2009/4/10 Michiel van Baak <mich...@vanbaak.info>: > I'm very happy how stuff went with kd85 and I got info about what > happened with my money and it's exactly as it was advertised on both the > official openbsd website as on wim's website.
Ingo rightfully requested an account of what happened to money he donated more than a year ago and stated that he reserved the right to a refund of that money with interest, had the transaction not been completed. The best case scenario to vindicate Wim, was for Ingo to receive that proof. But he then receives the refund plus interest from kd85! In my mind, that heavily suggests that Wim either sat on the money all that time, or otherwise did not make or retain good book keeping and therefore without being able to provide proof, had no other recourse but to refund the money to Ingo. Does this not ring alarm bells for you? Or is there a more innocent scenario? > Why send theo a CC if you have trouble with kd85 ? Because Theo is one of the two most important entities in such a transaction? The other being the donor? Theo should be allowed to have visibility of the actions of a middle man who is responsible for such an important part of the project. Especially a middle man who has almost admitted to sitting on money for at least one donation, for more than a year. I understand this logic, but it up to Theo to protest if it is not wanted. Not you. > If you have trouble with kd85 it's an issue between them and you, and > noone cares cept you and kd85. In this matter, I care and I am just a happy OpenBSD user who has never needed to use kd85. It seems that Theo cares too.
