On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 07:15, wrote:
>
> > did you take a look at net/arpwatch?
>
> Too many emails; email to root is not a useful mechanism for me.
arpwatch could be configured to send emails to an address other than root.
At the time I was using it, the --help showed a command line option for
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:42:55PM -0500, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>
> > only as originally intended for unix systems. Further, variable
> > content partitions such as /var and /home should be large enough to
> > allow for ssd wear levelling, or you will toss away expensive ssds
> > like autumn le
On Saturday, 6 January 2018, Eric Furman wrote:
> I always love threads like this. :)
> Doesn't it tell anybody anything that none of the developers have
> commented?
>
>
Theo talked about how scary some bugs in some Intel CPU’s were, a decade
ago...
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=118296441
On Friday, 5 January 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> The Intel flop hits the US .mil as well, because they depend on COTS
> Xeons.
>
> I pity the Russians. I wonder if they pay through the nose for Oracle's
> power hungry hardware, or make it cheaper and power efficient of their own.
>
> On Thu,
On 1 May 2013 23:42, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> May 1, 2013.
>
> We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.3.
> This is our 33rd release on CD-ROM (and 34th via FTP). We remain
> proud of OpenBSD's recor
On 18 June 2012 15:46, Raymond Lillard wrote:
> On 06/17/2012 12:31 PM, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>>
>> Having followed OpenBSD for quite some time I noticed that good developers
>> come and go. They come in, make something great happen, and disappear
>> again.
>> Also there have been forks and I a
On 26 April 2012 17:56, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> In an ideal world, availability of source code should not matter.
>
> Most interesting exploits are probably guest1 -> hypervisor (and then
> -> guest2).
>
> I refuse to believe that the glued on hardware suppport for
> virtulization on modern i386/
On 8 November 2011 23:25, Mostaf Faridi wrote:
> Thanks
> My problem is this I do not enough time to start from scratch and make new
> rule
Your philosophy is not compatible with OpenBSD. Grabbing a random
incompatible ruleset from the Internet and then trying to fix it is
going to take more tim
On 10 June 2011 07:45, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote on Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:21:38PM +:
>
>> Seriously, if whoever "maintains" openbsd-wiki.org is reading,
>> do us all a favour and take it offline unless you have time to look
>> after it...
>
> Even if you have the time to
On 4 June 2011 08:48, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>>> How comes nobody in other OSes noticed ? Well, people probably did, and
>>> tweaked their allocators to "work", by using preferably the low address
>>> space,
>>> and having addresses that increase slowly, so that a lot of pointers are
>>> below
>>>
On Sunday, 20 March 2011, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:29:13 -0700
> Ben Calvert wrote:
>
>> On Mar 19, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:58:59 +
>> > Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> >
>> >> I do get a fair increase in cpu usage for a disk at ful
n 1 Mar 2011 at 21:19, SJP Lists wrote:
>
>> With my link at about 12Mbit/S worth of web traffic and altq keeping
>> my VoIP calls nice and clean, my Soekris 5501 with OpenBSD 4.6 hovers
>> around 85% idle.
>
> Would you please describe what you do for inbound traffic shap
On 1 March 2011 14:11, Nick Holland wrote:
> DO NOT jump on the
> Alix/Soekris/Other-wacko-low-power-low-performing-specialty hardware
> train until you know what you are doing. It is good to see that people
> aren't automatically recommending Soekris for everything ("the answer is
> Soekris. W
On 28 February 2011 10:12, m brandenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Jan Stary wrote:
>
>> I have been using www.pcengines.ch/alix2c1.htm
>> as my home router for years. It is runnig current/i386.
>
> Have you been running from Compact Flash? I am interested in
> hearing about your experiences
On 28 February 2011 10:12, m brandenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Jan Stary wrote:
>
>> I have been using www.pcengines.ch/alix2c1.htm
>> as my home router for years. It is runnig current/i386.
