
The way I see it, this depends on one's use case.
There certainly are cases where it is important to be able
to irrevocably destroy all data in an instant. But there are
also use cases where one is only interested in making sure
tha
Hi,
Please fix your email client to correctly attribute quotes in list mail that
you reply to.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 02:13:53PM +, Nathan Carruth wrote:
> Thank you for your response (apologies that I just saw this).
>
> I will have a look at the file you mentioned.
>
> I am curious what
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 05:13:05AM +, Nathan Carruth wrote:
> Perhaps I should have clarified my use case. I have data which
> is potentially legally privileged and which I also cannot afford
> to lose. Thus an unencrypted backup is out of the question, and
> my first thought was to use full-di
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 05:13:05AM +, Nathan Carruth wrote:
> I presume that OpenBSD also writes on-disk metadata of the
> same sort somewhere. Where?
Look at /usr/src/sys/dev/softraidvar.h.
The structures that contain the softraid metadata are defined there. There is
general softraid metada
On 1/2/23 22:22, Nathan Carruth wrote:
Does a softraid(4) crypto volume require metadata backup? (I am
running amd64 OpenBSD 6.9 if it is relevant, will probably
upgrade in the next few months.)
I understand FreeBSD GELI (e.g.) requires such a backup to protect
against crypto-related metadata co
On 10/18/22 09:35, se...@0x.su wrote:
I have raid1 volume (one of two on PC) with 2 disks.
# disklabel sd5
# /dev/rsd5c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: SR RAID 1
duid: 7a03a84165b3d165
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 255
sectors/cylinder: 16065
cylinders: 24320
On 5/6/22 9:03 AM, Proton wrote:
Hi,
I'm using softraid 1C on my remote dedicated server, built on two NVMe disks.
It works really well from performance perspective and provide some data
protection,
but there is no way to check device health status because SMART doesn’t work.
I guess bioctl wil
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:09 PM Brian Brombacher
wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 3, 2020, at 12:22 PM, sven falempin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:00 PM Brian Brombacher
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2020, at 11:51 AM, sven falempin
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Mon,
> On Aug 3, 2020, at 12:22 PM, sven falempin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:00 PM Brian Brombacher
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2020, at 11:51 AM, sven falempin
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:38 AM Brian Brombacher
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Aug 3
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:00 PM Brian Brombacher
wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2020, at 11:51 AM, sven falempin
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:38 AM Brian Brombacher
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 3, 2020, at 9:54 AM, sven falempin
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello
>> >
>> > I saw a similar is
> On Aug 3, 2020, at 11:51 AM, sven falempin wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:38 AM Brian Brombacher
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 3, 2020, at 9:54 AM, sven falempin wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello
>> >
>> > I saw a similar issue in the mailing list around decembre 2019,
>> > follo
>> plugged in and just run /sbin/bioctl -c C -l softraid0
>> DUIDHERE.a on.
> The last two arguments in that command are reversed. Fixing
> that should solve at least part of your problem.
Thank you very much. I apologize, I did reverse the arguments in my
email. However, I was using them cor
freda_bundc...@nym.hush.com (2020-02-18 10:13 -0600):
> I've had Postgresql data on an encrypted external USB drive
> (encrypted via the OpenBSD FAQ instructions) for about a year
> and it's worked great.
>
> Recently, I started gettting dmesg messages
> saying softraid i/o error and it listed v
Few missing notes to this email:
- my performance testing, results and conclusion were done only on
mechanical drives (hitachi 7k500 and wd re 500) and only with meta-data
intensive workload. Basically tar -xf src.tar; unmount and rm -rf src;
unmount where src.tar was src.tar of stable at th
Tried something like that in the past:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=144217941801350&w=2
It worked kind of OK except the performance. The problem is that data
layout makes read op. -> 2x read op. and write op. -> read op. + 2x
write op. which is not the speed winner. Caching of checks
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Mason
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 7:13 PM
> To: Steven Surdock
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Softraid data recovery
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:34 AM Steven Surdock net.com> wrote:
> >
...
