Hi
Sorry for the non-threaded reply - I am following the digests...
> On 3/8/2010 12:11 AM, bofh wrote:
> > Is there *ANY* good virtualization software out there?
> > I don't care what OS
> > it needs to host it (preferably not windows :)) - my needs are
> > simple (home use):
>
> I haven't re
On 3/8/2010 12:40 AM, Steve Shockley wrote:
OpenBSD works well under ESX, I'd expect it to work well under ESXi too.
(snip)
I can verify that it works great. Upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 required a
manual change to the network driver, though - it quit matching the
pseudo-hardware that VMware pre
*clap*clap*clap*
I couldn't sound more condescending if I tried.
Bravo sir!
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 07:39:25AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 10:16:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > You forgot the pyramid!
> >
> > And the Venn diagram...
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 0
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> ...
>
> You switch to 'pretend' servers and try to keep the merry-go-round
> turning. And the spider sucks your juices out.
>
> Of course the bonus is you now have room for all the Project Managers
> needed to coordinate the management
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 10:16:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> You forgot the pyramid!
>
> And the Venn diagram...
>
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:19:19PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> > On 3/5/2010 7:42 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
> >> And yes, this is just the tip of the iceberg with vmware qua
On 3/8/2010 12:11 AM, bofh wrote:
Is there *ANY* good virtualization software out there? I don't care what OS
it needs to host it (preferably not windows :)) - my needs are simple (home
use):
I haven't really tried out Xen or qemu, but it seems ESXi should at
least be adequate for the job, de
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:11 PM, bofh wrote:
> ...
> > Is there *ANY* good virtualization software out there?
>
> The rest of your message gave several requirements but don't actually
> say *what problem you're trying to solve*, so any ans
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:11 PM, bofh wrote:
...
> Is there *ANY* good virtualization software out there?
"Yes, there are some that support the world economy by generating
'make work' jobs, thereby distracting people from revolution. Oh,
that's not what you meant by 'good'?"
The rest of your mes
I'm running/I've runned OpenBSD, NetBSD, OpenWall GNU/Linux and
Slackware 9.0/12.0/13.0 on qemu.
I'm no expert, but it seems to work ok. Give it a try, it compiles
fast.
I didn't use any modules on qemu - actually, I didn't even know such
modules exist. Go ahead and try the "main package".
I'm r
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
>
> What a crock of shite. Good to know as I am just getting into a few
> small-scale virtualizing projects.. not so sure I am at *all*
> surprised.
>
Is there *ANY* good virtualization software out there? I don't care what OS
it needs to ho
You forgot the pyramid!
And the Venn diagram...
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:19:19PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> On 3/5/2010 7:42 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
>> And yes, this is just the tip of the iceberg with vmware quality
>> issues, but that one was really, really easy to understand.
>
> So, you
Steve Shockley wrote:
> On 3/5/2010 7:42 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
>> And yes, this is just the tip of the iceberg with vmware quality
>> issues, but that one was really, really easy to understand.
>
> So, you're saying VMware *is* "enterprise-ready", then? Like Blackberry
> Enterprise Server, CA
On 3/5/2010 7:42 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
And yes, this is just the tip of the iceberg with vmware quality
issues, but that one was really, really easy to understand.
So, you're saying VMware *is* "enterprise-ready", then? Like Blackberry
Enterprise Server, CA Message Manager, or any number of
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Steve Shockley
wrote:
> On 3/6/2010 10:22 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
>
>> Oh, and it also blinks a pretty light when in use. I could be a typical
>> Mac
>> user, and consider this to be "the best ever!".
>>
>
> AND, as a Mac user, you'd have the most secure OS in the world
On 3/6/2010 10:22 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
Oh, and it also blinks a pretty light when in use. I could be a typical Mac
user, and consider this to be "the best ever!".
AND, as a Mac user, you'd have the most secure OS in the world!
