nal email describing the problem is appended below for interested
ports@ readers.
___
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org on behalf of Stuart
Henderson
Sent: Monday, 26 September 2022 11:27 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Libreoffice crashing on Thinkcentre m92p 7.1 FVWM - seems to be
On 2022-09-25, Luke A. Call wrote:
> Details in case it helps:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=161280915705719&w=2
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=164814366002554&w=2
I think I tried to read that bugs@ report before but got totally bogged down
in all the detail about how you use a spe
on Thinkcentre m92p 7.1 FVWM - seems to be a
python problem
Details in case it helps:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=161280915705719&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=164814366002554&w=2
On 2022-09-25 08:24:44-0600, Luke A. Call wrote:
> I had a similar problem
me is probably in the archives; I
> never got a reply, IIRC.
>
> Good luck :)
>
>
> On 2022-09-25 02:23:00+, Cal Ledsham wrote:
> > Dear OBSDer's -
> > I am running 7.1 with out of the box FVWM. Since this Sunday morning
> > libreoffice has crashed wh
me is probably in the archives; I
never got a reply, IIRC.
Good luck :)
On 2022-09-25 02:23:00+, Cal Ledsham wrote:
> Dear OBSDer's -
> I am running 7.1 with out of the box FVWM. Since this Sunday morning
> libreoffice has crashed whenever I try to either open an existing file
Dear OBSDer's -
I am running 7.1 with out of the box FVWM. Since this Sunday morning
libreoffice has crashed whenever I try to either open an existing file or
create a new file in libreoffice writer. When opening it allows file selection
but then crashes.
(Below I have put the crash messa
Thanks! I just made it run at opacity .55 and I LOVE IT! Thanks!
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:25 PM Thomas Frohwein
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 05:03:55PM -0600, Luke Small wrote:
> > I'm running fvwm window manager and I just switched to -current. Roxterm
> is
> > t
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 05:03:55PM -0600, Luke Small wrote:
> I'm running fvwm window manager and I just switched to -current. Roxterm is
> totally messed up, won't do transparent background and I tried
> xfce4-terminal and it says it won't do transparent backgrounds
I'm running fvwm window manager and I just switched to -current. Roxterm is
totally messed up, won't do transparent background and I tried
xfce4-terminal and it says it won't do transparent backgrounds because
compositing is disabled Sure first-world problems, but I REALLY
fullscreen iridium browser often stops letting me scroll to another fvwm
virtual desktop, but I never have that problem with firefox! Whats the
deal? On iridium, I either have to click on the browser window border or I
have to unmaximize the browser window to leave space between the browser
window
This configuration rocks, both of them. I love FVWM.
I think FVWM should dropped as the default WM, its old and clunky. I think
it should be twm.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:55 PM Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> Manuel Solis wrote on Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 08:50:23PM -0600:
>
enBSD era (from 60 to date) i was using cwm but wondering why they
> say that Theo uses fvwm, so i wondered that maybe it is worth it to try.
The default fvwm(1) is certainly not the best part of OpenBSD - the
code is old and crappy.
I can't speak for Theo, but the reason i'm using it
fvwm, so i wondered that maybe it is worth it to try.
So i attach my .fvwmrc and i hope that will help someone to start tweaking
it and get along with it and be happy with it.
I think that the config file is basic enough to start (for me it helped to
migrate from cwm) and has a good bindings that
on
Or in your ~/.Xresources file, configure it with these parameters:
XIdle.timeout
XIdle.nice
XLock.mode
XLock.usefirst
XLock.lockdelay
XLock.nice
See xidle(1) and xlock(1)
Tweaks can also be done in your ~/.fvwmrc file
(Sample: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fvwm/.fvwmrc)
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
On 07/12/18 18:34, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote:
man xset
I haven't used it to disable the screen saver, so I'm not sure the
exact command. But you need something like:
xset s off
Hey Edgar,
Thanks for help!