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Karel Gardas
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 11:26 AM
> To: Steven Surdock
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Softraid data recovery
>
> On 2019-10-15 13:44, Steven Surdock wrote:
> > Model Family: Western Digital B
On 2019-10-15 13:44, Steven Surdock wrote:
Model Family: Western Digital Black
Device Model: WDC WD4001FAEX-00MJRA0
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000Old_age Always
- 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000Old_age Always
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Karel Gardas
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 5:31 AM
> To: Steven Surdock
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Softraid data recovery
>
>
>
> On 2019-10-15 04:26, Steven Surdock wrote:
> > I believe the disks are mo
On 2019-10-15 04:26, Steven Surdock wrote:
I believe the disks are mostly healthy.
I seriously doubt that. What's the output from smartctl -a for both
drives? I can't imagine why would you get failures on heave reads on one
drive and then later failures on another one and yet it would not
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 3:04 PM, Steven Surdock wrote:
>
> root@host# more /var/backups/disklabel.sd1.backup
> # /dev/rsd1c:
> type: SCSI
> disk: SCSI disk
> label: SR RAID 1
> duid: 8ec2330eabf7cd26
> flags:
> bytes/sector: 512
> sectors/track: 63
> tracks/cylinder: 255
> sectors/cylinder: 16065
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Mason
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 7:13 PM
> To: Steven Surdock
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Softraid data recovery
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:34 AM Steven Surdock net.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have a
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:34 AM Steven Surdock
wrote:
>
> I have a simple RAID1 configuration on wd0, wd1. I was in the process of
> performing a rebuild on wd1, as it failed during some heavy reads. During
> the rebuild wd0 went into a failure state. After some troubleshooting I
> decided t
> My understanding is that a softraid passphrase is a seed from which bioctl
> creates a key.
>
> I currently use a passphrase to decrypt my CRYPTO volume.
> (How) can I create a corresponding keydisk that will decrypt the same volume?
I believe it is mutually exclusive. You can either use a pas
> I can imagine you have some old softraid metadata lying around. Did you
> try to wipe any existing metadata from the RAID partitions before
> attaching it?
>
Thanks! That did the trick.
Best regards,
—Håkon
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 02:36:49PM +0200, Håkon Robbestad Gylterud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two 5TB disks, which I want to set up as mirrored using RAID 1
> through softraid(4). But after attaching the disk using bioctl(8), the
> disk appears with 2TB, not 5TB.
I can imagine you have some old soft
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:13:45PM +1100, tomr wrote:
> Well... there's nothing in the FAQ about using a keydisk at all, and
> there's no hints in bioctl(8) about using both a keydisk and a password
> together.
That's because using both isn't a supported use case yet.
In the current design and imp
On 09/28/17 17:58, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 04:15:20AM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:11:49AM +1000, tomr wrote:
>>> I remember seeing a post, I think on undeadly.org, which went through
>>> having the bootloader on password-encrypted usb driv
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 04:15:20AM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:11:49AM +1000, tomr wrote:
> > I remember seeing a post, I think on undeadly.org, which went through
> > having the bootloader on password-encrypted usb drive, that also
> > contains a keyfile for the mai
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:11:49AM +1000, tomr wrote:
> I remember seeing a post, I think on undeadly.org, which went through
> having the bootloader on password-encrypted usb drive, that also
> contains a keyfile for the main disk. It said something like "I also
> wanted the laptop to appear broke
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was really annoyed by the numbers I got. So I did the testings again.
> Using
> a brand new VM. Being really careful on what I was doing and writing it
> down
> after each command run. I did the testings using 6.1 and 6.2-current
Hello,
I was really annoyed by the numbers I got. So I did the testings again.
Using
a brand new VM. Being really careful on what I was doing and writing it
down
after each command run. I did the testings using 6.1 and 6.2-current, in
case
there were some changes. There weren't.
First of all
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 07:32:49PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> I'm not a developer but I know 6.1 moved to a shiny new side channel
> resistant AES. I seem to remember Theo saying that if it is that slow
> then even worse; people won't use encryption at all and if they need
> side channel resis
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:24:32 +0200
> I noticed that there were a huge difference between
> plain and encrypted filesystem using OpenBSD.