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Scott McEachern wrote:
> Ted Roby wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey, I got a 2 GB usb stick for my troubles over a recent fiasco with
>> VMWare's release of Fusion 3.
>> It seems their PR department is doing a better job than QC.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Ooo, a trinket from WallyMart that
Ted Roby wrote:
Hey, I got a 2 GB usb stick for my troubles over a recent fiasco with
VMWare's release of Fusion 3.
It seems their PR department is doing a better job than QC.
Ooo, a trinket from WallyMart that you can buy for pocket change!
Thanks.. I think.
Hey, it's better than a(not
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Jason Beaudoin >wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Nick Holland
> >> wrote:
> >> > Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> >> >> Which VMware August bug you me
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Jason Beaudoin
wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Nick Holland
>> wrote:
>> > Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> >> Which VMware August bug you mean? This one or different?
>> >> http://communities.vmware.com/thread/1
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Nick Holland
> wrote:
> > Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> >> Which VMware August bug you mean? This one or different?
> >> http://communities.vmware.com/thread/162377?tstart=0&start=0
> >
> > yep, that's the one.
> >
>
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> Which VMware August bug you mean? This one or different?
>> http://communities.vmware.com/thread/162377?tstart=0&start=0
>
> yep, that's the one.
>
> Short version: VMware accidentally shipped a production release of ESX
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Which VMware August bug you mean? This one or different?
> http://communities.vmware.com/thread/162377?tstart=0&start=0
yep, that's the one.
Short version: VMware accidentally shipped a production release of ESX
and ESXi (yes, both the expensive and no-charge version) which
Which VMware August bug you mean? This one or different?
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/162377?tstart=0&start=0
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> You just think that it's running perfectly under Linux ;-) See eg. this
post
>> http://marc.info/?l=op
On 2010-3-5 2:47 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
> Think about this a bit. These people DELIBERATELY put a feature in
> their firmware to STOP me (and a lot of other people) from using this
> card. Legit user, but they felt that I was entitled to help them
> debug their shit for no more than sixty days.
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:47:38 -0500 Nick Holland
wrote:
> Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > You just think that it's running perfectly under Linux ;-) See eg.
> > this post http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=125783114503531&w=2
>
> Think about this a bit. These people DELIBERATELY put a feature in
> their
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> Now, tell me again how horrible it is that OpenBSD doesn't let you
> trust your data (and OpenBSD's reputation) to these incompetent assholes?
Thanks for the update, you convinced me the last time but have
definitely so now. We have about 2 s
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> You just think that it's running perfectly under Linux ;-) See eg. this post
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=125783114503531&w=2
I've been waiting for an excuse to update that story... :)
First of all, I want you to note that was posted in November. It is
now March, al
That card is a bag of ass. Do yourself a favor and throw it in a moat.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:55:56PM +, FRLinux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > You just think that it's running perfectly under Linux ;-) See eg. this post
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-m
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> You just think that it's running perfectly under Linux ;-) See eg. this post
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=125783114503531&w=2
Ah, I had actually skipped that one back then, thanks for pointing
that to me. So I now officially have a lum
You just think that it's running perfectly under Linux ;-) See eg. this post
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=125783114503531&w=2
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Michael Lechtermann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 04.03.2010 16:32, schrieb FRLinux:
>> Hello, i read from the current documentation that it i
Hi,
Am 04.03.2010 16:32, schrieb FRLinux:
> Hello, i read from the current documentation that it is not advised to
> purchase hardware containing the following (taken from
> http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html)
>
> Adaptec FSA-based RAID controllers (aac), including: (*)
> Note: In the past years Ad
Hello, i read from the current documentation that it is not advised to
purchase hardware containing the following (taken from
http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html)
Adaptec FSA-based RAID controllers (aac), including: (*)
Note: In the past years Adaptec has lied to us repeatedly about
forthcoming docum
32 matches
Mail list logo