>
> Have you been running from Compact Flash? I am interested in
> hearing about your experiences
On 9 February 2011 12:37, woolsherpahat wrote:
>>> On 6 February 2011 05:23, Alessandro Baggi
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi List, i had registered me to the security list:
>>> security-annou...@openbsd.org since 9 Genuary 2011, but any email come on my
>>> account. Some that had security list subscribtion,
On 6 February 2011 05:23, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> Hi List, i had registered me to the security list:
> security-annou...@openbsd.org since 9 Genuary 2011, but any email come on my
> account. Some that had security list subscribtion, can tell me if since
> 09/01/2001 at today there are mails?
I
On Friday, 21 January 2011, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>> On 2011-01-19, S Mathias wrote:
>>> I have a RouterBoard 450G [680 Mhz cpu, 256 MB ram, 512 MB flash]. I just
>>> can't decide what to put on it:
>>>
>>> OpenWrt or
>>> OpenBSD
>>
>>
On Thursday, 20 January 2011, S Mathias wrote:
> Purpose: Just a "home router".
>
> Question:
>
> What is more secure/reliable in this case?
> OpenWrt or OpenBSD?
> Anyone got any opinions? What should i choose?
I've been using OpenBSD since 2.5, '99.
In that time, the only time I've seen it cr
On Wednesday, 29 December 2010, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:47:11PM +1100, SJP Lists wrote:
> | This raises the PTR problem.
> |
> | Only one of those domains is going to have records that match forward
> | and reverse? If not, some anti-SPAM gateways will d
On 29 December 2010 22:47, SJP Lists wrote:
> On 29 December 2010 22:35, Gregory Edigarov
wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:22:33 +0530
>> Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>>
>>> Dear folks,
>>>
>>> OpenBSD's spamd is a network level spam filter an
On 29 December 2010 22:35, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:22:33 +0530
> Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>
>> Dear folks,
>>
>> OpenBSD's spamd is a network level spam filter and consequently we
>> need the MX records to point to spamd
>> before it hits our mail server thereby achiev
On 28 December 2010 03:33, Matthew Sullenberger wrote:
> I will be updating to the latest version very soon to see if that resolves the
> problem. I wasn't aware of the VMT package that provides some of the tools and
> things, so that is good!
>
> I wouldn't normally utilize a virtual firewall, bu
On 10 December 2010 03:42, Mehma Sarja wrote:
> On 12/9/10 4:54 AM, Chandrakant Kumar wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 09 December 2010 05:39 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/12/10 23:04, Adam M. Dutko wrote:
>
> I hope that one day due process is denied you.
>
I am wondering
On 9 December 2010 13:26, Daniel Melameth wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Scott McEachern wrote:
>> Given the (general) support of WikiLeaks here, I was wondering if anyone
>> could recommend a free alternative to replace EveryDNS.net?
>>
>> I know how to use Google to find free alternat
On 7 December 2010 02:42, Joe Barnett wrote:
> On 12/5/10 5:11 PM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
>>
>> if nothing else think about the charges they put on every transaction: you
sell something on ebay, they charge you; you process their payment through
paypal (ebay) they charge you again. they're clea
On 5 December 2010 22:20, SJP Lists wrote:
> On 5 December 2010 17:05, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>> On Dec 4, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>> > If you don't know why I am sending this mail.. you are reading US
>>> > managed news, and need to much m
On 5 December 2010 17:05, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On Dec 4, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> > If you don't know why I am sending this mail.. you are reading US
>> > managed news, and need to much much more informed
>>
>> It's in the US news. Even the mainstream news on TV. At least
On 24 November 2010 19:34, SJP Lists wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 01:12, Brad Tilley wrote:
>> carlopmart wrote:
>>
>>> Advantages are very clear for me: provisioning, administration tasks,
>>> etc ... But I will to know disadvantages. What is your opinion from
On 24 November 2010 07:28, Brad Tilley wrote:
> Nick Holland wrote:
>
>> what's changed?
>> Layering? Nope.
>> Crappy programming? Nope.
>> Better hardware? not really.
>> Features-before-security? Nope.
>
> Good points. The goals of virtualization are, easy management, power
> savings, quick p
On 24 November 2010 01:12, Brad Tilley wrote:
> carlopmart wrote:
>
>> Advantages are very clear for me: provisioning, administration tasks,
>> etc ... But I will to know disadvantages. What is your opinion from the
>> point of view of security?
