On Thu, 26 May 2005 05:10:20 +0100 Anil Madhavapeddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? OCaml isnt a functional language, its a language which supports > higher-order functions. And its native-code performance beats the > living daylights out of any C# implementation I've seen. But really, > who cares? They both work on OpenBSD, pick one :) It wasn't my intention to put down any other languages, just to point out that C# is an entirely acceptable language, and that the FUD about it being proprietary and evil is dumb, especially when offering java as an alternative. I agree, use whatever language you like. I just would have liked Joseph to use a language he likes instead of spreading FUD about one he doesn't like, that's all. Adam