'xset s off && xset -dpms' seemed to do the trick. I popped it into my
~/.profil
On 07/12/18 20:19, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the noob question. I am having trouble disabling the screen
saver / screen timeout for fvwm. I am using an OpenBSD machine as a
video terminal for my CCTV system and need the screen to be on 24/7 so
employees can see the camera
Hello,
Sorry for the noob question. I am having trouble disabling the screen
saver / screen timeout for fvwm. I am using an OpenBSD machine as a
video terminal for my CCTV system and need the screen to be on 24/7 so
employees can see the camera playback. Unfortunately the screen blanks
after
Hello,
I upgraded to the latest snapshot. I can see the major release is now
6.3, but fvwm's virtual desktop still shows OpenBSD 6.2.
b1$ uname -a
OpenBSD b1.example.org 6.3 GENERIC.MP#104 amd64
David
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 06:22:27PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed a snapshot of amd64 recently and I was using fvwm from
> Openbsd base to install some packages. I even started Firefox to look
> for some documentation.
>
> Later, I was going back to cwm
On 30 May 2017 at 11:22, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed a snapshot of amd64 recently and I was using fvwm from
> Openbsd base to install some packages. I even started Firefox to look
> for some documentation.
>
> Later, I was going back to cwm since I use it da
Hello,
I installed a snapshot of amd64 recently and I was using fvwm from
Openbsd base to install some packages. I even started Firefox to look
for some documentation.
Later, I was going back to cwm since I use it daily. I have a feeling
that Firefox pages fonts in fvwm were more appealing that
blindly typing into ttyC0.
I know this is a stupid question but should I try logging into ttyC0
via
CRTL-ALT-F1 while FVWM/X.org is still running or when I am in the
original shell at login?
When xenocara hangs, you may press e.g. Ctrl-Alt-F2 and enter blindly:
|
|
| shutdown -p now
In the other
t; > I have a few issues to sort out but my first concern is that I cannot
> > exit out of FVWM. I launch it via the command startx while logged in
> > as
> > root. When I go to exit (left mouse click on the desktop > Exit),
> > the
> > system just hangs whic
out but my first concern is that I cannot
exit out of FVWM. I launch it via the command startx while logged in
as
root. When I go to exit (left mouse click on the desktop > Exit),
the
system just hangs which requires me to forcefully power down the
laptop.
If you investigate more closely,
o the mailing list as I am new to
OpenBSD.
I am running version 5.8 (amd64) on a Lenovo Thinkpad T450s with a
fairly default installation.
I have a few issues to sort out but my first concern is that I cannot exit
out of FVWM. I launch it via the command startx while logged in as root.
Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2016, 15:29 -0500 schrieb Samir Parikh:
> I am running version 5.8 (amd64) on a Lenovo Thinkpad T450s
> with a fairly default installation.
The T405s is a Broadwell.
> I have a few issues to sort out but my first concern is that I cannot
> exit out of FVWM.
issues to sort out but my first concern is that I cannot exit
> out of FVWM. I launch it via the command startx while logged in as root.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege
TL;DR: don't run as root. Use doas(1).
> When I go to exit (left mouse click on the deskto
Hi Everyone! This is my first post to the mailing list as I am new to
OpenBSD. I am running version 5.8 (amd64) on a Lenovo Thinkpad T450s
with a fairly default installation.
I have a few issues to sort out but my first concern is that I cannot
exit out of FVWM. I launch it via the command
Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
I have learned a lot about
fvwm configuration
Learn more from the fvwm support community: http://www.fvwm.org/contact/
--
Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of
www.well.com/~jax # thinking, a way of skeptically interrogatin
I'm trying to change the border color of Windows from the stock reddish color
to another color. So far I have been unsuccessful. I have learned a lot about
fvwm configuration and made a lot of other changes along the way. Any help is
appreciated.
Thanks,
Edgar
Sent from my iPad
Hello,
I also tried "Style * NeverFocus" in "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fvwm/.fvwmrc"
but didn't worked :O
Thanks!
On 2014. 09. 13. at 1:03 PM, "Thomas Adam" wrote:On 12 September 2014
19:22, wrote:
> Still didn't found a way to disable the mouse and k
Hello,
I tried several CursorMove and CursorStyle configs, none of them work.
I don't have xorg.conf.d.
Many thanks!