I'm not a developer but I know 6.1 moved to a shiny new side channel
resistant AES. I seem to remember Theo saying that if it is that slow
then even worse; p
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:24:32PM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Initially comparing I/O speed between FreeBSD/ZFS/GELI and
> OpenBSD/FFS/CRYPTO, I noticed that there were a huge difference between
> plain and encrypted filesystem using OpenBSD. I ran the test on a 1
> vCore/1GB RAM Vultr VP
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Ian Watts wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback, Karel, Allan, and Kamil. The motivation is
> long-term data storage reliability. For example, my wife creates
> graphical books, which involves large files, plus other work and
> personal files.
>
so kind of SOHO NAS?
Thanks for the feedback, Karel, Allan, and Kamil. The motivation is
long-term data storage reliability. For example, my wife creates
graphical books, which involves large files, plus other work and
personal files.
Having a mirror is not terribly important, so doing a nightly sync to
anothe
loose -> lose. Sorry not native English speaker here.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> How much data can you loose on this mirror? The rebuild time is long
> and the chance of another drive dying is higher during rebuild so I
> would consider either increasing redundancy to
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Ian Watts wrote:
> After 17 hours it is 24% complete, so it'll be about three
> days to complete. The system is:
How much data can you loose on this mirror? The rebuild time is long
and the chance of another drive dying is higher during rebuild so I
would conside
On 2017-04-18, Allan Streib wrote:
> Ian Watts writes:
>
>> With this much disk space, should I be looking at another way of
>> achieving data redundancy?
>
> Buy a hardware RAID controller.
I'd sooner have decent software RAID with disks spread across multiple
controllers..
On Tue, April 18, 2017 8:48 am, Kamil CholewiÅ*ski wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Jiri B wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 08:23:56AM -0400, Allan Streib wrote:
>>> Buy a hardware RAID controller.
>>
>> I suppose you wanted to write - 'buy two equal hardware RAID
>> controllers',
>> or how would yo
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Jiri B wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 08:23:56AM -0400, Allan Streib wrote:
>> Buy a hardware RAID controller.
>
> I suppose you wanted to write - 'buy two equal hardware RAID controllers',
> or how would you be solving problem in broken hw raid controller in
> cca 10 yrs fr
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 08:23:56AM -0400, Allan Streib wrote:
> Ian Watts writes:
>
> > With this much disk space, should I be looking at another way of
> > achieving data redundancy?
>
> Buy a hardware RAID controller.
I suppose you wanted to write - 'buy two equal hardware RAID controllers',
Ian Watts writes:
> With this much disk space, should I be looking at another way of
> achieving data redundancy?
Buy a hardware RAID controller.
Allan
On 04/17/17 19:56, Ian Watts wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm planning on replacing an old fileserver that has a single 1T drive
> with something a little newer having 3T of space. I have two 3T drives
> and have installed OpenBSD 6.0 to both as a softraid mirror. Works well
> and I simulated a drive
On 2017-03-03, Eric Huiban wrote:
> bioctl needs a mandatory bootable partition to act correctly even on
> disks not aimed to be bootable.
I find that very surprising.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On 2017-03-03, Eric Huiban wrote:
> i just performed some remote connection... recreating GPT with an .i EFI
> boot partition. The softraid is now 2.7TiB... Grumbl! conclusion :
> bioctl needs a mandatory bootable partition to act correctly even on
> disks not aimed to be bootable.
Too late no
Eric Huiban wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:27:20PM +0100, Eric Huiban wrote:
Hello,
I should have miss something in the man pages with softraid and
bioctl. But
i want to form a RAID 1 between two 3TB harddisk (2.7TiB) and it is
acting
like 2TiB MBR disks with OpenBSD
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:27:20PM +0100, Eric Huiban wrote:
Hello,
I should have miss something in the man pages with softraid and bioctl. But
i want to form a RAID 1 between two 3TB harddisk (2.7TiB) and it is acting
like 2TiB MBR disks with OpenBSD 6.0.
fdisk -ig sd1
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:27:20PM +0100, Eric Huiban wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I should have miss something in the man pages with softraid and bioctl. But
> i want to form a RAID 1 between two 3TB harddisk (2.7TiB) and it is acting
> like 2TiB MBR disks with OpenBSD 6.0.