>
> I use virtualization for many things (mainly fo
On 13 November 2010 01:50, Chet Langin wrote:
> -Original Message-
>
>>I have run OpenBSD in production on both VMWare server and ESXi. It was
> the only machine >facing the Internet that the auditors had no findings on.
>>
>>--
>>
>>Edward Ahlsen-Girard
>>Ft Walton Beach, FL
>
>
>
> Whi
On 9 November 2010 04:44, Christopher Dukes wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 14:30 -0400, Joe McDonagh wrote:
>> "If your Sun fails" <-- that's a big IF. It's approaching a possibility
>> of 0 in my experience.
>>
>> If performance isn't an issue and stability is your chief goal, none of
>> this har
On 27 October 2010 10:14, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:36:00 -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
>>Chicago . . . THANKS!
>>
>
> And all the way through customs to Sydney Australia.
> WOW!
Me too. And more nice shirts and a 2.5 CD for old times sake and to
get my hands on my favorite stic
On 2 October 2010 02:16, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Gregory Edigarov [2010-09-30 16:13]:
>> nut is in ports, though I would recomend to build it by hands.
>
> sigh. cut the crap. the package is fine. and handbuilding is stupid,
> pretty much without exceptions.
>
> --
> Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.d
On 18 August 2010 23:57, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:28:57PM +0300, Mihai Popescu B.S. wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> My post was not intended as a direct hit for the article. I told my
>> opinion to misc@ because undeadly ask for subscription, no more
>> anonymous coward post. Am I w
On 12 August 2010 21:15, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> bellow is dmesg of OpenBSD running on corporate desktop. Everything is
> running fine including web camera or USB headphones. There is just one
> small issue. I can't use xlock(1) for locking of screen. After I use
> xlock(1) it's not able
On 29 July 2010 01:39, Robert wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:59:33 +0100
> Michal wrote:
>> Apart from ESXi is free but the management isn't...you need vSphere to
>> manage the thing. This seams like a very expensive way to learn an
>
> Just a note:
> You don't need vSphere for this setup; only
On 23 July 2010 06:28, roberth wrote:
> Lo,
>
> anyone ever killed a SSD while running OpenBSD ontop of it?
Been running OpenBSD systems from compact flash for more than 6 years.
Sandisk and Lexar. I have not managed to kill one yet.
Just using softdeps and noatime as a precaution, although I
On 19 July 2010 18:07, Bruce Khereid wrote:
> QWERTY layout. But after I restarted the fvwm (by typing restart in
> FvwmTalk), things changed, it began to interpret the configurations in
> Dvorak layout, that is, Ctrl-F and Ctrl-D in Dvorak layout, which are Ctrl-Y
> and Ctrl-H in QWERTY, started
2010/6/3 irix :
> Hello Misc,
>
> Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Nobody here is stopping you from using Linux.
2010/6/2 irix :
> Hello Misc,
>
> But at least you can say why?
>
>>no kidding. As we've told "irix" before, it will not happen.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Because it makes my VoIP phones at home and a friends workplace go
from hit-and-miss to...
> On 26 May 2010 23:13, Brad Tilley wrote:
> Julian Acosta wrote:
>
>> Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
>> opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
>> How can I contact him?
>> What's his real email?
>
> Just talk a lot about open source and th
On 11 May 2010 00:37, Benny Lvfgren wrote:
> matteo filippetto wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> today cd arrived in Italy
>
> ...and mine came today as well, together with two mugs and two t-shirts
that
> my girlfriend immediately banned from use in public amongst non-nerds. :-)
>
> Thanks, folks.
No s
On 25 April 2010 00:14, Danny wrote:
> My apologies then. It is just a screenshot of our IT guys classifying OpenBSD
> as
> a Hacking website.
>
>> Attachments are not passed along on misc@
Okay, if it makes them feel better, maybe you'd like to inform them
that Cisco [1], Sun [2] and even Micro
Crap, sorry all!
On 24 April 2010 22:12, SJP Lists wrote:
> Hey Danny,
>
> This list strips attachments, but I would like to see that screenshot.
