On 5/7/20 11:11 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On 2020-05-07 14:10, Consus wrote:
>> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:00:15PM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote:
>>> Dear OpenBSD fans,
>>>
>>> Can you please comment negative appraisal from the following website:
>>>
>>> https://isopenbsdsecu.re/quotes/
>>>
>>> I did not want to hurt anyone, just looking for a secure OS and
>>> OpenBSD looked very nice to me before I have found this website.
>>
> 
> Perhaps you could cite which part as the parts I read should seem without 
> merit
> to anybody?
> 
>> The fun thing to do: offer $50k rewards for code execution
>> vulnerabilities and wait for results.
>>
> 
> "Apple has lately been slapping proprietary mitigations around like there’s no
> tomorrow. But thing is, mitigations are often delicate creatures, with rather
> fragile assumptions. Having too many of them in one place can easily make them
> break one another, as happened here with execute-only memory vs PAN."
> 
> I am sure that examples of mitigations leveraging and protecting each other, 
> or
> an exploit failing because of multiple mitigations is far more common than 
> them
> hurting each other.
> 
> "I put a lot more faith in privilege separation and reduction than in all the
> mitigations. I’d be really impressed by a move to a safe language… most 
> everyone
> is late to that party, so it’s a chance for someone to pull ahead if they 
> wanted
> bragging rights"
> 
> I wouldn't want to read an OS written in Rust and I would love to see secure
> developments in C even if it hampers potential performance. Things like Go are
> not suitable for an OS with many small programs.
> 
Curious about why... though admittedly I have never written or read rust in 
great detail.
Genuinely curious why, I thought it was supposed to be pretty nice with thread 
safety and
all that jazz.

> Also, OpenBSD is one of the pioneers of privilege separation and most Go
> programs are not privilege separated at all.
> 
> I quickly lost interest, sorry. IMO, the main thing that causes exploitations 
> is
> carelessness. OpenBSD cares and is careful!
> 

Aisha

Reply via email to