On 2014. 09. 15. at 3:52 PM, "Piotr Isajew" wrote:Dnia 12.09.2014
somelooser3...@hushmail.com napisaÅ/a:
>
> we are using OpenBSD 5.5 with FVWM.
>
On 12 September 2014 19:22, wrote:
> Still didn't found a way to disable the mouse and keyboard.
>
> Any hints please?
I asked you before what you meant by this, and suggested:
Style * NeverFocus
Is that not what you're after? It's a pretty odd request. Are you
trying to build some kind
On 12 September 2014 19:18, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are using OpenBSD 5.5 with FVWM.
>
> How can we disable the mouse cursor?
>
> So we shouldn't see the mouse cursor if we push the mouse a little.
>
> Is the solution somewhere here? :
Not via FVWM directly. Yo
B holes on a PC, how can I disable any
> keyboard and any mouse input for a logged in user on an OpenBSD 5.5
> with FVWM?
A rather odd request considering what can be done with physical access
but anyway.
man config
e.g. disable wsmouse etc. in boot.conf
with FVWM?
Many thanks,
Hello,
we are using OpenBSD 5.5 with FVWM.
How can we disable the mouse cursor?
So we shouldn't see the mouse cursor if we push the mouse a little.
Is the solution somewhere here? :
# grep -i mouse /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fvwm/.fvwmrc
ColormapFocus FollowsMouse
On 1 September 2014 11:53, wrote:
> Besides gluing the USB holes on a PC, how could I disable the keyboard
> and mouse input for a logged in user on a OpenBSD 5.5 install with
> FVWM?
Style * NeverFocus
-- Thomas Adam
Besides gluing the USB holes on a PC, how could I disable the keyboard
and mouse input for a logged in user on a OpenBSD 5.5 install with
FVWM?
Many thanks,
> namely an implementation of the stuff that makes it possible to go fullscreen
> and back.
I remade .fvwmrc and set this to do what you wanted:
Key F9 A M Maximize 100 100
There is a lot options to change and make fvwm just perfect.
This takes the shell as an input and fullscreens
am [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]:
>> >>
>> >>> On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom wrote:
>> >>> > Zoran Kolic writes:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> In fact, fvwm is in base part.
>> >>> >
>>
am [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]:
>> >>
>> >>> On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom wrote:
>> >>> > Zoran Kolic writes:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> In fact, fvwm is in base part.
>> >>> >
>>
3 06:10, Carson Chittom wrote:
> >>> > Zoran Kolic writes:
> >>> >
> >>> >> In fact, fvwm is in base part.
> >>> >
> >>> > A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about
> >>> > relicen
Hi,
On 15 September 2013 11:48, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> James Griffin writes:
>
>> * Thomas Adam [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]:
>>
>>> On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom wrote:
>>> > Zoran Kolic writes:
>>> >
>>&g
James Griffin writes:
> * Thomas Adam [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]:
>
>> On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom wrote:
>> > Zoran Kolic writes:
>> >
>> >> In fact, fvwm is in base part.
>> >
>> > A while ago, there was a message
* Thomas Adam [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]:
> On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom wrote:
> > Zoran Kolic writes:
> >
> >> In fact, fvwm is in base part.
> >
> > A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about
> > relicensin
On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom wrote:
> Zoran Kolic writes:
>
>> In fact, fvwm is in base part.
>
> A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about
> relicensing fvwm to allow a more recent version into base. I wonder if
> there is any
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:10:36AM -0500, Carson Chittom wrote:
> Zoran Kolic writes:
>
> > In fact, fvwm is in base part.
>
> A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about
> relicensing fvwm to allow a more recent version into base. I wonder if
Zoran Kolic writes:
> In fact, fvwm is in base part.
A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about
relicensing fvwm to allow a more recent version into base. I wonder if
there is any status update?
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:20:33PM -0500, eagir...@cox.net wrote:
> Since the 12 June snapshot I have been unable to run fvwm, either
> from xdm or using startx. Dmesg and Xorg.log below.
It should be fixed in the next snapshot.
> --
> Ed Ahlsen-Girard
> Ft. Walton Beach FL
&
Since the 12 June snapshot I have been unable to run fvwm, either from xdm or
using startx. Dmesg and Xorg.log below.