>
> Can you send it to me?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Shane
Hey Danny,
This list strips attachments, but I would like to see that screenshot.
Can you send it to me?
Cheers,
Shane
On 24 April 2010 23:20, Danny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Here is a screenshot of what the IT guys at my work thinks of OpenBSD. Before
> I
> took this screenshot I could access
On 14 April 2010 19:11, Zachary Uram wrote:
> As a long time Linux user I will soon try out OpenBSD, I have been
> reading the list emails and contacted 1 OpenBSD top person who was
> very rude. There is some of the "RTFM" or "get lost" attitude in
> Linux, but if a questioner seems sincere there
On 25 March 2010 02:33, m brandenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
>> These things make me smile.
>>
>> OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC) #300: Fri Mar 19 08:58:21 MDT 2010
>> dera...@vax.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/vax/compile/GENERIC
>> VAXstation 4000/90 [13000202 04010002]
>
>
On 23 February 2010 12:59, Ted Walther wrote:
> I have a simple setup; a soekris box running 4.6 doing NAT for my local
> network.
>
> I'd like a configuration to give skype traffic top priority, then my DNS
> server, then ssh sessions, then http and SSL, then everything else, and
> bittorrent. I
On 16 February 2010 19:34, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:06:32PM +1100, SJP Lists wrote:
>
>> On 16 February 2010 06:33, wrote:
>>
>> > If you want i can send you my Paypal receipts to prove it. I never
received
>> > the books.
>> &g
On 16 February 2010 06:33, wrote:
> If you want i can send you my Paypal receipts to prove it. I never received
> the books.
> It is a swindle ! nothing else ...
I have been waiting too. But I have heard people speak of Jacek being
ill a few times over the years, to the point that his publicat
On 5 February 2010 05:01, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> I just finished installing the most recent snapshot, rebooted and
> ran sysmerge. I powered down the system, booted it up again, logged
> into my account, and was greeted by:
>
>panic: kernel trap (ignored)
>
> The timing was absolutely perfe
On 2 February 2010 10:06, Keith wrote:
> I've used OpenBSD & PF for a number of years without issue and am now in the
> position that I want to create a dmz between the Internet and my
> organisations WAN. Our security people are asking if the firewall that we
> use is accreditated by ITSEC and I
2010/1/13 Ciprian Dorin, Craciun :
>> 3.) Many of the benefits you gain by running a stable and secure
>> operating system like OpenBSD are lost when you run it as a "guest" on
>> top of some other insecure "host" operating system.
>
>This is only true if either:
>* there is a security bug
2010/1/14 James Peltier :
> on the HP ProCurve I have added the VLANs to the switch and ports and it
> works but not the way I would expect.
>
> Port B4 has VLAN 301 tagged and A1 is the port on which the OpenBSD box is
> connected which is also tagged VLAN 301.
It's been a while since I did th
2010/1/12 Diana Eichert :
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, SJP Lists wrote:
>
> SNIP
>>
>> Looks like it might have a serial console too...
>
> just a headsup
>
> probably redirection of video to serial, better than a sharp
> stick in the eye, but not a ROM monitor.
Bumm
Howdy folks,
I thought some on the list might find this embedded bare bones 1U
firewall product interesting.
They claim it supports OpenBSD, has 8x Intel 82574L GbE (expandable to
16), a CF socket, 2x SATA and support for Intel Core i3, i5, and i7
processors up to 3.33GHz.
Looks like it might ha
2009/12/25 Paul M :
> Here we're talking about 2 separate cases, electrical and mechanical.
>
> In electrical componentry, it's power up/power down that compromises the
> reliability of a part (circuit). This is primarily due to heat - it's the
> temperature cycling in the circuit components thats
2009/12/11 jackwssp q :
> 2 Tomas Bodzar:
> Why you so ugly? I don't looking for pf manual. As you can see above, i'm
> not alone. When i got it, will share it for all on misc@, and you may
> furiously try to stop me.
Funny. When you need help beyond the books and come here for it, I
imagine few
2009/12/10 Tomas Bodzar :
> This book is not for free download.
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:36 PM, jackwssp q wrote:
>> Sounds like piping.