>
> fdisk -ig sd1 is OK.
Did
> I'm taking the plunge now.
You're done with the swings.
On 11/16/16 11:52, Ax0n wrote:
> I'm taking the plunge now. Mostly, I was concerned about SSD longevity and
> if TRIM would be a problem due to the different way data is going to be
> accessed. It was the cheapest drive I could find locally anyway, and I keep
> good backups (dump to a much larger e
Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:10:08 +0100 ludovic coues
> Trim and ssd longevity and what not may have been an issue when ssd where a
> novelty.
> These day, it should last just as long as an hard drive. So make backups if
> what matters and don't worry about your disk.
Hi Ludovic,
You have to face it, th
Trim and ssd longevity and what not may have been an issue when ssd where a
novelty.
These day, it should last just as long as an hard drive. So make backups if
what matters and don't worry about your disk.
On 16 Nov 2016 5:54 p.m., "Ax0n" wrote:
> I'm taking the plunge now. Mostly, I was concer
I'm taking the plunge now. Mostly, I was concerned about SSD longevity and
if TRIM would be a problem due to the different way data is going to be
accessed. It was the cheapest drive I could find locally anyway, and I keep
good backups (dump to a much larger external drive that's also using
softrai
Am 11/16/16 um 17:07 schrieb Ax0n:
> I'm less concerned about swap, and more concerned about how a fully
> encrypted softraid Solid State Disk is going to act. I can't find a lot
> about FDE on SSD.
>
It acts as a normal harddisk would, just faster :). I had one in my
worklaptop i used before for
I'm less concerned about swap, and more concerned about how a fully
encrypted softraid Solid State Disk is going to act. I can't find a lot
about FDE on SSD.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:41 AM, trondd wrote:
> On Wed, November 16, 2016 10:23 am, Jiri B wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:14:51AM
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:23:39AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:14:51AM -0600, Ax0n wrote:
> > I just purchased a SanDisk SSD for my daily-driver laptop which has been
> > running -CURRENT well. I'm considering going with FDE and a fresh snapshot
> > install, adding my packages
On Wed, November 16, 2016 10:23 am, Jiri B wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:14:51AM -0600, Ax0n wrote:
>> I just purchased a SanDisk SSD for my daily-driver laptop which has been
>> running -CURRENT well. I'm considering going with FDE and a fresh
>> snapshot
>> install, adding my packages then
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:14:51AM -0600, Ax0n wrote:
> I just purchased a SanDisk SSD for my daily-driver laptop which has been
> running -CURRENT well. I'm considering going with FDE and a fresh snapshot
> install, adding my packages then copying over what I need from my old
> spinning rust drive
Hi,
...on Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 03:06:05PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> While a single core of the T1000 is quite slow, this just seems too slow,
> making this setup unusable. openssl speed shows 10 MB/s for AES-128-CBC and 7
> MB/s for AES-256-CBC on a single core. So a single core is de
> Uhm, but the dd command wasn't :-) (the guest's root disk is sd2, not
sd0...)
>
> Now our numbers align much better:
>
> # dd if=/dev/rsd2c of=/dev/null bs=10m count=50
> 50+0 records in
> 50+0 records out
> 524288000 bytes transferred in 131.796 secs (3978008 bytes/sec)
Ah, thanks. I was just a
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 07:53:06PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Are you sure that LDOM was indeed using softraid crypto?
>
> Yes.
Uhm, but the dd command wasn't :-) (the guest's root disk is sd2, not sd0...)
Now our numbers align much better:
# dd if=/dev/rsd2c of=/dev/null bs=10m count=50
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 07:39:29PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> > I have the 1GHz version with 4 cores (32 threads).
>
> Ok, so same per-core speed, so single-threaded performance should be the same.