--
Ed Ahlsen-Girard
Ft. Walton Beach FL
OpenBSD 5.1-current (GENERIC) #231: Tue Jun 12 18:31:26 MDT 2012
t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0
From: Richard Toohey
> Welcome to OpenBSD.
Thanks!
> The installation? Boot off the CD and follow the instructions
and OpenBSD
> will be installed 5 minutes later.
Yes, that's already done. I
really meant 'configuring' the installation,
not 'setting up'.
On 10/12/2011, at 5:18 AM, Neoklis Kyriazis wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Richard Toohey
>
> To: Tekk
> Cc: Neoklis
> Kyriazis ; OpenBSD
> Sent: Friday, December
> 9, 2011 9:03 AM
> Subject: Re: Failed to setup fvwm for antialiased Xft fonts
>
- Original Message -
From: Richard Toohey
To: Tekk
Cc: Neoklis
Kyriazis ; OpenBSD
Sent: Friday, December
9, 2011 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Failed to setup fvwm for antialiased Xft fonts
On 9/12/2011, at 7:27 PM, Tekk wrote:
> iirc the binary packages are audited,
ports are not
>
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Neoklis Kyriazis wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Thomas Adam
>> To: Neoklis
>> Kyriazis
>> Cc: OpenBSD
>> Sent: Thursday,
>> December 8, 2011 6:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: Failed to setup fvwm for antialiased
iirc the binary packages are audited, ports are not
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Neoklis Kyriazis wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Adam
To: Neoklis
Kyriazis
Cc: OpenBSD
Sent: Thursday,
December 8, 2011 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: Failed to setup fvwm for antialiased Xft
fonts
No
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Adam
To: Neoklis
Kyriazis
Cc: OpenBSD
Sent: Thursday,
December 8, 2011 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: Failed to setup fvwm for antialiased Xft
fonts
> No -- OpenBSD's version of FVWM as included in base is ancient. Get
> the one from ports which wi
Hi,
On 8 December 2011 16:32, Neoklis Kyriazis wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have been trying in vain to setup fvwm for anti-aliased fonts
> in
> obsd 5.0. I tried the instructions in man of fvwm and some
> tips on google, but
> with no result. fvwm reports that it can't
&g
Hi all
I have been trying in vain to setup fvwm for anti-aliased fonts
in
obsd 5.0. I tried the instructions in man of fvwm and some
tips on google, but
with no result. fvwm reports that it can't
get the specified fonts. I made
sure I used fonts as listed by
fc-list and tried them in xt
I think that's what
you meant by "global X configuration"? Sorry that I entered a wrong option
name in the previous mail.
What I don't understand is that does FVWM receive original hardware keycode
or something translated to letters according to the layout specified in
xorg
d
> > 4th keys in the middle line), so I began to think all those bindings
> > are parsed as in QWERTY layout. But after I restarted the fvwm (by
> > typing restart in FvwmTalk), things changed, it began to interpret the
> > configurations in Dvorak layout, that is, Ctrl-F an
On 19 July 2010 18:07, Bruce Khereid wrote:
> QWERTY layout. But after I restarted the fvwm (by typing restart in
> FvwmTalk), things changed, it began to interpret the configurations in
> Dvorak layout, that is, Ctrl-F and Ctrl-D in Dvorak layout, which are Ctrl-Y
> and Ctrl
re parsed as in QWERTY layout. But after I restarted the fvwm (by
> typing restart in FvwmTalk), things changed, it began to interpret the
> configurations in Dvorak layout, that is, Ctrl-F and Ctrl-D in Dvorak
> layout, which are Ctrl-Y and Ctrl-H in QWERTY, started to turn the
> p
Hi,
I use Dvorak keyboard layout, and have already added kbd Option in
xorg.conf, and everything work fine with programs run in the X environment.
When I compose my own .fvwmrc for Fvwm, I defined some key bindings for it,
say:
Key FACGoToPage 1 1
Key DACGoToPage 0 0
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:10:02PM +0100, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
> Indeed I tried a Opaquemovesize 100 and worked !
> I already didn't know why but if the window is opaque the
> activity dont stops.
Ah, that was it. I had it backwards. Window resizing should also
freeze things then.