>>
>> You should share it for us or shut the mouth.
You can have this for free, along with the software!...
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=pf
2009/12/6 rhubbell :
> Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
Your manner is counter productive, including for yourself. So why do
you persist?
Unless of course you're more interested in causing mischief than
getting anything out of OpenBSD.
Please, either adjust yo
2009/11/28 Christoph Leser :
> 1723 is PPTP. This uses GRE ( generic routing encapsulation ).
>
> You must allow this protocol.
>
> And, as far as I know, openBSD cannot NAT this protocol ( it is possible to
> nat GRE for pptp if you peek into the next higher level protocol ( ppp in this
> case ? )
2009/11/20 rhubbell :
> Definitely not missing the point. Maybe you missed mine. Not "worrying"
> because you trust everything about OpenBSD and everyone that's worked on
> it and every package you've installed and every piece of hardware you've
> installed, etc., etc. It's naive to point elsewhe
2009/11/5 Justin Smith :
> "By default, Ubuntu 8.04 and later with a non-zero
> /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr setting were not vulnerable."
>
> Ubuntu 8.04 released in 2008 april.
They've moved on from this then...
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=143334
2009/11/5 Jean-Frangois SIMON :
> Hello,
> Is there any particular problem with installing OpenBSD on a SSD HD ?
I've been using flash based SSD's in OpenBSD systems for 6 or 7 years,
starting with small CF in firewalls and now SATA SSD's in desktops and
laptops.
Never had a problem installing t
2009/7/22 Henning Brauer :
> * Christiano Farina Haesbaert [2009-07-21 21:02]:
>> openbsd usually runs on small underpowered servers/routers
>
> rright.
>
> it's also slow, ya know.
>
> and beer is dry.
This multiple choice exam is easy...
http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/print/2007/2/car
2009/5/28 Johan Beisser :
>> I was trying to highlight to irix that once traffic is received, it is
>> too late to alter the bandwidth it already used coming in.
>>
>> In other words, doing it on the incoming is pointless. Thus, as in
>> your examples, the logic behind shaping only on the outboun
2009/5/28 Johan Beisser :
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:04 AM, SJP Lists wrote:
>> How do you shape traffic that you have already received? Or to put it
>> another way, how do you alter the past?
>
> I've always just assigned inbound traffic to the existing outbound
2009/5/28 irix :
> Okey, i see. But I can not understand why you are sure that traffic
> can only outlet Shape , You can say that's silly to try to Shape traffic
that came,
> but if it works it's worse than outgoing (if only for tcp) it is not
> stupid ?
How do you shape traffic that you hav
Hi,
2009/5/21 Obiozor Okeke :
> Hi Diana (and Stuart) thanks for all your advice.
>
> The problem or nut we're
> trying to crack is that we're trying to deploy OpenBSD to remote clients
and
> we wanted an inexpensive but very high reliability system with the
flexibility
> to change configurations
2009/5/5 Mischa Diehm :
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 01:38:16PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
>> Look dude, that ftp site made something available before any of the
>> second level mirrors were even opened up to other sites to retreive
>> it. Deliberate action was taken to release something early witho
2009/4/21 Theo de Raadt :
> precognition means that we can identify an upcoming
> period when such packets will come in -- packets which would
> defragment and subsequently arrange themselves into an attack above
> the socket layer. since we can precognitively pre-identify the risk,
> we can drop
2009/4/17 Nenhum_de_Nos :
> that I was known, I just want to be sure it won't die out of a sudden.
> thanks anyway.
I've been using CF cards in OpenBSD firewalls for about 4 or 5 years.
I have yet to see a failure with SanDisk and Lexar CF cards.
As a precaution, I only use softdeps and noatime
2009/4/10 Michiel van Baak :
> I'm very happy how stuff went with kd85 and I got info about what
> happened with my money and it's exactly as it was advertised on both the
> official openbsd website as on wim's website.
Ingo rightfully requested an account of what happened to money he
donated mor
2009/4/9 STeve Andre' :
> Nah, its Systemagic. ;-)
Yeah, my favourite too.