> (Btw, you have 8 cores, not 4. 8 cores @ 4 threads each.)
>
> > Otherwise it's probably s
> I have the 1GHz version with 4 cores (32 threads).
Ok, so same per-core speed, so single-threaded performance should be the
same.
(Btw, you have 8 cores, not 4. 8 cores @ 4 threads each.)
> Otherwise it's probably similar to yours.
> It's running 6.0 at the moment, yes. Some guests are running
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 06:57:00PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Oh, wow, these are *much* better than what I get. Which CPU do you have? I
> have 6x 1 GHz (meaning 24 threads). Are you running 6.0?
>
> Thank you for these numbers, they make me much more hopeful about this
> machine.
I hav
Am 29.10.2016 um 18:34 schrieb Stefan Sperling :
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 06:08:37PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>> Hm, my main problem seems to be that whenever I decrypt something from the
>> disk, all other 23 cores seem to get stalled.
>>
>> So, would you recommend doing the following th
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 06:08:37PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Hm, my main problem seems to be that whenever I decrypt something from the
> disk, all other 23 cores seem to get stalled.
>
> So, would you recommend doing the following then:
>
> * Have a partition for the main system on a so
Hi,
> I run a T1000 which is segregated into a couple of LDOM guests (about 10).
> Some of the guests use softraid crypto inside. The host does not.
Yeah, I was planning on using LDOMs as well. However, since I wanted to put
this into a datacenter (for a cheap price, so it not being the most curr
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:12:51PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Another thing I noticed:
>
> When running dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=65536, my SSH connection gets extremely
> laggy. If I open 4 more in parallel, all go down to KB/s of writes, and SSH
> becomes unusable. Now unusable as in thi
Another thing I noticed:
When running dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=65536, my SSH connection gets extremely
laggy. If I open 4 more in parallel, all go down to KB/s of writes, and SSH
becomes unusable. Now unusable as in things need forever to start. Unusable as
in I press a key and it takes forever t
Am 26.12.2015 um 23:18 schrieb Alexander Hall:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 10:41:34PM +0100, Thomas Bohl wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I updated from 5.8-stabel to current today. (First just an update, than
>> because of the problem a fresh installation.) On 5.8-stabel I had a
>> working softraid boot setup
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 10:41:34PM +0100, Thomas Bohl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated from 5.8-stabel to current today. (First just an update, than
> because of the problem a fresh installation.) On 5.8-stabel I had a
> working softraid boot setup with a USB-Stick as keydisk.
>
> Now, if the keydis
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:22:09AM +0100, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> What is the problem? I have downloaded the 'install58.iso'-file
> (amd64-current) and burned the disk to start from. dmesg recognizes the
> three media and reports them as 'sd0' (=m.2-SSD), 'sd1' (SATA-SSD) and 'sd2'
> (USB-stick). I
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:42:14AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> ...
It works fine, I'm exercising 4K sr crypto with rsync every night.
Commit it pretty please :) The remaining bugs don't find themselves
On 8 October 2015 at 07:13, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> mcmer-open...@tor.at (Marcus MERIGHI), 2015.10.08 (Thu) 12:26 (CEST):
>> kwesterb...@gmail.com (Kenneth Westerback), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 17:09 (CET):
>> > Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment.
>> > Ken
>>
>> Any new
On 10/08, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> kwesterb...@gmail.com (Kenneth Westerback), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 17:09 (CET):
> > Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment.
> > Ken
>
> Any news on this one? No answer as always means 'no'.
>
> I saw plus58.html:
> * Use DEV_BSIZE inste
mcmer-open...@tor.at (Marcus MERIGHI), 2015.10.08 (Thu) 12:26 (CEST):
> kwesterb...@gmail.com (Kenneth Westerback), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 17:09 (CET):
> > Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment.
> > Ken
>
> Any news on this one? No answer as always means 'no'.
After re
kwesterb...@gmail.com (Kenneth Westerback), 2014.03.19 (Wed) 17:09 (CET):
> Alas, softraid only supports 512 byte block devices at the moment.