Dan Harnett escribis:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:10:04PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:05:45PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
I'm using FVWM as window manager and works really fine but w
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:10:04PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:05:45PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm using FVWM as window manager an
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:05:45PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm using FVWM as window manager and works really fine but when I have
>> various windows (xterms for example) and drag one w
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using FVWM as window manager and works really fine but when I have
> various windows (xterms for example) and drag one window to move it
> around, after a few seconds, all of them stops doing its
Hi list, using 4.3 stable.
I'm using FVWM as window manager and works really fine but when I have
various windows (xterms for example) and drag one window to move it
around, after a few seconds, all of them stops doing its work, also
gkrellm freezes until I drop the moving window in any
Ted / Johan,
thx. i downloaded 2.4.20 tar from fvwm site and ran ./configure --prefix
/usr/X11r6 (otherwise default /usr/local)
and then
make
and then
make install
after that i was able to use the new fvwm version.
-BG.
~~aapka kalyan ho~~
- Original
On Jan 7, 2008, at 9:55 AM, badeguruji wrote:
Hello,
I figure that i will need to give some runtime arguments to
following commands for upgrading my fvwm installation. as per README
from fvwm package...
can someone tell me what is the right value for PREFIX and EPREFIX?
Since they are
On 1/7/08, badeguruji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I figure that i will need to give some runtime arguments to following
> commands for upgrading my fvwm installation. as per README from fvwm
> package...
pkg_add fvwm2 is a lot easier...
Hello,
I figure that i will need to give some runtime arguments to following commands
for upgrading my fvwm installation. as per README from fvwm package...
can someone tell me what is the right value for PREFIX and EPREFIX?
Installation directories:
--prefix=PREFIX install
Marco Peereboom writes:
> > -Nix Fan. (Fvwm, IMHO is ugly..)
>
> Fluxbox is fugly, fvwm is awesome.
>
> this discussion is very useful!
cwm (with the changes I've made :-) is looking nicer and nicer! I hope
to see these changes in the tree, soon.
// marc
Can we please stop this discussion?
Nothing is going to change in base X. All the other things you guys are
so called "proposing" are in packages/ports. Use them; that's why they
are there for.
Base is fine, leave it alone.
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:19:06AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On
* Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
[...]
> I also forgot that Enlightenment seems to be under a suitable licence,
> although probably too big to put in base.
enlightnment is development code that does not run stable. It is not
usable for "production" or "every day use" machines.
>
> Doug.
>
- Marc B
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:46:43PM -0800, Unix Fan wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> > To satisfy my own curiosity, looking at
>
> > www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_X_window_managers which
> > provides links to 45 window managers for which there are wiki pages,
> > I looked at the lice
hought I'd FYI. I'm not making an argument either/any way.
> >
> > Doug.
>
> Fluxbox is MIT licenced, it's dependencies are Imlib2, which is BSD
> licenced.. everything else is included in Xorg and is (AFAIK..) under a
> similar licence.
>
> -Nix Fan. (Fvwm, IMHO is ugly..)
Fluxbox is fugly, fvwm is awesome.
this discussion is very useful!
MIT licenced, it's dependencies are Imlib2, which is BSD licenced..
everything else is included in Xorg and is (AFAIK..) under a similar licence.
-Nix Fan. (Fvwm, IMHO is ugly..)
ssue.
>
> Correct. Newer version of fvwm are GPLed..
To satisfy my own curiosity, looking at
www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_X_window_managers which provides
links to 45 window managers for which there are wiki pages, I looked at
the licence for each and found that only xmonad, w
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 09:53:29PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > Is there anything up with newer versions then? Why should it not be
> > brought up to date?
>
> i believe license is the issue.
Correct. Newer version of fvwm are GPLed..
--
Alas, I am dyi
On Mon 2007.12.31 at 01:05 +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Cwm is very good, but there are some bugs in that too. I notice that
> if you hide a window so the pointer falls onto the root window and
> then try to search for a window (alt+/ if i remember correctly), then
> the search menu is not displayed
aking decisions about what
> should be > in and what not, resulting in or updating or removing fvwm.
Many people know and love fvwm. I think they may have something to say
about removing it.