2009/4/7 J.C. Roberts :
> The design involves a technology called "Express Ether" though it is
> typically written as "ExpEther," and it is basically a way to run a
> PCIe bus over ethernet. Though this might be the first you've heard of
> it, ExpEther has been in development at NEC for the last f
2009/4/2 Daniel Seuffert :
>> Why are you on this list?
>
> Because Mr. de Raadt accuses Mr. Vandeputte in public for having done some
> bad things without any evidence yet.
Did you not think that this is an event in progress? It appears that
neither side has finalized this matter. So involveme
2009/4/1 Daniel Seuffert :
> Mr. de Raadt,
>
> I don't care what you do for a living. If it's not enough get a job and
> work like anybody else.
>
> Daniel Seuffert
Theo works hard and from the goodness of his heart we all benefit from it.
But you have a problem with him expecting to receive pa
2009/3/24 patrick keshishian :
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
>> Yeah, it happens to me too:
>>
>> # strcpy
>> ksh: strcpy: not found
>>
>> Very strange...
>
>
> why the fuck are you guys logged in as root? use sudo(8); see afterboot(8)
Theo is allowed to be logged i
2009/3/24 my mail :
> How to use hier?
The hier manual page nicely describes the filesystem hierarchy.
Not all manual pages describe a tool.
2009/3/20 Markus Hennecke :
> Guido Tschakert wrote:
>>
>> the question is: do you use the vmware-tools from server 2.0 and if you do
>> so, how did you manage it?
>
> No, we are running server 1.0.8 for our OpenBSD vmware installations. We
> have some laptops with our Windows client software that
2009/3/18 Michiel van Baak :
> I'm running OpenBSD 4.4 and -current under KVM here at home.
> I wont run it in production tho. Real hardware is much more stable.
I agree. I use VMware Workstation at home/work and ESX3 at work. I
had a lot of distrust initially (2004), but over a few years I had
2009/3/13 Rod Whitworth :
>>You could have scrubbing turned off at the bride
>
> So what's she going to do? Just the dishes?
> Why did he marry her anyway?
>
>
Careful Rod, from memory Diana is a crack shot and packs!
2009/3/12 :
> I discovered a severe performance problem, wherein an OpenBSD guest would
> run fine for some period of hours, and then become horribly bogged down
> during disk operations, to the point of unusability. This was true even
> when the guest was nearly idle and the VM host had abundan
2009/3/9 Alface Voadora :
> Thanks,
>
> but stating the obvious is not very helpful.
And failing to state how and what you researched is not helpful to
people who might be interested in helping you. A consequence of that
is that others need to "state the obvious" since they don't know where
to st
2009/2/19 Mikel Jimenez :
> What are the limitations of contrackd?
Maybe this is a better place to ask...
http://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/support.html
I've narrowed it down to my car. My speed is limited to 80kph on a
110kph highway. What should I check?
Hi Steve,
2009/1/23 Steve Laurie :
>
> I've got a Sun Microsystems Ultra 5 270MHz 64bit CPU with 128MB of RAM.
> Would that be better than the 1GHz 1024MB RAM x86 bitsa I'm using at the
> moment?
I'd be surprised if that U5 was faster than the 1GHz x86.
Back with OpenBSD 3.7 or so, I found with
Hello all,
Just a heads up if anyone specifically tries to get sk(4) by sourcing
Belkin F5D5005 cards.
I just purchased a pack of 10, since I had others which were sk(4),
but these new cards are all RTL8169 based.
The box shows Ver.2001
Shane
2008/12/12 cbc :
> Hello,
>
> I have a PPTP server (running Windows Server) behind PF (OpenBSD
> 4.4). I tried 'rdr pass' on 1723/TCP and all GRE traffic, without
> success. Then, I tried to set up an alias on WAN interface and create
> a binat rule, doesn't work too.
>
> Is there any limitation
Got mine today. Sydney Australia.
Thanks to all the devs and supportive user community! Another
brilliant set and release!
2008/10/10 Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Boy, those Intel-branded boards have shitty BIOSes...
>
> And support. They've basically said that OpenBSD is not a supported OS, so
> they won't help me. Neither do they support diagnostics from third-party
> programs or comp
93 matches
Mail list logo
