Re: Multimedia FAQ

2020-05-07 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 06:12:21PM -0300, Oficial wrote: > Hi, > > The multimedia FAQ (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq13.html), list some > mixerctl outputs like: > > outputs.headphones=160,160 > outputs.headphones.mute=off > > In my system (current i386) there is no "outputs.headphones.mute"

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread Aaron Mason
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:30 AM jeanfrancois wrote: > > As long as there's no material published it's worth just any other word. > To quote Douglas Adams on whether you can trust people on the internet, "of course not, it's just people talking". -- Aaron Mason - Programmer, open source addict I'

Re: change default constraint server in ntpd.conf

2020-05-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2020-05-07, Marko Cupać wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > why not change default constraint server in ntpd.conf from current > > > https://google.com to something more neutral / reputable? > > > > > > If https://www.openbsd.org does not

Re: change default constraint server in ntpd.conf

2020-05-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020-05-07, Marko Cupać wrote: > > Hi, > > > > why not change default constraint server in ntpd.conf from current > > https://google.com to something more neutral / reputable? > > > > If https://www.openbsd.org does not want to be involved, perhaps > > https://www.

Re: change default constraint server in ntpd.conf

2020-05-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-05-07, Marko Cupać wrote: > Hi, > > why not change default constraint server in ntpd.conf from current > https://google.com to something more neutral / reputable? > > If https://www.openbsd.org does not want to be involved, perhaps > https://www.ntp.org would be fine. Neither of those are

Multimedia FAQ

2020-05-07 Thread Oficial
Hi, The multimedia FAQ (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq13.html), list some mixerctl outputs like: outputs.headphones=160,160 outputs.headphones.mute=off In my system (current i386) there is no "outputs.headphones.mute" for example, but there is a "outputs.hp_mute". The documentation is outdate

Re: LDPD includes non-default rdomain interfaces to address message type

2020-05-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Yeah I must be stupid Obviously. But if that's the case what are you? Sergey wrote: > ok youre stupid if you dont know that there is no need to show you rdomain > and ldp > confuguration to answer the question, because of these are very simple and > static > enough on openbsd. moreover ldp a

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 5/7/20 11:11 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On 2020-05-07 14:10, Consus wrote: >> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:00:15PM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote: >>> Dear OpenBSD fans, >>> >>> Can you please comment negative appraisal from the following website: >>> >>> https://isopenbsdsecu.re/quotes/ >>> >>> I d

Re: LDPD includes non-default rdomain interfaces to address message type

2020-05-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Sergey wrote: > ok theo, you are very user friendly as always. > you may be think that users should solve their issues themself and would be > nice if > they will post their effort here for you, very fair. You want the people on misc@ to decide for you if code from 2018 might work better than

change default constraint server in ntpd.conf

2020-05-07 Thread Marko Cupać
Hi, why not change default constraint server in ntpd.conf from current https://google.com to something more neutral / reputable? If https://www.openbsd.org does not want to be involved, perhaps https://www.ntp.org would be fine. Regards, -- Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After e

Re: LDPD includes non-default rdomain interfaces to address message type

2020-05-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
I think you using the phrase "my effort" incorrectly. Your only effort has been mail misc@openbsd.org with a request that other people do all the effort for you. Good luck. > im not able to just jump to the current on production remote box just for the > testing > purpose. And i asked if it e

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread Nick Holland
On 2020-05-07 10:00, i...@aulix.com wrote: > Dear OpenBSD fans, > > Can you please comment negative appraisal from the following > website: > > https://isopenbsdsecu.re/quotes/ > > I did not want to hurt anyone, just looking for a secure OS and > OpenBSD looked very nice to me before I have foun

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread jeanfrancois
Good evening, As long as there's no material published it's worth just any other word. You can state anything you like granted this collection has value, so no there are no clear points, nothing really worthwhile can emerge. When I feel lost in any Unix system calls I just open an OpenBSD's man

Re: one-character expansion in shell

2020-05-07 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Philipp, Philipp Buehler wrote on Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:03:41PM +0200: > Am 06.05.2020 15:54 schrieb Ingo Schwarze: >> Your misunderstandiing is that file names consist of characters. >> They do not. They consist of bytes, and to match two bytes, >> you need two question marks. > One can h

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On 2020-05-07 14:48, Aisha Tammy wrote: >> I wouldn't want to read an OS written in Rust and I would love to see secure >> developments in C even if it hampers potential performance. Things like Go >> are >> not suitable for an OS with many small programs. >> > Curious about why... though admitted

Re: LDPD includes non-default rdomain interfaces to address message type

2020-05-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Sergey wrote: > Hi. > > Im using the pretty old release 5.5 on openbsd box acting > as MPLS PE router with many domains, and i noticed that > ldpd sends huge ldp address message including all interfaces > in every rdomains. > Looking at the -current sources it seems there is the same behavior, >

Re: List a package's dependencies

2020-05-07 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On 2020-04-21 17:54, Kevin Chadwick wrote: >> Nope, it's definitely the wrong place to fix things. >> >> You should fix your pipes (change the timeouts or whatever). >> >> If worse comes to worst, pkg_add could *possibly* retry running ftp(1), >> but that makes little sense. > I agree ftp/tcp shou

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On 2020-05-07 14:10, Consus wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:00:15PM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote: >> Dear OpenBSD fans, >> >> Can you please comment negative appraisal from the following website: >> >> https://isopenbsdsecu.re/quotes/ >> >> I did not want to hurt anyone, just looking for a secur

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread Per Gunnarsson
I don't claim to be an fan of OpenBSD security myself, but as long ås somebody än effort to collevt quotes aboit it's insrcurity I guess it provides decent security to the average pimp on the block. On 7 May 2020 16:00:15 CEST, i...@aulix.com wrote: >Dear OpenBSD fans, > >Can you please comment

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread Peter J. Philipp
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:00:15PM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote: > Dear OpenBSD fans, > > Can you please comment negative appraisal from the following website: > > https://isopenbsdsecu.re/quotes/ > > I did not want to hurt anyone, just looking for a secure OS and OpenBSD > looked very nice to m

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread Consus
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:00:15PM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote: > Dear OpenBSD fans, > > Can you please comment negative appraisal from the following website: > > https://isopenbsdsecu.re/quotes/ > > I did not want to hurt anyone, just looking for a secure OS and > OpenBSD looked very nice to me

OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-07 Thread info
Dear OpenBSD fans, Can you please comment negative appraisal from the following website: https://isopenbsdsecu.re/quotes/ I did not want to hurt anyone, just looking for a secure OS and OpenBSD looked very nice to me before I have found this website. Kind Regards

LDPD includes non-default rdomain interfaces to address message type

2020-05-07 Thread Sergey
Hi. Im using the pretty old release 5.5 on openbsd box acting as MPLS PE router with many domains, and i noticed that ldpd sends huge ldp address message including all interfaces in every rdomains. Looking at the -current sources it seems there is the same behavior, but may be im wrong. Can someon

Re: support

2020-05-07 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, Chris Petrik wrote on Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:57:30AM -0500: > 0 > C USA > P Mississippi > T Gulfport > Z 39501 > O Petrik Consulting > I Chris Petrik > A 1610 Thornton, Ave > M ch...@cpettington.com > U http://www.cpettington.com/ > B 2282650091 > X > N BSD based consulting in the Mississipp