> Pau Wrote
> please, don't touch fvwm 2.2.5... it's just perfect... not in vain
> it
On 12/30/07, Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Security fixes in fvwm-menu-directory. (CVE-2006-5969)
i don't get it. i can make a magic directory name and... run commands
as myself?
> Security fixes in FvwmCommand
> Security fix for fvwm-menu-directory. See BugTraq id 9161.
please, don't touch fvwm 2.2.5... it's just perfect... not in vain
it's the default wm in obsd... Don't touch t!
2007/12/30, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 07:36:47PM +0100, Jan wrote:
>
> > I would
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 07:36:47PM +0100, Jan wrote:
> I would suggest to remove all window managers from base except twm.
> Twm is in all default X installations and could be left in as last
> resort. When someone needs a window manager, he can install it from
> repo or ports, but it should not
After a discussion on the openbsd irc I am sending this mail, hoping fvwm will
be removed from base and repo, or updated.
The fvwm version in base is 2.2.5, which is released somewhere in the late
nighties.
Every installation using X, does have this program installed on the system.
Then in
> > quite a while since I last had a look at cwm) :-)
>
> You can use a tool called XBindKeys.
>
> http://hocwp.free.fr/xbindkeys/xbindkeys.html
It's in ports... x11/xbindkeys.
However, the cwm keybinding support works fine. Since I documented it
and added some extra features it should be bette
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:36:26AM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Well, these seems to run quite well on a single one. :-) Can anyone
> confirm this?
Yes, I can reproduce this (launching cwm in a session already having
fvwm running, i.e. on the same display). I need a beer now.
On 10:26:22 Nov 20, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm just curious how come it its possible to start (and run) cwm at the
> same time as running fvwm (from base). AFAIK a window manager normally
> cannot (or refuses to) run if another window manager is already in use.
Jan Stary wrote:
On Nov 20 10:26:22, Alexander Hall wrote:
I'm just curious how come it its possible to start (and run) cwm at the
same time as running fvwm (from base).
How exactly does that happen on your box?
Well, using fvwm as window manager, I simply run cwm from a shell. I did
On Nov 20 10:26:22, Alexander Hall wrote:
> I'm just curious how come it its possible to start (and run) cwm at the
> same time as running fvwm (from base).
How exactly does that happen on your box?
> AFAIK a window manager normally
> cannot (or refuses to) run if another
Hi!
I'm just curious how come it its possible to start (and run) cwm at the
same time as running fvwm (from base). AFAIK a window manager normally
cannot (or refuses to) run if another window manager is already in use.
Is this only a courtsey from the second window manager? I thought
OpenBSD 4.1 GENERIC#0 i386
Hi:
Don't know if any one else experienced this. When gmplayer is
activated from Fvwm's menu then it locks up fvwm.
To reproduce:
1) Put:
+"GMplayer" Exec exec gmplayer
in the RootMenu section, of the .fvwmrc
2) Rest
No need to uninstall the older version, just install the new one via
ports. At the end, it will spit out a message to add
'exec /usr/local/bin/fvwm2' to your .xinitrc or .xsession file. That
will Do The Right Thing.
On 2007 Mar 02 (Fri) at 19:24:58 +0800 (+0800), ronald jiang wrote:
:I want
On 2007/03/02 10:02, Nick ! wrote:
> On 3/2/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 2007/03/02 09:34, Nick ! wrote:
> >> However, I *think* you should just be able to install the new
> >> fvwm--which presumably means compiling and that means manual
On 3/2/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007/03/02 09:34, Nick ! wrote:
> However, I *think* you should just be able to install the new
> fvwm--which presumably means compiling and that means manually copying
> the new fvwm over the old
ugh. install the new
On 2007/03/02 09:34, Nick ! wrote:
> However, I *think* you should just be able to install the new
> fvwm--which presumably means compiling and that means manually copying
> the new fvwm over the old
ugh. install the new one under /usr/local/...
On 3/2/07, z0mbix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 02/03/07, ronald jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to install a newer one.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=pkg_delete&sektion=1&manpath=OpenBSD+4.0
fvwm isn't a package.
However, I *think* you sh
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
