On Thu, 26 May 2005 05:10:20 +0100
Anil Madhavapeddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? OCaml isnt a functional language, its a language which supports
> higher-order functions. And its native-code performance beats the
> living daylights out of any C# implementation I've seen. But really,
> who
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:52:34PM -0400, Adam wrote:
>
> No, there you go living in a little fantasy world where you can say
> things and they are magically true. Python and java are both
> significantly slower than C#, especially python, its not even close.
I wonder what you mean by C# here; y
Hi Adam,
Apologies for the delay in response; I've been busy.
On 9 May 2005, at 11:52, Adam wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2005 07:40:10 +0100
Joseph Kiniry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I guess I should have been a little more specific to only
include
languages that have enough libraries to be us
On Mon, 9 May 2005 07:40:10 +0100
Joseph Kiniry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While I guess I should have been a little more specific to only
> > include
> > languages that have enough libraries to be useful, and obviously
> > purely functional languages aren't comparable, you ignoring the
> >
Thank you, Adam, your trolling induced me to plug something in at
google and browse a bit:
http://www.google.com/
search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22C%23%22%2B%22performance%22%2B%22java%22
The ones I found particularly interesting were these two:
http://www.sosnoski.com/presents/dotnetusers/java-dotnet.ht
Hi Adam et al,
On 9 May 2005, at 02:57, Adam wrote:
On Sun, 8 May 2005 22:25:54 +0100
Joseph Kiniry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, C# really is much better than other languages for what it
does. Is there some other safe, garbage collected, high level
language with performance anywhere close
On Sun, 8 May 2005 22:25:54 +0100
Joseph Kiniry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, C# really is much better than other languages for what it
> > does. Is there some other safe, garbage collected, high level
> > language with performance anywhere close to C#?
>
> You mean, besides Java, Mod
Hello Hannah, Adam, Joel, et al,
On 7 May 2005, at 17:23, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:03:04PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
On 2005 May 6, at 5:55 PM, Henry Lenzi wrote:
P.S. It'll be a cold day in Hell before anything in OpenBSD gets
compiled with Mono. I suppose there's a
counter-trolling,
On 2005.5.8, at 04:02 AM, Adam wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005 23:03:04 -0700
Ben Goren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And, truthfully, I just don't see the point behind it, either. It's
not like C# or Java is *that* much better than C or C++ or Perl or
Lisp or any of a dozen other language
On Fri, 6 May 2005 23:03:04 -0700
Ben Goren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And, truthfully, I just don't see the point behind it, either. It's
> not like C# or Java is *that* much better than C or C++ or Perl or
> Lisp or any of a dozen other languages that *aren't* encumbered. I
> mean, sure, you co
Hello!
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:03:04PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
>On 2005 May 6, at 5:55 PM, Henry Lenzi wrote:
>> But for the BSDs, maybe Mono would be a
>> fresh, unhindered start.
>Erm...for Linux, maybe. Not for us.
> http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing
>All we could use are th
On 2005 May 6, at 5:55 PM, Henry Lenzi wrote:
> But for the BSDs, maybe Mono would be a
> fresh, unhindered start.
Erm...for Linux, maybe. Not for us.
http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing
All we could use are the class libraries. Everything else is GPL.
And, truthfully, I just don't
On 5/6/05, Henry Lenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/3/05, Ian F. Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Robbert Haarman wrote:
> >
> > >>Just how stupid is SUN? Developing a CROSS platform coding solution
> > >>that fails to achieve is goal due to licensing and testing
> > >>restrictions and th
IMHO, the open source community should avoid this Java fixation and
switch to Mono. Mono is free sotware and a superior technology than
Java, from what I've read. Sure, there's lots of investment already
made in Java (Tomcat, etc). But for the BSDs, maybe Mono would be a
fresh, unhindered start.
Th
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:04:53PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Why Mono? Try GCJ instead it is more mature and much older.
> I am tried of people recommending Mono, if anyone looks into its
> code would realize why.
I tend to agree with this sentiment. Mono is Kinda Neat (TM), but
it's sooo not
On May 6, 2005, at 8:55 PM, Henry Lenzi wrote:
IMHO, the open source community should avoid this Java fixation and
switch to Mono. Mono is free sotware and a superior technology than
Java, from what I've read. Sure, there's lots of investment already
made in Java (Tomcat, etc). But for the BSDs, ma
On 5/3/05, Ian F. Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robbert Haarman wrote:
>
> >>Just how stupid is SUN? Developing a CROSS platform coding solution
> >>that fails to achieve is goal due to licensing and testing
> >>restrictions and the like.
> >>
> >>
> >On a different note, I recall FreeBSD ha
17 matches
Mail list logo