> Ken
Any news on this one? No answer as always means 'no'.
I saw plus58.html:
* Use DEV_BSIZE instead of 512 where appropriate in the kernel. This
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:17:16PM +0200 or thereabouts, Jan Vlach wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
> I have a small netbook with two flash devices - 32G and 4G. I'm using
> softraid crypto discipline with passphrase on the 32G one. That works
> fine.
>
> I would also like to use softraid crypto on the sec
On 12/06/15 18:15, Noth wrote:
On 12/06/15 18:11, Joel Sing wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2015, Joel Sing wrote:
On Friday 12 June 2015, Noth wrote:
Hi misc@
I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the
/home one
was filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of is
On 12/06/15 14:57, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jun 11 19:47:43, nothingn...@citycable.ch wrote:
Hi misc@
I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one was
filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and other non
necessary items. I did this yesterday and it s
On 12/06/15 18:11, Joel Sing wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2015, Joel Sing wrote:
On Friday 12 June 2015, Noth wrote:
Hi misc@
I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one
was filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and
other non necessary items.
On Saturday 13 June 2015, Joel Sing wrote:
> On Friday 12 June 2015, Noth wrote:
> > Hi misc@
> >
> >I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one
> > was filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and
> > other non necessary items. I did this yesterday
On Friday 12 June 2015, Noth wrote:
> Hi misc@
>
>I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one
> was filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and
> other non necessary items. I did this yesterday and it still hasn't
> cleared the disk space completel
[Fri Jun 12 16:59:18] homeuser@casper: ~ $ sync ; sync ; sync ; df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/sd3a 19.7G5.6G 13.1G30%/
/dev/sd2a 906G819G 41.6G95%/home
[Fri Jun 12 16:59:23] homeuser@casper: ~ $ dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1
> >># df -kh
> >>Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> >>/dev/sd2a 906G859G1.2G 100%/home
$ cd
$ sync ; sync ; sync ; df -h
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1m count=1024
$ du -h file
$ sync ; sync ; sync ; df -h
Did the Avail space drop by 1G?
$ rm -f
On Jun 11 19:47:43, nothingn...@citycable.ch wrote:
> Hi misc@
>
> I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one was
> filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and other non
> necessary items. I did this yesterday and it still hasn't cleared the disk
>
No clue comes from it...
# fstat -f /home
USER CMD PID FD MOUNTINUM MODE R/W SZ|DV
root fstat 30300 wd /home 2 drwxr-xr-x r 512
homeuser imap 29865 wd /home12595200 drwxr-xr-x r 3584
homeuser imap 32331 wd /home12595
On June 11, 2015 7:47:43 PM GMT+02:00, Noth wrote:
>Hi misc@
>
> I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one
>was filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and
>other non necessary items. I did this yesterday and it still hasn't
>cleared the disk spa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 31 May 2015 10:20:25 +0200
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 08:07:07PM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> >
> > So now I'm in recovery mode and it is doin
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 08:07:07PM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
> So now I'm in recovery mode and it is doing about 1% per hour
> (it's a 2Tb raid1). Is this normal
That's normal. Just let it run until it's done. You can reboot
th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
So now I'm in recovery mode and it is doing about 1% per hour
(it's a 2Tb raid1). Is this normal and can it be speeded
up from userland?
Thanks,
Dhu
On Thu, 21 May 2015 04:24:22 -0400
Jiri B wrote:
> > > bioctl sd3 ?
> > >
> > > j.
> > >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 21 May 2015 04:24:22 -0400
Jiri B wrote:
> > > bioctl sd3 ?
> > >
> > > j.
> > >
> > # bioctl sd3
> > Volume Status Size Device
> > softraid0 0 Degraded2000396018176 sd3 RAID1
> > 0 Offline
> > bioctl sd3 ?
> >
> > j.
> >
> # bioctl sd3
> Volume Status Size Device
> softraid0 0 Degraded2000396018176 sd3 RAID1
> 0 Offline 0 0:0.0 noencl <>
> 1 Online 2000396018176 0:1.0 noencl
>
So you got the answer, full
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
